CC: Jim Mora, Jr - Everything Michigan Needs
Why aren't we discussing Jim Mora, Jr. here? It seems like he would be the perfect fit for Michigan.
He's only 53 years old, runs a clean program, and is currently paid less than $2 million at UCLA. He's twice the coach of Hoke, at half the price. And his offensive scheme could fit our current personnel. No need for another disruptive offensive transition.
Why do I think he'd be great? First of all, he's had success at all levels of the game - from the NFL to college. He coached under Mariucci & Holmgren, comes from a strong football pedigree (PLAYOFFS?!) and made the NFC Championship Game with the Falcons.
Next, he clearly understands the importance of winning games and beating rivals. In 2011, UCLA was 6-8. In Mora's first year, they went 9-5 and beat USC. He won 10 games the next year, and has won 9 games this year - and as a former DB, he understands how to play defense against the heavy offensive hitters of the Pac-12.
On the recruiting trail, he catapulted a mediocre UCLA class into the Top 15 almost immediately and consistently brings in talent. He's proven he can also develop that talent, as he's sent guys to the NFL.
So why not Mora? He's young, enthusiastic, ethical, talented, understands the academic needs of a public university, recruits well, and has won at all levels of the game.
December 4th, 2014 at 8:41 PM ^
December 5th, 2014 at 11:43 AM ^
He was on the verge of what was suppossed to be a historic season at UCLA with Brett Hundley's last year and a lot of maturing talent. If I was in his shoes I wouldn't have left either. Now we can basically offer similar things, lots of talent, uncertainty at QB, and a somewhat uncertain future. However, Michigan can offer more money, fan support, and MUCH better facilities. I don't think the lessons of last year necessarily apply this year.
December 4th, 2014 at 6:57 PM ^
I could get behind him if he came but he still doesn't seem like the guy who could beat Urban consistently.
December 4th, 2014 at 6:59 PM ^
what in the name of fuck makes you think that?
December 4th, 2014 at 7:15 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 4th, 2014 at 8:29 PM ^
but he still doesn't seem like the guy who could beat Urban consistently
He was able to beat Rodriguez and Arizona. Held Arizona to 255 total yards.
Not trying to start a Rodriguez debate (seriously, I'm not) ... but if Mora is capable of that it seems he'd be capable of beating Meyer.
December 4th, 2014 at 8:35 PM ^
Meyer is a much better coach than RR.
December 4th, 2014 at 6:58 PM ^
all right I suggest if a CC thread is started you are hit with the banhammer
December 4th, 2014 at 7:11 PM ^
December 4th, 2014 at 7:34 PM ^
No I had no idea. Thanks
December 4th, 2014 at 6:59 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 4th, 2014 at 7:37 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 4th, 2014 at 7:52 PM ^
but 12 years old is just too young.
December 5th, 2014 at 10:02 AM ^
Stop drinking and go to bed.
December 4th, 2014 at 7:03 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 4th, 2014 at 7:03 PM ^
He would just need to hire a staff with some midwest recruiting ties (specifically Ohio) and he'd be a great Plan B.
December 4th, 2014 at 7:03 PM ^
David Shaw.
Grew up in Michigan. Brian Griese said he was involved in the coaching search and later in the interview mentioned Stanford as what Michigan wants to be.
December 4th, 2014 at 7:09 PM ^
December 4th, 2014 at 7:52 PM ^
December 4th, 2014 at 7:16 PM ^
David "riding the coattails" Shaw? The same guy whose offense is only functional when you have Peyton Manning incarnates running it? No thanks. Let's at least keep it in the 2000s with the offense here.
December 4th, 2014 at 7:21 PM ^
I'm not endorsing Shaw, i'm just throwing his name out there as a prediction. Shaw kind of fits Cowherd's vague "mystery candidate" description. Plus there's a Brian Griese interview where Griese says he's involved in the process but refuses to name names. But later in the interview he talks about how Schlissel's vision for Michigan is similar to what Stanford is doing. Plus if Harbaugh isn't interested, he'd probably recommend Shaw.
December 4th, 2014 at 9:25 PM ^
December 4th, 2014 at 7:18 PM ^
December 4th, 2014 at 8:00 PM ^
those of you that think shaw is regressing should do your homework. look at last years resuls and this years. picture michigan playing those two schedules and tell me you wouldnt want shaw. i think there is one bad loss. and the guy who didnt like how they played msu, 4 pt. loss in the rose bowl? ya we wouldnt what that would we?
December 4th, 2014 at 8:10 PM ^
Harbaugh had one year at Stanford with double-digit wins -- 2010 (12-1). In 2009, they were 8-5.
Since then, Shaw has gone 11-2, 12-2, and 11-3 prior to this year. That's not much of a regression. And that 11-3 season last year (6 pt loss at Utah, 3 pt loss at USC, and 4 pt loss to Michigan State in the Rose Bowl) and the 12-2 season the year prior (4 pt loss at Washington and 7 point overtime loss at Notre Dame) were without Andrew Luck.
December 4th, 2014 at 7:04 PM ^
We're not going to be able to stop the CC threads, we can only hope to contain them.
December 4th, 2014 at 7:05 PM ^
What about Tony Dungy? From Michigan. Played at Minnesota. Great Mid-West ties.
December 4th, 2014 at 7:40 PM ^
All around great human being in addition to knowing what to do to turn us around.
December 4th, 2014 at 7:44 PM ^
An old, conservative NFL zombie whose side hobby is publicly hating on the gays. Yeah, we really want a guy like that.
The only reason people think he's a "good all-around person" is because he doesn't use or permit "foul" language.
December 4th, 2014 at 7:49 PM ^
December 4th, 2014 at 7:56 PM ^
You're about six years late to the party, bro.
http://deadspin.com/245881/tony-dungy-makes-it-clear-that-only-straight…
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/forget-popular-opinion-tony-dungy-is-the…
Also, try to recall that he had a major hard-on for Tebow despite that "media distraction" being orders of magnitude more severe than anything Michael Sam-related.
December 4th, 2014 at 8:03 PM ^
December 4th, 2014 at 8:07 PM ^
Also, the track record speaks for itself. We're not talking about an isolated blurb. And some of the organizations he's publicly endorsed are the nutjob types.
December 5th, 2014 at 11:49 AM ^
No, it really isn't. No politics, but holding a viewpoint that an opinion on one issue in which there appears to be sincere disagreement(held by a lot of people still)is the same as hate is pretty ignorant.
December 5th, 2014 at 11:11 AM ^
helping Michael (not gay) Vick get back into the NFL
December 4th, 2014 at 7:58 PM ^
December 4th, 2014 at 7:43 PM ^
December 4th, 2014 at 7:50 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 4th, 2014 at 8:00 PM ^
December 4th, 2014 at 9:10 PM ^
in quotes implies he doesn't have any. When was he duplicitious?
December 4th, 2014 at 9:34 PM ^
He said he wouldn't draft Michael Sam because of the "media distraction" when he sung the praises of Tim Tebow a few years earlier. It's pretty obvious that he wasn't concerned about what he claimed.
December 5th, 2014 at 12:48 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 4th, 2014 at 7:09 PM ^
December 5th, 2014 at 12:53 AM ^
The just absolute chaos on the board is actually pretty fascinating.
December 4th, 2014 at 7:09 PM ^
I think David Shaw's luster is going away. Stanford is slowly declining from the JH days. I'd rather our model be Alabama and hire Harbaugh to win us national titles.
December 4th, 2014 at 7:13 PM ^
December 4th, 2014 at 7:19 PM ^
They smoked UCLA but went 7-5. I wasn't impressed last year with his philosophy of run the ball straight into MSU's front on 1st, 2nd, and 3rd down then punt. With Harbaugh they had good balance between passing and running.
December 4th, 2014 at 7:58 PM ^
...and he also had Andrew Luck!
You just pointed out someone being selective in their response, by doing the same thing.
Harbaugh had luck for 2 of the 4 years he was at Stanford. Of course he had balance and threw the football.
He was also 9-15 in those first 2 years. Obviously he was building and you need more than 2 years to turn things around, but it had to be nice to get Luck his last 2 years at Stanford. I'm sure that constributed to passing more and winning games.
Harbaughs balance
Year 1: 35 passes per game / 37 rushes
Year 2: 24 passes per game / 41 rushes
Year 3: 24 passes per game / 41 rushes (Luck's RS Freshman year)
Year 4: 29 passes per game / 41 rushes
...so actually, Harbaugh. too, favored the run!
Shaw's balance
Year 1: 32 passes per game / 40 rushes (Luck's RS Junior/final year)
Year 2: 29 passes per game / 39 rushes
Year 3: 22 passes per game / 42 rushes
Year 4: 30 passes per game / 36 rushes
Stanford has always preferred to run more than they pass.