John U. Bacon: "If I had a guess" one year from now, Brad Bates will be the AD and one of the two Harbaughs will be the HC

Submitted by michgoblue on

John U. Bacon, just wrapped an interview on the Hugh Show.  When asked to guess who will be the HC of Michigan football one year from now, after giving several disclaimers and noting that it was just his guess, stated that one year from now, Brad Bates would be the AD and one of the two Harbaughs would be the HC. 

He also said earlier in the interview that from talking to people who he knows who are close to Miles, Harbaugh and Harbaugh, he does not believe that any of that group would accept the HC spot with Brandon as AD. 

Sorry, no link, as it was a radio interview.

trueblueintexas

October 8th, 2014 at 5:04 PM ^

It's settled then. Dave Brandon needs to do what is best for the Team, the Team, the Team, and step down so one of the Harbaughs can be the next coach...because that is what is best for Michigan...and he cares about Michigan.

mgolund

October 8th, 2014 at 5:06 PM ^

Why are we getting excited? The guy said it was a guess, and he made a huge disclaimer about it being a guess.

Bacon is clued in, and I'm a big fan, but to me, this sounds like nothing. Hopefully, his guess is right, though.

MWolverine7

October 8th, 2014 at 5:06 PM ^

Brandon's either in hiding or the President has told him to cease all external communication. The guy hasn't sent a tweet in 7 days.

MayOhioEatTurds

October 8th, 2014 at 5:51 PM ^

Very interesting indeed:  It is rare treat to have that imperious bastard take a week-long hiatus from praising himself and "his" department in public.  

Based on his strategy and behavior during concussion-gate, I'd guess he's the hiding type.  But I'm hoping he was also dressed-down by Schlissel!

BoFan

October 8th, 2014 at 5:11 PM ^

Jim is most likely to end up at the Raiders. Thats a guess but they like where they are in the Bay Area. They've made that pretty clear. For Bacon to suggest otherwise raises questions. Is this hearsay? Any real insight? Probably not. Bacon's been shut out of Fort Schembechler since 3 and out. In fact Bacon is known to not like Brandon because Brandon took Bacon's booth credentials. Look it up.

BoFan

October 8th, 2014 at 7:24 PM ^

Just based on pure speculation, John would have potential and would be an awesome choice:

Potential:

1)  He already won his superbowl.

2)  AA and Michigan affiliation.

3)  His statement of denyal was more a statement of "I support the current coach".  Which is a classy thing to do.

4)  Existing relationship with Mattison.

5)  I think he has young kids.  Ann Arbor is a much better place to raise a family than Baltimore I hear.

 

umumum

October 8th, 2014 at 6:27 PM ^

1.  everyone on this site knows that--everyone

2.  you act as if you are okay with Brandon yanking Bacon's credentials cuz he didn't like what he wrote.  It is well-known in the media that Brandon will punish those he believes do not toe the line.

3.  just cuz he may be persona non grata at the Athletic Department doesn't mean that he doesn't still have sources at the AD.

4.  Bacon clearly has a myriad of other credible sources among athletes and people close to the program outside of the AD cabal.

BoFan

October 8th, 2014 at 7:19 PM ^

I don't think Brandon should take away Bacon's, the Freep's, or anyone else’s credentials just because of what they wrote.  I think that is a stupid way to win media friends and it lack character.  

On the other hand you're not going to see anything positive from Bacon on Brandon.  And anytime one person completely vilifies another you always have to 'question' their objectivity and agenda.  Just think about Drew Sharp.  And I do use the word 'question' rather than 'condem'.

umumum

October 8th, 2014 at 8:01 PM ^

if you really think they're analogous, I can't help you.  Also, you have nothing to support you're thesis that Bacon is acting out of vindictiveness and is unwilling to be objective.  In fact, outside of the Michigan AD, Bacon has a pretty damn good reputation for being a straight-shooter.  It is "possible' that Bacon is correct and that Brandon is simply that bad.  

Pea-Tear Gryphon

October 8th, 2014 at 5:14 PM ^

In a thread a couple of weeks ago, I mentioned a rumor I had heard from two people: 

http://mgoblog.com/mgoboard/cc-bacon-hoke-likely-stay-until-december-br…

To summarize:
1. Brandon is gone soon (could even be in October)
2. New AD is hired (at the time it was between Manuel or Bates - seems Bates is leading candidate now) to work with Hoke on an exit that is nice and not a firing.
3. John Harbaugh is announced as the new HC. He doesn't want to follow a guy who's been fired, hence the buyout/walkaway/resignation agreement with Hoke
4. ???????
5. Profit

The pieces seem to be falling into place...excellent...excellent

Pea-Tear Gryphon

October 8th, 2014 at 6:29 PM ^

Were not hobos nor bottles of coke, although that would have been delicious. We were at a golf outing after the Minny game. One person told the rumor I repeated here a couple of times. Not to grab attention or to show off, but more like sharing information. After he was done, another guy in our group said he heard the exact same rumor. Uncorraborated.

Now, they could have both been full of shit or all a figment of my desire to get attention on a message board. Either way, my point was that the dominos (see that) are starting to fall in that direction, albeit very early tea leaf reading.

Rumormongoring is fun. As opposed to watching this team attempt to football, this is the most fun I've had this season. Brian's posts on coaches were far more fun than reading the UFR today.

Erik_in_Dayton

October 8th, 2014 at 6:34 PM ^

Question: What would be the best way for Michigan to speak to AD and coaching candidates without having to worry about FOIA requests or computer hacks?  Answer: By having hobos serve as messengers, their information stored solely in their heads (and perhaps their bindles), traveling between the parties by rail.   

Mittelstadt

October 8th, 2014 at 5:23 PM ^

If I remember correctly he mapped out hiring criteria for a head coach that didn't seem to match reality.  And it didn't take into account the true profile of successful coaches.  It was as if the criteria were laid out with a pre-determined result.

An example of one of his criteria was to have a coach with recruiting roots in the region.  There were others like that. 

Seemed the profile of a successful college coach at this high level was not mapped out. For example, Win/Loss record, attention to detail, management style, personality characteristics, charisma, leadership style, etc.

When you map out characteristics of top coaches you begin to see similarities:

1.  Detail oriented (Saban, Brian Kelly, Chip Kelly, Gus Malzahn, etc.)

2.  Strategic thinker

3.  Leadership style - stubborn - process oriented

What would the new AD's criteria be?