ESPN's take on Uncommited Football Prospects (Paywalled article)

Submitted by tigers17fan on

Espn recently put out a list of uncommited prospects in the top 150 and where they think they will go. Those predicted to Michigan?

2. Jabrill Peppers (CB)

4. Hand (DE)

55. Alex Bars (OT)

69. McDowell (DT)

75. Corey Holmes (WR)

85. Artavis Scott (WR)

87. Parrker Westphal (CB)

100. Kyron Watson (OLB)

 

Note* I'm not sure the feeling about paywalled articles on this site. Here is the link if wanted.

Mods, feel free to delete if this isn't acceptable use of the board.

1464

April 30th, 2013 at 12:44 PM ^

The only surprising one to me is Corey Holmes.  I haven't heard much information on him.  Peppers has sounded strong lately, and Hand gave some pretty good quotes about us recently.  McDowell, Bars, and Westphal have seemed to me in the bag, which is why I hope Lawrence Marshall doesn't drop for us (Hand and McDowell).  Scott would be great for that 2-year pipeline as well...

go16blue

April 30th, 2013 at 12:44 PM ^

That would make a total of 16 commits in the ESPN 150, and 2 of the best 4 players in the country. Yes, please. 

Even if (slash when) we don't actually get a class this good, I just want to say how happy I am that Hoke has proven his ability to maintain the recruiting momentum he established in year one. It's not that hard to recruit going into year one at a major program if there's enough positive energy around the team, but to be able to not only keep that up but if anything improve upon the previous year's recruiting class each year has been extremely impressive. In 2 or 3 years we're really going to be seeing the fruits of this, and it's going to come in national championships. 

dennisblundon

April 30th, 2013 at 1:09 PM ^

I think Marshall is a MSU lean as of the moment which is nothing ground breaking because everyone knows that. Howeva, the longer he drags out his recruitment the better chance he has of becoming an option if one of these guys doesn't fall our way. Is it me or does it seem like OSU is slow playing him now as well?

ScruffyTheJanitor

April 30th, 2013 at 12:48 PM ^

except that would mean we were taking 4 WRs.  Don't think that happens, though if Scott or Holmes are willing, 3 is possible. I am thinking of this class as an 18 person class which leaves us 9. Remove a WR, and if we were to ge the above persons I would have to think a D-Tackle and a Running Back would be the focus of the remaining spots. 

Mr Miggle

April 30th, 2013 at 2:17 PM ^

I wonder if the coaches have decided on how many places to recruit for yet. Last year they were clearly recruiting for more spots than most here expected them to. We always seem to underestimate attrition. Two would be a remarkably low number of players to lose over the next ten months. 

robbyt003

April 30th, 2013 at 12:49 PM ^

 

4. Hand (DE)

55. Alex Bars (OT)

69. McDowell (DT)

75. Corey Holmes (WR)

I don't see us getting all 4 of these guys.  I'd be content with getting 2 of the 4 though.  The other 4 on the list I think it's just a matter of when they commit to us, not if.  

michiganinmd

April 30th, 2013 at 12:50 PM ^

That puts Michigan is the ballpark of LSU (with 12 predicted uncommited prospects) and Alabama (with 13 predicted uncommited prospects).  Not bad company.  By way of comparison, Ohio State is listed with 3 predicted prospects and Michigan State has 1.

there_in_2005

April 30th, 2013 at 12:59 PM ^

i don't remember artavis scott ever giving off the vibe that he has a favorite (much less whether that favorite is michigan). seems like people are assuming he will come here because of Cole and the 2015 guy who likes us?

FreddieMercuryHayes

April 30th, 2013 at 1:05 PM ^

That seems an incredibly optimistic list.  Of that, Peppers, McDowell, and Westphal are by far the best best best.  Watson would be, but Winovich may take is spot before Watson has the chance to visit and commit.  Hand we're still behind VT, but not out of it.  I haven't gotten the vibe Scott loves us (same with Holmes), and neither may have a spot if KJ Williams beats them to the punch.  Bars is looking less and less likely as well.  I don't think he has a ton of loyalty to UM just because of Blake.  His other brother plays for PSU, and his dad played for ND.  But if we somehow manage that haul...holy shit that would be EPIC.  But I don't think we do.

Logan88

April 30th, 2013 at 1:06 PM ^

Peppers == True

Hand == False (Va Tech)

Bars == False (Domer)

McDowell == True

Holmes == False (??? not UM)

Scott == False (??? not UM)

Westphal == True

Watson == False (Winovich will commit before Watson's scheduled visit on 5/20)

LSAClassOf2000

April 30th, 2013 at 1:11 PM ^

Just so the OP is aware, the feeling on paywalled articles is to basically leave the article itself some value and not to copy and paste large portions or the entire thing. That's where the problems arise. 

What you have done here is spot on, I would think, in taking carefully selected portions of the information. 

As for these names, it seems unlikely that we land them all, of course, but even half of them would still contribute in a great way to what is looking like an amazing class so far. 

 

sammylittle

April 30th, 2013 at 11:11 PM ^

know I could bet the mortgage. In that case, I bet the mortgage that Hoke does away with the wings on our helmets and changes the uniforms to scarlet and green. I, further, bet my student loans that no SEC teams will be ranked during the 2013 football season.

BILG

April 30th, 2013 at 3:23 PM ^

They are building something very special with these last few classes. Going after the Alabama pro style Model with recruits just slightly less touted. Coached up, this will be a team competing for national titles...big, nasty, and fast. Given what Mattison did with subpar RR recruited talent ( not a knock on our players, just looking at nfl draft), it is hard not to get excited when extrapolating that coaching toward the last 2-3 classes. Borges and the offense will be the wild card. Clearly we have a lot of talent coming in to run their preferred system, and all things considered they were ok in handling the denard zone spread conundrum transition. This will be the first year we can truly and fairly judge Borges offense. My sense is, even if things don't totally click with the future qb's, having such a mamouth o-line will allow us to dominate 8-9 teams on the schedule annually by just plowing over them. A storm is a brewing in Ann Arbor, and because of all the focus on SEC, and Meyer and Kelly in the Midwest...it's kind of flying under the radar.

BILG

April 30th, 2013 at 3:23 PM ^

They are building something very special with these last few classes. Going after the Alabama pro style Model with recruits just slightly less touted. Coached up, this will be a team competing for national titles...big, nasty, and fast. Given what Mattison did with subpar RR recruited talent ( not a knock on our players, just looking at nfl draft), it is hard not to get excited when extrapolating that coaching toward the last 2-3 classes. Borges and the offense will be the wild card. Clearly we have a lot of talent coming in to run their preferred system, and all things considered they were ok in handling the denard zone spread conundrum transition. This will be the first year we can truly and fairly judge Borges offense. My sense is, even if things don't totally click with the future qb's, having such a mamouth o-line will allow us to dominate 8-9 teams on the schedule annually by just plowing over them. A storm is a brewing in Ann Arbor, and because of all the focus on SEC, and Meyer and Kelly in the Midwest...it's kind of flying under the radar.

Danwillhor

April 30th, 2013 at 6:32 PM ^

I have ZERO qualms about posting "premium" info here. In fact, I hate that people often talk about how the NCAA uses these kid for profit when these recruiting sites LITERALLY use these REAL non-adult kids for profit. At least in college the player is technically an adult and is trading a service (their skill) for another (education) regardless of how much the player cares about the service they get. With these sites, other than the kids that love attention, what do they get?!? Scout, Rivals, ESPN and less so but also 247 all make money on TRULY amateur non-adult Kids. I've always been of the opinion that those sites can do their thing but make it free and ad based for revenue. Best site wins. Pure capitalism. Also, imagine the ad revenue on NSD! Paying for info on a kid is disgusting to me (on the site side). What about the kid they make money on by starting rumors or making up sensationalized paywalled titles to stories when the kid doesn't want to be bothered with their constant calls, texts, emails, tweets, etc asking for info they'll sell? I say post away on "premium" shit. F#ck those sites, lol.