NBA moves All-Star Game from Charlotte

Submitted by Lionsfan on

It's being reported basically everywhere, but the NBA is following through on its threat to move the All-Star game out of North Carolina over recent bigoted laws aimed at the LGBTQ community.

 

Without any movement by state legislators in North Carolina to change newly enacted laws targeted at the LGBT community, the NBA is pulling the 2017 All-Star Game out of Charlotte, league sources told The Vertical.
NBA commissioner Adam Silver had threatened to move All-Star Weekend out of Charlotte unless a discriminatory North Carolina law aimed at the state’s lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community was changed – and time to do so has run out because of the logistics and planning the NBA needs to run its marquee midseason event, league sources said.

The league is reportedly looking towards New Orleans as a replacement host.

Edit, forgot the link. From Yahoo! Sports

Ali G Bomaye

July 22nd, 2016 at 8:54 AM ^

Depending on who you ask, stopping after "Q" is fine, because "Queer" is intended to be a catch-all to include the other categories. I don't think there's any "official" acronym, and people have started to realize that adding letters to the acronym reduces its usefulness.

SpikeFan2016

July 21st, 2016 at 7:43 PM ^

This is a very good point. (And I say this as someone who is happy with this NBA decision)

 

Sexual orientation and gender identity are very, very different issues. 

In some ways, the trans movement shares more with the feminist movement than it does with the gay rights movement. 

 

Lumping everything together isn't helpful. Trans people face very different issues than gays and lesbians. 

1817

July 21st, 2016 at 7:04 PM ^

So the Hornets can stay in Charlotte because they provide an all inclusive environment but the NBA can't for 1 game. Too hypocritical.  Keepin' the game there and bringing out LGBT All Stars at the half and free bathroom choice for all at the game would have been preferable. That would of shamed those NC yahoos.

The Mad Hatter

July 21st, 2016 at 7:15 PM ^

In other countries I've visited the bathrooms have proper stalls. Doors all the way to the floor and no gaps to peek in. They're basically like a little private room, and you have no idea who is in the stall next door. Our public bathrooms are cheaply made and poorly designed. This is a design problem, not a political one.

Petr89

July 21st, 2016 at 7:28 PM ^

I tend to agree with those that are cynical of the NBA's motives here, but it is interesting that whatever profit-maximizing calculation they've made landed on the side of the LGBTQ (or whatever the current abbreviation is) community and its allies.

If you, as most that have posted thus far, are against the law in North Carolina, then, regardless of the NBA's motivation, this should be encouraging. People tend to vote with their dollars.

This is very tangentially related to the relative viability of professional women's sports among the big four. I think it's safe to say, as laughable as the WNBA is to many, that basketball has the greatest cross-sex (gender?) appeal. I may be making a false equivalency here, but I'd guess that people who support women's athletics in traditionally male-dominated sports also tend to be against NC's law.

I'm rambling, but I find this stuff interesting. After basketball, it's seems to a big drop off in terms of the popularity of women's sports (among "the big four"). I think "football" is a clear loser. Softball is more popular than hockey, but is it really baseball? I'd put hockey second but I love hockey, live close to Canada, was somewhat disturbingly aroused by the recent gold-medal-winning ladies smoking cigars and drinking cans of beer on the ice and in full uniform.

Feel free to ignore me.

Wolvie3758

July 21st, 2016 at 7:38 PM ^

I hate that NC law.....BUT isnt the NBA being hypocritical and just trying to be politcaly Correct?? China...because u know China has such a GREAT track record on human rights...so they will take a stand here in the US but anywhere else?  doesnt matter

In reply to by Wolvie3758

beardog07

July 22nd, 2016 at 12:18 AM ^

The NBA cannot affect political change in China.  It can, however, do it here. I think the NBA is giving the American people what they want.  Its really not OK to discriminate against LGBT anymore.  People are saying this is purely a publicity stunt and has nothing to do with morals.  Why can't it be both?

AmayzNblue

July 21st, 2016 at 7:41 PM ^

Love how people who don't know anything about the specific laws say they are "bigoted laws aimed at the LGBTQ community." There are laws that protect religious freedoms....but somehow those must be designed "target the LGBTQ community." What would America look like if we could quit seeking out opportunities to feel offended?



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

SpikeFan2016

July 21st, 2016 at 7:49 PM ^

If you seriously think that the "religious freedom" laws (that didn't exist until a few years ago, conincidently only after gay Americans were finally granted their constitutional right to marry) have nothing to do with the gay community you're either hopelessly ignorant or not paying attention. 

Listen to the rhetoric of the politicians, their intent, their history on issues and you'll clearly see that these new "religious freedom" laws are purely anti-gay. 

Nobody has ever pressured any church to marry people they don't want to, but if you are a private business using the public market you have no right to discriminate against somebody for who they are. 

A very religious Catholic restaurant owner can't choose to not serve a man and woman who are cohabiting but not married. So they shouldn't be able to do so for a gay couple either. 

SpikeFan2016

July 21st, 2016 at 8:01 PM ^

No, no it does not. Not even close. 

 

Why should gay people have to be refused service at a nonreligious business? Why should gay Americans, who pay taxes, serve in the military, and vote, have to worry that at random businesses they won't be served because of who they are? 

No Christian has to be worried about not being served at a private business in this country. 

Gays have been oppressed in this nation for years (and still are, by the way). If you think that somehow just because they are now closer to being equal that the 5% of the population that is gay is going to suddenly oppress the 75%+ proportion of the population that is Christian, you are insane. 

 

Stopping people from oppressing others is not intolerant to the oppressors, it's protective of the minority. 

 

People used these same arguments for racial issues for centuries, relying on religion as a crutch as well. 

Do you think that people should not be able to serve interracial couples because of their religious beliefs? Is that violating religous rights? Because for centuries the majority of this country believed that was ammoral due to Biblical passages. 

superstringer

July 21st, 2016 at 7:54 PM ^

Always funny how the people
claiming to practice religion want to exclude other groups -- blacks, gays, etc.

Srsly would Jesus approve this law? Did he ever say, "hey those sinner over there go ostracize them?". Did he advocate for the separation or ridicule of non-believers? Think not. These laws are not in keeping with their professed religion. This is discrimination in the name of religion. As a Catholic, every invocation of "religious freedom" makes me puke. I guess ISIS is practicing religious freedom too huh? You might find that extreme but both groups use religion to cover a very non-religious conduct.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Doc Brown

July 21st, 2016 at 8:15 PM ^

Ok, then you have a to respect my freedom to not want your religious bullshit in my face. Christianity is just one of a thousand different religions. If we have to respect your religion then you have to respect Islam, Judiasm, Hindiusm, Atheism, ..., etc. I won't be my breath.

The Mad Hatter

July 21st, 2016 at 8:45 PM ^

Someone always has to take it too far. As for me, I hate everyone on both sides of this and pretty much every other issue. People need to learn how to mind their own damn business. As long as you are not harming anyone (without their permission), I say do whatever you please.

BornInA2

July 21st, 2016 at 7:58 PM ^

1. Good for the NBA.

2. I call bullshit on the people whose position is "If you don't change everything you do to make it all right, you shouldn't change any one thing you do to make it right."

Nobody Likes a…

July 21st, 2016 at 8:54 PM ^

As a sneakerhead I was looking forward to this one. I was even going to make the trip figuring it being in MJ’s town the limited drops would be exceptional. However, I don’t mind standing on this principal.

I know there are more cases to prove they are hypocrites when it comes to other issues. Aren’t we all? They’re doing the right thing, so what if there will be a litany of idiotic contradictions made by the league. They got this right and lets hammer them when they get the next one wrong.

Kermits Blue Key

July 21st, 2016 at 9:10 PM ^

Whether you believe sports leagues should jump into the political arena or not is your opinion and I'm not going to try to argue with you. However, I live in NC and this law is about a lot more than which bathroom people should use. It takes away the right for anyone to sue over employment discrimination based on sexual preference, amongst other things. If you're going to talk shit, at least know what you're talking about.

Ty Butterfield

July 21st, 2016 at 9:54 PM ^

I don't care what Lebron or any other sports star has to stay about political issues. I remember that Jordan had a famous quote about how republicans also buy sneakers.