Is this a done deal or can the presidents of the Big Ten schools vote it down?  And fire Delany while they're at it.

until the OSU-UM game is moved to early October.  Once OSU-UM play one or maybe 2 times back to back (last game of the regular season and then in the title game), the game will be moved.

Illinois gets their big rivalry with Michigan back to an every year thing.

 

Predicting Georgia Tech as team #15, Kansas as team #16

big ten's greatest coaches - ralph friedgen

There is no denying that this alignment is idiotic, BUT we can also face a few troubling, if advantageous, facts about the B1G.  Northwestern is middling at best, sparty is regressing toward their private (below average) mean, Nebraska is and will be good, but their move to the B1G seems not to have helped their recruiting.  They don't seem particularly scary in the long term.  On the other hand, Michigan and Ohio (and ND) are all looking to be genuinely great within 2 to 4 years (none qualify now).  Does this alignment grease Ohio's path to the title game? sure.  But if we take care of our business we should play in about 1/2 to 2/3 of the B1G championship games in the fairly near future.  Likely about the same as Ohio.

I'm sure the Suckeyes are thrilled to be playing Maryland and Rutgers every year.  That's about the only positive I can rationalize from this.

Penn State? Cool! Nebraska? Nice move! These 2? Wait, what?

Maryland droped like 8 sports recently didn't they? I think we just poached the baseball coach from Maryland partly b/c the Maryland AD couldn't support the program at a high level.

 

Rutgers & Maryland don't do anything at a high level.

 

We just took mid- to-low-level teams from the ACC and BEast. Both of those league are shrugging their shoulders and saying, 'eh, whatever'

 

the ACC will jsut grab Uconn, the Beast is dead anyway. What happened to the "we won't look to expand just to maintain status quo" line that Delaney talked about for the last 2 years?

UNC, Duke, GT all have more athletic and academic plusses.

Such a depressing sop to the great moneyball in the sky. Totally dilutes the spirit and identity of the B10. Nobody wants to go play in Piscataway and College Park.

Plus, now it's only a matter of time before 2 more teams are added to make it 16. Given the geographic trends, I'm guessing most people here agree that the best scenario would involve UNC and Virginia: top-notch schools with considerable fan-bases and tv markets. But why would basketball-first program leave the warm embrace of the ACC? I don't see UNC separating from Duke and NC State. 

Since it's all about TV, logic says the league now takes aim at other get-able schools near their new footprint (which unfortunately amounts to the dead-zone of college football): GTech, VA, VT, BC. The only remotely viable big-splash options left are Oklahoma, FSU. OU is a sub-standard school; the Noles literally have nothing in common with the other teams.

Prediction: VA and GT.

 

I'm never going to be able to remember who is in what conference now. No more m's + n's the Iowa in the conference without the actual word featured in our fight song in our conference and everybody else in the other.

50 Millions American Dollars.

 

holy shit, they are desperate to GTFO of the ACC

FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK!

I hate you Jim Delaney!

You are banned from this historical conference!  You and your children and your children's children...  for three months!

These teams are obviously here for the rest of us to beat up on and pad our win columns. Fewer trips to Arlington and the Left Coast, more cross divisional cupcakes. Dave Brandon said their joining the conference came with an agreeement to always play their home games in the New Meadowlands Stadium. They'll just dress the stands up like Buck Rodgers for Rutgers games, vomit and wood chips for Maryland. Also officially changing the division name to Ledgers and Leadins. I tell myself this makes sense because I'm unprepared to deal with the reality of how much the move is actually a B1G steaming bowl of elephant piss. BIG TEEEEEEENNN!!!

All things considered... although this is a big change for the B1G as a whole, this doesn't affect Michigan THAT much.  We are still guaranteed to play 6 of the other 9 traditional B1G teams annually.  We've replaced the others with an annual game against Nebraska, which might be an improvement.  We'll still play one of the other traditional B1G teams or PSU almost annually.

The big overhaul is going to come when Central Florida or Rice or Portland State is added to get up to 16 in a couple more years.  I'm assuming they're just waiting to inevitably reach 16 teams before bothering to rework the divisions.  My other assumption is that when they do rework the divisions, the result will be even more nonsensical with respect to geography and tradition.

Why does it seem that this came out of nowhere?

There has been a fair amount of discussion about Brandon’s role in this.  In the end the final say, and Michigan’s vote, comes from Mary Sue Coleman.  If you are displeased with this move she would probably be the place to start.

[email protected]

Not that it will make any difference but it is a place to register your opinion.  She won’t read it of course but there may be a staffer that gives a count of for and against e-mails to her.

 

Are they just going to keep adding schools until they get 10 teams in each division, then they can feel good about using the name again?

Getting Dave Brandon wrong is fast becoming your legacy. You continually overstate or misrepresent Brandon's influence on the changing superstructure of collegiate athletics, and fail to recognize that his responsibility (and really, the only thing he can tangibly direct) is to ensure Michigan's continued success within that environment. In this regard we could not ask for a better athletic director in this current context. 

OH MY GOD! DAVE BRANDON WHAT THE HECK?

and the other division is another separate nearby vaguely familiar conference....until it changes when they go to 16 for whatever reason.

The "Maryland Divisions" as leaked by them might well be premature, a trial balloon, or a temporary placeholder.  I'd think that's more an AD decision and they will hopefully be more sympathetic to the fans that make CFB what it is. Though UM fans have a (well deserved) reputation for arrogance, this is one case where your concerns are quite valid.

Though Nebraska takes a back seat to no one for winning tradition and championships, we are sensible enough to know the B1G we joined is at its heart a Michigan-Ohio St conference. It's entirely legitimate to expect some respect and preferential treatment. College Football without traditional rivalries is just.......pro football lite.

The XII was always a shotgun wedding, purely a media-$$$ driven marriage of convenience that was doomed from the start (still is). Hope the B1G doesn't devolve into the same thing.

As one poster said, the B1G jumped the shark on this one.