This week's Haskins Hurdle™ [Patrick Barron]

Michigan 29, Indiana 7 Comment Count

Alex.Drain November 6th, 2021 at 11:27 PM

This one was a sleepy game, and by sleepy, I mean that I almost fell asleep watching it. Between a lack of wake-you-up plays, long injury-related timeouts, and the typical deluge of excruciatingly long commercial timeouts at the behest of our corporate sponsor overlords, this one trudged along at the meandering pace of a 160-year-old tortoise. It was never in doubt, but it was not a total blowout until the fourth frame, hence the sleepy nature of the contest. Indiana, very good at not being competitive, but also not being run off the field, did the same in this one. Maintaining their pride, but never really within striking distance. In the end, Michigan claimed a 29-7 victory, and moved to 8-1 on the 2021 season. 

Speaking of injuries, this one was rough for both sides. Your author summed it up at one point accordingly: 

For Michigan, the list of casualties was long, including (but not limited to) Blake Corum, AJ Henning, Andrel Anthony, and Gemon Green, while Cade McNamara spent a series in the tent. Indiana's list was probably even longer, but I don't track that because I am not paid to write about Indiana football. At one juncture it seemed like both sides may have just preferred the game to end prematurely, rather than risk losing any more bodies. 

The game started out with Indiana stitching together a decent drive before succumbing to a punt. Michigan's first drive was uninspiring but their second series went much smoother. A 4th down sneak kept the chains moving, and another 3rd & short conversion by Haskins got Michigan firmly into Hoosier territory. A 34-yard FG by Jake Moody got Michigan on the board, and they led 3-0. 

You don't want to see David Ojabo bearing down on you [Bryan Fuller]

As I predicted in FFFF, the Hoosiers were not particularly interested in letting freshman QB Donaven McCulley air it out much, leaning on his legs as a major component of the offense. When they did let McCulley throw, the pressure came in a hurry. While Aidan Hutchinson is the name everyone knows, David Ojabo had a monstrous effort to continue putting his name out there. Your author is begging that NFL scouts are not some of the people who learn about Ojabo's name. The Scottish DE delivered a thundering strip sack of McCulley on IU's third offensive series and after Chris Hinton recovered it, the Wolverines got great field position. A Hassan Haskins hurdle and then a goal line dive later, Michigan led 10-0. 

Indiana's next offensive series was their best. A trick play ended in a pass from McCulley to TE Peyton Hendershot, and then a long McCulley run on 3rd & 5 after Junior Colson lost contain put the Hoosiers at the goal line. Davion Ervin-Poindexter scored from a yard out and Indiana trailed only 10-7. 

Any thought that the game might be a fight was quickly erased by a 62-yard Hassan Haskins run through a huge hole opened by Ryan Hayes and Trevor Keegan. That put the Wolverines in the red zone, and a Cade McNamara roll out pass to Luke Schoonmaker put the ball in the end zone, and Michigan led 17-7. That play in particular seemed to be a savvy call from Josh Gattis, as Michigan had issues picking up IU's varied blitzes. McNamara faced considerable heat, and a QB rollout pass was an astute counter that worked out. Both teams traded punts before the first half ended. 

Cade McNamara was very solid, per usual [Bryan Fuller]

The second half was far more one-sided. Though Michigan's first drive ended in disappointing fashion, the next three Wolverine possessions ended in points. A JJ McCarthy-led drive got Michigan a FG off of Jake Moody's foot, and then a McNamara-led drive tacked another FG on the board after Hoosier pressure stalled it short. Red zone (in)efficiency remains a bugaboo for the Michigan offense. They did cash in on their next red zone trip, though, as Cade McNamara's best deep ball since Wisconsin landed in the arms of Cornelius Johnson for a 50 yard gain, setting up a TD pass to Luke Schoonmaker. At that point, it was 29-7 Michigan. 

Michigan was able to build such a large lead because Indiana's offense flopped around like a fish out of water in the second half. The Indiana offensive line was predictably unable to block Michigan's pass rush whatsoever, limiting their downfield passing attack and shutting down any hope of moving the ball on the ground. In totality, Indiana ran 24 plays in the second half, and gained 53 total yards, scoring 0 points. Their first four drives were three-and-outs, while the fifth drive (then against a mixture of reserves and starters for Michigan's defense) came to a close rather deep in Michigan territory after a Vincent Gray PBU on 4th down forced a turnover on downs. JJ McCarthy and Michigan's offense (also a mix of reserves and starters by then) drained most of the fourth quarter on the subsequent drive, and that was more or less all she wrote for this one. 

Hassan Haskins was Michigan's biggest star offensively, rushing 27 times for 168 yards and 1 TD. After Corum exited the game with an apparent lower body injury, it was all Haskins on the ground for Michigan. No other player attempted more than three rushes for the Wolverines. McNamara was rather quiet but effective, going 10/18 for 168 yards, 2 TDs and no turnovers, dodging pressure, taking care of the ball, and moving Michigan down the field. McCarthy was more erratic, 5/10 for 55 yards and an interception, showing that there remains a real gap between the two on the depth chart.

Luke Schoonmaker had a nice game [Patrick Barron]

Cornelius Johnson hauled in 5 catches for 108 yards, including the 50-yard deep shot. Luke Schoonmaker had arguably the best game of his career, catching two TD passes out of his three total receptions. Roman Wilson, finally working back from his wrist injury, made three catches of his own and carried the ball on an end around. The offensive line had a spotty day, struggling at times with Indiana's complex blitzes, but also opening several notably big holes to allow Haskins to gash the Hoosiers on the ground. 

Defensively, it's hard to argue with the results. IU gained 202 yards on 3.4 yards per play, scoring 7 points. Michigan held McCulley to 11/25 through the air on a pitiful 3.6 yards/attempt. Taylor Upshaw, who had a strong game, added Michigan's only sack outside of Ojabo, but the story was Michigan's ability to generate pressure, even if few plays ended in a sack. Junior Colson led Michigan with eight tackles, narrowly ahead of Josh Ross and Dax Hill, who had seven. It was a strong bounce back effort for Mike Macdonald's crew after last weekend's disappointing loss to Michigan State. 

Michigan moves to 8-1 on the season and their B1G hopes are still alive, thanks in part to MSU's loss this afternoon to Purdue. If the Wolverines win the next two weeks, and Ohio State beats Michigan State, then The Game on November 27 in Ann Arbor would be for the B1G East title and a trip to Indianapolis. Of course, the first part of that sentence is a rather sizable "if". Michigan has to go to Penn State next week and face a Nittany Lions team that, while struggling offensively, is playing great defense. The Wolverines have not won in Happy Valley since 2015, Jim Harbaugh's first season as head coach. A game time has not yet been announced for that one. 

There is no content after the jump. 

Comments

jhayes1189

November 7th, 2021 at 11:04 AM ^

If this is our hangover game against a team that nearly beat MSU (sigh) and hung around very well with Cincy, I will take it. Defense looked dominant and offensively it was cool to see Haskins be the bell cow for a game, Johnson seemed to have a good bounce back game after having the dropsies at MSU, and we saw two TD’s to tight ends in the red zone. Still wish a couple more of those FG’s were TDs

victors2000

November 7th, 2021 at 7:09 AM ^

MIght as well throw in lesser teams as well; if that's as good as we can do, allowing teams to stick around, we could be in trouble against Maryland. Okay, probably not against the Terps, but perhaps in a bowl game against a lesser foe. A bowl that once again we aren't really interested in going to, because the effort we gave against Penn State, and or the Buckeyes, wasn't good enough and we find ourselves up against an opponent that is having the time of their lives in said bowl and playing inspired ball while we ultimately screw the pooch. Wow sorry, this got real negative. I was really on a roll there; I could have broken up that last sentence. I didn't need to be disgusting, either; I don't think things will ever get so bad as for one to screw the pooch.

victors2000

November 7th, 2021 at 1:58 PM ^

I know I wrote that but I really didn't mean it! It was more like a meandering...oh never mind...

Hey, you know what though? We should, actually Brian should I suppose, set up MgoPoints like cryptocurrency! You can like mine it, somehow, by providing good thoughts, or lose it by being a wanker. You could exchange it at the MgoBlog site for your fiat currency. 

That way when you lose 'Brian Bits' you have a real reason to feel bad about losing them!

The Deer Hunter

November 6th, 2021 at 11:39 PM ^

OSU will own Sparty @ the Shoe. We do really have a huge opportunity here if we get by PSU next week. Sure Penn St is playing great defense, I would argue that Michigan's D is playing better combined with a one dimensional PSU offense I like our chances. 

victors2000

November 7th, 2021 at 7:17 AM ^

Aside from these past few years when the Buckeyes have been on Alabamas' level, and the Spartans had fallen into mediocrity, MSU have played the Buckeyes hard. During the Dantonio years they actually beat the Buckeyes at the 'shoe two or three times. This Spartan team is pretty decent; don't put that in the loss column just yet.

1VaBlue1

November 7th, 2021 at 8:46 AM ^

Uhh, have you seen MSU's pass defense?  Or OSU's pass offense?  Have you tried to imagine the two together, on the same field?

Michigan - MICHIGAN - dropped 400+ yards on MSU's secondary.  Purdue torched them for 500+ yards.  OSU is going to be unrelenting - I bet they top 450 yards.  I mean, the only way MSU slows them down is if Olave sprains his wrist jerking off while watching video of MSU's pass defense.

Sure Walker can run against OSU's rush defense.  So what?  If Purdue can bottle him up...  He won't see the same mistakes Michigan made against him - the illegal substitution penalties.  Take just those away and Michigan wins that game.

victors2000

November 7th, 2021 at 2:13 PM ^

Okay, I'm just going to direct you guys to the luckiest team thread. When they are running around the stadium after kicking the winning FG, you're going to feel salty! A lot like those guys who laughed - LAUGHED! - when I said I was worried about Walker going 150-200 yards against us.

Sometimes I hate it when I'm right.

Actually, I don't know if they laughed.

TIMMMAAY

November 7th, 2021 at 1:12 PM ^

I agree, but the injuries sustained last night will likely make the game in Happy Valley much more difficult to win. I still think we have a good shot, but we need either Corum or Edwards back (preferably Corum, obv), and definitely need Anthony healthy as well... I think our D will be fine, but we can't be missing so many key offensive weapons in that game, without some luck going our way. 

stephenrjking

November 6th, 2021 at 11:40 PM ^

This was fine. We won't remember a thing about it unless one of these injuries keeps a guy out for the OSU game. 

We knew going in that Michigan would probably win in a comfortable but unspectacular fashion. Michigan under Harbaugh post-Fisch doesn't pull out new and interesting stuff on offense for these gap games before big games, and we're in the track we expect them to be in. 

Big game next week. Winning next week doesn't on its own accomplish any season goals, but it's a lot harder to get to a point where this is a plus season if they lose. It's on the road, and Penn State is a good team: important to see people step up. 

stephenrjking

November 7th, 2021 at 12:09 AM ^

I'm reluctant to ever assume a win on the road, and this is certainly not a place for that, but a loss against PSU, while enough to drive the board insane, will not cause a minor injury to rest in the memory; the OSU game, whatever the result, will render the PSU game considerably less important. 

Edit: A classic example is 2016. We remember Wilton Speight's injury against Iowa more for the game he played, against Ohio State at less than 100%, than for the game he missed, the snow game against Indiana. 

MGoBlue96

November 7th, 2021 at 12:23 AM ^

You are seriously telling me Michigan fans would not remember a loss to PSU that essentially eliminates the team from conference title contention? Like I get this team has already outperformed some people's expectations but the reality they are squarely in the hunt for the Big Ten with 3 games left. Any loss impacted by injuries suffered in a . game like this with an forgone conclusion would be remembered. The snow game we don't remember because they still won that game it was not a game they lost to eliminate them from conference title contention. A PSU loss impacted by injuries suffered in a dumb game like this would be exactly that. I mean without hearing the significance of the injuries this was an absolutely terrible game for injuries.

stephenrjking

November 7th, 2021 at 12:31 AM ^

You're making a mountain out of a molehill. I'm saying that this was an utterly forgettable football game and that the only way that we remember it is if one of these injuries keeps a guy out of the OSU game. I actually debated saying either OSU or PSU, but: 1. it doesn't really matter that much, and 2. If we lose to PSU, we will remember it, but not as much as we remember the result of the OSU game. 

And that's absolutely true. Either Michigan loses big to OSU and it's humiliating and most people on the board are yelling you-know-what, or Michigan loses close to OSU and it's heartbreaking and we are yelling stuff like that but lamenting the one or two big moments that robbed us of the game, or a miracle happens and literally no other result this year matters at all anymore except that one. 

This is a really minor issue here.

I'm pretty disconsolately resigned to not beating OSU, but I know how we'll all feel if/when that happens. A PSU loss, unless it is an absolutely humiliation, will not stick out to us the way the rivalry losses will. And if it's an absolute humiliation, missing a cornerback or a tight end won't matter much. 

BuckeyeChuck

November 6th, 2021 at 11:45 PM ^

This Indiana team is so completely disinteresting. They're neither good, nor are they #CHAOS. They were a lot more fun when they were bad but fear-inducing chaos. Last year they were interesting because they were good.

Now they're just dreadfully dull.

jmblue

November 6th, 2021 at 11:49 PM ^

Haskins was great but we need the Corum counterpunch, too.  
 

As for the game, yeah, a bit dull, but we don’t really want to play a thriller against IU, do we?

UM Indy

November 6th, 2021 at 11:52 PM ^

Second week in a row that Cade disappeared in the injury tent for a drive but didn’t seem obviously injured or like he was fighting through anything when he re-emerged. Granted, I’m not in the know and maybe he was dinged up both times. But maybe dude just has to take a shit at inopportune times - like the family member who’s always in the bathroom when it’s time to leave. 

MGoBlue96

November 7th, 2021 at 12:02 AM ^

People are saying it's fine, but idk. For a team that essentially got completely new life assuming OSU beats MSU that was very uninspiring. Really didn't build on anything from last week in the passing game, playcalling was predictable and UM continues to think 2 free defenders on third and short is a sound offensive strategy and a very bad game on the injury front as well. Pass blocking was inexplicably atrocious tonight, that was completely unexpected.

After the MSU loss earlier in the day I was hoping to see something that could make me believe they could win out but I really can't see it. They got gut punched last week and responded with a sleepy performance both from a coaching and player standpoint, was hoping for more fire. Though what we saw unfortunately was not unexpected either.

MGoBlue96

November 7th, 2021 at 12:17 AM ^

We aren't talking about busting out new stuff. We are talking about the staff realizing that maybe playcalls on third and short that continue to result in 2 or more unblocked free hitters may not be the optimal playcall, the passing game building on last week instead of reverting to being rather rickety, etc. Michigan needs to building on things to try and put together a gameplan that can actually beat OSU if they make it through the next two. You build on things by repping them not trying to pull them out of your ass against a really good opponent. And the pass blocking was in fact atrocious tonight on top of it for whatever reason.