BlueSpiceIn SEC.hell

October 9th, 2014 at 12:15 PM ^

Bo did not have the best record but he was a MAN of integrity.  

I live in Nashville and know people VERY closely associated with this case and it is/was bad. So did they do a better PR job, maybe?- does it make that situation any better?

skeeter

October 9th, 2014 at 9:45 PM ^

Bo was against the law because he thought it would screw up college football. There'd be enormouse pressure on the football program to become an even-bigger money making operation. That is exactly what happened. The way football scholarships were reduced by the NCAA, no doubt hurt college football. On top of that, the gender-equity plan cut squad sizes, which cost the school between 10-30 walk-ons.

Bo Schembechler was no fan of Title IX, but his love for Michigan – and his respect for Hutchins – was stronger than his dislike of that law.  When he was athletic director, and saw Hutch’s team practicing in random t-shirts and shorts, he didn’t like it.  The next day, Hutchins found big boxes of official Michigan t-shirts and shorts outside her office, and within a couple weeks, more gear with Michigan Softball emblazoned on it all.

From a JUB article http://www.johnubacon.com/2012/05/the-winningest-coach-on-campus/

 

jtmc33

October 9th, 2014 at 12:49 PM ^

My understanding is that he told his players that he saw it so he would have more credibility when he discussed the issue during a team meeting.   He didn't want to say "I heard it was bad..." he wanted to say "I saw it, and it's bad"

So, a year later, he is under oath and he admits that he never saw it.

I don't disagree with him on this - he knew it was true and that it happened.  Why watch a video of such a horrible event when you already know that it occurred.

 

 

ijohnb

October 9th, 2014 at 4:08 PM ^

understood why seeing the Ray Rice tape in its entirety made people's outrage so much stronger.  I actually came away from watching that tape believing it was more likely that the Rice incident could have been a first time-one time abberation in conduct where a (likely) drunken argument just spiraled out of control.  I mean, I am not saying it wasn't bad, I just can't figure out why seeing that particular incident was really all that different from hearing about it.

Chuck Norris

October 9th, 2014 at 4:56 PM ^

Here's my take:

The Ray Rice elevator video showed the worst possibility of what could have occured. When all we see is her unconscious when the elevator opens, no one knows exactly what happened. She could have hit her head after he shoved her, or she could've been trying to claw his eyes out, or any number of other things that didn't involve him straight-up cold cocking her, which is what happened.

Jonesy

October 9th, 2014 at 5:27 PM ^

I'm with you, I saw all those click-bait type headlines on reputable news sites that you normally see only in the crap that gets posted all over facebook and got fooled by the reputable news sites.  We knew he knocked her out, videos hows one punch knocking her out.  Where's the outrage?  What did you think happened?  The video showed exactly what I expected and wasn't 'brutal' at all.  Disagree with the guy above me, it showed the best-case scenario of what could have happened in that elevator.

Yeoman

October 9th, 2014 at 2:39 PM ^

The story doesn't make sense to me on its face. Do you really have to have witnessed a rape to have credibility discussing the issue?

I'd be talking to the team regardless. What seeing the video would change is that I'd be talking to the police as well.

Gameboy

October 9th, 2014 at 3:52 PM ^

The way I read it is that he is lying on the stand. He saw the video and told the players to delete it. If that is true, he is in a FAR greater trouble than just looking bad. Perjury is a risk worth taking if the other option is Obstruction of Justice or accomplice to a horrific crime.

michelin

October 9th, 2014 at 1:16 PM ^

That would mean that what he now tells the court that he lied about--seeing the video--was really the truth--and that he is lying to the courts now.  This thing  could really blow up.  If true, it would be more than perjury.  It would be an effort to destroy evidence.

That would be almost unbelievably stupid.  Maybe it is not true.  Or maybe the player allegedly told to delete the video is himself making misleading statements or commiting perjury.  But in any case, the whole video lays bare Franklin's breathtaking mendacity.  He says he did not see the video.  He confirms that he told players he did see it.  The questioner says, "so you lied".  Then Frankling says no.  He lies about the obvious, admitted lie just exposed.  Now we learn that the lie --that he saw the video--may actually have been the truth; and he may also be lying about lying.

I wonder if this great recruiting class he is assembling will give second thought as to whether they can trust his promises.

Baloo

October 9th, 2014 at 1:20 PM ^

Well sure, if we assume he's committing perjury, then obviously it's a big deal, but I don't see a whole lot of evidence for that and it wouldn't make much sense.  

The only evidence I've seen is a buzzfeed article reporting that "a source close to one of the defendants said he believes Franklin encouraged a player to delete a video of the incident after the player showed it to Franklin."  Not exactly airtight.

 

creelymonk10

October 9th, 2014 at 12:55 PM ^

As Brown Bear said, I think he's trying to stay away from it completely, rather than admit to seeing it and open up the door further about what he told those players at the time. I think he's lying about lying, which in either case, makes him a liar. One is perjury, the other is just a motivational lie to your team which I don't think is a big deal, I just doubt that's what happened.

brewandbluesaturdays

October 9th, 2014 at 12:19 PM ^

I would fire him today. This is the kind of thing they had to of asked about in an interview and soemthing he must've lied about. I would want to get far away from something toxic like this especially after what PSU just went through. 

brewandbluesaturdays

October 9th, 2014 at 2:22 PM ^

He admittedly lied to his team, which I find in and of itself shady, in regards to such an important matter. 

The whole situation seems immensely sketchy to me and he doesn't seem trustworthy and seems like he would put wins above all. This, along with the report that he alledgedly contacted the victim, make for a toxic situation and what seems to be a toxic individual.

We talk about not taking any fliers in Michigan's next head coaching search for different reasons. After what Penn State has been through it seems as though they took a flier on someone and if I am the PSU AD, I am sitting down with Franklin and letting him know that, PSU doesn't need this kind of publicity and they will be just fine without him.

KBLOW

October 9th, 2014 at 12:22 PM ^

He's clearly lying about lying.  If he really saw that tape (which I believe he did) then this is pretty much his only way out.  Better to seem like a stern, caring coach who got a little carried away rather than actually be known as a guy who was trying to cover up a rape.

Zoltanrules

October 9th, 2014 at 12:26 PM ^

If you spent ANY time around coaches like Hutch, Red, Beilein,others.... THEY represent what UM is all about. Competing hard with class and character and caring about kids... but you do have to win more than we have in the past 12 months : (

 

 

Pinto1987

October 9th, 2014 at 12:28 PM ^

I just want to be sure I have this right.

1.  Four Vandy players are accused of a sexual assault...

2.  Franklin lays into his team about the behavior of these four specifically and about team behavior in general....

3.  During this tirade TO THE TEAM he says he's seen a video (which does exist) of the assault and he refers to it as "disgusting"....

4.  It turns out that that he was lying because he didn't actually see the video, he only had it described to him by other members of the administration....

....and some people (apparently including the OP) would like to criticize Franklin for lying?

Please tell me you're kidding me.  Please tell me I missed the /s.

Are we now ready to criticize parents who lie about Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny in order to encourage good behavior from their children?

I hope I've missed something here, so please correct me.  If not, and the point is that Bo never lied to prove a point to his players, well, there's a bridge in Brooklyn....etc, etc. and I'll need to refer you to a long list of Bo's former players who can confirm that such a lie wasn't beneath him.

NittanyFan

October 9th, 2014 at 12:36 PM ^

Full disclosure, I'm a Penn State fan (as if my user name doesn't make that apparent  :-)  ).

 

But I'm not some "Penn State fan who has his head stuck in the head" ---- if there's smoke, I'll acknoweldge there's a very good possibility there's a fire.

 

As of the moment, I'm not seeing too much smoke.

 

We'll see where this goes ........