- Member for
- 2 years 13 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|22 min 24 sec ago||If Pitt's run game is legit, you drive the length of the field||
and take six minutes off the clock.
I'm betting it doesn't happen.
|25 min 15 sec ago||From what I can tell, ESPNU is actually pretty decent.||
Instead of a halftime show they just cut to games where a team is about to score ala College Scoreboard.
Agreed on the announcers, also. No agenda that I've seen. Just calling the game.
|40 min 3 sec ago||Michigan will beat Utah today. So add that one.||
(knocked on wood).
Also, Iowa will win.
(I didn't knock on wood for Iowa because, meh).
|43 min 20 sec ago||So the coach was:||
|51 min 17 sec ago||Very much so. Super conservative.||
But it actually worked (this time).
Three point game anyways.
|1 hour 7 sec ago||It's really hard to argue against yards after contact.||
Plus, he already has 140 yards against Iowa.
He's slow, in my opinion, but he's dang good.
|1 hour 14 min ago||My stream is delayed.||
I thought you were talking about the five yard toss. Wow.
That was one of the best catches I've ever seen.
|1 hour 25 min ago||Conner looks so slow.||
Slow like a tank, apparently.
|1 hour 35 min ago||Game is far from over.||
Make sure you save the voicemail.
If Iowa comes back and wins call your friend and just play the voicemail that he left for you two.
|1 hour 37 min ago||Ah thanks. I was wondering what happened.||
I'd say that's probably the nail that ends it.
|2 hours 6 min ago||I never said I thought it would stay close.||
That being said, I'm not sure what to make of Wisconsin yet despite fully expecting them to win by around twenty.
(Yeah, caught the gibe).
|2 hours 17 min ago||This Iowa Pitt game is going to be good.||
Iowa is built to beat Pitt but Pitt is better than most people think.
|2 hours 50 min ago||Well, Wisconsin is off to a good start.||
Tied at 7 with bowling green.
|13 hours 50 min ago||My Kant was aimed at our, as a group, indignation at Winston's||
To which Kant would reply, if Winston is guilty, he deserves to be castigated. Period.
This isn't, or shouldn't be about, mob rule. It's about getting what he deserves.
|14 hours 16 min ago||I can answer one of your questions very easily.||
<blockquote> paste text here </blockquote>
But click on the "switch to plain text editor" before you type the above. To find "switch to plain text editor" look to the bottom left of the text box.
|14 hours 26 min ago||I disagree.||
I simply think someone 'up top' understands (or abides by, at least) Kantian ethics.
|14 hours 49 min ago||He was accused of rape, as you noted||
and then shouted out the meme he did. That alone warrants his suspension. Viewed in isolation yelling out what he did is not a reprehensible act. It sure as heck is, however, when you're accused of rape.
This isn't, or shouldn't be, about mob justice. It's about Winson being a moron.
If the actual mob that was close to Winston was given any power, Winston wouldn't be sitting for a second of the game tomorrow.
|15 hours 1 min ago||.|
|16 hours 45 min ago||Honestly, my age is misleading. I'm 33 but I've only been a||
Michigan fan since 2006 (first year there).
My answer of course is twofold, however, the B1G has not been producing first round qb picks like you stated.
It ridiculous to pretend that means anything because it's virtually impossible to pick the next Tom Brady.
At the same time, however, I realize that having a college qb that is pumping out stats is good for the college program.
My response, of course, is that the stats don't matter. It's about having a great qb. The B1G has consistently produced those.
The "first round" metric is silly.
Pretending that the first round selection is more important than what qbs have actually produced is more than silly.
|17 hours 14 sec ago||.||
Cutler, Stafford and Newton then? Yeah, I'll go with the PAC.
Feel free to guess why you your point isn't really on point (it involves us having to talk about this again in a year or two).
Edit: well argued, alum (which doesn't mean I think you're right. It was just well argued. /cheers).
|17 hours 14 min ago||I did add the disclaimer when I included Wilson.||
The problem he had with his previous staff, in my opinion, is enough to make him a B1G player.
But not for stat arguments like this, so I understand.
It doesn't matter. In my opinion, at least. And frankly, the B1G has been pulling in and will continue to pull in, qb talent. If I had to name any position group that the B1G lacked in, it's speed on the defensive line. How you solve something like that? No idea. That's just my take.
|17 hours 26 min ago||Comparable overall to what the B1G has produced and that||
are still starting? Hardly.
edit: now if we want to talk about how every quality qb comes from Texas... that might be a post.
|17 hours 27 min ago||Allow me to rephrase your original post||
(and feel free to call me a moron afterwards for not seeing it originally):
The B1G has not had a qb that has passed for enough yards with enough accurracy while playing college ball in order to warrant a first round pick in a long while?
That's your point, correct?
I once again repeat: who cares? Bear in mind that I mean no disrespect to you personally, alum.
In fact, I think you get the better of it most times we talk.
But again, I repeat: who cares? The B1G has been dominating the qb scene for quite some time.
|17 hours 38 min ago||Wilson.||
Unless you consider him ACC.
Qbs in the NFL is one of the few (very few) areas that you can't really rip the B1G for (not that I think you're trying, man).
Compare who the B1G has in the NFL (starting) versus the PAC (B1G wins), SEC (meh, I can see the argument), B12 (B1G wins), everyone else: (B1G wins).
You're using a statistic (first round qb drafted) that, ultimately, doesn't matter at all. Not only that, but it's been proven (by B1G qbs) to be a bad stat.
|17 hours 48 min ago||That's not my point.||
It's about the fact that the B1G has virtually indisputably produced more [current] quality QBs than any other conference. You can argue for the SEC. That's about it.
The fact that these QBs weren't drafted in the first round doesn't mean much considering their success.
If anything it's a black spot on the people in charge of drafting.
|17 hours 57 min ago||Agreed.||
Especially impressive considering the running game that PSU is spitting out.
|17 hours 58 min ago||Counter question: why care?||
The B1G has, at worst, the second best group of starting qbs in the league. Obviously I'd vote them first (I really don't like Eli). No, the PAC doesn't have a dog in this race.
You know where Brady was drafted. Also know that Brees wasn't in the first round. Wilson was third round.
|18 hours 26 min ago||If you ever chart the weight of incoming freshmen against||
their weight a year later based on position, ideal weight, and school in order to determine which b1g school has the best sc program let me know.
I doubt the school released weights are accurate, but you never know.
|21 hours 18 min ago||Yes.||
Did you see the first interception from the two yard line?
How else do you think Auburn knew Lockett would fake catch the td reception and allow the ball to bounce off his chest and over his head to be caught by the KSU receiver on that trick play?
Pretty obvious Auburn saw that play coming.
edit: /s (I wouldn't think I actually need this tag but you never know. That was a painful game to watch. KSU beat themselves).
|22 hours 20 min ago||Come on, man.||
It had his name on it.