2018 class size? thoughts?

Submitted by reddogrjw on

Currently, we are at 87 - this includes Drake Johnson and an OL that apparently is leaving but has not been named - for arguments sake, let's assume it is Kugler

 

This puts us at 85

O'Korn, Isaac, Poggi, K Hill, Hurst, Cole and McCray are all out of eligibility

This puts us at 78

seniors possibly not getting a 5th year

Ways, JBB, Furbush, Wangler and Watson

This puts us at 73

up in the air for a 5th year = Drake Harris, Marshall - assume one stays - puts us at 72

likely gets a 5th year if they want to stay = Speight, Bunting, Mone, Winovich

 

so class size would be 16 (we seem to go to 88 then get attrition to 85)

 

16 seem right to people?

best guess breakdown

1 - QB

2 - RB

3 - WR

4 - TE

5 - TE

6 - OL

7 - OL

8 - OL

9 - OL

10 - DE

11 - DT

12 - LB

13 - LB

14 - DB

15 - DB

16 - DT/DB/RB

thoguhts?

Stringer Bell

March 5th, 2017 at 12:47 PM ^

Think you have to expect more attrition than that, transfers and such.  18-20 seems like a good guess.  I would expect we would take at least one more TE, especially given the Asiasi news, and more DL.

In Baugh we trust

March 5th, 2017 at 1:01 PM ^

I thought he was getting a 6th year and would be on next year's team. Did I miss some news that he would not be on the team? I'm sorry if I missed something but I was really hoping the kid could get another chance to see the field.

havkarl

March 5th, 2017 at 1:04 PM ^

with the team currently skewed to the younger side, I'd expect there to be more than 3 players move on after two seasons where their playing time is limited. The natural competitive lines and playing time limitations at QB, wr, and OL might force some out. With that, I'd believe the class will be closer to 20 than 18.

OwenGoBlue

March 5th, 2017 at 1:07 PM ^

Depending on attrition, injuries and recruit interest they might only sign 3 OL. I think teams used the OL numbers in the '17 class to negatively recruit against Michigan with some success. Recruits looking at 5 guys in the class ahead makes it harder to sign 4 really good ones this year. Add in a freshman All-American (Bredeson) and Onwenu as projected long-term starters and the idea of Newsome starting in '18 and '19 after an injury year, and that makes for some easy depth chart negative recruiting.

reddogrjw

March 5th, 2017 at 1:59 PM ^

yes - he can help

for 2018?

not as important

2018 OL

LT - Stueber

LG - Bredeson

C - Ruiz

RG - Onwenu

RT - Filiaga

with Hall, Honigford, Newsome, Ulizio, Runyan, Spanellis plus 2018 recruits all able to fill in

if JBB isn't starting, he would probably be best served to grad-transfer for both himself and the team

CalifExile

March 5th, 2017 at 2:07 PM ^

There are 2 decisions to be made. One by the player and one by the coaches. While the coaches might want him back he could decde to go elsewhere as a grad transfer for a better opportunity to get playing time. Counting on a guy ahead of you getting injured or having personal problems so you can see the field isn't good planning.

Mich1993

March 5th, 2017 at 2:19 PM ^

I have liked what have seen so far from Furbush.  Given our LB depth, I expect him to play a lot this year (inside and outside) and be back for a 5th year in 2018.

getsome

March 5th, 2017 at 4:10 PM ^

Yep furbush made some plays on ST and whatnot but hasn't seen much LB game action. He obviously sat behind peppers and 2 other talented LBs so maybe he's a beast and maybe he'll break out this fall, there's just not much tape to back up that assertion (though I know brown has praised his game & effort). LB should be very interesting over next few years as they've added so many young guys - I believe 7-8 LB's signed bw 2016-2017. And that may be area for some attrition after competition shakes out a bit. Overall a young talented roster, should be fun to watch those dudes get after it and see who rises. Iron sharpening iron!

SeattleWolverine

March 5th, 2017 at 2:20 PM ^

I'd guess you'll see a little more playing time transfer attrition soon. Most of the guys we've lost under Harbaugh so far have been 5th years or behavior issues. But one consequence of having two large classes in a row is that you wind up with 63 guys who are freshman/sophomores in 2017. Normally, you can look to more juniors/seniors graduating to free up playing time in the future, but given that our roster is so young that may not be the case at some spots. Some of the guys who are 3rd string will be behind guys with similar eligibility and they'll probably look for easier opportunities to play elsewhere once the competition has settled. Not the worst thing in the world, the best players play and you'll see a more even distribution across classes. 

CalifExile

March 5th, 2017 at 2:35 PM ^

Exactly. Say you were at QB and saw Speight would be back for 2 more years and Peters and McCaffrey were right behind you. (Behind you in eligibility, possibly ahead of you on the depth chart). The smart thing to do would be to graduate in 3 years and take all the expert coaching you had received and transfer to a place where you could get meaningful game experience. That's what you would do if you wanted to play in the NFL, anyway.

StraightDave

March 5th, 2017 at 3:13 PM ^

I'd put 4-12 as OL recruits unless Drake Harris bulks up and plays a little OT then I'd say more like 4-13 OL.  

CalifExile

March 6th, 2017 at 11:15 AM ^

I agree with most of what you wrote. However, I doubt either Harris or Marshall will get an offer to come back unless he has a breakout season, in which case he may go pro anyway. I could name 2 guys who I think will transfer due to playing time issues, if our dear leader didn't frown on such things. Then there are the unexpected injuries/personal issues that you added in to your calculation. That puts my count at 3 above yours.

Of course, it's possible Harris and Marshall both have breakout years and both come back. Maybe the guys I see as likely transfers pull a Cone. Maybe no one has a serious injury or a personal issue that leads to a departure. As Yogi Berra noted, "Predicting is hard, especially about the future."

Late Bluemer

March 5th, 2017 at 3:56 PM ^

But I have wondered if Kugler would want to go spend his final year of eligibility with his father at UTEP.  Besides being able to play for his dad, Sean Kugler is a heck of an O-Line coach.

Night_King

March 5th, 2017 at 7:10 PM ^

I think your breakdown is pretty reasonable. If class size climbs near 20, you could probably just add another RB, OL, DL or DB. I could see us taking 3 tight ends if they are all very high ranked. We seem to have a fair chance with several.