OT: Batman vs Superman Comic-Con Trailer
Okay Zack Snyder... I'll give you a shot. That's saying a lot considering MoS was, let's just say, mediocre.
Cons:
Batman's parents' storyline getting old.
Gal Gadot still kinda just there/out of place.
Pros:
Robin's dead
Superman cults and skeptics!
Jesse Eisenberg's Luthor
This trailer deff got me feeling a little bit more optimistic. Eisenberg's Luthor is looking very interesting for sure. Affleck is doing a good job pulling off another secluded Bruce Wayne like Bale did.
I just hope it doesn't turn into another mess of destruction porn.
GODDAMN IT LEROY!!!!
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Lex Luthor looking and sounding like a nerdy, scrawny college freshman. No, I'm not a fan.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
If it were up to me, I would make a Sandman movie or TV show along with all these. That is one of the best comics ever made and it's under DC.
Right now it's just sitting in Hollywood limbo.
Nor in the Dream Country. Joseph Gordon-Levitt is signed on to produce: it's in active development at New Line.
http://www.thewrap.com/joseph-gordon-levitts-sandman-moving-from-warner-bros-to-new-line/
In a Reddit AMA, J G-L said,
"I think a big screen adaptation is a better idea and here's why. If you did the episodic version, I think it could very well end up as a not-as-good-version of what is already brilliant in the comics. But by reworking the material into a big movie, Gaiman's brilliant characters and ideas get to take shape in a way they never have before.
Also, I think Sandman deserves to look absolutely mind-blowingly awesome, just on a visual level, and as cinematic as some TV shows are becoming these days, they still can't compete with big movies visually, just because they can't afford to."
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Exactly. Sony did an OK job with Spider-Man, but after five movies, they still could not get it right. The first three movies were great for their times, but after seeing what Marvel Studios has been able to do, I just wish Marvel had its hands on Spider-Man from the start. I'm glad that Marvel basically has creative control (for the most part) with Spider-Man in Civil War. I also wish Marvel had the rights to X-Men, but alas, Fox will never sell that property. It's a shame, really. X-Men is a Marvel thing, but they cannot make their movies. I like, for the most part, the current X-Men movies (especially First Class and Days of Future Past), but I'd just love to see what Marvel can do with the property. It would be weird, though, to see someone else play Wolverine.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
I am extremely excited for this movie, but the only thing that annoys me is having Wonder Woman in it. That actress is sexy as hell, but I do not feel the need to see WW in this movie. I know why, though. This is the beginning of the Justice League and she is part of that crew. I read that she has only a minor role, though.
It looks unbelievably bad.
You're that guy. You're the guy, no matter how awesome something is, who has to stay how stupid it looks. You'll watch the movie, though.
Eisenberg looks like he can pull off a great Luthor, and I'm cautiously optimistic about Affleck as Batman. I just hope they don't make this into a Michael Bay-esque movie where something has to explode every 7.5 seconds.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Nerds
Last trailer made me think it might not be as bad as I thought.
This one makes me think it will be much worse.
I'm Batman