Derrick Green reaffirms Michigan as his leader
Per Mike Farrell in this video: LINK
He also says he's not even sure who is contending with Michigan right now. I haven't done more than exchange one word texts with Derrick pretty much since his official visit, but it shouldn't be a surprise they're leading.
Hope everyone has a safe and happy New Year.
December 31st, 2012 at 12:14 AM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 12:46 AM ^
He said in an interview with Farrell that he'll definitely try to make his decision in January at some point....for what it's worth.
December 31st, 2012 at 1:05 AM ^
Expect him to announce mid to late January. I am hearing right around January 20.
December 31st, 2012 at 12:14 AM ^
Do we still have no idea when he will decide or is it reasonable to expect a decision soon since he doesn't currently have anyone competing with us and time is running out...
Also Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
December 31st, 2012 at 12:17 AM ^
I doubt it makes much of a difference at this point since signing day is basically a month off, unless he drags it out past that.
December 31st, 2012 at 8:48 AM ^
Even when a recruit makes a "decision," it doesn't count until he enrolls early or signs an LOI. It seems like there is always one "flip" to the good side and one to the bad side on NSD. With an "average" class of 25, that works out to any "committment" being a 96% "committment."
December 31st, 2012 at 12:15 AM ^
I'll take more news like this, please!
December 31st, 2012 at 12:16 AM ^
Water is wet. Until signing day then water is dry.
December 31st, 2012 at 12:16 AM ^
He hasn't had a set date for an announcement since his recruitment began. He's been one of those "when it feels right, etc." kids.
Rivals also posted this article with Dymonte Thomas, who plans to recruit Green hard this week. It's hard to say when he'd announce though.
December 31st, 2012 at 10:32 AM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 2:40 PM ^
You're making an assumption based off a small amount of circumstantial evidence. This is a huge decision for an 18 year old kid who dreams of making it to the pros. I would probably be pretty hesitant to say anything in his position even if I was 99% sure. There is nothing weird about waiting on it and we shouldnt be speculating reasons for it.
December 31st, 2012 at 12:19 AM ^
He's also talking about taking two more visits.
I'll be happy to see his signed LOI.
December 31st, 2012 at 12:22 AM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 12:23 AM ^
From the Farrell video, they say OSU has 19 in their class...Wasn't the word that they were going to have a smaller class this year?
December 31st, 2012 at 12:23 AM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 12:24 AM ^
Michigan may be the leader, but his actions this past month have not been of a person who is in love with Michigan football.
December 31st, 2012 at 12:39 AM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 12:48 AM ^
I didn’t say he does not like Michigan. I meant, from the sounds of things, he isn’t necessarily 100 percent sold on Michigan, despite naming the Wolverines as his leader. He told Rivals on Dec. 27 that he is “definitely considering” Miami, and, as it is public knowledge, he will take official visits before signing day. My previous comment stands true, he doesn't appear to exactly love Michigan.
December 31st, 2012 at 1:01 AM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 1:32 AM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 6:38 AM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 8:52 AM ^
My gut tells me that he can probably beat out most of the guys on the roster, with the lone exception being a healthy 2011 version of Fitzgerald Toussaint...who is coming off a poor season and a broken leg.
December 31st, 2012 at 11:49 AM ^
I know that Rawls did not show very good vision this year, but I still have some hope that once the OL can get some push, he will be decent. When Wisconsin's OL was horrible at the beginning of the year, Ball couldn't get going either.
December 31st, 2012 at 1:34 PM ^
With a very good offensive line, I think Rawls can be average.
December 31st, 2012 at 2:37 AM ^
pessimistic. He just said we're his leader. Nothing wrong with looking around before committing to be sure.
December 31st, 2012 at 8:50 AM ^
As a running back, I wouldn't be 100% sold on Michigan, either. The running backs sucked this year, as did the offensive line. And no Michigan running back has done anything in the NFL since Anthony Thomas, who was a mediocre NFL player.
I think the offensive line will be good within a couple years, but if teams are selling recent success at the position, Michigan would be far down in the pecking order.
December 31st, 2012 at 10:40 AM ^
Magnus, you say the O line sucked but did it really? You've got an All American and a few All B1G performers. Or was it more of teams putting 8 in the box, stopping the run, and forcing Denard to throw? Or was it the play calling of the O co-ordinator. UM tried several runnning backs with limited success, so I see deeper problems than you blaming the O line.
December 31st, 2012 at 11:15 AM ^
If you go back and look closely at the interior offensive line you will see just how terrible they were this year. Just because Omameh was given a career achievement award with an all conference selection doesn't mean he was actually one of the best lineman in the conference. The three in the middle were beaten time and time again, missed blocks, missed assignments, and couldn't pull fast enough to get out in front of the backs.
You mention that UM tried several running backs with no success, doesn't that tell you that the constant of the O Line is more of a problem then the running backs? You ask about the OC, but forget that he was the same OC who called the plays that got Fitz over 1000 yards last year and having 8 men in the box is no different than what we had last year. The only difference in those elements between last year and this year is the change at center and left guard.
Bottom line, the interior O Line was atrocious and that hand cuffed the offense, particularly the running backs.
December 31st, 2012 at 11:35 AM ^
Are you saying that losing a four-year starter at center who was a consensus All-American and Rimington Award winner his senior year wasn't a huge loss? Especially when we didn't have an experienced and capable center to replace him?
December 31st, 2012 at 2:39 PM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 1:37 PM ^
"I see deeper problems than you blaming the O line."
I don't. Yeah, Lewan was pretty good, but Barnum, Mealer, and Omameh couldn't get any push, and Schofield was mediocre. One good offensive lineman doesn't make the rest of them good. And if Omameh truly deserved to be named All-Big Ten, then the rest of the guards in the conference must have been poor. I think that was more of a Lifetime Achievement Award than anything.
December 31st, 2012 at 10:18 AM ^
That interview was from...Canesports.com
When Matt 'the Caneman' Schodell (or whatever the hell the Miami reporter's sweet middle name is) calls you and asks you if you're interested in Miami, quiet non-trouble causing high schooler says yes.
Matt 'the Caneman' Schodell prints up NATION'S TOP RB TAKING STRONG LOOK AT CANES
December 31st, 2012 at 12:41 AM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 1:53 AM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 10:14 AM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 10:23 AM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 12:48 AM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 12:53 AM ^
If he is quiet, then we don't like it because he's not in love with Michigan. If he is saying he's in love with Michigan, then he's playing us.
Can we please relax and let this play out?
December 31st, 2012 at 12:37 AM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 12:45 AM ^
would be a nice get, yes please
December 31st, 2012 at 12:52 AM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 1:21 AM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 1:43 AM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 8:52 AM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 8:55 AM ^
So a guy declares Michigan his clear leader a month before NSD, and your chances are "slim to none"? That doesn't make any sense at all. Just because you think he'll end up elsewhere doesn't mean our "chances" are non-existent. That's like saying that because Michigan lost a close game to Notre Dame that we had no chance to win the game.
December 31st, 2012 at 9:57 AM ^
Yes, all kids making decisions are different, but the longer it takes the worse the chances for Michigan. To say otherwise is being blind to experience.
December 31st, 2012 at 10:18 AM ^
Past performance does not guarentee future results. If he is taking a long time choosing us, then he's also taking a long time choosing anyone else.
December 31st, 2012 at 11:02 AM ^
Yes, chances are slim to none. Not sure why that was flamebait. I never said anything negative about either Michigan or Green. Yes, chances are slim to none, IMO as it looks like Green is looking to go elsewhere but hasn't found a good enough fit and therefore is maintaining Michigan as a "fall-back" option, the one thing I've found about "fall-back" options in life is they rarely prove to be the road taken. So yeah, he can maintain Michigan as his leader all he wants, it might just be a way for him to keep the various sites off of his back. I will be thrilled to be wrong, but I doubt I will be.
December 31st, 2012 at 12:26 PM ^
December 31st, 2012 at 1:42 PM ^
If Michigan's chances are slim to none, then I think that indicates that Green is skipping college football and going straight to hosting "The View."