OT: Paterno knew of Sandusky abuse in 1976

Submitted by Wolverine Devotee on

The PSU cultists will still defend him. 

http://www.pennlive.com/news/2016/05/court_filing_says_joe_paterno.html

A new bombshell dropped in the Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse scandal Thursday.
 
It came in the form of a line in a court order on a related insurance coverage case involving Penn State, and its ramifications can't immediately be gauged.
 
But that line was eye-popping in itself.
 
The line in question states that one of Penn State's insurers has claimed "in 1976, a child allegedly reported to PSU's Head Coach Joseph Paterno that he (the child) was sexually molested by Sandusky."

1464

May 5th, 2016 at 8:56 PM ^

The thing is, this was systemic. Cops, coaches, administration. Everybody. They choose football over kids. It isn't some lone wolf thing. It's an entire rotten organization that deserves to be dissolved. An entire town who STILL deifies a man complicit with the abuse of dozens of kids over decades! They don't deserve a team. They really don't. They've lost any perspective. It's sick.

1464

May 5th, 2016 at 8:56 PM ^

The thing is, this was systemic. Cops, coaches, administration. Everybody. They choose football over kids. It isn't some lone wolf thing. It's an entire rotten organization that deserves to be dissolved. An entire town who STILL deifies a man complicit with the abuse of dozens of kids over decades! They don't deserve a team. They really don't. They've lost any perspective. It's sick.

ahw1982

May 5th, 2016 at 9:29 PM ^

There's a decent argument that if Sandusky committed the crimes and nobody else knew about it, PSU shouldn't get punished since it's not an NCAA issue, so I get what you're saying.

However, PSU isn't being punished for Sandusky's wrongdoing, they're being punished for Paterno's wrongdoing.  Paterno covered it up, and he did so to protect the image of his football team, which is an NCAA issue.

Re: someone else talking about PSU sanctions being reduced, I'll bet it was in part because there wasn't actually any specific NCAA rule in place that Paterno clearly violated.  I wouldn't be surprised if it was just one of those things that's SO fucked up, the NCAA never thought there'd be a need to write a rule addressing it.

Mr Miggle

May 5th, 2016 at 10:25 PM ^

NCAA rules cover things which are legal, but which they restrict. They have a catchall provision prohibiting all illegal activity. Just imagine how ludicrous a rulebook would be if it had to spell out every crime you could not commit.

You're right that these become police matters, but it makes no sense that the NCAA can't punish those involved too. By the same logic, you wouldn't have players suspended for being charged or convicted of crimes.

Mr Miggle

May 6th, 2016 at 7:26 AM ^

It's not the job of football coaches or programs to investigate crimes any more than it's the NCAA's. Would you argue they shouldn't be allowed to punish players for committing crimes? That they can suspend players for missing a meeting, but once they've broken the law their punishment has to come from the courts?

The NCAA suspended Florida's QB for a year for PEDs. They do get involved in player discipline. That's typically handled by conferences and teams. If they refused to take responsibility, the NCAA would surely take a greater role, but that's not my point. 

 

 

ijohnb

May 5th, 2016 at 8:58 PM ^

discovery of the abuse at anytime before a lengthy coverup would not have adversely affected the football program. This line of reasoning is flawed. I believe that Joe Pa knew and failed to take action and I believe he is likely in hell for his failures, but I think his failure stemmed from pure cowardess in the face of a moral responsibility. It does not make sense as a "for the good of the program" decision, IMO.

In reply to by ijohnb

1464

May 5th, 2016 at 9:06 PM ^

Wouldn't have a negative effect? Seriously? If kids are getting raped in showers, I'm not sending my kid there to play football even after Sandusky is hauled off. Don't care what the motive was, PSU was in a better position to excel at football due to the cover-up. Objectively.

In reply to by ijohnb

Sac Fly

May 5th, 2016 at 9:11 PM ^

They did make a decision, it was just done behind closed doors without getting law enforcement involved. That was when Sandusky, the heir apparent to Paterno, mysteriously retired.

There's no reason I can think of whatsoever that would lead Paterno to take that action unless it was to protect the football program.

Chalky White

May 5th, 2016 at 8:53 PM ^

The reason they kept this quiet was for the sole purpose of keeping their football program intact. This had everything to do with football. It was no coincidence this didn't see the light of day until the exact second after he passed Eddie Robinson in wins. Forget the fact that he spent about as much time coaching Penn St as I did in the 2000s, this cover up is a disgrace.

drzoidburg

May 6th, 2016 at 12:36 AM ^

yeah and the sad thing about it is it didn't even harm their football program that much even after their lies and continued protection of a serial child rapist were uncovered. In addition, as a community they showed no remorse. That is exactly why they should've got the death penalty and been removed from the conference. I'd take 10 rutgers to get rid of them now

Mr Miggle

May 5th, 2016 at 9:43 PM ^

of incidents in the late 80s.Of course there were. Child molesters rarely start in their 50s.

The only reason Sandusky was allowed to keep molesting children was to protect Paterno and the football program. This wasn't a case of a child molester who just happened to be a football coach. This was a child molester free to operate only because he was also a football coach. 

LJ

May 5th, 2016 at 8:45 PM ^

Guessing I'll get negged for this, but you can't see the distinction between (1) improper benefits that provided a clear competitive advantage on the court and (2) an admittedly heinous crime that involved multiple members of the football program but was essentially unconnected to the business of the football program itself?  I can see the argument there -- one is enforcing NCAA rules, the other is enforcing criminal statutes.

Chalky White

May 5th, 2016 at 9:03 PM ^

If Paterno knew about this, Sandusky should have been on death row somewhere as opposed to coaching national championships. The fact that he was allowed to coach for so long has severely affected the integrity of the game. Sandusky was one of the greatest coordinators ever but mysteriously never got a job anywhere ever. People knew about this but never said anything.

LJ

May 5th, 2016 at 9:47 PM ^

Okay, so if Ty Wheatley Sr. committed a murder tonight, and Harbaugh learned of it and covered it up, Michigan's football program should get sanctions?  I just don't get that.  They should both be in jail, but it's totally divorced from the football program.

Mr Miggle

May 6th, 2016 at 7:32 AM ^

Harbaugh covered it up and then Wheatley goes on to commit 20 more murders on campus. In the meantime the AD and school administrators and various other university employees knew about some of them, but were afraid to cross Harbaugh.

Yes, I think the school deserves punishment in that case. They would have played a big part in enabling Wheatley snd Harbaugh breaking the law. Meanwhile they profited from having the best coach in CFB leading their FB program.

ijohnb

May 5th, 2016 at 9:05 PM ^

there is actually a very strong argument to be made in that regard, but I have tried it and you won't find a receptive audience here. It never made sense to me as something that could be effectively "sanctioned" by the NCAA nor do I believe that the coverup can rightly be considered as contributing to a "competitive advantage" for the program. But like I said, you won't find support for this argument on these pages.

In reply to by ijohnb

jmblue

May 6th, 2016 at 9:44 AM ^

You don't think a program's reputation (and thus, its recruiting and overall popularity) might be harmed by the disclosure that one of its coaches is a pedophile?

 

 

1464

May 5th, 2016 at 7:50 PM ^

I am an emotionally stable grown up and I honestly feel the right course of action is to publicly defile anything and everything tied to Paterno. I legitimately think that is the mature and proper course of action at this point.

saveferris

May 6th, 2016 at 12:02 PM ^

Well there's a strawman argument if I ever heard one.  How is the fact Don Canham once offered Joe Paterno the head coaching job here at Michigan germane to the discussion?  Nobody here is disputing Paterno's skill and acumen as a football coach.  We're questioning his ethics and moral compass.

So the fact that Don Canham once offered Joe Paterno a job here disqualifies us from being able to throw stones?  I'm confused.

93Grad

May 5th, 2016 at 7:38 PM ^

it is sickening how the PSU cultists have defended this crap to the point of actually filing lawsuits against the NCAA etc. These nutjobs actually think they are the victims and not the abused children.