Upon Further Review 2014: Offense vs Notre Dame
FORMATION NOTES: We're a… shotgun spread offense with personnel exactly like Rich Rodriguez's preferred 1 RB, 1 blocky/catchy, 3 WR?
We were in this game. Take off… er… put everyone in identical uniforms and don't check to see which team has the 6'5" giant at WR and you would have no idea which team was which based on presnap alignments. Excluding short yardage and two snaps inside the Michigan 5, Michigan had 49 shotgun snaps, five from the pistol, 7 in ace and zero I-Form.
This wasn't quite as WR heavy as that would imply as you can see Kerridge split to flanker in the above shot, something that happened half a dozen times. But… yeah, it looked like a callback to 2010 minus non-scramble QB runs, of which there was one.
Michigan deployed Kerridge all over; here he's the H-back.
And they deployed a few instances of what I call "Pistol FB," which indicates there's a dude next to Gardner and a TE.
Michigan ran a version of this where the "FB" was Norfleet, once from the pistol and once from the gun. Norfleet also motioned to the backfield for a two-back look.
Now if the next time Michigan uses my preferred offensive style if they could just score some points that would be cool.
SUBSTITUTION NOTES: Line was Cole/Magnuson/Miller/Glasgow/Braden the whole way. Gardner QB obviously; Green was the starting RB and vaguely the top guy, with Smith getting close to equal time and Hayes getting some third down snaps.
WR was a rotation between Funchess, Darboh, Chesson, and Norfleet with nobody else getting in IIRC. Hill and Williams saw almost all the TE snaps save a handful Butt got early; Kerridge also played H-back frequently.
[After THE JUMP: why don't you try running INTO the hole this time?]
Ln | Dn | Ds | O Form | RB | TE | WR | D Form | Type | Play | Player | Yards | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M24 | 1 | 10 | Pistol twins fleet | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4-3 over | Run | Triple option IZ | Green | 1 | ||||||||
Norfleet motions in to the nominally FB spot in this pistol and Michigan runs a triple option look that's probably frippery on a no-read handoff. This looks like it can be successful, as the LBs are very much paying attention to the frippery and Chesson comes down to get a block on a safety. It's unclear whether Glasgow(-1) and Miller blow their block on Jones because of bad communication or if Glasgow just loses him but even so he stays connected and there's a big crease with Braden(+1) blowing out the force DE way wide. Green(-2) cuts away from that hole basically into Jones when if he bursts to the play design he does get into the second level and probably the secondary. They never come back to this and actually run the option bit, which is a shame because the pitch looks very open. | |||||||||||||||||||
M25 | 2 | 9 | Shotgun trips | 2 | 0 | 3 | Nickel even | Pass | Hitch | Funchess | 12 | ||||||||
Kerridge a flanker to the trips. Simple five yard hitch that Funchess(+1) turns into a first down by breaking a tackle and running over a guy. (CA, 3, protection 1/1) | |||||||||||||||||||
M37 | 1 | 10 | Ace trips tight bunch | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4-3 even | Run | End around | Norfleet | 13 | ||||||||
Kerridge Butt and Norfleet are the bunch, with Kerridge and Norfleet coming across the formation for the end around. IZ fake holds the DE in, Norfleet scoots outside. Mason Cole makes some iffy initial contact with Smith; Kerridge(+2) shows up and locks on, driving him almost to the first down marker. Norfleet(+1) sets the block up well and runs through Smith's harried tackle for a nice gain. RPS +1. | |||||||||||||||||||
50 | 1 | 10 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-3 over | Pass | Tunnel screen | Funchess | 2 | ||||||||
Magnuson(-0.5) is late getting out and Day reads the screen excellently, so Funchess has nowhere to go. (CA, 3, screen) | |||||||||||||||||||
O48 | 2 | 8 | Shotgun 2 back | 2 | 0 | 3 | Nickel even | Run | Lead zone | Green | 7 | ||||||||
Kerridge(+1) IDs and nails an edge blitzer, leaving just one LB behind the line. Cole(+1) kicks the end; Mags(+1) and Miller(+1) seal the NT and Mags gets an eh block on the second level; Green(+0.5) gets momentum and pounds out some YAC. | |||||||||||||||||||
O41 | 3 | 1 | Ace big | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4-4 even | Run | Inside zone | Green | 0 | ||||||||
Cole(+1) and Hill(+1) absolutely obliterate the playside end, so there is a bounce here once Smith blows past Magnuson(-1); Day ripped past Glasgow(-1), causing him to go down and preventing Braden from doing much with him; Glasgow cannot get to a LB as result; Miller(-0.5) is struggling. Green(-1) plows directly into the trash here, which gets nothing. | |||||||||||||||||||
O41 | 4 | 1 | Ace big | 1 | 3 | 1 | Goal line | Pass | PA FB flat | Kerridge | 4 | ||||||||
Kerridge gets open for the first down and brings it in; always nervous when you're tossing it to a big blocky guy out there. (CA, 3, protection N/A) | |||||||||||||||||||
O37 | 1 | 10 | Ace trips tight bunch | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4-3 even LB split | Pass | PA swing | Norfleet | 7 | ||||||||
Jailbreak on the protection here as Kerridge (-1) misses a cut and Glasgow(-1) and Green(-1) combine to blow a stunt pickup. Gardner is like oh crap and flips it out to Norfleet on a high-arcer that is right in line for him to run after the catch, which he does. Hill(+1) obliterates a guy coming back to the play. DO? Uh, shortest one ever but I'm issuing it. (DO, 3, protection 0/3) | |||||||||||||||||||
O30 | 2 | 3 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel even | Pass | Bubble screen | Norfleet | -2 | ||||||||
This would actually work just fine if Chesson(-2) would just block the nickel guy instead of his guy. You always block the nickel guy. WTF man. (CA, 3, screen) | |||||||||||||||||||
O32 | 3 | 5 | Shotgun trips | 2 | 0 | 3 | Okie two | Pass | Scramble | Gardner | 3 | ||||||||
Kerridge motions from FB to flanker. Protection is fine, Gardner sees a gap in the line and thinks he can get it, and I thought he could too until Smith rockets in and puts him on the turf. (TA, N/A, protection 2/2) | |||||||||||||||||||
Drive Notes: Missed FG(46), 0-0, 6 min 1st Q. | |||||||||||||||||||
Ln | Dn | Ds | O Form | RB | TE | WR | D Form | Type | Play | Player | Yards | ||||||||
M25 | 1 | 10 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel even | Run | Counter | Smith | 5 | ||||||||
ND playing to spill this to Smith with the end diving inside; a pulling Glasgow(+0.5) manages to hold him off enough for Magnuson(+1)'s motion to give Smith a crease. Hill(+0.5) helped Glasgow as well. Smith(+0.5) ran through a couple arm tackles after setting his block up. | |||||||||||||||||||
M30 | 2 | 5 | Shotgun trips TE | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-3 over slide | Run | Zone stretch | Smith | 9 | ||||||||
M puts everybody to the field and ND slides that way, then they run to the boundary. Miller(+2) gets a reach block on a guy lined up a full gap away from him and with no end that is pretty much the play. Playside DB in fact cuts Cole to force the play back in (smart), and Magnuson(+0.5) gets out to the second level, as does Glasgow(+0.5). Smith almost runs through a safety tackle at the end but not quite. | |||||||||||||||||||
M39 | 1 | 10 | Shotgun empty TE | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel over | Pass | Hitch | Funchess | 27 | ||||||||
Zone blitz, M has a hot route right where it comes from and Gardner gets it out quick to Funchess before the DE can drop to it. Funchess gets to turn upfield for an easy chunk play. (CA, 3, protection 1/1, RPS +2) | |||||||||||||||||||
O34 | 1 | 10 | Ace 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel over | Penalty | False Start | Miller | -5 | ||||||||
Or illegal snap whatever Miller(-1) | |||||||||||||||||||
O39 | 1 | 15 | Shotgun deep 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel over | Run | Inside zone | Green | 6 | ||||||||
Green motions to Gardner's left presnap and takes a handoff going vertically; Magnuson(+2) and Cole club the playside DT, with Mags doing the bulk of the work. Cole(-1) tries to pop off on a LB and gets popped back; that guy can peel off to tackle after a moderate gain. Miller(+1) got a good second level block on Smith, Glasgow(+0.5) locked out his guy. | |||||||||||||||||||
O33 | 2 | 9 | Shotgun deep 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-3 even | Run | Inside zone | Green | 2 | ||||||||
Stunt gets this. Mags(-1) gets caught on it, unprepared for the inside step from the DE, and he rips through to tackle. Glasgow(-1) fell after initial contact on the backside; Braden(+1) got a good drive on his man. | |||||||||||||||||||
O31 | 3 | 7 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel even | Pass | Out | Funchess | Inc | ||||||||
ND slot guy in Funchess's shirt on this route and seemingly gets a PBU. Chesson right next to this route is actually open but with Hayes getting knocked back in his face this isn't the worst idea and does not rise to the level of a BR. Funchess needs to extend his arms here to box the CB out. (CA, 2, protection 2/2) | |||||||||||||||||||
Drive Notes: Blocked FG(48), 0-7, 13 min 2nd Q. | |||||||||||||||||||
Ln | Dn | Ds | O Form | RB | TE | WR | D Form | Type | Play | Player | Yards | ||||||||
M9 | 1 | 10 | Ace twin TE | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4-3 under | Pass | Rollout comeback | Chesson | 16 | ||||||||
Not a waggle but waggle ish; Kerridge first bumps the SAM so he can't flow up and then goes into a route, taking him away, and Gardner has the edge easy. He has Chesson open for a chunk and hits him; ball is a bit behind but not too bad. (CA, 3, protection 1/1, RPS +1) | |||||||||||||||||||
M25 | 1 | 10 | Shotgun trips TE | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel even | Pass | Comeback | Chesson | 14 | ||||||||
Chesson the #2 WR and gets good separation from Farley in man coverage; Gardner has good protection and slings it out. (CA, 3, protection 2/2) | |||||||||||||||||||
M39 | 1 | 10 | Ace twin TE | 2 | 1 | 2 | Base 3-4 | Pass | Long handoff | Chesson | 0 | ||||||||
No idea why Gardner thought this was a good idea, as the corner is five yards off. Funchess had his guy eight off and that was a much shorter throw, throw that one. Assume this is a sight check at the line he screwed up. (BR, 3, screen) | |||||||||||||||||||
M39 | 2 | 10 | Pistol 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel even | Pass | Drag | Funchess | Inc | ||||||||
M takes a bunch of time getting out of the huddle; not getting set until 5 seconds left. ND is sending a safety, no time for him to tip it. He comes free as Smith(-1) fails to recognize it; everyone else gets blocked. Gardner has time to dump it, but Williams screwed up the route. He releases outside, and instead of getting in Jaylon Smith's way he gets in Funchess's way. With no pick Smith is right there and makes a play on the ball as it arrives. (CA, 0, protection 2/3 Smith -1, RPS -1, Williams route -) | |||||||||||||||||||
M39 | 3 | 10 | Shotgun 3-wide | 2 | 0 | 3 | Okie one | Pass | Sack | N/A | -2 | ||||||||
Kerridge flanker, Funchess H-back. Not a fan of the Kerridge flanker stuff on passing downs. This is supposed to be a screen to Hayes; Hayes gets blown up in the backfield, and Gardner tries to improvise. (not charted, N/A, screen, RPS -1) | |||||||||||||||||||
Drive Notes: Punt, 0-7, 9 min 2nd Q. | |||||||||||||||||||
Ln | Dn | Ds | O Form | RB | TE | WR | D Form | Type | Play | Player | Yards | ||||||||
M25 | 1 | 10 | Shotgun 2 back | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel even | Run | Down G | Norfleet | 7 | ||||||||
Norfleet motions to the backfield and takes the handoff with Green leading for him. This play catches ND off guard and they don't have much on the edge; Magnuson pulls; Williams(+1) fends off the DE and gets a yard of depth, Green gets the kick; Magnuson(+0.5) gets to the hole, and Norfleet(+0.5) motors for a nice gain. RPS +1. | |||||||||||||||||||
M32 | 2 | 3 | Shotgun twins twin TE | 1 | 2 | 2 | Base 3-4 | Pass | Yakety sax | N/A | -17 | ||||||||
Pocket's okay. Miller's(-1) getting driven back; Gardner decides to throw and then decides against it, fumbling the ball as he tries to make it a pump fake and the NT drives back to hit the ball. Chaos, M recovers, but they just shot a drive to hell. (BR, N/A, protection 1/2). Gardner definitely could have taken off here. Ugh. This really isn't terrible from Miller. You don't want him to give so much ground but he's connected the whole time; we've seen a lot worse. | |||||||||||||||||||
M15 | 3 | 20 | Shotgun trips | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3-3-5 nickel | Run | Draw | Hayes | 10 | ||||||||
Give up and punt. | |||||||||||||||||||
Drive Notes: Punt, 0-14, 2 min 2nd Q. | |||||||||||||||||||
Ln | Dn | Ds | O Form | RB | TE | WR | D Form | Type | Play | Player | Yards | ||||||||
M25 | 1 | 10 | Shotgun trips | 1 | 0 | 4 | Nickel over | Pass | Hitch | Funchess | Inc | ||||||||
Good time; Gardner doesn't like anything, he should probably just dump it to Hayes; instead starts moving up in the pocket, allowing a DL to grab him. As he's going down he tries to get it out to Funchess, but it's short. (BR, 0, protection 2/2) | |||||||||||||||||||
M25 | 2 | 10 | Shotgun trips | 1 | 0 | 4 | Nickel over | Pass | Post | Norfleet | Inc | ||||||||
Protection a little shaky but they make it work. M lets a guy through on a stunt but the rest of the pocket is excellent so Gardner can just step up and around. Magnuson(-1) is fortunate that he doesn't get called for a hold. Gardner can step up and fire to Norfleet, who's beaten the coverage and may have a touchdown... Gardner puts the throw well behind where it should be. It is still catchable, but Norfleet can't dig it out. (MA, 2, protection 1/2) | |||||||||||||||||||
M25 | 3 | 10 | Shotgun trips | 1 | 0 | 4 | Okie two | Run | Draw | Hayes | 10 | ||||||||
ND rushes three from a standup position and M runs at it, which just gets Michigan a first down. With 22 seconds left in the half this is kind of a give up and punt and ND is strategically induced to prevent something very long, so I'm not going to RPS this. Or really grade it, since no one really had to do anything. | |||||||||||||||||||
M35 | 1 | 10 | Shotgun trips | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3-3-5 nickel | Pass | Fade | Chesson | Inc | ||||||||
Lot of time in the pocket and may as well heave one. It's a little short and too near the sideline; CB breaks it up and Chesson is landing OOB anyway. (MA, 0, protection 1/1) | |||||||||||||||||||
M35 | 2 | 10 | Shotgun trips | 1 | 0 | 4 | Prevent | Pass | Seam | Norfleet | Inc | ||||||||
Norfleet actually comes open on this and if he's human-sized this is a good throw. He is Norfleet, though, so he leaps up and the thing just glances off his fingertips. LIFE. (CA, 1, protection 1/1) | |||||||||||||||||||
Drive Notes: EOH, 0-21. | |||||||||||||||||||
Ln | Dn | Ds | O Form | RB | TE | WR | D Form | Type | Play | Player | Yards | ||||||||
M25 | 1 | 10 | Ace 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel over | Pass | Waggle scramble | Gardner | 9 | ||||||||
Butt engages the playside DE to prevent megadeath as Gardner turns around and then releases; Gardner(+1) has time to survey, likes nothing, stiffarms a 290 pound guy, and gets near first down yardage. (SCR, N/A, protection N/A) | |||||||||||||||||||
M34 | 2 | 1 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel over | Run | Inside zone | Green | 2 | ||||||||
Cole(+0.5) catches and drives a slanting Day past his spot, allowing Green(+0.5) a cutback for the first down; I don't really expect Butt(-0.5) to do much with that 290 pound guy other than vaguely annoy him, but this could be a bigger gain with a better block there. | |||||||||||||||||||
M36 | 1 | 10 | Shotgun 2 back | 2 | 0 | 3 | Nickel over | Pass | Scramble | Gardner | 6 | ||||||||
PA with what look like deep routes... Gardner sits, and sits, and finally Kerridge(-1) is overwhelmed and a guy threatens to sack; Gardner spins out and gets a nice gain. This is good coverage downfield, so I don't blame him for the hitching up. (SCR, N/A, protection 2/3 Kerridge -1) | |||||||||||||||||||
M42 | 2 | 4 | Pistol trips TE | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel over | Run | Zone stretch | Green | -3 | ||||||||
Michigan to the line super late and about to get a delay penalty, and then it seems like they bust an assignment on the backside of the play. Glasgow(-1) cuts the backside DT and Braden(-1) tries to track down Smith on a play where he is a full gap away from him. That is never going to work; you need to work through the DT and scoop him and then get a hat on Smith. Instead he can run really fast and make a tackle by shooting the gap. RPS -1, clock. | |||||||||||||||||||
M39 | 3 | 7 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Okie two | Pass | Seam | Hill | INT | ||||||||
Well, I remembered this wrong, as Michigan actually picks this up excellently, with Hayes finding the cornerback off the edge and M picking up everybody else. Nobody seems open; Gardner steps and fires to Hill, which a safety undercuts for a pick. (BRX, 0, protection 2/2) | |||||||||||||||||||
Drive Notes: Interception, 0-21, 12 min 3rd Q. | |||||||||||||||||||
Ln | Dn | Ds | O Form | RB | TE | WR | D Form | Type | Play | Player | Yards | ||||||||
M2 | 1 | 10 | Ace Big | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4-3 under | Run | Inside zone | Green | 3 | ||||||||
Double by Miller(+0.5) and Glasgow(+0.5) blows out the NT, providing a tiny crack that Green uses to get some breathing room. There is a lot of other chaos that basically amounts to push. | |||||||||||||||||||
M5 | 2 | 7 | I-Form Big | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4-3 under | Run | Inside zone | Green | 2 | ||||||||
Green(-3) misses an insanely gaping hole to the right that is at least a decent chunk and third and short and could be a lot if he breaks a safety tackle. Or not misses it, but literally cuts away from it. Inexplicable. Magnuson(+1) and Miller(+1) had caved in a DT; Cole(+0.5) escorted a DE upfield as that guy misses an assignment. | |||||||||||||||||||
M7 | 3 | 5 | Shotgun 4-wide tight | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel even | Pass | Out | Funchess | 8 | ||||||||
M blows a blitz pickup badly as Miller(-2) looks to a side of the field with only two guys on it once Smith drops to a zone; Day runs right up the middle untouched. Gardner somehow gets it out to a receiver for a completion. (DO, 3, protection 0/2) | |||||||||||||||||||
M15 | 1 | 10 | Pistol FB | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4-4 under | Run | Counter | Smith | 0 | ||||||||
Hill next to Gardner. Mags pulls around. M wants to sell IZ and spring this on ND; two problems. One is that ND has an extra guy in the box and he is a free hitter in the hole. The other is Smith beating up Hill(-1)when he tries to make a block. Mags(-0.5) also let Day come all the way around him and tackle after the Hill block caused Smith to slow up. RPS -1. | |||||||||||||||||||
M15 | 2 | 10 | Shotgun trips TE | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel even | Run | Zone read keeper | Gardner | 9 | ||||||||
I say zone read but this is another down G on the frontside; end crashes and Gardner(+1) pulls. Out on the edge without anyone to tackle him until the safety comes down at about the sticks. Chesson(+0.5) and Darboh(+0.5) get stalk blocks to provide a lane. RPS +1. | |||||||||||||||||||
M24 | 3 | 1 | Ace | 1 | 2 | 2 | Confusion | Run | QB sneak | Gardner | 5 | ||||||||
M tempos to the line and gets an easy conversion! RPS +1! | |||||||||||||||||||
M29 | 1 | 10 | Ace 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel even | Penalty | False Start | Magnuson | -5 | ||||||||
M tempos to the line and gets a false start! Magnuson and Cole -1! | |||||||||||||||||||
M24 | 1 | 15 | Shotgun trips TE | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel even | Run | Inside zone | Smith | 1 | ||||||||
Smith(-3) should immediately cut back to the backside of the play a la Brandon Minor as the end is about three yards upfield—two too far—and the DT has been pushed down the line. These then look like crappy blocks but that's not the way zone works. The back HAS to read that the backside DT is inside of the guard and go straight NS. | |||||||||||||||||||
M25 | 2 | 14 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel even | Pass | Out | Funchess | 6 | ||||||||
Two LBs sent on a zone blitz, Smith picks the first up, Gardner has to go hot. He throws it a bit behind Funchess but not too bad; may have some influence on lack of YAC. (CA, 3, protection 2/2) | |||||||||||||||||||
M31 | 3 | 8 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3-3-5 nickel | Pass | Throwaway | N/A | Inc | ||||||||
ND sends the house. Seven guys. Gardner likely has Norfleet over the middle for a 50/50 shot at a first down but doesn't have time as Day gets a free run as Mags(-1) and Cole(-1) fail to ID and block the blitz. (PR, N/A, protection 0/2) | |||||||||||||||||||
Drive Notes: Punt,.0-21, 7 min 3rd Q. | |||||||||||||||||||
Ln | Dn | Ds | O Form | RB | TE | WR | D Form | Type | Play | Player | Yards | ||||||||
M16 | 1 | 10 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel even press | Pass | Hitch | Funchess | 10 | ||||||||
Gardner looks to the field first and then aborts, hitting Funchess on a hitch that he gets a couple YAC on for a first down. (CA, 3, protection 2/2) | |||||||||||||||||||
M26 | 1 | 10 | Shotgun 2 back | 2 | 0 | 3 | Nickel over | Run | Inside zone | Green | 1 | ||||||||
M unfortunate to eat a corner blitz that makes the CB a free hitter in the hole. Glasgow(+1) got push on Day; Mags(-1) lost his guy badly. Glasgow gives the hole and corner fills it. RPS -2. Braden(+1) got a good kick on his guy. | |||||||||||||||||||
M27 | 2 | 9 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel over | Pass | Fade | Funchess | 33 | ||||||||
It works the first time they try it. I mean... ack. The protection on this isn't even any good as Williams(-1) gets beat up by a LB and Day rips through Glasgow(-1) and Gardner's just about getting hit, but fades are quick throws that go a long way so it works out. Funchess goes and gets it, with Riggs not even close to coping on a throw that isn't even as high as it could be. (DO, 2, protection 0/2) | |||||||||||||||||||
O40 | 1 | 10 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel over | Run | Inside zone | Green | 1 | ||||||||
ND DT plays this much better than he did on the one I complained about Smith. DE does too, to the point where Gardner(-0.5) should pull, but I'm not even sure this is a real read. Mags(-1) gets no depth or movement and when Green cuts back there's no gap. | |||||||||||||||||||
O39 | 2 | 9 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel over | Pass | Scramble | Gardner | 3 | ||||||||
Pocket terrific, timer goes off in Gardner's head, he starts moving around. He gets in acres of space, has Chesson wide wide open for like first and goal, doesn't throw, gets tackled for like three yards, fumbles. (BRX, N/A, protection 3/3, Gardner -3 run) | |||||||||||||||||||
Drive Notes: Fumble, 0-28, 1 min 3rd Q. | |||||||||||||||||||
Ln | Dn | Ds | O Form | RB | TE | WR | D Form | Type | Play | Player | Yards | ||||||||
M20 | 1 | 10 | Shotgun trips | 2 | 0 | 3 | Nickel under | Pass | Hitch | Darboh | INT | ||||||||
Welp. I don't know how much I blame Gardner for this one since Darboh's route is asking to be jumped; keep moving back to the QB and you at least make this an incompletion. Also Riggs is in F-it highlight mode. Might be more conservative if this game was in doubt. I mean, it's man coverage. It's up to the WR to make it work. We've seen that all day. (BR, 0, protection 1/1) | |||||||||||||||||||
Drive Notes: Interception, 0-28, 14 min 4th Q. | |||||||||||||||||||
Ln | Dn | Ds | O Form | RB | TE | WR | D Form | Type | Play | Player | Yards | ||||||||
M25 | 1 | 10 | Shotgun empty TE | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel even | Pass | Hitch | Funchess | 6 | ||||||||
Standard pitch and catch. (CA, 3, protection 1/1) | |||||||||||||||||||
M31 | 2 | 4 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel even | Pass | TE flat | Hill | 9 | ||||||||
Outside WR runs the corner off, Hill(+1) sits down in that gap and then breaks the CB's tackle to get some YAC. (CA, 3, protection 1/1) | |||||||||||||||||||
M40 | 1 | 10 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel even | Pass | Scramble | Gardner | 2 | ||||||||
Pocket is basically okay; Gardner starts stepping up and continues to; DT can grab him; they fall forward for short gain. (TA, N/A, protection 2/2) | |||||||||||||||||||
M42 | 2 | 8 | Shotgun trips TE | 1 | 1 | 3 | Okie two | Pass | Bubble screen | Funchess | 3 | ||||||||
Again the outside WR ignores an overhang slot defender to go after his guy who is way soft. Reps reps reps reps;. This is Darboh(-2) who blows an otherwise open play. (CA, 3, screen) | |||||||||||||||||||
M45 | 3 | 5 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Okie two | Pass | Improv | Hayes | Inc | ||||||||
Gardner wants Hill, and that's the right option but Hill has no separation and hasn't even turned around when Gardner wants to throw. He aborts; Cole(-1) gave way too much ground to his dude this time and he hits as Gardner tries to improv a throw to Hayes. Uh. (PR, N/A, protection 1/2, Cole -1, Hill route -1) | |||||||||||||||||||
Drive Notes: Punt, 0-31, 9 min 4th Q. | |||||||||||||||||||
Ln | Dn | Ds | O Form | RB | TE | WR | D Form | Type | Play | Player | Yards | ||||||||
M42 | 1 | 10 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel over | Run | Inside zone | Green | 0 | ||||||||
I mean... the OL here execute a great scoop on the NT, there's a gaping hole off the front side, they get to Smith on the second level, and Green(-3) cuts away from it. Miller(+1), Glasgow(+1). Mags looks bad but it's because this goes away from his angle. | |||||||||||||||||||
M42 | 2 | 10 | Pistol 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel over | Run | Inside zone | Green | 2 | ||||||||
This one is at least not his fault; ND RPSes Michigan by blitzing a LB off the edge. They have no one for a potential keep or rollout but this is a pistol thing not a read so eh. Day goes hard to the inside so Green has no choice but to go into the hole a linebacker coming off the edge is filling. Possible Cole should have come off on this guy but then that just leaves the DE free. Green(+1) does truck the guy for 4 YAC. RPS -2. | |||||||||||||||||||
M44 | 3 | 8 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3-3-5 nickel | Pass | Comeback | Darboh | 10 | ||||||||
Corner blitz, Michigan kind of picks it up. Cole(-1) is getting driven back to Gardner, not fast enough to get there but fast enough to force a throw. It's to a blanketed Darboh, who's interfered with but still makes the catch. Funchess is back in, limps out. Because possibly aggravating an ankle injury for your best player in a 31-0 blowout makes sense. (CA, 1, protection 2/3) | |||||||||||||||||||
O46 | 1 | 10 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel over | Pass | Sack | N/A | -5 | ||||||||
Bubble fake with a post type thing that has one DB in tight man coverage and a linebacker underneath, so that's not there. At this point just dump it off if you can, and you can; Gardner holds it and holds it until the protection breaks down and he's sacked. (TA, N/A, protection 2/2) | |||||||||||||||||||
M49 | 2 | 15 | Shotgun 2-back TE | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel even | Run | Triple option IZ | Smith | 15 | ||||||||
Norfleet motions to backfield, triple option dive look again. Playside end takes a bump from Hill and forms up on the QB. Day gets over aggressive to the inside; Cole(+1) latches on and shoves him out of the hole. Smith shoots out to the edge in an attempt to contain the pitch. Magnuson(-1) released, saw Smith flash past him, and turned around to block a guy not relevant to the play who you can't block if he is, robbing him of a shot at blocking a safety. Smith(+0.5) makes the right NS cut and avoids one safety for near first down yadrage. RPS +2. | |||||||||||||||||||
O36 | 1 | 10 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel even | Pass | Comeback | Darboh | 13 | ||||||||
Excellent protection on a zone blitz that one of the LBs times poorly; Gardner can step and fire to Darboh, who does have some separation this time. (CA, 3, protection 2/2) | |||||||||||||||||||
O23 | 1 | 10 | Shotgun trips TE | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel even | Run | Inside zone | Smith | 1 | ||||||||
Magnuson(-1) blown back by Day, so no choice for Smith except to run into the back of Glasgow and Braden. Still think there's something there for Smith(-0.5) if he makes a hard vertical cut to the backside as soon as he gets it. This one is not clear cut, though. | |||||||||||||||||||
O22 | 2 | 9 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Okie one | Pass | Fade | Darboh | Inc | ||||||||
No separation for Darboh; Gardner throws it OOB instead of giving his guy a shot. (IN, 0, protection 2/2, Darboh route -) | |||||||||||||||||||
O22 | 3 | 9 | Shotgun 3-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Nickel 4-4. | Run | Inside zone | Smith | 0 | ||||||||
No safeties. Michigan runs at an eight man box. RPS -1. | |||||||||||||||||||
O22 | 4 | 9 | SHotgun 4-wide | 1 | 1 | 3 | Okie zero | Pass | Sack | N/A | -8 | ||||||||
Six guys sent, jailbreak sack. Magnuson(-1) beat, Hayes(-1) picks two guys and so picks neither, Braden(-1) airballs. (PR, N/A, protection 0/3) | |||||||||||||||||||
Drive Notes: Turnover on downs, 0-31, 3 min 4th Q. Final drive has 40 seconds on the lock and is not charted. For hands purposes I'll note Norfleet got a 3 and Hill did not get a 2. |
why did you do this
I don't quit until late in the season.
a true michigan man would quit in the middle of the third quarter
Ah, so.
okay go i guess, what happened etc
A lot of dumb little things. Things that aren't particularly hard that Michigan biffed, either because they turn into a pumpkin on the road or they are adjusting to a new offense or randomness is bad or they are just bad. The rest of the season will tell. The CUMONG MAN I exclaimed on that bubble screen that had my mentions all full up with "I told you the bubble screen wasn't an answer" was real, and it was not spectacular:
That's just… I mean, block that guy and that is a first down instead of an eventual punt.
I am not 100% clear on how the outside WR decides who to block on bubbles (seems like any man look should be the slot, and any zone look whoever has the flat) but the default should always be the slot guy since he's closest, and if you know a bubble is coming and you check the slot first and he is hauling ass for Norfleet, you block that guy. It is not hard. And Michigan did it twice in this game, leading to Mayock moaning expressively about the awesome play of the ND defense without so much as mentioning the fact that running at a guy unblocked isn't real hard.
Unlike the defense, the lack of precision here was widespread. We have an entire section on the running backs upcoming, we saw Chesson have an issue above, we'll get to Gardner's general hesitance, and here's a route screwup that is subtle but deadly:
Williams releases to the outside instead of straight upfield, so he ends up getting in Funchess's way instead of Jaylon Smith's. The result is a PBU. If Smith gets hung up at all that's a nice catch and run.
The line was surprisingly good, but they were also susceptible to mental issues. Here Glasgow and Braden elect to cut the backside DT and have Braden chase after Jaylon Smith. This blocking angle would not work on Richard Nixon, let alone Smith:
Overall the line was the least of Michigan's problems but they were not so good as to not blow up some stuff.
So this is an entire team taking turns playing like poop, mentally. Is this supposed to make me feel better? Or worse?
I don't know.
Surely you must have some opinion.
I guess I'd rather have stuff like the above happen instead of having your OL flung into the ballcarrier on every play? Mental issues can get fixed faster than you can make your OL meatbastards. I mean, Michigan was not physically overwhelmed like they were in… oh… every game last year except Northwestern. So I'd rather have this.
With one major exception, for which we should get out a
I'm just not up for it
chart.
So these numbers are really low in amplitude, because there were only 20 tailback runs—scrambles and sacks and the like are in the protection metric—and a chunk of them had grading aborted because of ludicrous running back behavior.
BTW, I moved Kerridge to the OL section since he was basically a TE. I am thinking about renaming these sections to "Blocking" and "Running" since that's a more useful distinction anyway.
Offensive Line | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Player | + | - | Total | Notes | |||||||||||||||
Cole | 4 | 2 | 2 | Didn't seem overwhelmed at all. | |||||||||||||||
Magnuson | 5.5 | 6 | -0.5 | Coping with Day is difficult. | |||||||||||||||
Miller | 4.5 | 0.5 | 4 | Don't see him getting displaced again. | |||||||||||||||
Glasgow | 3 | 3 | 0 | A bit shaky. | |||||||||||||||
Braden | 2 | 1 | 1 | Kickouts seem good but I tend to take those for granted. | |||||||||||||||
Kalis | DNP | ||||||||||||||||||
Williams | 1 | 1 | Good block on Norfleet carry. | ||||||||||||||||
Kerridge | 3 | 3 | Even better block on Norfleet carry. | ||||||||||||||||
Hill | 3.5 | 1 | 2.5 | Decleater on… Norfleet carry. | |||||||||||||||
Butt | DNC. Area for improvement: blocking for Norfleet. | ||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL | 26.5 | 13.5 | 66% | This is right on our desired number. Low OL amplitude and high performance edge blocking mean it's a little optimistic, but I'm serious. | |||||||||||||||
Backs | |||||||||||||||||||
Player | + | - | T | Notes | |||||||||||||||
Gardner | 1 | 3.5 | -2.5 | Fumble. | |||||||||||||||
Morris | - | - | - | DNP | |||||||||||||||
Green | 2 | 9 | -7 | Discussion below. Lots of cumong man. | |||||||||||||||
Smith | 1 | 3.5 | -2.5 | Also cumong man. | |||||||||||||||
Hayes | #FREEJUSTICE | ||||||||||||||||||
Johnson | DNP | ||||||||||||||||||
Shallman | - | - | - | DNP | |||||||||||||||
Kerridge | N/A | N/A | N/A | moved to TE for now | |||||||||||||||
Houma | DNP | ||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL | 4 | 16 | -12 | Ample discussion below. | |||||||||||||||
Receiver | |||||||||||||||||||
Player | + | - | T | Notes | |||||||||||||||
Funchess | 1 | - | - | YAC on broken tackle | |||||||||||||||
Chesson | 0.5 | 2 | -1.5 | Bubble biff | |||||||||||||||
Darboh | 2 | -2 | Also bubble biff | ||||||||||||||||
Norfleet | 1.5 | - | 1.5 | Best tailback available? | |||||||||||||||
Canteen | - | - | - | DNP | |||||||||||||||
Dever | - | - | - | DNP | |||||||||||||||
Ways | - | - | - | DNP | |||||||||||||||
TOTAL | 10 | 1 | 9 | Major reason RBs could run long way without dodging. | |||||||||||||||
Metrics | |||||||||||||||||||
Player | + | - | T | Notes | |||||||||||||||
Protection | 38 | 18 | 68% | Mags –3, Miller –3, Cole –3, Kerridge –2, Glasgow –2, Green –1, Smith –1, Hayes –1, Braden –1, Williams -1 | |||||||||||||||
RPS | 8 | 7 | 1 | It makes sense. |
Yup: the running back situation is deeply alarming right now.
Did you know this had happened when you wrote up that thing about Fred Jackson parade of failed tailbacks post-Hart?
I saw two bad cuts live. I did not think it was this bad. The tailbacks were a disaster. Notre Dame tailbacks dodged guys in the backfield to avoid tackles for loss; Michigan tailbacks dodged holes to avoid runs for gain.
On the opening snap Michigan does allow penetration, but it is gap-vacating penetration that leaves a jump cut wide open:
Green cuts away from it. Yeah, maybe that guy makes a tackle if you head to the wide open hole. But since he still made the tackle you chose poorly. I minused Glasgow for this but I minused Green harder. Go to the side of the block that your OL is standing, into the large hole, and then if bad things happen that's not on you.
What's more: Green makes this worse on himself by making the right decision initially and then changing his mind. If he fires N/S hard immediately, which should be his natural instinct because he's a truck, he pounds out a couple more yards and I'm not as persnickety.
That was actually one of the less clear-cut WHAT ARE YOU DOING moments since it does feature a guy in the backfield making things difficult. Green did the same thing on a near-identical play in the fourth quarter, minus penetration:
The linemen are trying to turn in that guy and seal him. That is what you are looking for, because if they do that the D is in trouble. That is the #1 thing you are looking for.
Later, Green would be presented with this:
He ran away from the massive frontside gap in front of his face, into all the dudes on the backside. That was 1v1 against a safety for a massive gain. Instead, bupkis. It is even worse on film:
ARE YOU KIDDING ME
This is the thing that still makes me twitch more than anything else about this game.
De'Veon Smith was not immune, either. Here he turned a crystal clear opportunity to MINOR RAGE down the backside of Notre Dame's defense into nothing:
This was so obvious some unaffiliated dude at 247 compared it to a 40-yard touchdown Florida had in their game. This screenshot is just…
…oy. The endzone view is boggling. Unaffiliated dude Pete Roussel:
You can bet Michigan running back coach Fred Jackson has already watched the film with his group and given his running an opportunity this week in practice to demonstrate the correct aiming point, track, and techniques involved in this play.
I might take that bet. I might bet that Fred Jackson planned on doing this but got distracted by his never-ending thirst and is now buried under an avalanche of still-full pop, juice, water, milk, Hi-C, Capri-Sun, soda, Ecto-Cooler, tea, and coffee bags/bottles/cans/sacks/boxes/mugs.
Smith at least learned better than Green did. On Michigan's penultimate drive they went back to the triple option look for a belly play and he cut hard N/S for 15.
Finally, Michigan got stuffed on a third and one on their first drive. Jaylon Smith makes this difficult, but Michigan caves a defensive end off the ball. Maybe Smith grabs you after he contacts the blocker, maybe not. The opportunity to make a play by bouncing is there, and once you get out there on short yardage you could be flying for a long while:
This is a situation where bouncing might get you tackled for a loss on third and one and chewed out so I don't want to say this is wrong, per se.
But there's a play to be made there. A guy with Hart-like feel and feet feels that cave-in of the DE and conspires to use it. Make a guy miss, juke in-out with a plan in mind instead of Green's "oh poop what now" on the first play in this section, just do something. Make plays! Running back is a make plays position, and nobody is making any plays. The opportunities were there; collectively the 21 tailback carries probably left 100, maybe more, yards on the field.
I don't want to write anyone off right now, but can we please see some real carries for Hayes? It is possible to be an effective running back without being 225 pounds. Hell, the guy who looked the best with the ball in his hands was Norfleet and that's not even close.
And so… the offensive line was good?
Yes. Now, let's state that this ND line is a far cry from last year's. There's no Nix, there's no Tuitt, there's no Shembo. But this was a much better performance from the OL in specific than last year's 41-point outburst. Before you knock this counterintuitive assertion, here's the assessment from last year's UFR after a 41-point outburst:
Michigan's protection number of 60% is very, very bad and he was +5.5 on the ground largely because he is fast.
That out of the way, there are a few positives amongst mostly exploding face here. Lewan was his normal self even against Tuitt and Day. Toussaint had a good day turning nothing into something, and when Michigan went to isos in the second half Kerridge was a thumping presence.
The rest? Urgh.
Scoreboard.
So. The protection numbers are actually a bit worse than I expected, but they're near 70% and that's with an 0/3 on the last play I bothered with when ND sent seven guys at Gardner because lol we're up 31. The blocking numbers hit our 66% desired mark, and while a very good performance from the TEs and one Hill plus for breaking a tackle that shouldn't be in there are folded in make that percentage overstate the OL's performance, overall it was quite good.
This year when the tailbacks actually went in the damn gap things went forward.
That was a consistent(!) thing. Day gave Michigan a good deal of trouble; other than that they were decent, at least insofar as you can tell when you only get about 15 reasonable attempts to judge blocking.
Even Miller, most people's vote for Obvious Weak Point, held up for the most part. Yeah, he got bulled back into the quarterback some on the drive-killing Gardner fumble in the first half. As errors go that's not a huge one. If Gardner throws on time, nobody notices. If Gardner decides he doesn't have a WR and bursts through the gap next to Miller, nobody notices. It's only when Gardner decides to throw and then aborts that the ball ends up essentially on the hand of the DL.
Compare that to last year… exactly.
When not being not quite physically dominant enough to hold up to a DT, he was doing well. Here he channels Molk, stepping around a guy lined up shaded outside a guard to seal and pave the way for a first down:
That is hard to do. Yes, even if the guy is going upfield. Step-around-and-anchor is something that made Michigan's run game go for years, except when it ground to a halt when Molk was injured.
But they got more pressure than we did, by a million.
There were a couple of blitz biffs where Sheldon Day of all people was let loose untouched, but any semblance of pressure was 1) usually isolated enough to let Gardner deal with it by moving around or 2) created by indecision in the QB.
Remember how we talked about Golson being 1-2-3-gone in the defensive UFR? Compare that to Gardner on this second down:
That's 1-2-3-4-5-gone, and thus the safety blitz feels dangerously close to getting home. Late in the first half, Magnuson lost a guy, kind of got away with a hold, and let his guy in on Gardner. If this was last year this would have been the first in a series of baffling miscues that ended with Gardner buried under ten tons of rat meat. Instead Gardner just stepped up in the pocket and… sigh… missed an open Dennis Norfleet for a potential 75-yard touchdown.
Meanwhile this is like up to 7-not-gone before the walls cave in.
The protection breakdowns came in isolated drabs until very late when Notre Dame was sending cover-zero blitzes at Gardner in the waning minutes of a five-score game because lol we're up 31.
Speaking of Gardner.
Devin Gardner 2013
Opponent | DO | CA | MA | IN | BR | TA | BA | PR | SCR | DSR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Central Michigan | 2 | 10(1)+ | 1 | 1 | 2* | - | - | 1 | 3 | 82% |
Notre Dame | 7+ | 16(1)++ | 4(1) | 2 | 3* | - | 1 | 4 | 4 | 82% |
Akron | 3 | 14(2) | - | 5 | 3** | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 59% |
UConn | 2 | 13(1) | 1 | 5*+ | - | 1 | - | 5 | 5 | 76% |
Minnesota | 4+ | 7(1) | 4 | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | 2 | 92% |
Penn State | 7+ | 12(2) | - | 5+ | 2** | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 66% |
Indiana | 5 | 18(3) | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | - | - | 5 | 78% |
Michigan State | 1 | 15(2) | 1 | 5 | 4* | 6 | - | 4 | 1 | 50% |
Nebraska | - | 17(1) | 1 | 4(1) | 2* | 5 | - | 6 | - | 62% |
Northwestern | 5 | 21(6) | 3 | 5 | 6***** | 1 | 2(1) | 6 | 4 | 65% |
Iowa | 3 | 12(5)+ | 2(1) | 5(1) | - | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 68% |
Devin Gardner
Opponent | DO | CA | MA | IN | BR | TA | BA | PR | SCR | DSR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
App State | 1 | 11(4) | - | 2(1) | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | 82% | |
Notre Dame | 3 | 17(3) | 2 | 1 | 6(1)** | 3 | - | 2 | 2 | 68% |
Shane Morris
Opponent | DO | CA | MA | IN | BR | TA | BA | PR | SCR | DSR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Central Michigan | - | 4 | - | 1 | 1* | 1 | - | - | - | N/A |
App State | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1* |
He was bad. I know the DSR says eh, okay; the DSR hasn't been good at turnovers. Gardner had four plus what was essentially a fifth when Michigan recovered his fumble for a 17-yard loss. Even if you don't count the last two because it was laugher time, three turnovers that are entirely your fault is game-crushingly bad.
He started off hitting a lot of throws, but even early his decision-making let Michigan down. After the bubble biff above Michigan had a third and five on which he took off early and got hacked down by Jaylon Smith; the first fumble was caused mostly by his indecision.
The first interception was atrocious. Live I thought a blitz was about to blow him up, but Michigan picked it up fine and Gardner lasered one directly into a safety's chest after staring Hill down the whole route:
The overhead view makes it very clear that Gardner looked at one guy the whole way and all but delivered a hand-written Invitation To An (inter)Reception to the safety.
Michigan would later throw it deep to Funchess like once ever and that worked and then they had a drive. Michigan would give Gardner stellar protection, and after he moved around the pocket Chesson came blitheringly wide open in front of his face; Gardner never saw him and eventually started running, getting crushed and fumbling.
The third interception was deep into DGAF territory and a terrible route by Darboh; still that guy sitting at ten yards is asking for trouble.
He was bad. He was accurate, for the most part, but his decisions and ability to read the Notre Dame defense were substandard. Caveat: from what little I could tell it felt like Michigan was not getting much separation. Switch the QBs and Gardner may have an awesome day. This was not one, though, nor even a decent one.
At least they used NORFLEET though.
Yeah, one of the pleasant surprises from the game was Norfleet's creative, diverse, and effective deployment. He was a decoy on a couple of those "option" runs, took an end-around, grabbed a couple screens, was an emergency option on a swing pass, and even had a couple of handoffs out of the backfield.
Norfleet has a cutback option there but elects to follow his blocks and go with the play design; he was patient and explosive at the right times when he got the ball in his hands.
Also in fringe guys who played well, Kerridge had an interesting day. Nussmeier isn't a huge fan of fullbacks, so Kerridge bounced from H-back to flanker(!) along with a smattering of actual FB snaps. This is likely because he's the best blocky/catchy guy at the blocking stuff. Norfleet's end around featured him clubbing Jaylon Smith about eight yards downfield:
He coolly chopped down some blitzers
I don't like splitting him to flanker on obvious passing downs, as Michigan did with some frequency. You get matchup positives when it's a standard down; on third and ten you should have a wideout out there.
(You'll also note that this play or close enough was one Ace thought might make an appearance as Michigan goes to an IZ-focused run game—end around or fly sweep to Norfleet with an arc block to make that DE think twice.)
And Hill showed some promise. He looked like a capable receiver and okay-but-developing blocker. He also decleated a guy.
These are all Norfleet related since they are edge blocks for Norfleet. Also Norfleet. Norfleet for tailback and president and AD and pope.
RPS POSITIVE? ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR MIND?
Again, RPS is a trees measure so I only issue a minus if ND does something that I think makes it specifically hard for Michigan to get anything on play X. I am with you on the inexplicable lack of throwing it a long way to the guy who is a foot taller than the other guy. The metric doesn't really have room for "did not throw deep to Funchess on this play, RPS –1."
So what's it good for? It's good for seeing who won the rock paper scissors. I think Michigan came out slightly ahead. They didn't run into stacked boxes such that the extra guy was a free hitter in the hole (except once), they took the stuff on the edges that was there, or would have been there if Michigan wasn't derping their blocking, they neither sprung the big surprise for a big gain (low RPS positive) nor ate blitz after blitz on which unblocked guys showed up to death the running back to death (low RPS negative).
The gameplan mostly made sense, the plays were there to be made, Michigan did not make them. Yes, God yes, throw it deep to Funchess a lot. Other than that this was good.
Wideouts?
[Passes are rated by how tough they are to catch. 0 == impossible. 1 == wow he caught that, 2 == moderate difficulty, 3 == routine. The 0/X in all passes marked zero is implied.]
I'm going to try a new thing this year where if a route jumps out at me as obviously good or bad I'll make a note of it. A good route gets his guy wide open, a bad one allows a defender to make a play on the ball or results in an incompletion because the guy stumbles or falls down or whatnot.
Player | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Funchess | 2 | 1/2 | 8/8 | 3 | 2/3 | 14/14 | |||
Chesson | 1 | 3/3 | 1 | 1/1 | 4/4 | ||||
Darboh | 2 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 2 | 1/1 | 2/2 | |||
Norfleet | 0/1 | 0/1 | 3/3 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 6/6 | |||
Canteen | 1/1 | ||||||||
Butt | |||||||||
Hill | 1 | 0/1 | 1/1 | 1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 1/1 | ||
Williams | |||||||||
Heitzman | 1/1 | ||||||||
Dever | |||||||||
Green | |||||||||
Smith | |||||||||
Hayes | 1 | 1 | |||||||
Johnson | |||||||||
Kerridge | 1/1 | 1/1 | |||||||
Houma |
ROUTES: Hill –1, Williams –1, Darboh -2
I hope everyone who trashed Funchess's hands this offseason is paying… oh who am I kidding they're all drunk.
Heroes?
Jack Miller, Funchess, and to a lesser extent most of the rest of the OL.
Maybe not so heroic?
Tailbacks. Gardner.
What does it mean for Miami (Not That Miami) and the future?
Take a deep breath. Just as last year's ND game did not herald an explosive offense of fireworks and Gardner Heisman heroics, this year's game does not herald nonstop doom. There were a bunch of simple errors that could get corrected; Gardner played poorly; I don't think I've ever seen Michigan tailbacks play that badly. The parts are there, particularly on the OL, to be okay.
Funchess still good. Let's throw it at him deep some more.
The OL looks vastly improved. You can improve vastly and still not be real good but they hit the number against a real team. They didn't hit the number against, like, Akron last year. They are still going to be subpar; there will be struggles; the cohension of these guys already vastly outstrips last year's outfit.
And they won't change. This is your starting OL until injury or serious struggles. Hooray.
All available options should be considered for tailback. Green and Smith should be given the opportunity to atone, but #FREEJUSTICE and #CONSIDERGNOMEFLEEET. This was gross.
Gardner needs to take a breath and have things slow down. As I said at the beginning of the season, his decisions are never going to be good enough to be great; he can be much better than he was in this game.
It gets better. One dollar, I bet it.
September 11th, 2014 at 3:43 PM ^
That scary ledge is now vacated
Let's see what happens
September 12th, 2014 at 12:01 PM ^
Agreed.
In last year's ND game, Jeremy Gallon was the difference. He accounted for 3 of the 4 receiving TDs (other was Dileo) and 184 of the 294 receiving yards. He got open almost every play, and he got open quickly.
Of course, the '13 ND game also had Good DG show-up, and this year's version was...not Good DG. Even though he had more time to throw (although the pocket wasn't always clean) he looked more rushed and was far less accurate. To be fair, he probably looked better than Denard did in South Bend two years ago.
Let's remember that only six of last year's ND completions are still on this roster. The DG to Gallon connection was a big deal, and Funchess, while the more talented player, isn't the same route ninja and doesn't have the same telepathic relationhsip with DG. We need a quick little bugger or a TE to step up as DG's safety valve this year; that just isn't what Funchess does.
There are lots of negative things to say about Al Borges, but he did know how to get WRs open. Unfortunately, he didn't know how to draw-up a play that gave DG enough time to find those WRs. I'm ceratinly NOT implying that Nuss isn't good at this, but this year's receiving corps is going to take a little time to develop chemistry with DG and the new system.
The blocking, on the whole, was far better this year. Other than Gallon, the biggest difference in the two ND games was that DG went from Superman in '13 to Lois Lane in '14. He needed help this time around, and Gallon wasn't there to give it.
On the whole, I'm much more concerned about the CBs inability to cover anyone than I am about the offense. It will come around.
September 11th, 2014 at 3:48 PM ^
I think Michigan beats Miami of Ohio.
I am very interested in seeing how they beat them. The final score is of less interest to me than the UFR of the game. What I would hope to see if a trend line developing where the + numbers trend up and the - numbers trend down. That is, improvement at the point of execution.
If Michigan comes out unfocused, sloppy, and treating Miami as a joke of a game ... then I get back on the ledge.
September 11th, 2014 at 3:51 PM ^
They're called Miami University, not Miami of Ohio.
September 11th, 2014 at 3:55 PM ^
They're called Miami (NTM). eos.
September 11th, 2014 at 4:07 PM ^
"They're called Miami University, not Miami of Ohio."
First, from Wikipedia: "...(also referred to as Miami U, Miami of Ohio, or simply Miami)"
Second, Google "Miami of Ohio" (with quotes) and stand back ... a lot of hits, all in reference to Miami University.
Third, all of my life (I'm 55) I've heard sports announcers and others refer to it as "Miami of Ohio," and never "Miami University." Even Bob Ufer referred to Schembechler's coaching stay there as "Miami of Ohio."
Finally ... I'm guessing you're the kind of guy a lot of people turn away from and roll their eyes.
September 11th, 2014 at 4:50 PM ^
I'm really not sure citing Wikipedia is going to help your arguement.
September 11th, 2014 at 5:08 PM ^
Wikipedia is a remarkably accurate reflector of group sentiment about such things. I promise you if "Miami of Ohio" was as incorrect as suggested, then someone would have corrected that line. Pronto.
I know because I've created Wikipedia articles on various technical topics and I was always amazed at how quickly, how thoroughly, and in general how accurately corrections are made. Typically anything that smells of unsupportable opinion is scrubbed. Quickly.
September 11th, 2014 at 5:42 PM ^
Thank you! Why don't more people understand this!?
September 11th, 2014 at 8:56 PM ^
"To Hell with Miami"....wait, he wouldn't have said that. Never mind.
September 11th, 2014 at 6:07 PM ^
You're not really sure citing Wikipedia is going to help because you're not really sure what Wikipedia is, obviously.
September 11th, 2014 at 6:13 PM ^
How about all the other things he said?
September 11th, 2014 at 9:02 PM ^
My sister and grandfather are both alum of Miami of Ohio. They call is Miami of Ohio or Miami.
September 11th, 2014 at 4:43 PM ^
Right. Ask 100 people where "Miami University" is located and 90 will say Florida. Thus, Miami of Ohio.
September 11th, 2014 at 7:06 PM ^
That doesn't mean it's correct, and we like precision on this blog. Nowhere is the school officially called "Miami of Ohio." If you asked 100 people where Michigan University is, 90 would probably say Ann Arbor. That doesn't mean it's correct.
Miami University == Ohio
University of Miami == Florida
September 11th, 2014 at 8:45 PM ^
Officially? Michigan isn't officially Michigan. It's The University of Michigan. Do you say that every time you refer to the university or the football team? The pedants are out in full force in the comments.
September 12th, 2014 at 1:59 PM ^
Miami of Ohio == Ohio
Miami of Florida == Florida
There's no possibility of confusion, even for the uninformed.
September 12th, 2014 at 10:08 AM ^
There is the University of Miami in Florida, but no Miami University.
September 11th, 2014 at 3:49 PM ^
came out with a very good rating. Alot of comments had to do with him backing up, as would most humans trying to get in the way a 315lb nose tackle! However he seemed to always be between the NT and the QB ... which I believe is the concept of blocking. Only the second game for this line and against a good to very good front 7. I'm hopeful they can continue to improve through the season.
Go Blue!
September 11th, 2014 at 4:00 PM ^
Last I checked, the concept of blocking was not only being between the NT and QB, but also providing some modicum of resistance and preventing the NT from going wherever he wants... Just saying.
September 11th, 2014 at 4:33 PM ^
Forcing the defender to push through you, and thus slowing him, certainly constitutes at least "a modicum of resistance."
September 11th, 2014 at 4:43 PM ^
Miller did a good job. Thanks for helping to clear that up.
September 11th, 2014 at 4:51 PM ^
You saved your first comment for this?
September 11th, 2014 at 4:57 PM ^
NDs front 7 isn't that good. That's the problem.
September 11th, 2014 at 5:44 PM ^
For what it's worth, I still disagree with Brian about Miller. Yeah, he didn't blow an assignment, but his leverage was attrocious on a lot of plays. When I'm screaming at the TV for a hands to the face penalty on ND because it looks like his head is being pushed toward the sky but it's actually the guy picking him up by his shoulder pads, that's bad leverage and hands technique.
That said, it wasn't a terrible game and I don't know if it makes sense to change at this point. Definitely something to keep an eye on going forward though.
September 11th, 2014 at 3:50 PM ^
Miller played well? Brian must not have gotten the memo that the entire board wants a new center. I personally did not think he played well, but- Hail UFR
September 11th, 2014 at 4:14 PM ^
is looking for a convenient scapegoat, I commend Brian for being objective and not letting his pre-season / pre-game bias against the OL get in the way of calling it like he saw it.
September 11th, 2014 at 9:15 PM ^
Oh but we found our scape goat: Fred Jackson.
/s
I'm also feeling better after these UFRs. That said we've got to improve. If we look like that at the end of the season then I think this staff will be in trouble. If this team improves then the record may take care of itself.
Seriously though those holes our RBs missed were huge. Is vision something that can improve or is it something that is innate? Anyway, let's prove once again that the result of the ND game means zilch for our future contests.
September 11th, 2014 at 3:51 PM ^
The UFRs for this game had to be the most painful Brian has ever had to do. Honestly, if I operated this blog and did the UFRs, I'd likely skip this game because it was that bad, but that is what makes Brian better than most of us.
September 11th, 2014 at 3:51 PM ^
can introduce you to most of last year
September 11th, 2014 at 3:53 PM ^
LOL. Well, 2013 was that forgettable for me.
September 11th, 2014 at 3:51 PM ^
It's always interesting to see how the UFRs, mesh with my feeling during the game. I remember thinking that the offensive line was fine in pass protection, but Gardner screwed that up and that they were a major culprit in the run game. It seems that the RBs might have been more of a problem than I realized. The game as a whole was a needle mover for me and my faith in Hoke, but he has 10 games left in the season. If we get the ship turned around as I hope we do, then I'll be the first to admit I was wrong. If not, well I think the Michigan job is a bit more attractive than you give it credit for Brian.
September 11th, 2014 at 3:53 PM ^
This is different from last year. This team has the ability to be good. Gardner needs to limit mistakes, the tailbacks need to get some glasses, and we will be fine.
Is it just me, or does everyone else feel a little bit better about things moving forward after these UFRs? I still think this team should win 9 games.
September 11th, 2014 at 4:24 PM ^
to have the same problem he has always had....he was "bred" to be a running QB, not a pocket QB. He never learned from his beginnings as a QB to see the entire field and he won't become appreciably better in the next 10 games.
Brian points out the play when Gardner had Chesson wide open waving his hand in the middle of the field....well how can we expect Gardner to see him when he couldn't see his outlet, Smith, 10 yards away begging to be thrown the ball? Nope, Gardner see's his primary covered and it's play over. Last year when confronted by the same circumstance Gardner would spin and scramble and turn a dead play into positive yardage. However, he has been admonished to make scrambling his last ditch effort and not his second read. The problem is Gardner continues to have problems seeing, or pulling the trigger on, his second receiver read, so that by the time he realizes it's time to go, he can't.
September 11th, 2014 at 4:48 PM ^
is that Gardner was raised to be a running qb so much as he is still shell shocked from last year.
I realize, that sounds really unbelievable. But go back and watch the Texan's first ever season. Carr was literally flinching from the hits he thought were coming four steps into his drops.
September 11th, 2014 at 5:33 PM ^
it his entire time as a UM QB. Moreover, he was supposed to have spent the last six months in 7x7 drills building up the reps required to start seeing the field. Personally I think it would take quite the exceptional person to shed years of being a running QB and take on the mantle of patience, discipline, and being able to see the field in an entirely different way. Much easier, IME, to start as a pocket QB...learn that skill, and then adapt athleticism into the game.
September 11th, 2014 at 6:26 PM ^
Also, allow me to clarify. Carr was broken by the Texan's offensive line (sorry Carr, if you read this somehow. I would have broken way earlier than you did).
Gardner is far from broken.
September 11th, 2014 at 8:55 PM ^
I think Gardner's problems are a combination of the following: a new OC, 3 OCs in all during his career, a very simple passing game under Rodriguez, and a year spent at WR. People were bashing Borges when Gardner said he can read MIKEs now, but then others chimed in that the OL can do that too. Hard to say if you really wanna put more on a mediocre OL, but even though Gardner is a 5th year player, it's certainly possible to put too much on his plate in one year.
Hopefully the running backs get their heads in the game to help him out. Even looking at the UFR and the replays, holes don't look that obvious to me but I'm sure I'm just not good at reading those plays. However, I definitely noticed that massive fail when M was on their own 5 or whatever late in the game and the whole left side of the line was open. If I'm able to see a massive gap like that without the aid of replay, then you know the back really screwed up on that one.
Hopefully Nuss can adjust to what DG is capable of and we can get a ground game to support him. The offense should be much better then.
September 11th, 2014 at 10:24 PM ^
September 12th, 2014 at 7:50 AM ^
They probably should. It's his last season, so why not let him play to his full extent? I'm not sure he can be very successful as a pocket type guy. I'd like to see a few more designed runs/ read option type plays.
September 12th, 2014 at 12:05 PM ^
Agreed.
September 11th, 2014 at 5:17 PM ^
@GoBLUinTX - I agree 100%. The first time I noticed it was when he came in for a play or two when Denard was hurt against MSU in EL way back when (I think it was the trash storm game).
There was a RB WIIIIDDDEEEEE open for a touchdown running free in the middle of the field and he never saw him. Was literally dead on straight ahead with no defender any where near him and Gardner tuck and slammed into the line. Had he seen him and made the play, those points would have been enough to win that game.
He's not going to change at this point.
September 11th, 2014 at 5:48 PM ^
He's only had a QB coach for 8 months though. Al may have had valid excuses as and OC and some positive track record, but his record as a QB coach was abysmal. It takes a long time to develop good habits and when 300lb dudes are running at you, everyone reverts back to habits.
September 11th, 2014 at 6:25 PM ^
I made an observation, one in which you seem to agree. I'm not judging so I'm at a loss as to why you're rationalizing.
September 11th, 2014 at 8:57 PM ^
"he won't become appreciably better in the next 10 games."
Don't wanna put words in his mouth but it seems his point is that he doesn't agree with that.
September 11th, 2014 at 11:05 PM ^
That's exactly right, I should have blockquoted it.
September 11th, 2014 at 5:26 PM ^
Honestly, I felt immediately after the game that it wasn't as bad as the scoreboard indicated. In part because of the final boxscore, but also, it just didn't seem THAT bad while I was watching it. Having said that, it did seem like one team (ND) was in complete control and knew exactly what they were doing, while another (M) seemed to be feeling things out and scrambling to have it all come together. Given the change in OC and the change in defensive philosophy, it would seem this would make a bit of a sense....here's to hoping it gels as the season goes along.
September 12th, 2014 at 8:47 AM ^
I had to work and didn't see the game, only the occasional update from flipping to ESPN (at about 21-0 I quit doing even that). It is extremely disappointing that Gardner had the struggles he did, and it is disappointing that the RBs did not find the holes. It does make me feel much better about Hoke and Funk, though, as the line seems to be much better than last year, so Hoke had the guts to stick with Funk, Hoke had the integrity to let Borges go and get a real OC and the team is looking more like a team is supposed to look. It is probably not Hoke's fault that Green and Smith went the wrong way.
Someone asked whether an RBs ability to hit the correct hole or follow the correct block is instinctive or learned. I would like Space Coyote's opinion on that (or some other equally knowledgeable input). If Norfleet is the only one who hits the right hole, then let's hope Hoke has the sense to give him more carries and take them away from those who do not know which way to turn.
September 12th, 2014 at 9:09 AM ^
Here's what I said:
You can coach keys, and where to take your eyes, and what you're looking at. My feeling is that Green is likely not doing a good job seeing his keys, but instead is working on some sort of combination of feel and tendency. In the film room, Jackson needs to stress who is the key on the defense and where to take your eyes based on that, and then, like you said, reps, reps, reps.
My guess is that some of this is the RBs predetermining some of their reads a bit. The triple option play for instance: the cutback there is probably 7 times out of 10 and is the best place to go. It's because the triple option look draws the backside defenders, but the frontside defenders need to respect the IZ, so there is a gash for the cutback (something I addressed with Wisconsin here). And before people get on Jackson about that (I'm not as down as most about Jackson, but I'm certainly not high on him either, but), this is always a tricky thing with how much to bring it to younger guys or guys new to a system. How much information do you give them? How much do you tell them? Because the coach knows all these things, but it's the players that need to be able to see it and feel it and execute it real time. If you give them too much, well, you saw what happens. So I think some of that needs to be scaled back and a re-emphasis on keys needs to be made.
When I first saw what we'll call the worst run from Green, I was at first going to tweet something about it, but then second guessed it thinking it was the designed Counter Belly that Nuss pulled out on ND when at Bama (and I never saw them run in any other game). It wasn't that, it was just a bad read all the way (he must have seen the safety flash in the hole, because all other keys say slam it in there, but still a bad read).
So it's probably going to get back to maybe deemphasizing some of the "this will likely happen on this play" and just focus the RBs on reading their keys. That may prevent some of the bigger runs, but it may see them playing more with feel and not have the WTF type runs to a degree. But, vision is still vision, it doesn't really improve much except with reps, but emphasis on keys can be taught a bit.
September 11th, 2014 at 3:55 PM ^
So we basically have two Trent Richardsons at running back? Great
Comments