27 Tickets To Team 135: Post-Spring Edition Comment Count

Brian

What is this? Folks who cover the USMNT drop lists like this projecting the 23 guys who end up on the next World Cup team. I have appropriated it. Regarding the number of tickets: 22 starters on offense and defense + 2 kickers + nickelback + FLEX TE  + fullback.

THIS IS THE POST-SPRING UPDATE: changes! More than I'd like, actually. We've shifted some positions around with the over move and tried to pick through spring hype versus spring hope. Also "he played for 'Bama" hype versus hope.

PACK YOUR BAGS

bilde[1]1. QB Devin Gardner, Sr.* [Last time: 1]

No. No, there is not a quarterback controversy or competition or anything of the sort. No, the spring game means nothing in this regard. For the love of pants, please stop talking about this.

Jake-Ryan[1]2. MLB Jake Ryan, Sr.* [ Last time: 2]

Shift to over defense kind of makes Ryan a man without a country, so they're going to try to make his country MLB. Skepticism severe around these parts, but that doesn't mean he's going to drop out of the starting lineup. Worst case he ends up playing SAM or DE or something. He'll be on the field. Possibly wondering what he should be doing.

funchess-um-football-game[1]3. WR Devin Funchess, Jr. [Last time: 3]

Spring start was no surprise. Has been officially confirmed a wide receiver forever and ever amen. Matchup nightmare should be frequent motion guy to discombobulate defenses, leap over them to make catches, possibly wiggle a bit in endzone. Fade this man, please. I mean seriously throw him a fade like every sixth play.

Ld4vH[1]4. S Jarrod Wilson, Jr. [Last time: 4]

One look at the depth chart is enough to tell you he was too low last time. Michigan's only experienced safety, only upperclass safety, only guy who stayed back for most of the spring game as others were tasked with SS duties. He's going to start.

BFrajY8CUAAI2Uf11175. WDE Frank Clark, Sr. [Last time: 7]

Surprising second-team ABT selection last year did round into a pretty good player by year's end. Much better against the run and capable of providing some pass rush, which was more than anyone else could say. On the cusp of serious breakout.

image6. WLB Desmond Morgan, Sr. [Last time: 5]

I'm sticking to my guns. Morgan is the QB of the defense, hits harder than any other LB, and saved M's ass with the athletic INT pictured against UConn. Easily capable of moving to the over's WLB slot, which features a lot of head-banging against Gs. Ignore spring depth. Morgan starts.

bilde[2]7. SAM James Ross, Jr. [Last time: 6]

Slides to Stevie Brown-style space SAM that operates as quasi-nickel at times. May or may not be well-suited to that, but with line looking like penetrators instead of space eaters that move seems good for him. Gets swallowed by Gs; makes quick reads.

UNLESS SOMETHING STRANGE HAPPENS

13350471-standard[1]8. SDE Brennen Beyer, Sr. [Last time: 9]

Where he needs to be technically, now needs weight. Won't star, but pressure from behind is not severe. M moved Taco Charlton to this spot, which is odd, and moved Keith Heitzman away from it. Hopes to end his career Craig Roh 2.0. Over SDE less of a DT than under, so that helps.

9856114085_66cdeac232_b[1]9. FLEX Jake Butt, So. [Last time: 10]

Tore ACL but word is that he's going to be back after a few games so we'll leave him here, and leave him high because no one else is going to be able to do the things he can. Capable receiver was also best inline blocker for M last year despite being 230 pound freshman; stardom beckons if the knee is all right.

Willie Henry Michigan v Connecticut GVJN3qglVSsl[1]10. NT Willie Henry, So.* [Last time: 11]

Pipkins injury forced move to nose tackle, where he languishes on fake spring depth chart. That gets five fakes out of five from this site. Hugely strong; get a sword of Pad Level +5 and he will star. Heavy rotation likely to feature Henry first off, move into Pipkins and Bryan Mone.

wile_thumb[1]11. K Matt Wile, Sr. [Last Time: 12]

Gibbons graduates, leaving Wile the presumed starter at kicker. Has a bigger leg; does not have a track record of being automatic from within 42 yards give or take a shaky four-game sequence in his senior year. Will also handle kickoffs and at least pooch punting.

gif_74x89_07ca6112. SLOT Dennis Norfleet, Jr. [Last Time: 13]

You have one job, Doug Nussmeier. Okay you've got like 50, but one of those jobs is to get to ball to this dude in space and see what happens. Was targeted on wheel route in spring game, which is fine, but seriously just try to get some cheap yards here.

FAIRLY SAFE BET

10226222015_d3e1456eb3_b[1]13. CB Blake Countess, Jr* [Last time: 4]

Welcome to cornerback row. Generally the further down you get here the more nervous you are about the slot; in this situation it is the opposite: Michigan has so many good options that this space has bumped Jabrill Peppers in favor of…

13656129695_fbdf006687_z (1)14. NICKEL Jourdan Lewis, So. [Last time: NR]

…the sticky-fingered sophomore who started over Countess and picked off a couple passes in the spring game. Lewis was right there as a freshman and any increment was going to make him good; now suited to Michigan's press style he demands playing time, possibly from…

raymon-taylor-pick-thumb-646x429-122643[1]15. CB Raymon Taylor, Sr. [Last time: 14]

…a guy who has started for two years and turned in a number of big plays a year ago. Taylor seems most vulnerable because he has not played nickel; realistically everyone gets playing time. Oh, and Peppers. Can he play OL?

glasgow-cat-sweater[1]16. G Graham Glasgow, Jr* [Last time: 16]

Will miss opener after offseason driving incident. Was most recently playing RT(!), which says that Michigan is open to moving him around what with this Chad Lindsay fellow maybe arriving. Showed ability to play G last year; will be on field, but where is unknown.

385446_3012007678845_1455385026_n1_thumb[1]17. T Erik Magnuson, So.* [Last time: 17]

Spring absence did nothing to upset presumed death lock on left tackle job since by the spring scrimmage his replacement was true freshman Mason Cole. Hopefully can get up to 300 or so pounds despite the injury; M needs more POWER anywhere they can get it.

asoi[1]18. C Chad Lindsay, Sr.* [Last time: at Alabama]

Visited for spring, saw… that, has ton of experience with Nussmeier, started four games for 'Bama last year. Hard to say a fifth-year transfer is a lock, but… uh… he's not coming here to play cribbage. Unless he thinks that would help.

ICdzU[1]19. P Will Hagerup, Sr.* [Last time: 27]

Still on pace to return this fall so we're moving him up from the bottom. This is so the bottom can be, like, all offensive linemen. Because that is both objective and emotional reality. Anyway, Hagerup is once again booming punts off the Glick ceiling because he has a massive leg cannon. Consistency, as always, is the bugaboo.

IN A BATTLE

13654644975_62cfc6c5aa_z20. WR Freddy Canteen, Fr. [Last time: NR]

Avalanche of spring hype offset by fact he still has no idea what to do; EE helpful in that regard. Jungle beats. Quick feet, quick hands, quick person. Jungle beats. Manningham 2.0? Let's hope so. Passed Chesson to start spring but still has to hold both him and Amara Darboh off; blocking could be an issue for wisp-thin FR.

13655945333_633d3f19ec_b21. 3TECH Maurice Hurst, Fr*. [Last time: NR]

More prominent than Wormley/Strobel in spring, so let's give him the tentative nod in a platoon situation. Has been getting way more insider buzz than either competitor thanks to Mike Martin-esque first step; at three tech can go one on one more often.

heitzman22. TE Keith Heitzman, Jr.* [Last time: NR]

Moved immediately after bowl game and had apparently passed AJ Williams by spring. If he can block adequately will be large upgrade on that position's production from last year. Probably not useful in the receiving game; Michigan doesn't need him to be.

10132012_spt_um_illinois_football_djb_1198[1] 23. RB Justice Hayes, Jr. [Last time: NR]

Hayes leaps into this spot after taking the first and most effective snaps in the spring scrimmage. Sometimes running back is about more than who has the tree-trunkiest thighs. Ask Mike Hart. (Actually, don't. Thighs for days.) Catching out of backfield a strength Nussmeier might use.

UM-scrimmage-Cleary-Clark[1]24. S Jeremy Clark, So.* [Last time: 23]

Still giving Clark the spot here but by this point these are the spots on the depth chart at which the coaches could tell you honestly that they have no idea. Clark, Dymonte Thomas, and Hill are all in the mix, as they say, and no one has tried to climb out of the bowl yet.

Joe Kerridge in action during Michigan's annual Spring Football Game at Michigan Stadium, Saturday, April 15th. 25. FB/HB Joe Kerridge, Jr.* [Last Time: 24]

At this point Kerridge is a placeholder for what will be a diverse array of FB/HB back types ranging from pure FB Kerridge to FB/RB Shallman to FB/TE Hill, and then there's Sione Houma, who's kind of all of that plus amazing hair.

11290091[1]26. T Ben Braden, So.* [Last time: 26]

Still the presumed starter at right tackle but presence of Glasgow outside hints that Michigan may be looking at other options. Was too slow-footed to play guard; can he hold up in pass protection well enough to play tackle? Enormousness makes you hope so. Road grader if he works out.

7879940[1]27. G Kyle Bosch, So. [Last time: 25]

Under assumption that Lindsay comes in, Glasgow displaces one of Braden/Bosch/Kalis. Random guess here is that it's Kalis because Bosch should improve more as younger guy but your guess is as good as mine. So is Hoke's.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

PUSHING FROM BEHIND

QB Shane Morris—Hosing hoser has cannon, occasionally uses it to throw things directly to Jourdan Lewis.
QB Wilton Speight—Navarre type wobbly in spring.

RB DeVeon Smith—occasionally looks like a promising grinder.
RB Derrick Green—lost the weight; had a nice bounce in spring game.
RB Drake Johnson—still recovering from ACL tear.

C Jack Miller—veteran presence provides options.
C Patrick Kugler—still behind Miller in spring.
G Kyle Kalis—battle for starting job will go to opening day.
G David Dawson—practiced at both tackle spots since arrival, now at guard. Likely to be one of top options should Michigan turn to bench.
T Logan Tuley-Tillman—looks part; still needs time to act it.
T Mason Cole—good for Cole that he was so prominent in spring as FR; bad for Michigan.

WR Jehu Chesson—had some promise in freshman season; punishing blocker for size.
WR Amara Darboh—still recovering from foot issue.
WR DaMario Jones—could push for some PT in slot.

NT Ondre Pipkins—hyped recruit got ACL tear at worst possible time. Could push through Henry. NT is platoon city, so not a huge distinction.
NT Bryan Mone—I've been waiting for a large Tongan DL my whole life.
SDE Henry Poggi—SDE now, still needs some time.
SDE Taco Charlton—Still adapting to new spot.
3T Tom Strobel—assume he plays SDE this year; buried as a 3T.
3T Chris Wormley—will at least platoon.
WDE Mario Ojemudia—will spot Clark.

SAM Royce Jenkins-Stone—over move very good for him as it makes his size an asset.
SAM Allen Gant—ditto Gant.
WLB Joe Bolden—nominal starter next to Ryan in spring, but has to hit/cover someone to hold that distinction.
WLB Ben Gedeon—freak athlete had some playing time late in the season.

CB Jabrill Peppers—you may have heard of this dude.
CB Channing Stribling—will be good if he just stops phasing out.
S Delano Hill—strong safety type has hitter's reputation, may be good fit w/ Wilson.
S Dymonte Thomas—burned redshirt to block that one punt; still raw.

Comments

WolvinLA2

April 8th, 2014 at 1:01 PM ^

It's funny that OSU fans are saying that about DG.  Gardner torched their D in Columbus last year, partially while injured, and was one pass away from beating them.  But he's not a QB?  Was it our other offensive standouts who scored all those points?  

If MSU fans said that, that's fine.  Maybe they're putting a lot of emphasis on just that game, or they didn't watch his other games.  But OSU fans?  I don't get it.

AC1997

April 8th, 2014 at 12:36 PM ^

Why is it odd that Taco is moved to SDE?  That position has provided nothing of significant impact since RVB left - just bodies.  With Clark and Mario at WDE and Beyer someone who can rotate between the two positions based on situation, why not put the large and athletic Taco at SDE?  I love the move.  He is big enough to be decent against the run and athletic enough to maybe provide the pass rush that no one else has.  Also, I would love for Pipkins or Mone to develop enough to play a fair amount of NT with Henry playing DT.  I think Henry is a monster against single team blocking but will be a non-factor against double teams.  Right now we need someone on the line to demand a double team so we get good match-ups elsewhere.

uofmfan4

April 8th, 2014 at 12:59 PM ^

I came to ask the same thing. I loved the move. Taco has the size to hold up in the run, but also has the ability to provide some pass rush. I never really thought he'd stay at WDE his entire career.

WolvinLA2

April 8th, 2014 at 1:03 PM ^

Agreed - I love that move too.  Taco played 3T in passing situations last year and did fine, so him playing SDE in the 4-3 over is about perfect for him.  He plays like a WDE but he's huge.  An equal rotation of him and Beyer sounds about right to me.

MVictors97

April 8th, 2014 at 2:15 PM ^

Until Taco plays the run on a consistant basis the rotation will favor Beyer. I saw Taco get washed down the line by AJ Williams on one play. And as we know AJ is no devastating blocker.

With that said I think this is the best spot for Taco going forward.  I just don't see him taking too much playing time from Beyer on 1st and 2nd down situations IMO.

Leroy Hoard

April 8th, 2014 at 12:43 PM ^

The last few years don't recommend the coaching received by either the OL or the D Line - hate to say, but true.  Gotta wonder if that is why Mattison and Hoke are no longer coaching the D Line - we'll never know if they are willing to look at themselves as not having created success, but I will say if that is what happened, I think it would bode well for the future that they recognized the issue and remedied.

 

 

AC1997

April 8th, 2014 at 12:49 PM ^

I still can't figure out how we got to where we are on this OL.  There isn't a single position.....not ONE of the five that is settled.  The only one with some experience that has even decent performance to go with it is Glasgow and he's suspended and without a true position.  He should be a guard, but that's the one spot we have the most depth.  Kalis has seen his star fade, Bosch and Magnuson have some promise still but are both coming off injury, Braden has yet to crack the two-deep going into his third season, and the rest are raw.  Scary.  Who cares about the RB and QB depth charts if the OL isn't able to be competent. 

Rabbit21

April 8th, 2014 at 2:11 PM ^

I'll go with one remaining O-Lineman from two full recruiting classes as being the main reason the OL looks so bad.  This is a position in which experience counts for a great deal and where we basically had no recruits for two years.  Put that together with three years of no schematic consistency or base to work from and you have the tire fire that the group now is(along with major concerns about strength and conditioning based on lack of any push from both the OL and DL).

Hannibal.

April 8th, 2014 at 1:00 PM ^

Where is Chris Fox?  He was the second highest rated lineman in the program on rivals.  He had an injury late in high school, but wasn't that a couple of years ago?  Is his career basically doomed at this point?  We have heard absolutely nothing about him and seen nothing on him at all.  He and LTT.  That Mason Cole (who I saw projecting to guard until now) has instantly passed both of them is not a good sign at all.  In the '12 and '13 classes we got a fantastic haul of three blue chip OTs plus one good 3* prospect.  Surely, we should have gotten two good projected starters out of that bunch, right?  Now, one of those guys is injured and totally unproven, another one is apparently just not very good, and two of the blue chippers can't crack a completely empty depth chart.  Not good at all.

Space Coyote

April 8th, 2014 at 1:13 PM ^

Yes. Chris Fox's career is absolutely doomed now that he isn't seeing significant playing time going into his RS FR year on the OL, after an injury held him out almost his entire FR year and he was still working to get up to college level strength/technique.

Also, not sure you're aware that LTT is also entering his RS FR year, had a hand injury, missed much of early spring ball, and had a huge club on his hand.

Surely, this comment is either sarcasm or a nice jab at a highly impatient fan base, right?

mgobaran

April 8th, 2014 at 1:30 PM ^

I am pretty sure Patience is not listed under the Dave Brandon Approved, Bo Memorial Stephen Ross Athletic Department Virtues.

They are....

1. Toughness
2. In front and inside
3. Execution
4. ?????
5. Profit

Idk, maybe Patience is the ????? and no one has figured it out yet. But my money is on that it stands for either Brand, new uniforms for the bowl game, or Jim Harbaugh.

MVictors97

April 8th, 2014 at 2:25 PM ^

To add to your points, I really didnt think LTT looked all the bad on Saturday for someone who came in raw and out of shape. Then missed a part of the spring and is now playing with a club.  He got bull rushed pretty bad by Ojemudia once but seemed to hold his own overall out there. I thought he made it to the second level on zone combos a few times and broke down nicely to pick up the LB.  I do not think he is pushing to start but I think he is progessing.

Hannibal.

April 8th, 2014 at 4:15 PM ^

Except that Chris Fox and LTT, as redshirt freshman, are both behind a TRUE freshman and a walk-on position switcher.  Both of them have been in a college S&C program for a lot longer than Mason Cole and I would wager that both of them have taken more practice snaps at tackle than both Glasgow and Cole.  And there is no buzz that the competition is even close.  I don't think that I have heard these guys' names even mentioned.  Between wtka, this blog, and the BTN -- literally not once.  It's similar to the Blake Bars vibe from last year (i.e. conspicuously absent from conversations about getting playing time). 

Over the years, Michigan has had numerous redshirt freshmen in starting roles on the offensive line, and legions of them who played as backups (this is in stark contrast to the bizarre mgoblog conventional wisdom that no freshman eligibility player has ever played in the history of the world, and therefore it is wildly unreasonable to wonder why one of these freshman eligibilty players can't get playing time when every other option is really bad).  It's one thing for these guys to not be starters, or to be raw guys who need work, but to not even be cracking the emptiest depth chart in the history of the program?  

If it's purely a matter of recovering from injuries that have set these guys' careers back then that's one thing, but -- damn.  If Magnusson is injured or just isn't good, then we're talking about a level of DEATH here that easily rivals the "Mark Moundros at linebacker" experience, the Threet/Sheridan fiasco, or the catastrophe that was the 2010 defensive backfield. 

yoyo

April 8th, 2014 at 1:11 PM ^

I think it's pretty disappointing that Dymonte isn't starting and didn't play much safety last yr.  He was supposed to be on of the better recruits in the country and we have a lack of good safetys and now Delano might be playing?  It clearly isn't from difficulty with learning the position if a RS freshman might play.

dahblue

April 8th, 2014 at 1:14 PM ^

Not sure how much of anything we can learn from the spring "game".  We were running normal packages?  Were the coaches tinkering to sort out some internal questions?  Why is the game so early and cold? How much is the price of tea in China?  Who let the dogs out?  Too many questions; spring game answered none of them.

ijohnb

April 8th, 2014 at 1:41 PM ^

graduate?

Geez.  No offense intended.  I just thought that he was expelled before he graduated.  If I am wrong just tell me.

Magnus

April 8th, 2014 at 1:48 PM ^

FWIW, I think the Canteen hype is legitimate. I'm not saying he will have 1,000 yards as a freshman, but I would be surprised if he's not on the field quite a bit by midseason, if not at the beginning. Receiver is a pretty easy position to learn. He did look confused a couple times in the spring game, but he's only 15 practices into college. The physical skills are there to play early. Even if Darboh and/or Chesson beat him out for one of the outside spots, I would put Canteen ahead of Norfleet in the slot.

Bodogblog

April 8th, 2014 at 1:52 PM ^

In one of the mgbolue video segments, he mentions 3 Techs, and says "Me, Strobel, and Godin".  I think that's why Godin got the nod at 3T to start the spring game (though I think that entire side of the ball was a mix of first, second, and third stingers the whole time).

The point is, I think Hurst, Henry, and Mone are all 1T's right now.  When Pipkins returns, I'm hoping one of them is pushed over to 3T, and Wormley moves to 5T (or can play both 3T and 5T).  Though it's quite possible I don't have any idea what I'm talking about.

alum96

April 8th, 2014 at 3:11 PM ^

I think that is quite accurate.  Wormley is listed as DL on the spring roster, most of the rest are either DE or NT ... it could be EVERY other lineman in fact, I did not check but Wormley was not clearly given a position.

MilkSteak

April 8th, 2014 at 1:54 PM ^

Is there any chance that we see Peppers or Dymonte Thomas on the offensive side of the ball this year? Both were great on offense in high school, it seems like it would be worth getting them on the field for a few snaps at WR given the lack of experience we have in that group anyways. It couldn't be bad to have dynamic athletes with the ball in space, especially given the excess of talent at CB at the moment.

Erik_in_Dayton

April 8th, 2014 at 2:03 PM ^

I haven't seen any mention of Thomas on the offensive side of the ball.  As for Peppers, I believe the plan is to start him out on defense and then later see if there is also a place for him on offense.  That said, I wouldn't be surprised if he's a guy that you can't keep off the field and that he gets a few handoffs or whatever.  We might also see him return punts and/or kickoffs, of course. 

funkywolve

April 8th, 2014 at 4:49 PM ^

While UM doesn't have a Jeremy Gallon returning, I'd say the wr position is a fairly solid one.  Funchess should hopefully be a stud.  You have a guy in Chesson who saw a good bit of time last year.  Canteen tore up spring ball and looks like he is going to see the field quite a bit come fall.  Lastly, you have Darboh who before he got injured was supposedly ahead of Chesson.

I'm all for finding a way to get your play makers (in this case Peppers) the ball but it might be asking a lot of him to try to get both offensive and defensive assignments down in the fall.

MilkSteak

April 8th, 2014 at 5:17 PM ^

Yeah I'm thinking more of I'm a very small role like have him run basically only Flys, quick slants, and bubble screens. If for nothing else maybe he could do the old Texas Tech and spell our wrs while simultaneously tiring out opposing corners with Flys because he is a legit threat over the top.

Go Blue in MN

April 8th, 2014 at 1:56 PM ^

I'm actually encouraged after seeing how many good players there are in the "Pushing from Behind" section.  There is some real ability there and it seems we are finally beginning to build depth, at least at certain positions.  Unfortunately, we still need to build an OL and as we saw last year, sometimes a team is only as strong as its weakest link. 

Ron Utah

April 8th, 2014 at 3:32 PM ^

Great stuff, Brian.

I have a few differences of opinion.  You have all three starting LBs in the top group; while I tend to agree--it is our deepest and strongest position group (although WR and CB is pretty dang good, too)--I think the starters may be a bit more fungible with Bolden, Gedon, and RJS right on the heels of the three you've named.  Bolden was a "fourth starter" last year, and his athleticism is something Morgan will never have.

Willie Henry is immensely talented and almost as inconsistent.  While Lloyd almost always played talent, I think Hoke really will put a guy on the field who is more consistent--even if he's not as good.  If Henry doesn't take himself seriously, he's in danger of losing that job.

I love Dennis Norfleet.  He's entertaining, tiny, and seems to have potential.  But that's the problem--it's only potential.  He has never demonstrated proof of his talent, and I don't think his spot as the slot is at all assured.  I think he'll play more, but the emergence of Canteen coupled with the return of Darboh may mean there are four WRs ahead of him.

At CB, the wealth of options makes the waters murkier.  That said, I don't think Lewis is a nickel at all.  IF, and that's a big IF, Countess and Taylor beat him out as outside starters, I think he'll play on the outside nickel situations, with Countess tucking into the slot...perhaps that's what you meant.  But hype and the spring practice/game thingy sure make it look like he deserves to start, with one of his elders coming off the bench in the nickel.

Dude.  Chad Lindsay isn't even on the roster, and is visiting other schools.  I'd replace him with either Kalis or Miller, and move that slot to the bottom of the list.  I love the wishful thinking, and Lindsay would be a HUGE get, but it's far from a done deal.

Hurst is obviously only a tenous starter given his spot on the list, but the omission of Godin is glaring.  That spot is wide open, and it could be Wormley, Hurst, or Godin, IMO.  Henry may very well find himself back at the DT.

 I believe Heitzman/AJ Williams is a toss-up.

I believe De'Veon Smith will start on first down against App. State.  He has gotten stronger and quicker, and the new system is perfect for him.  His ability to break tackles and move the pile will, I believe, make him the nominal starter.  I do think Hayes is the #2 RB right now, even on first and second down, and I even think that Green will have to battle Drake Johnson for #3.  All that said, I think Hoke is right: these are good problems to have, as any of these guys will be an upgrade over what we had last year.  I expect RB to be a strength for this team, and it has good depth.

Clark doesn't look any better than Hill; in fact, I like Hill better.  But experience often wins out at safety, so he may be the nominal starter.  I'd expect rotation there, perhaps even a frustrating amount of rotation.

I think Houma is ahead of Kerridge.

That's my 2 cents.

 

m1jjb00

April 8th, 2014 at 9:03 PM ^

I was going to follow Ron and echo a lot of his thoughts.  But, really after thinking about it I think this exercise points out the real issue:  how few sure starters there are.  

On offense there's Gardner, Funchess, Magnuson and Glasgow.  Butt's not on the list because of injury.  After that there's a lot of competition, some of that means we have depth, some of it means we don't have a starter yet.  We don't even have an idea how we'll line up mostly.  1 RB & 1 TE?  RB and H-back?  RB-and fullback?  RB and slot?  How do you rate Heitzman vs. Kerridge vs. Norfleet (ignoring the fact that each might not even be the #1 guy at that position)?

On defense, there's Clark, Beyer, Ross, JMFR and Wilson.  Pipkins would be on the list if it weren't for injury.  I'd like to pencil in Henry, but there's a little question (from what is said) about consistency/effort.  Surely, he'll play a lot, as will Wormley, but you can't be sure who starts. Morgan vs. Bolden is a real thing.  I'd suggest that it's conceivable that Bolden is putting it together.  Taylor, Countess, Lewis will all play, but I don't know who starts and how all of them get on the field, especially with Peppers coming in.  J Clark, Hill, Thomas, you got me.  Maybe none of them.

ca_prophet

April 8th, 2014 at 4:29 PM ^

... But much talent with which to answer them. Can we get it to develop and gel? I too agree that the fetish-ization of Norfleet is overdone; he seems like he has no real clue about how to get his speed to work for him against college players, and loses the ball too often to boot. I don't know what the coaches think, but based on what I've seen so far Norfleet is the last person on the list I want to touch the ball against MSU or OSU.

west2

April 8th, 2014 at 5:48 PM ^

that I have heard about Chris Lindsey transferring.  A senior center that was a backup at Alabama...sounds promising even if he was a middling player for the best program in college football right now thats going to be as good or better than what we have now.  Not that the young guys won't get there they just need time to develop.  Are there any other additions along these lines (juco plyaers or 5th year seniors) in the works to shore up weaknesses?