A 16 has done it! -- UPGRADING TO POSBANG!!!

Submitted by mi93 on

I never thought I'd see it.

I LOVE COLLEGE SPORTS

UMBC beats overall #1 seed Virgina by 20.

74-54

A Lot of Milk

March 17th, 2018 at 1:55 AM ^

Damn straight. Xavier: never made a Final Four. UVA: never made a title game. Wake Forest: never made a title game. Purdue: never won a title. Kinda ridiculous that these schools get so much love considering they've never reached the peak. Hell, U of San Francisco has as many titles as Sparty does

JWG Wolverine

March 17th, 2018 at 1:50 AM ^

The amazing thing was: not only was this a 1 seed in Virginia, it was the overall #1 and the undisputed best team in the country going into this tournament.

...And then, they didn't just lose, but endured a classic beatdown, in an exciting fashion, all by a 16 seed.

History. Wow.

J.

March 17th, 2018 at 2:04 AM ^

http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/22801426/2018-nc…

One guy placed a $20K parlay.  He picked three high seeds to win, straight-up.  A winning bet would have been worth $870.  UNC, Purdue... and Virginia.  Oops.

There was another guy who placed a $1294.40 wager on Virginia straight up.  It would have paid.. $12.95.

There's a reason alcohol is free in Vegas, people. :)

J.

March 17th, 2018 at 2:32 AM ^

Edit: somebody had asked if Caesar's had offered 5000-1 on UMBC to win vs. Virginia.  I don't know if that post got deleted or edited or what, but that's what this was a response to. :)

5000-1 to win the tournament, not just for this one game.  ML for this game was between 20-1 and 25-1, depending upon where you bet.

1VaBlue1

March 17th, 2018 at 8:38 AM ^

Because UVA was the overall #1, does that mean UMBC was the last 16 to get in?  Either way, being the #61 seed, or the #64 doesn't really matter.  This upset will never be topped - it can't get better than beating the living shit out of the overall #1!!!

Congrats, UMBC Chessie Bay Retrievers!

J.

March 17th, 2018 at 12:16 PM ^

You'd think so, but no.  They must have swapped 16s around for some reason.  In fact, nothing in the bottom of the bracket makes much sense.

UMBC was actually #63 on the S-Curve, maing them actually the strongest 16 per the committee.  The play-in games were #65 Radford vs #66 LIU-Brooklyn and #67 UNC Central vs #68 Texas Southern.  If they had bracketed everything according to the S-Curve, they should have matched up #65 vs #68 and #66 vs #67, and UVa should have gotten the latter.

It's a little weird to say that UVa got hosed by the specific choice of 16 seed the committee made, but they basically did.

Don

March 17th, 2018 at 8:59 AM ^

than I ever do in filling out a bracket, and the results show—of the first 32 games, I picked 11 wrong.

Including UVA.

Which I had winning the NC.

 

Ceck

March 17th, 2018 at 1:09 PM ^

Truly amazing to watch.  Had my wife, who'd rather read Kindle than watch these games, yelling at the screen.  Also a generational moment...  The first time in a while where I couldn't spin a yarn to my boys about how I'd "seen this script before" or "it ain't going to happen because" while referencing some random game from before their time.  An anti-choke coming down the stretch from the UMBC.  Simply a cool moment...