Profiles In Heroism: Jim Mora The Younger Comment Count

Brian

la_i_morajr01jr_576[1]

Head  Coach, UCLA
Age 53
Exp. 3rd year
Record 28-11
Previous Jobs
HC @ Seattle 2009
DB/AHC @ Seattle 2007-08
HC @ Atlanta 2004-06
DC @ San Fransisco 1999-03
Playing Career
LB/DB, Washington, 1980-83

These again. We're skipping Harbaugh because it's not like you need to be told about Harbaugh. In the event M does hire him, he'll get one.

These are in approximate order of personal preference.

Previously: Dan Mullen.

Jim E. Mora is the son of Jim "Playoffs?!" L. Mora, and as a result joined the nepotism-friendly ranks of NFL position coaches soon after he graduated college. After a decade as a DBs coach he broke through as the San Francisco 49ers defensive coordinator, parlaying that into two brief, unsuccessful stints as an NFL head coach.

After the second—a one-year gig with the Seahawks after which he was thrown overboard for Pete Carroll—Mora was out of coaching for two years. When UCLA tapped him for their head coaching job, Bruins Nation was wroth. Bruins Nation is always wroth but at the time it seemed like they had a point. Mora looked like a guy who'd never have gotten anywhere without his father's name and seemed a particularly poor fit for college, what with his single year as a Washington grad assistant. The motivation appeared to be "he's kind of like Pete Carroll."

But it's worked rather well. Mora's led the Bruins to three 6-3 Pac-12 records in three years, had a 10-3 2013, and hasn't won fewer than nine games. This is a considerable step up from Rick Neuheisel (21-29 in 4 seasons), Karl Dorrell (35-27 in 5 seasons) and even nominally successful Bob Toledo, who followed up two top-ten outings in the late 1990s with a string of mediocre teams and finished his career 49-32. Mora's three years are the most successful UCLA has had in 15 years, and you have to go back to Terry Donahue's mid-80s heyday to find anything definitively better.

So he's plausible. But how good have these seasons actually been, and what happens post-Hundley?

[After THE JUMP: bad NFL defenses, excellent recruiting, and stealth spread.]

Xs and Os Proficiency

Mora's record as an NFL defensive coordinator is so uninspiring it boggles the mind he was tapped for a head coaching job, and he did about what you'd expect in Atlanta. I'm ignoring the single year with Seattle since that's not long enough to determine anything, but here's San Francisco and Atlanta circa their Mora years, with both DVOA (Football Outsiders' fancy schedule adjusted stat) and raw yards per play. Finishes in the top half of the NFL are bolded:

Year Team DVOA YPP
1998 San Francisco 16 23
1999 San Francisco 30 31
2000 San Francisco 28 25
2001 San Francisco 15 18
2002 San Francisco 20 22
2003 San Francisco 18 15
2004 San Francisco 31 21
2003 Atlanta 27 32
2004 Atlanta 17 15
2005 Atlanta 28 22
2006 Atlanta 18 25
2007 Atlanta 28 24

Mora's best argument is that San Francisco got really really bad the year after he left and that Atlanta was significantly worse on average before and after. Still, this is a guy with eight years of track record who has never finished better than 15th in either of these metrics. This looks like his path to NFL head coach was entirely due to the Shield's dynastic tendencies.

What about college?

Year Team FEI S&P YPP
2011 UCLA 111 77 86
2012 UCLA 29 40 66
2013 UCLA 18 27 26
2014 UCLA 54 40 33

That, at least, is a picture of improvement. It topped out at 2013's legitimately good D and backslid some this year.

Recruiting

0909484001410908346_filepicker[1]

Josh Rosen will be a familiar name to M recruitniks

While it's never been that difficult to convince kids to hang out in the Rose Bowl for four years, Mora's record as a recruiter is excellent. A recent history of UCLA recruiting:

Year Coach LOIs 247 Comp JUCOs 4/5 stars
2008 Neuheisel 23 14 1 12
2009 Neuheisel 31 10 2 10
2010 Neuheisel 28 10 2 10
2011 Neuheisel 17 45 1 2
2012 Transitional 25 19 1 7
2013 Mora 27 7 0 19
2014 Mora 19 19 0 9
2015 Mora 15 15 1 8

Mora was hired on December 10th of 2011; at that point Neuheisel's final class had just seven guys who would end up signing with UCLA. Mora added 19 over the last two months before signing day, including seven Rivals four-stars and five star Ellis McCarthy, a potential first round pick. Most of that bounce-back is him.

Mora followed that up with a terrific 2013 class with 19 touted recruits in it; recently he's fallen off a bit, partially because he hasn't had a lot of slots to fill. Worth noting that in 2015 he's locked down five stars Josh Rosen and Keisean Lucier-South. JUCOs aren't an issue, and UCLA hasn't seen the massive attrition Neuheisel had before his recruiting tanked in 2011.

There is a bit of a catch: USC. USC just finished their sanctions last year; 2015 is the first class in which Mora is going head to head with a USC that can actually hand out 25 offers, and the Trojans just went through a coaching change. Mora's taken advantage of that instability; maintaining that advantage now that USC is back on its feet is another matter.

CEO Stuff

Mora imported vagabond college OC Noel Mazzone to deal with Hundley. Mazzone's coaching career is a spectacular traipse about the country, featuring QB stops at CSU, TCU, and Minnesota before OC duties at Ole Miss, Auburn, Oregon State, NC State, Ole Miss again, Panther Creek High School(!) and Arizona State before his arrival at UCLA. He was the WR coach for the Jets somewhere in there, too.

He's done quite well with Hundley and the assorted receivers Michigan did not acquire.

Hundley has been a dual threat in the "dual" sense of the word—UCLA uses him as a runner (about 14 carries a game over his career) and a thrower (70% completions in 2014 and a career YPA over 8). Worth noting here that Mora's three years with the Falcons were Michael Vick's final three in Atlanta; Vick rushed for about 850 yards a year at just under seven yards a pop. If there was ever an NFL-only coach prepped to take advantage of a dual threat QB, it was Jim Mora. That is quite a historical accident right there.

Mora's DC is 37-year old Jeff Ulbrich, who had a decade-long NFL career followed by a brief stint as a special teams coach with the Seahawks; after two years as a LB/ST coach he was promoted to DC. Ulbrich was a LB for Mora back when he was the 49ers DC; against Oregon there was a shouting match/hissy fit between the two.

The rest of his staff is the usual mix of old hands and randoms with more of an NFL focus than usual; Mazzone's son Taylor is the newly-installed QB coach. Mora's got Michigan grad Courtney Morgan on his staff. He appears to be in role similar to that Chris Singletary plays at Michigan.

Potential Catches

Wither the scalps? Concerns about Dan Mullen's inflated record are somewhat applicable to Mora. His best wins:

  • Two against Pelini Nebraska teams that finished with four losses.
  • Sanction-depleted USC in 2013 and again this year.
  • Both Arizona teams this year.

He hasn't beaten Stanford in four tries—has barely come close—and got plowed by Oregon; this season features a two-point escape against Cal and a double OT win over Colorado, plus uncomfortable close shaves against UVA and Texas. UCLA played seven one-possession games this year and won six. You'd hope for something better with a fourth-year Brett Hundley wowing NFL scouts.

On the other hand, UCLA may have played the toughest schedule in college football this year what with a nine-game Pac-12 schedule and UVA, Texas, and surging Memphis the nonconference schedule.

Uh… is Jim Mora a spread coach now? Mora had one year in Seattle when Matt Hasselbeck was his QB in which he ran for about a hundred yards. The six other years he's been in charge of a football team have seen QBs run for hundred and hundreds of yards.

The answer here is probably not since he acquired a pocket passer in Josh Rosen this year. It is goofy how the anti-spread people are willing to overlook one entirely shotgun-based, heavy-QB-run offense while screaming "no" about another one.

Is three years enough to take a gamble? The last three years at UCLA are the first in Mora's career in which he seems to have had any positive impact on the program he's in charge of. What if Hundley is the whole reason?

The recruiting successes and Mora's flexibility when dealing with both Vick and Hundley argue the other way. Still, Mora is a couple years away from being a definitively good idea.

Would He Take The Job?

Maybe? Mora signed a six-year contract last December, rebuffing advances from his alma mater Washington and possibly even Texas. That Texas interest was real but how far it got was disputed:

Saban was obviously the first guy on the list, while Strong was No. 2 and Baylor coach Art Briles was No. 3. Texas representatives talked to Saban’s agent, Jimmy Sexton, and met with Strong, Briles and Mora, but only offered the job to Strong. He accepted after taking time to let his former employers at Louisville know he simply couldn’t pass up the opportunity.

If Mora was behind Strong on their list (eminently reasonable) then Mora may have parlayed that mild interest into a contract extension and would be more available than said extension hopes to imply.

The unreliable USA Today database only pegs Mora salary at 19th nationally, so Michigan could come in with a bigger offer. UCLA's facilities are reputed to be bad and there have been consistent rumblings that not only is Michigan poking the tires but that he would consider it. Rich Rodriguez leapt to Michigan a year after turning down Alabama, after all.

Still: this is a sitting head coaching in a stable situation who has recruited very well. He is not in a Mississippi State situation where he's always going to be at the most resource-poor school in his division. He's got a five star QB on the way. His availability is far from certain. I would even call it doubtful.

Overall Attractiveness

I still think Mora is behind Mullen due to Mullen's success as Urban's offensive coordinator and the nigh-impossible build job he culminated this year at Mississippi State; Mullen also has significantly more long-term upside since he's more than a decade younger. The institutional obstacles faced by Mora are nowhere near as daunting.

Nontheless, Mora is a guy I'd be pretty happy with. He's done well at UCLA, he's adaptable and he appears to be a plus recruiter—UCLA's transitional class is a bit of a miracle. He's got an anchor class on par with the one Hoke dealt with this year (Neuheisel's final class was Hundley and almost nothing else) but has still piloted the Bruins to a 9-3 record against a very difficult schedule.

Comments

BraveWolverine730

December 8th, 2014 at 4:22 PM ^

I am more down on Mora than others, but mainly that's because I still can remember being flustered with him as a Falcons fan. Seeing him take over my #1 football team would be...interesting. Still, he's got about the best resume of any realistic candidates that aren't Harbaugh and I'd be okay with him as the selection. 

Joeybehave

December 8th, 2014 at 4:40 PM ^

Ok...Not sure how many of the readers listen to Colin Cowherd, but he hinted at a very reliable source last week who was floating a name as interested in the U-M coaching job. A name that was not on any blogs, media, or on anyone's radar.

Cowherd did not state the coaches name on his show as his source asked that he keep it confidential for the time being (Uugh!). But, he thought the name would come out very soon and that Michigan fans would LOVE this coach.

Anyway, the name did not come out this weekend as Cowherd stated today...but, Colin gave a good hint of the candidate. That it was a current college football coach AND someone who had also coached in the NFL. From that statement, narrowing down the selection of coaches to whom:

1. Michigan fans would like ; 2. Current college coach with a good winning pedigree ; 3. NFL coaching experience ; and 4. Someone NOT on the current crop of candidates that fit this criteria (ie. Harbaugh, Mora)

The only coaches I've come up with that meet these criteria are Bobby Petrino and Steve Spurrier.  I just can't see Spurrier being a good fit or coming up to the colder weather of Michigan from South Carolina. BUT, Bobby Petrino on the other hand....his system would fit nicely at Michigan. Albeit, he JUST came back to Louisville after his issues at Arkansas. But, his history suggests he will depart a good situation to take a risk (Louisville to Atlanta...Atlanta to Arkansas).  Anybody else think Petrino may be wanting the U-M position?

Joeybehave

December 8th, 2014 at 5:35 PM ^

I agree...Petrino has flaws and his poor exit from Atlanta and his affair with the former volleyball player at Arkasas really do not get me excited. But, if you really look at how he has faired at the college level, he's been successful. And in all honesty, UM needs a coach that is going to bring us back to the top of the Big10. Personal flaws aside, Petrino has proven at Arkansas and Louisville his system wins at the college level.

Joeybehave

December 8th, 2014 at 10:28 PM ^

If Petrino (well, Petrino's agent) puts his name out there as interested...he'll definitely get a look over from the UM selection committee & Hackett.  Along with a number of other coaching candidates.  We are not going to get any of the guys we'd hope would resurrect the program (ie. Harbaugh, Miles, Stoops, Mora)...it's just wishful thinking.

bluelaw2013

December 9th, 2014 at 9:05 AM ^

The Sabans are wanderers. Did he want the job in 2007 but Michigan took RR--Alabama's first choice--instead? Mrs. Saban is on the record as being unhappy with the crazy expectations of the spoiled Alabama fanbase. " 'You come to a crossroads and the expectations get so great, people get spoiled by success and there gets to be a lack of appreciation,' Terry Saban said in an interview last week [Nov. 2013]. 'We're kind of there now.' " "According to interviews with colleagues, players and university administrators who have known the Sabans, they are a formidable team that makes decisions in tandem. Terry, who goes by 'Miss Terry' (she uses 'Ms.' in correspondence) is a behind-the-scenes negotiator for her husband's coaching contracts."

His Dudeness

December 8th, 2014 at 4:42 PM ^

Yea... nice write up and all but Mora has turned down Texas, Washington and the Minnesota Vikings within the last year. He has zero midwest ties. He ain't coming.

1 - Jim Harbaugh

2 - Bob Stoops

3 - Hold on to your butts

 

gbdub

December 8th, 2014 at 5:21 PM ^

How the hell is Bob Stoops more likely to leave Oklahoma than Mora is to leave UCLA? Stoops is more established at a marquee school in the Big 12 that can match any Michigan offer. Yeah the fans grumble at him when he loses to the Cowboys, but anyone sane checks the alternatives and says, nope, let's keep this guy as long as he'll stay.

There are a disturbing number of people who seem to think Mora/Miles/Mullen/etc. are non-starters because of non-availability, but then propose Bob Stoops. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.

His Dudeness

December 9th, 2014 at 9:09 AM ^

There has been a lot of smoke about how OU is getting a little sick of Bob Stoops and Bob Stoops is getting a little sick of OU.

Mora isnt coming because of his actions (not taking better jobs within the last year)

Miles would definitely come. Not sure where youre hearing he wouldnt. Michigan doesnt want him.

Mullen hasnt been asked because the chatter is that he is a little filthy in the recruiting, admissions, etc.  game and would have to clean up his act quite a bit to be a candidate at M.

Stoops would actually love to "come home" to the midwest. He is a Big Ten guy. And nobody has been asking him because your thoughts are the norm. He would come and if we dont get JH I think you will be pretty excited when he does.

 

His Dudeness

December 9th, 2014 at 1:25 PM ^

Is that in reference to Mora? If so, I mean I agree, but Mora literally laughed when someone asked him about taking the Michigan job then went on to  say (paraphrasing here)  "I turned down Texas last year, Washington - my alma mater- and the Minnesota Vikings. My kids are here. My wife loves it. I'm not done building this yet. I'm not going anywhere."

That doesn't seem like a guy who is coming to M.

 

 

StraightDave

December 8th, 2014 at 4:48 PM ^

for the UM coaching position....just a feeling because the Herd is a Kiffin homer and he said the coach he's thinking about coached pro and college ball and Colin went on about how great of a coach Kiffin has been at Bama.

Joeybehave

December 8th, 2014 at 5:24 PM ^

Valid point...Cowherd can't stop wagging his tail about Kiffin....and I forgot about his coaching the Raiders (easy to forget with poor job he did). But, I don't see UM fans "Liking" Kiffin as Colin has stated the coaching candidate would be.  He is a coordinator at best...not a head coach as he has shown at USC, Oakland, and Tennessee. Seriously, I'd be more excited to have his dad as head coach.

RJMAC

December 8th, 2014 at 4:49 PM ^

Had dominating victories against Arizona State and USC, but lost badly to Stanford at home to end the season, and ruin their chance to be the PAC 12 south winner. Troubling loss.

Michigan football

December 8th, 2014 at 5:15 PM ^

If they don't get Harbaugh I have every confidence they will mess this whole process up again. The candidates that are being thrown around will bring nothing more than more changes. Once again having to hear he needs to get his guys in here. Not saying they are all bad coaches but there have been a few names mentioned that make me nervous.

They need a coach that can pull together a program that is already here, and bring back recruits that have wavered. Just by their name, without having to say a word the first few weeks. Seven years people! Michigan's brand is losing it's buying power with the younger generation. 

THEY BETTER THROW THE KITCHEN SINK AT THIS ONE!

alum96

December 8th, 2014 at 6:24 PM ^

Can you let me know where you get the # of JUCO information in the graphic?  Would like to see this type of stuff for multiple other teams as well. Thx.

Mora is tough to judge due to just 3 years but he seems like Mark Richt West or Lloyd Carr (without a NC) West.  Gets to you to 8 to 10 wins ever year, gives you 1-2 WTF losses every year.  And doesnt take the last step.  But jury is still out on if he can do that @ UCLA.  3 years is not a lot of resume.   The way UCLA laid down vs a very average Stanford team with all the chips on the table for UCLA is the type of stuff that makes you bang your head on a wall.

Dunder

December 8th, 2014 at 6:28 PM ^

you've got one more year of data, verse the same competition, from David Shaw. I would lean Shaw. 

Hope to see a profile of him, by Brian, for points of comparison (probably Mora as a better recruiter?). On the other hand, I'd gladly bypass seeing that comparison should it be sacrificed to coverage of  a sudden Harbaugh at Michigan presser!

My Name is LEGIONS

December 8th, 2014 at 9:29 PM ^

My gosh, someone is delusional. Youd be okay with Mora? Zero ties to the midwest. Has the easiest recruiting advantage. I'm shocked by your position on Mora



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

gobluesasquatch

December 8th, 2014 at 9:30 PM ^

UCLA is in a beautiful location in Southern California. With proper recruiting, prestigue and the playing in the Rose Bowl, this school should easily be 9-10 wins a year and challenging USC for the Pac 12 lead. Compared to facilities in Tempe and Tucson, and heck, Tempe and Tucson, UCLA is much, much better.

Word out here in Pac 12 country is that Mora, as a competent coach should have won the Pac 12 south this year, but lost to schools he had no business losing to. Combined with the soft wins versus dreadful Colorado, and improving Cal (which you still shouldn't lose to), and it's no surprise that no one in the Pac 12 is hailing Mora as a great coach. The coaches in this conference who everyone thinks has done a great job are Graham, Rodriguez, and of course, everyone is always talking about Mike Riley doing more with less than everyone (lets see what he does at Nebraska).

I'm underwhelmed with Mora as a pro coach, his college track record is very thin, and is one of those candidates that makes me think, meh - should have given Hoke one more year. 

Patterson, Mullen, Richt, Pinkel, Briles, Fitzgerald, Cutcliffe, Johnson, and Whittingham, with all their warts and unlikelihood to come to Michigan would still be better than Mora. Maybe even the horror, Schiano too. 

alum96

December 8th, 2014 at 10:21 PM ^

Yep.  As said earlier very Richt/Carr like year

Here is 1 guys view of the Pac 12 coaches this year.  Mora was a solid C - basically had a high ranked team preseason that came in a bit below expectation.  Again, very Richt/Carr like. 

It's just a damn shame Todd Graham's such a job skipping mercenary.  After Patterson he is really the logical hire from a football perspective after Harbaugh if not for his stupid past.

In the Pac 12 throwing aside Graham who for football reasons would be my #1, I'd probably put Whittingham and Mora on the same plane.  With Mora I feel I know what I am getting; with Whittingham I could at least make a case to myself that he has never had the talent that UCLA or Michigan gets so he could have more upside while providing a similar floor to Mora.

http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegesports/2014/12/04/pac-12-football-g…

Welcome to a new feature on the Hotline, one I hope to turn into an annual exercise: Grading the performance of each coach.

As with everything else on the Hotline, I call ‘em like I see ‘em.

1. Nobody had a truly awful season, which I’d describe as losing four or five more games than should reasonably be expected.

2. Top to bottom, coaching in the Pac-12 is the equal of any conference in the country, if not better.

3. My criteria for the grades: How did each coach make use of the talent available over the past three months — some good coaches had bad seasons.

Oh, and I hold the HC responsible for everything, including strength/conditioning, special teams and the side of the ball that he doesn’t take a hands-on role in coaching.

 

Here we go …

Arizona’s Rich Rodriguez 
Grade: A+
Comment: Won the South, won in Eugene and is within range of a playoff berth with a rookie quarterback and spotty defense. Magnificent.

Oregon’s Mark Helfrich
Grade: A
Comment: Sure, helps having the best player at the most important position. But Helfrich made shrewd use of Royce Freeman and adjusted the passing scheme to fit the personnel. And he figured out a way for the defense not to screw the whole thing up.

Arizona State’s Todd Graham
Grade: B+
Comment: Challenged for the division title until the final minutes of the 12th game and deftly retooled the defense. But the loss in Corvallis was inexcusable, and if USC had simply defended a Hail Mary, the Devils wouldn’t have been in the race down the stretch.

Utah’s Kyle Whittingham
Grade: B
Comment: Finally got it right with Dave Christensen running the offense and sculpted a stout defense. Now, if he could only find a quarterback.

Cal’s Sonny Dykes
Grade: C+
Comment: Orchestrated the climb from awful to mediocre but didn’t beat a team with a winning record, couldn’t overcome BYU in the finale and can’t get it right defensively.

UCLA’s Jim Mora
Grade: C
Comment: Bruins were overrated in the preseason (No. 7), which isn’t Mora’s fault, but they tanked the finale with nothing less than the division at stake, which is.

Washington’s Chris Petersen
Grade: C-
Comment: Soft noncon schedule padded the win total and two major gaffes cost UW potential victories (fake punt vs Stanford and clock management at Arizona). In his defense, the Huskies were seriously flawed at QB.

Colorado’s Mike MacIntyre
Grade: C-
Comment: Has the youngest team and the least-talented roster in the league (by far), yet the Buffs competed in every game and were oh-so-close four times (Cal, UCLA, Oregon State and Utah).

Stanford’s David Shaw
Grade: D+
Comment: Shaw on Shaw: “It starts with me … making sure the guys are in position to do the things they’re capable of doing and realizing that every year we’re a different team and that you can’t just do what you did last year.” Couldn’t have said it better myself.

USC’s Steve Sarkisian
Grade: D+
Comment: The lack of depth cannot be discounted, but the Trojans were talented enough with their top 25-30 players to win more than eight (remember: no Oregon). And I simply cannot get past the collapse vs ASU or the complete rollover vs UCLA.

Oregon State’s Mike Riley
Grade: D
Comment: Won just two conference games — I expected four or five Ws — and one of them was Colorado. Tough to give Riley anything lower than a D because of an injury list that stretches to eternity.

Mike Leach
Grade: D-
Comment: The Cougars experienced a major backslide and weren’t competitive in five of their nine league games. Might be willing to give Leach the Pullman discount if this were his first or second season. But there was nothing positive about Year 3.

 

gobluesasquatch

December 9th, 2014 at 12:46 AM ^

I don't get the catagorization of Todd Graham as a job-hopping mercenary? 

He spent a year at Rice and went 7-6. This, a Rice program that, despite dropping from the SWC to the WAC, to CUSA, had averaged 4.7 wins/year under Ken Hatfield, had only 3 winning seasons in 12 years, and is the second smallest D1 school. So when the time came to move up, he did. Again, I look at the Gary Blackeney situation at BGSU. If you stay too long at a small school, not only do you end up losing your opportunity to move up, but you might see other schools catch up, and you get wacked.

He spent five seasons at Tulsa and did about all you could do there. Nothing wrong with that.

At Pitt- this is where the controversy starts and is highly blown out of proportion. The reality is he was hired late after Pitt had to part ways with Mike Haywood because Steve Pederson (yes the guy who fired Frank Solich and replaced him with Bill Callahan at Nebraska) had fired the Moustache even though Pitt tied for the Big East title and then didn't check out Haywood really well. So while Todd Graham might have wanted the job, I have a feeling when he got there, he realized what a sh!t show Pitt was. 

Also, lets keep in mind that prior to his departure, a number of his staff, which had been with RichRod at WVU and Michigan, left after the regular season end to go join him in Arizona. So, here he was at a shitshow school, with a baffoon of an AD (Pitt is around .500 since then) and his staff departing for arizona. He had ASU calling, they refused him the right to talk to ASU (douche move), and so he took matters into his own hands.

Yeah, the players were pissed, and he did text them, but sometimes you don't get a chance to meet with them in person. I believe St. Hoke also did this at SDSU, and I think we know he cares about his kids (so much so he didn't want Michigan to play SDSU that next fall). 

You can argue we have a well travelled coach that has had plenty of short stops along the way in John Belein, but no one seems to call him a mercenary. (again, I don't question his character at all). But I do think we look at Graham and forget that he a) wasn't Pitt's first choice, b) bailed Pitt out allowing them to have a big name hire to cover up for there poor firing of Wannsted and botched hiring of Haywood, and c) his staff left immediately to join RichRod. 

Just a thought. 

 

goblueincbus

December 9th, 2014 at 9:18 AM ^

Could Briles and Patterson be approached with the argument that coming to the B1G could be an easier path to the championship playoff?  Co-champions of a lesser league did not mean anything in the eyes of the panel.

umfanchris

December 9th, 2014 at 4:12 PM ^

I think this article gives Mora too much credit for recruiting. Yes he pulled in some good classes, but According to rivals California has 14 top 100 propects for the 2015 recruiting class. Michigan has 2. Of course you are going to get talented kids to stay home and play when there are that many options in your backyard. Further showing this is how well Neuheisal did in recruiting. Other than Neuheisal's last class, his classes were ranked: 14, 10, and 10. So who knows what he will do when he isn't in LA where there aren't 4 and 5 star kids just walking down the street.