MnB: Every Speight Pass against Cincinnati, analyzed
Basically, he made some great throws but the misses were terrible, and a couple might have been interceptions against a better opponent.
[SORRY GUYS...I had a copy/paste fail. I've put the correct link in now. I've got a baby at home and am working on very little sleep.]LINK.
September 11th, 2017 at 4:17 AM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 4:28 AM ^
I think this is the link you meant to direct us to, Tiger.
September 11th, 2017 at 6:15 AM ^
I was thinking it might lead to pr0n.
September 11th, 2017 at 9:05 AM ^
Speight was reading when making the bad passes. When he doesn't bring them to the huddle, he's actually a good passer.
I think that's what Tiger was implying.
September 11th, 2017 at 1:00 PM ^
You'd enjoy another thread making the rounds
September 11th, 2017 at 8:27 AM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 10:25 AM ^
Thank you MGoClimb. I was not impressed with the analysis from the OP's link.
September 11th, 2017 at 5:05 AM ^
Jonathan Strahan looks like Stacey Keach and Steve Bannon had a child together...
September 11th, 2017 at 6:43 AM ^
Actually he looks like he could star in Sheriff Joe Arpaio, The Younger Years.
September 11th, 2017 at 5:09 AM ^
So, Speight did pretty well on most passes, but missed some wide open receivers with uncatchable balls sailing over the receiver's head. This seems to be a common theme. I'm no expert, but him sailing the balls over the receiver's head has to be caused at least in part by a lack of confidence, right? Throwing too high lessens the chances of an INT, unless there is a safety back there...
September 11th, 2017 at 7:03 AM ^
What I've seen from people with more analytical abilities than myself is that the difference between Speight being on target or not is his footwork. Nick Baumgardner has three useful video/tweets showing this exact issue. When he properly sets his feet, he's delivering strikes. He appears to be affected by the inexperienced OL in front of him, which may not even be their fault. Maybe it's an issue of the offense becoming comfortable with and trusting eachother? I still say, when Speight is on, there's no reason he can't score plenty of points against solid defenses. Hopefully we start seeing the offense gel as a unit, with Speight showing more confidence in his teamates.
September 11th, 2017 at 7:46 AM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 8:05 AM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 9:01 AM ^
"When he gets pressured he rushes with his feet and doesn't throw off a sol[i]d base and his passes sail high." Yep. That's what Speight said in the postgame interview. Although he's had some overthrows when he's not pressured, as well. Hope he gets his footwork under control.
September 11th, 2017 at 8:36 AM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 11:12 AM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 2:59 PM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 9:17 AM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 11:18 AM ^
would certainly indicate some qb credentials.
September 11th, 2017 at 8:01 AM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 8:36 AM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 11:17 AM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 6:50 AM ^
Not sure when I read it, but Harbaugh has said he measures a quarterback by how well he moves the team down the field. Completing 1 yard passes on 3rd and 5 doesn't do that. I don't see how this one is even a mediocre outing for Speight. This level of performance will lose a game against at least 6 teams left on our schedule.
September 11th, 2017 at 7:53 AM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 8:26 AM ^
Come on! Don't let facts get in the way of a good story. JTGoBlue was on a roll. A fairy-tale roll, but a roll nonetheless.
September 11th, 2017 at 8:18 AM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 8:29 AM ^
No, this performance loses games against maybe 3 teams on the schedule. What loses games against lesser teams are the backbreaking turnovers, like two pick sixes. Which Speight did not do in last game. The defense and the offense is good enough to overcome minor mistakes against all but the best.
September 11th, 2017 at 9:44 AM ^
All but the best, like 2016 Iowa?
/toosoon
September 11th, 2017 at 10:35 AM ^
This performance would have beat Iowa. Speight was a ton worse against Iowa. It was probably his worst game at UM. He went 11/26 (42%) for 103 yards (4.0 YPA) and 1 INT. Give me the UC Speight in that game and UM wins a close but comfortable game.
September 11th, 2017 at 10:57 AM ^
Also, the receivers played like shit against Iowa as well.
September 11th, 2017 at 11:19 AM ^
and it would have been nice if the O-line had blocked Jaleel Johnson and if we didn't fumble the kickoff to start the 2nd half. Plenty of blame to go around in that Iowa game.
September 11th, 2017 at 12:05 PM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 1:12 PM ^
How can you say that after the adjustment Perry made to bail Speight out in the third or the worm burner he threw in the second that was incorrectly called incomplete??
September 11th, 2017 at 1:30 PM ^
Eh, I don't know, man. Without the defensive touchdowns, this was a one-score game against a terrible, terrible team. I think if Speight plays like he did Saturday, we lose to MSU.
September 11th, 2017 at 7:01 AM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 7:02 AM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 7:15 AM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 8:38 AM ^
I think that's just confirmation bias at this point. You want to see a bad throw, so you see one. It was a TD pass that was a great read and apparently a good enough throw that it allowed the WR to keep his momentum and score a long TD. This is a good thing. Passes for all QBs will be long, short, high, low. It happens. This is why you want good WR. Could it be a better pass? Sure. But any pass good enough for the WR to make the catch, keep his feet, and keep running, is a good thing.
September 11th, 2017 at 9:24 AM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 12:09 PM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 12:41 PM ^
But I would "grade" my sons thorws (he played QB through High School) as 1's, 2's, or 3's.
A 1 is the "perfect" pass. You hit the receiver on time, in rythem, in the hands chest high and the receiver did not have to break stride. These passed usually lead to big gains cause you allow the recevier to make plays in the open field.
A 2 would be a good pass defined as on time and within the receivers catching radius. These are good passes but the QB needed the WR to make a play on the ball to make the catch. As a team sport, this happens often, but the QB did his job and needed the WR to make a play. This is how I would have graded this throw, Speight made th right read, delivered the ball on time, and was within Perry's catching radius. Perry is the one who will get the +1 on the play for his catch and YAC. Speight did his job on that throw, Perry made it a big time play.
A 3 is just a bad throw, either too early, too late, or outside the catching radius. Looking at the highlights, Speight is having too many of these throws and I believe that is what is bugging people.
His game ending number were ok, 17-29 (58.6%0, but there were 6-9 "3's" (pending on ones opinion) within the 27 opportunities. Those are missed opportunities to make an impact on the game. Certainly no one is perfect, but when 20% - 33% of your throws are 3's, that is not encouraging.
September 11th, 2017 at 1:07 PM ^
Speight can certainly make those #1 throws, and when he does it's a thing of beauty.
I'm actually a litle more concerned with the preponderance of those #2s, or what I would call 2-s.
Speights accuracy and timing always seem a bit off to me. His passes seem like they almost always require the reciever to go up, reach reach back, slow down, or dive to catch. Regardless of of the style of pass the end result is that any potential for YAC is greatly diminished. Those frustrating passes short of the first down markers would be fine if they were hit in stride more often.
I don't know if it's footwork, timing or whatever? I expect a few bad throws a game, thats sports. But most of Wilton's throws seem to call for too much reciever adjustment.
September 11th, 2017 at 10:00 AM ^
I know what you mean. Why just the other day I found a ten-dollar bill on the sidewalk, and I've never been more disappointed in a ten in my life. It was wrinkly, stained, had some indecipherable scribbling on it, and one of the corners was torn off. I felt dirty putting it into my wallet since it wasn't up to my high standards for how free money was supposed to look.
September 11th, 2017 at 11:50 AM ^
I watched that play a couple of times and thought it was fine. It was a little high, but Perry was able to catch it and then turn it into a TD. QBs have been throwing those passes for generations, and sometimes you get a TD and sometimes you don't.
The analysis was fine, but it basically broke down to "Speight was mostly fine, sometimes he let a ball sail. He acknowledged those issues and will work on it." Every QB is going to have bad throws, and usually they occur for the same reason - bad mechanics and not going through their progressions. Speight had a fine game. I fully expect the UFR this week to highlight that and also point out other flaws the offense showed.
September 11th, 2017 at 7:54 AM ^
Man oh man, this isn't thread-worthy, but if you think we UM fans are tough on Speight, what's going on over on the OSU boards is brutal. I mean, people want JT benched (for a guy with a broken hand), and it seems almost unanimous.
Plus, I read over there yesterday that OSU's troubles are part of a conspiracy by Kevin Wilson to tank the team so that Urban gets fired and he (Wilson) is hired to replace him. Many of the posters agreed with this assessment! :-OOOO
September 11th, 2017 at 8:28 AM ^
Kevin Wilson as Buckeye coach??? Where can we vote for this? Get Putin on the line!
September 11th, 2017 at 8:57 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 11th, 2017 at 9:10 AM ^
When you look at this from a corporate standpoint, it turns into not a bad idea - I mean, I am sure plenty of us have stories of watching people tank something and somehow get promoted because they were able to sell the disaster correctly.
Of course, this is a horrible way to manage your career in collegiate sports, but you can certainly try.
September 11th, 2017 at 10:25 AM ^
If Oklahoma had recovered those fumbles in the first half that game could have been ugly.
Not sure how Wilson is able to tank the secondary, though. Maybe slipping something into the secondary coach's coffee?
September 11th, 2017 at 12:36 PM ^