Rawls if he can hang onto it, I'd guesss
Michael Scarn
History
- Member for
- 1 year 17 weeks
- Blog
- View recent blog entries
Karma
- Current value
- 2
Recent Comments
| Date | Title | Body |
|---|---|---|
| 2 hours 42 min ago | It's pretty sad that even in |
It's pretty sad that even in May, when I'm heavily jonesing for college football, I can't even bring myself to read through the entire preview for a team if that team is Purdue. Take that, Danny Hope! |
| 1 day 20 hours ago | That's a sunk cost though. |
That's a sunk cost though. It's not as if Mattison wouldn't get paid for that month if Michigan didn't go to a bowl. BCS win bonuses, on the other hand, likely greatly outweigh the small profit. I think Hoke's contract included something around 75k or maybe even 6 figures for winning a BCS bowl. |
| 1 day 22 hours ago | Don't know who this "William" |
Don't know who this "William" you speak or is. I do know a Tom Gholston. Maybe Feldman means him. |
| 2 days 3 hours ago | Are you inside Mgroworld's |
Are you inside Mgroworld's head too? Maybe he was, in fact, talking about how Warren's career would affect Cravens' decision. Regardless, my point was that one data point shouldn't make us abandon hope that Michigan will land more kids in head to head battles with SC. I know that Cravens probably won't go to Michigan, I'm just saying that connecting the two dots, whether its in terms of their careers, the time that's passed since we snagged a recruit, whatever, doesn't seem to be on point. Since Donovan Warren committed, a lot has happened. Michigan now has a staff with significant connections to California (Hoke/Borges at SDSU, Borges at UCLA) and is recruiting like gangbusters, beating out a ton of premier schools for premier talent, and in head-to-head battles that haven't gone Michigan's way a lot. There are plenty of reasons to think that Cravens will go to SC over Michigan, I just don't think anything relating to Donovan Warren is one of them. And don't assume I am angrily defending my thread or anything, I'm just discussing a topic. The reason I have an MGoBlog account is because it is the only place on the internet I feel like conversations are worthwhile. Disagree with me all you like, who cares? |
| 2 days 5 hours ago | My point was that any |
My point was that any connection you are trying to make between Donovan Warren and Cravens other than the offers from both programs seems tenuous at best. I don't think anything about Donovan Warren doesn't bode well for Michigan with Cravens. The fact of the matter is, SC is and always will be tough to beat for a recruit, especially if the kid is from California. I don't have delusions that Cravens will come here, it's highly unlikely. It's just seemed strange to me to think that because Warren made a mistake during his career that would affect Cravens' decision whatsoever. Also, Erik Magnuson had an SC offer but stayed blue, if we want to count that as a win. |
| 2 days 5 hours ago | Yup. What if he's so good |
Yup. What if he's so good they rename the Heisman "The Cravens Trophy". What if they rename the national championship "Try to beat Michigan." The possibilities are endless, really. |
| 2 days 6 hours ago | Yea, one player who performed |
Yea, one player who performed well and made a silly decision to leave early for the NFL means that any recruit we compete with SC for will do the same. That makes perfect sense. |
| 3 days 6 hours ago | (No subject) | |
| 6 days 5 min ago | (No subject) | |
| 6 days 19 hours ago | This is what OSU and Sparty |
This is what OSU and Sparty say about our O-Line class. He'll be fine. If he would've succeeded at Michigan, he'll find a way to succeed at SC. Not to mention Michigan's class already has two running backs, though not as highly touted, in the fold. Move on. |
