NBA moves All-Star Game from Charlotte

Submitted by Lionsfan on

It's being reported basically everywhere, but the NBA is following through on its threat to move the All-Star game out of North Carolina over recent bigoted laws aimed at the LGBTQ community.

 

Without any movement by state legislators in North Carolina to change newly enacted laws targeted at the LGBT community, the NBA is pulling the 2017 All-Star Game out of Charlotte, league sources told The Vertical.
NBA commissioner Adam Silver had threatened to move All-Star Weekend out of Charlotte unless a discriminatory North Carolina law aimed at the state’s lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community was changed – and time to do so has run out because of the logistics and planning the NBA needs to run its marquee midseason event, league sources said.

The league is reportedly looking towards New Orleans as a replacement host.

Edit, forgot the link. From Yahoo! Sports

EJG

July 21st, 2016 at 6:52 PM ^

After watching a man with shaved legs, ridulously short shorts, striped knee sox, pumps he could not walk in, a dozen necklaces, big loopy earrings, long hair dyed pink and five o'clock shadow walk into the ladies room at a Panera Bread in Port Charlotte, FL yesterday I feel very safe in saying it is not bigoted to say that guy doesn't belong in the ladies room with my wife, daughters or anyone else for that matter. It is a free country and you can dress up however you wish, but where do you draw the line? Erasing all lines for <1% of the population makes little sense.

Lakeyale13

July 21st, 2016 at 10:00 PM ^

I think the logic he might be using is this...bathroom / bathroom signs have NEVER been about nor made a statement about sexuality. A "men's room" sign has never said here is where heterosexual men deficate and urinate. Bathroom signs make no statement on sexuality, they simply make a statement on biology / anatomy. Such as, you have XY chromosomes and a penis...you use the men's room. You have XY genetics and a vagina...you use the ladies room. There is anotomical discrimination happening, but no statement about sexuality is being made by a bathroom sign. It does t care if you are gay, straight, bi-sexual, etc. It just cares what your anatomy and chromosomes are.

Lakeyale13

July 22nd, 2016 at 8:15 AM ^

That is a statement that clearly isn't true. If you had a time machine and could go poll the US population from every decade going back 200 years and ask them "Excuse me, but do you choose the bathroom you use based off of 'gender norms' or do you choose the restroom you use based on the physical anatomy you have or don't have?". If you are being honest and have no agenda to put forward, you clearly know what answer you would get virtually 100% of the time.

Ali G Bomaye

July 22nd, 2016 at 9:00 AM ^

Stop conflating gay and trans people with molesters/pedophiles.  That's been the discriminatory playbook for 50+ years and it's demonstrably untrue.

If you don't want your family hanging out with people who don't dress according to societal norms, that's fine. But let's not pretend that this is a bathroom issue or anything sexual. I don't know what you're worried might happen, but I'm pretty confident that the person you describe isn't going to go waving their pecker around the bathroom or anything like that.

BayWolves

July 21st, 2016 at 6:17 PM ^

That's fine. NC can have its values and do business with those that share them. If the nba wants to relocate to San Francisco then that is their business. If hobby lobby wants to only to biz in NC that is dominantly their business



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

LSAClassOf2000

July 21st, 2016 at 6:19 PM ^

I haven't seen the app version of this thread, nor do I particularly wish to do so, but so far so good here. Please keep it that way. 

So everyone knows, if by chance there is an unfortunate remark on the app, then let me or JGB know usernames - we can't delete anything contentwise that appears over there, but Bolivia works on their site accounts all the same. 

LSAClassOf2000

July 21st, 2016 at 6:30 PM ^

It has the same content, but I have editing capabilities on the site ("Edit", "Delete", etc...buttons and the like) that don't exist over there. As you know, posts on the app don't always show up here, and banned users on the site can still post on the app and sometimes the replies to those people show up here and kill thread continuity. That is to say, when people get caved, they only get caved in this environment, not on the mobile one. 

Semi-amusing note - I have fielded e-mails and tweets from people who didn't realize they were caved for months for that reason. 

 

Steve Breaston…

July 21st, 2016 at 8:53 PM ^

Oh yes. Let us all keep our thoughts, fears and apprehension to ourselves because your friend Cady is deciding to be someone else.

This comment is the bullshit going on in America right now. If the guy is terrified of letting a man in the bathroom to piss with his daughter, THATS HIS FUCKING RIGHT! Your friend Cady doesn't factor into this, nor should someone walk on eggshells



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Sports

July 21st, 2016 at 9:44 PM ^

If this is such a problem and societal plague, why don't we hear about it on the news ever? Oh wait, BECAUSE IT NEVER FUCKING HAPPENS. The entire idea that transgender people are lurking in bathrooms waiting to prey on women is so pantently ridiculous. They're in bathrooms because they want to take a piss. Who cares. Let them be.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Lakeyale13

July 21st, 2016 at 11:04 PM ^

To compare LBGTQ issues of today to racial discrimination of the past is a stretch. Has the LBGTQ community been unfairly treated in the past...yes...for sure...and that is wrong. But I have worked for either Fortune 500 or 100 companies for the last 17 years and I can promise you that in today's corporate world, there is no more celebrated and protected group than the LBGTQ. One would experience far more backlash by stating openly that they are a conservative / Orthodox Jew or Eveangelical Bible Believing Christian in a business meeting than stating that they were something else other than heterosexual. That is a fact. It may not be so outside of the corporate world, but absolutely is so in it...at least everywhere I have been.

SpikeFan2016

July 22nd, 2016 at 9:13 AM ^

1) That is not a fact. That's your opinion and there are many who would disagree. 

 

2) The percentage of Americans that work for Fortune 500 companies is probably like 3%. That's not indicative of what it's like to be gay in America. Work is just one part of life anyways, and most Americans don't work at big corporations. Most gay discrimination is in social realms, although gays can still be fired without cause in about 20 states in this country (including Michigan). 

3) It's not a fight for "who is more oppressed". The NAACP supports gay rights too. 

 

4) No group faces more oppression as adolescents/children than gays do. It's incredibly difficult to be a closeted gay youth, with literally nobody to talk to, confusion, self-loathing, etc, etc. 

Lakeyale13

July 22nd, 2016 at 11:06 AM ^

I have never made any claim saying that LBGTQ's aren't oppressed. Not at all. They have been discriminated against BIG TIME in the past, and surly today as well...albeit to a lesser degree. Progress is being made, but nowhere near perfect, and the same could be said about race relations. Furthermore, To grow up gay has to be incredibly difficult. I cannot imagine the possible harassment and teasing. It should never ever ever happen nor be tolerated. If you were to read my comment above I am specifically referring to the corporate world only (my experience...which is the only thing I can comment on). Now, do I believe that my experience is everyone's no I don't. Do I believe that today in corporate America the LBGTQ community is protected more than any other group...yes I believe so. Do I think that fact is a bad thing, No I don't. I am simply stating what I believe to be true based off of my experience. I have been at two companies where and entire day was devoted to "sensitivity" training for the LBGTQ community. Do I think that is a bad thing? No I don't. But I have never seen any other group being given a similar course either.

SFBlue

July 22nd, 2016 at 4:34 PM ^

There are similarities between Jim Crow and LGBT, but it's not a perfect comparison. LGBT exclusion was not often de jure (except in the case of the military). But there was violence against gay people in the U.S., and to a lesser extent there still is. (In San Francisco, there is an ugly history from like the 1950s through the 1970s of police basically bashing people at gay bars, and riots and marches in response to the same; this has also happened in Miami and other cities). That corporations have largely come to accept LGBT people does not mean that discrimination is not still problematic. Where I grew up in Michigan not that long ago these issues were unspeakable and discussed by whispers and innuendo. But there was a lot of casual gay bashing (e.g., kids played 'smear the queer' at recess, things that sucked were 'gay'). I think the NC law is motivated by this same animus. States should not sanction hate, and if they do it is illegitimate.       

Coldwater

July 21st, 2016 at 6:38 PM ^

Q=Questioning. When the hell did this letter come in to the equation? I guess if you're confused and a little Unsure you get a letter.

My letters are IBC....I bang chicks