decision time [Bryan Fuller]

Coaching Search Time: Initial Candidates Comment Count

Brian March 16th, 2024 at 11:36 AM

Not Happening

Creighton's Greg McDermott leads this list. He signed a contract extension a week ago and said he wants to retire at Creighton. Nate Oats also just signed a contract with Alabama that will give him a top five salary in college basketball. Retired guys John Beilein and Jay Wright are also in this group, as I bet one dollar neither wants to come back and deal with the portal and NIL and whatnot. Michigan is deeply unlikely to poke around the NBA, in any capacity, after Howard went so wrong.

Tony Bennett… cumong man. Get real.

Probably Not Happening

Two up-and-coming P5 coaches have difficult buyouts. South Carolina's Lamont Paris looks like a natural fit: he was born in Ohio and spent eight years as a Wisconsin assistant. Unfortunately he just signed a six-year extension with a $12.5 million buyout. Iowa State's TJ Otzelberger has a buyout described as "hefty" that Jeff Goodman thinks will dissuade OSU from pursuing him so I'd imagine Michigan is in the same boat. The number out there is 17 million, but I can't find anything that confirms that.

Shaka Smart has done a great job at Marquette after some up-and-down years at Texas, but I think Brendan Quinn is probably right that Smart isn't going to leave a good Big East program that's probably a two seed to run it back as the second banana at a football power.

The opposite applies for Porter Moser. His three years at Oklahoma have been underwhelming.

SDSU's Brian Dutcher has had a ton of success with the Aztecs but he's 64 and may not want to spend a few years rebuilding the crater that is Michigan's roster when he could be having fun with a good program. Also the connection to Steve Fisher may still be a problem 25 years later.

Fred Hoiberg has Nebraska in the tourney after a long build but bringing the king of the portal to Michigan seems like a bad fit for both parties. Chris Collins: no.

Realistic Candidates

image

[Colorado State]

NIKO MEDVED, Colorado State. Medved took over a Larry Eustachy crater and immediately improved CSU from 224th in Eustachy's last year to 180th, 99th, 76th, and then 46th in 2022, the year when Michigan faced them in the first round of the tourney. CSU had an off year in 2023 but is back in the tourney this year with room to spare. Torvik has them as a 7 seed. An 10-8 conference record doesn't seem great but this year's Mountain West is more or less a power conference—it's the #7 conference in Kenpom, but their average efficiency rating is closer to the Big East (#2) than the A10 (#8).

Medved is an offensive guy first and foremost. His teams have been top 50 in two-point percentage every year he's been at CSU and they tend to have very high assist rates. That combination usually means a guy is scheming up excellent looks for his team. TO avoidance has been good, but not Beilein good. Speaking of:

Colorado State’s motion offense has become a must-watch for basketball junkies. The ball moves; there’s constant cutting and reads. It has elements of Johnny Orr’s spread, John Beilein’s 2-guard attack and Lennie Acuff’s version of the Princeton.

“Maybe one day it’ll be the Medved system,” Medved says.

He’s proud that this system is uniquely his.

That's from an Athletic article in which Medved offered a two-week deep dive on his program; it mentions that Isaiah Stevens, the point guard Michigan played in that game, stuck it out at CSU when he could have hit the portal:

“The main thing that has always kept me here was it’s hard to find people that genuinely care about you,” Stevens says. “My dad always told me there’s certain things money can’t buy, and that’s loyalty and relationships and faith and love. And I just feel like a lot of that has been built up here over my time.”

Medved, like everyone else in college basketball, has hit the portal for players but he's gone an unusual route: he's got two DII transfers and a DIII transfer in his rotation. The two DII transfers are starters with 121 and 118 ORTGs on ~21% usage in what is more or less a high major conference. Guy has an eye for talent.

[After THE JUMP: more mid-major guys]

DARIAN DEVRIES, Drake. DeVries took over for Medved after Medved's single season at Drake and after a couple of okay-to-good years he's taken off. Drake has been at or near the top of the Missouri Valley for four straight years, grabbing bids in 2021 and 2023, the former an at-large. This year Drake is 28-6 and headed for another 11-seed.

Devries's teams are Beileinesque in their turnover avoidance (top 40 the last four years) and have been fierce defensive rebounders while also being awful offensive rebounders. This is a positive since Drake has been around 300th in effective height over this period: the offensive rebounding is about a talent deficiency; the defensive rebounding is good coaching.

Before taking over Drake, Devries was a Creighton assistant for 17 years, so if you want McDermott Devries is McDermott At Home.

FWIW DeVries's best player is his son, who has a year left. You'd imagine he'd come along. Given the state of the Michigan roster anyone who comes with a top portal option attached looks a bit more attractive.

JOSH SCHERTZ, Indiana State. The other MVC dude. ISU is a remarkable 28-6 this year and has cracked the top 50 on Kenpom for the first time ever. Those rankings stretch back to 1997. ISU leads the nation in eFG and was fourth last year on the strength of absurdly good two-point shooting—59% and 62%. His teams take buckets of threes and have a sky-high assist rate. As mentioned just above, this is a signal that coaching is moving the needle.

Schertz has only been at ISU for three years; prior to that he was a D-II coach at Lincoln Memorial in Tennessee, where he won his conference nine of 11 years to end his tenure, made three D-II Final Fours, and had a 32-1 team when the tournament was cancelled in 2020. It's tough to tell if a D-II team has a natural advantage over the teams it tends to play; ISU has been a middling MVC program for decades, lending credence to the idea that this guy can coach.

DUSTY MAY, Florida Atlantic. Reached the Final Four a year ago and then got to run it back with more or less the same roster this year. Hasn't been quite as good this year, but "has Florida Atlantic at #35 in Kenpom instead of #17" is not a dealbreaker. Top 25 offenses the last two years.

May's issue relative to the guys listed above him is the length of his track record. He's been FAU's coach for six years; until last year FAU was a thoroughly mediocre CUSA team. The guys above him have had longer stretches of top-end play. May could have just got lucky with his current roster.

AMIR ABDUR-RAHIM, USF. Yes, Shareef's brother. Abdur-Rahim built Kennesaw State from a 1-28 team just transitioning from D-II in to a 26-9 team that made the tourney. USF hired him; the Bulls are 23-6 and won the AAC at 16-2. His tenure as a head coach is too short to draw any conclusions from Kenpom stats—I'm not holding his first three years at KSU against him but that just leaves this year and last.

MARK POPE, BYU. Has BYU at 10-8 in the Big 12 and in line for a five seed, according to Bart Torvik's algorithim. Had top-20 Kenpom teams in his first two years at BYU before falling off to .500-ish in the WCC. Before that had a successful four-year tenure at Utah Valley. Is a Mormon so might be a tough pull. He had some complaints about NIL at BYU a year ago, so maybe Michigan can convince him they're better equipped to get guys. (You know… if they are.)

Pope has the best teams, per Kenpom, of anyone on this list. His teams are not super consistent in any department but are consistently good on both sides of the ball. With limited exceptions all of his teams have been balanced.

PAT KELSEY, Charleston. Three bids in nine years at Winthrop, whereupon he moved to Charleston and rebuilt a program that was 9-10 the year prior to his arrival into a 31-4 team in year two, then 27-7 this year. Kelsey's teams play fast—top 60 in tempo going back almost a decade—and they crash the offensive boards; defensively they are all over the place but consistently clean up their own boards.

MATT LANGEL, Colgate. This is Langel's thirteenth year at Colgate; he inherited a 7-23 team and spent three years digging out of the hole. First he got the Raiders to 500-ish over a three year span and then he hit the gas. Colgate hasn't done worse than 12-6 in the Patriot League since 2017 and they've won it five of the last six years, with a second-place finish to Navy in the COVID year the only exception.

Langel's teams haven't quite had the extreme turnover aversion that Beilein's did but the running theme through his last six years is torching the next from three. They're only 81st this year but the last three years Colgate hit 40% from deep, finishing in the top three nationally. His system is three-heavy, as you might expect, but that's dropped off a bit in recent years. His teams now pick up buckets of assists and shoot well from inside the arc.

Defensively they've been a bit all over the place but they are good on their own boards and don't give up many free throws.

The problem with Langel is his conference. The Patriot League is 30th of 33 conferences in average efficiency. The leap from the Patriot to the Big Ten is vast, far more daunting than the Mountain West, MVC, or the AAC.

One Man's Ranking

The top three guys are in the "probably not happening" tier, but:

  1. Shaka Smart
  2. TJ Otzelberger
  3. Lamont Paris
  4. Niko Medved
  5. Josh Schertz
  6. Darian Devries

Of the guys who would definitely come, Medved is my guy. He performed well enough to get CSU an obvious at-large bid in a (more or less) high major conference this year with a couple of D-II transfers in the starting lineup. A couple years ago his star was David Roddy, a 6'4" power forward who was a first round pick in the NBA draft. He held onto Isaiah Stevens despite the fact that he was a grad transfer and could have made bank in the portal. In six years at CSU the worst he's ever finished in 2PT% is 43rd; every other year he's been top 25.

All of this adds up to a guy who finds weird talent, coaches it such that they take and hit a lot of twos—very repeatable—and has done it at a level that is as close to the level Michigan plays at as anyone on the "obviously realistic" list.

Comments

A Lot of Milk

March 16th, 2024 at 12:04 PM ^

Brian, curious why Shaka is your top choice. I know the fanbase in general has a fairly negative perception of him, but my biggest red flag for him is his tourney resume. Since the Final Four run in 2011 (which I chalk up as being unprepared for VCU's Havoc defense), he hasn't won more than a single game per NCAA tournament in 13 seasons. Unless you subscribe to the idea that NCAA tournament runs are more or less random/draw-based and that the only thing you can control is having a consistently good team, I can't say I'm too enthused by that resume. Beilein had Elite 8 and Sweet 16 runs before coming to Michigan, and it's clear that man is an EXCELLENT tournament coach.

Should more value be placed on post-season success than regular season consistency? I wouldn't trade any of Beilein's tournament runs for the entire tenure of Matt Painter for that very reason. With this criteria, my #1 pick is Otzelberger, who has already made a Sweet 16 and looks primed to get at least that far this season, too. Medved and Schertz seem like decent backup plans to buy a lotto ticket on.

JonnyHintz

March 16th, 2024 at 1:20 PM ^

If we’re going to claim that more value should be placed on post-season success than regular season consistency, I feel like I should point out that since Juwan Howard was hired, no B1G coach has more tournament wins that he did. So be cautious how much value you’re placing on that. Is a 17-14 season where you lose in the Sweet 16 really better than a 24-7 season where you lose in the Round of 32? Winning one more postseason game outweighs 7 more regular season wins and no trophy in either? 
 

I get that post-season success is very important, the trophies are why the game is played, but I don’t think it’s constructive to devalue the 30+ other games that are played to focus on the results of single games in the post-season which are often toss-ups. 
 

Beilein had Elite 8 and Sweet 16 runs before coming to Michigan
 

It took until his 13th season for him to win more than 1 game in the NCAA Tournament. And took him initial Year 6 at Michigan to do the same. Let’s be real here, it is difficult to win in the NCAA tournament if the situation isn’t laid out perfectly. Smart is 8-9 in the tournament through 14 seasons. Beilein was 8-7 before making his first run to the national title game with Michigan in his 21st season as a D1 head coach.

 

Now I’m not saying Smart is better than Beilein but it seems like you’re being somewhat selective in your memory. And valuing two Sweet16+ runs for Beilein in his 13 and 14th seasons over a Final Four run for Smart in Year 2. 
 

Beilein was eventually successful at Michigan but he didn’t have the resume coming in that you’re making it out to be.

JonnyHintz

March 16th, 2024 at 2:17 PM ^

They did. But as with most candidates on the board you’re looking at a good chunk of the players being inherited as well. Both for the successes and failures of each candidate. 
 

Beilein players or not, Juwan had postseason success when he was able to make it there. More than any other B1G school. That doesn’t make him a better coach than someone like Painter or Underwood.
 

 

 

JR3410

March 16th, 2024 at 12:10 PM ^

Any reason Jerome Tang was not mentioned in this?  I have been pretty impressed with the job he has done at Kansas State the last two years and I think he has brought a great energy and excitement to that program. 

Also, I wonder if there would be any interest in Luke Murray.  He is an assistant at UConn and has been credited for his recruiting and really turning around their offense under Hurley.  That offense has really taken off since he was hired a couple years ago, and Hurley is constantly praising this guy.  He looks like he could be one of the next big coaching names in college basketball but wonder if a high major program considers him without any head coaching experience.

cheesheadwolverine

March 16th, 2024 at 12:18 PM ^

This is a good reality check for the corner of the fanbase that thinks we can hire Tony Bennett/Nate Oats/the Ghost of Red Auerbach.  Quinn's take that Shaka Smart is an almost certain no is a surprise to me and I thought I was on the more realistic end of the fanbase.

Kilgore Trout

March 16th, 2024 at 12:18 PM ^

I like your realistic top 3. Something that may factor in is timing. Nedved and Devries are going to the tournament where it's looking more and more like Schertz isn't. With the portal opening Monday, Schertz probably goes off the board first. I'm not sure that matters to Michigan as there are equivalent programs looking for coaches and getting it right is more important than getting it fast. The team is going to likely be bad next year regardless. 

I think I'd lean Devries, but I'd be happy with any of them. 

WorldwideTJRob

March 16th, 2024 at 12:20 PM ^

If you look at Michigan’s track record in their last few outside hires for basketball coach…they take from a major conference program. Beilein(WVU) & Amaker(Seton Hall) fit this trend and during the Juwan search Ed Cooley(Providence) was the next viable candidate. I think people are shooting too low with all the mid major names.

Team 101

March 16th, 2024 at 12:40 PM ^

They say that the OSU (yes that OSU) coaching search is down to Dusty May and interim coach Jake Diebler.  I would give a hard look at the one they take a pass on.  I think they are going to stick with Diebler but I hope they don't.

Ham

March 16th, 2024 at 12:54 PM ^

I mean no offense by this, but I just don't get this take.

Making Smart a top-3 paid coach is telling him that he 100% needs to win starting next year. There would be no patience. 

And I don't see what Smart has done in his career that merits being a top-3 paid coach anyway.

True Blue 9

March 16th, 2024 at 12:46 PM ^

Like a lot of the names listed here. I'll add three:

- Danny Sprinkle at Utah State
- Randy Bennett at St. Mary's 

And perhaps a hot take, Jamie Dixon at TCU? 

I've seen some mentions of Calipari but I'd prefer we not go that route but I understand why others would disagree. 

lhglrkwg

March 16th, 2024 at 12:52 PM ^

Definitely on board with getting a riser from a mid-major. This is a multi-year rebuild and hiring a big name would seem to put unnecessary pressure on everyone for a quick turnaround. I'd love someone like Medved with a clear "this is a 5 year build" expectation up front

tybert

March 16th, 2024 at 2:06 PM ^

I think anything short of 4 year rebuild is not feasible. This program is a truly flaming mess. And, if Hunter D is right, the NIL for hoops will need a lot of work (funding). 

Next year: assemble a patch-work roster and get to the NIT. NIT is likely even a stretch but at least start building a strong culture. Never again should a guy from Nebraska go coast to coast for an uncontested lay-up on Senior Day. Bring back the Fab 5 banners - it's been over 30 years, and 20 since they went down. With the admissions challenges, we won't be able to get a Love kind of guy from UNC.

2025-26: bring in some fresh recruits, a few more portals and try to get into NCAA. At worst, a long run in the NIT so fans can see the progress. Then press for more NIL funding.

2026-27: make NCAA as at least a 10 seed. Hopefully win opener but even w/o that keep building a roster of guys who play for 3 years minimum. NIL is no longer a 4-letter word with Warde.

2027-28: get us back to Sweet 16. 

SagNasty

March 16th, 2024 at 2:43 PM ^

Not sure what hanging the banners has to do with anything? It actually would kind of be a slap in the face to Howard to put them up right after he leaves. 
 

I think whoever the coach is should be at the very least knocking on the door for an ncaa bid in year two. Probably should be in the field in year two. And if they can’t make it in by year 3, then what are we really talking about here? 

Blue Vet

March 16th, 2024 at 12:53 PM ^

MGoBlog. I mean, just MGoBlog.

Having read lots of potential-candidate lists, I expected another list.

But I forgot — this is MGoFB. We get names AND we get reasons AND analysis. 

So I am Spartacus. I.e., Brian's list is my list.

Blue Highlander

March 17th, 2024 at 9:36 AM ^

Totally with you.

Unlike many posters, I know I don’t know anything on the topic.  I’m not sure why we’d go the mid-major route, but it sounds good to me.

i loved the TO free basketball we played under Beilein, as well as the player development, and would love to see it again.  Not sure that you can make it hiring criteria, but again, what do I know?

rainking

March 16th, 2024 at 12:54 PM ^

Great writeup Brian.

I like Princeton's Mitch Henderson a lot and think he is worth a looksee.

I've said this in two other threads so I'll shut up about it now.