Hab

September 16th, 2018 at 5:25 PM ^

Your argument would be more persuasive if UM and UW started at the same spot.  The simple fact that UW started at 4 and UM at 14 is sufficient to explain why UW is still ranked higher.

 

Edit:  sorry, replied to the wrong response, intended to respond to Darboh's Extra 

BoFlex

September 16th, 2018 at 2:28 PM ^

The main solace I get is that there’s no way Ohio State’s remaining SoS allows them to jumps the top-3, so the only direction they can move is down.

BoFlex

September 16th, 2018 at 2:51 PM ^

Based on resume alone, I feel like LSU should be higher... Blew out Miami, shutout their FCS opponent, and took down Auburn on the road.

Joe Burrow finally gives LSU’s offense some competency to go along with their usual stout defense.

M-Dog

September 16th, 2018 at 4:19 PM ^

The team looks better than last year, but it still does not look like a top 10 team, or a Big Ten Champion team, or especially a team that can beat Ohio State.

Since just staying at AP #19 all season is nobody's goal at Michigan, there are some quite legitimate concerns.

 

Tyler1495

September 16th, 2018 at 3:18 PM ^

AP legit doesnt make sense. Michigan got pushed way down in the rankings after losing by one score against a rank team in a road night game. Other teams lose to ranked teams in similar or worse deficits and only drop 2-3 spots at most. 

Also, how did Michigan St move up In the rankings?

SpartyJon

September 16th, 2018 at 5:57 PM ^

Uh, the rankings are supposed to reflect who would win on a neutral field, right now.  Hartbarger is an elite punter - he is a huge loss to the team, especially since MSU plays ball control/field position offense.  

SDSU is 60th in S&P right now and won 32 games over the previous 3 years. It's not a bad loss, especially on the road.  

The oLine and secondary are both missing their best players in Chewins and Scott, and they will both be back in time for the MSU/UM game.  

 

StraightDave

September 16th, 2018 at 3:19 PM ^

I think what the AP is saying is,  Wisconsin is a better team than Michigan and if the two played today Wisconsin would win.  

No need to get butthurt Harballies.   It’s a long season with a lot of football to be played. 

chatster

September 16th, 2018 at 3:28 PM ^

Why do they call it the “Coaches Poll”?  Shouldn’t it be called the “Graduate Assistants/Sports Information Directors/Sports Information Office Interns” Poll?

Can you just imagine Nick Saban, Dabo Swinney, Ed Orgeron, Jimbo Fisher and all the other coaches who vote in the Amway Coaches Poll* sitting down early this morning, reviewing the game films from all the teams in the country and then deciding where to rank the top 25 teams?

For that matter, can you imagine ANYONE doing that?__________________________________________

*   For snarling wolverine, former Nebraska quarterback Turner Gill of Liberty (who was 28-2 in his three seasons as the Cornhuskers' starting QB) and Chad Lunsford of Georgia Southern get to vote in the Amway Coaches Poll, as do Big Ten coaches Jeff Brohm (Purdue), Mark Dantonio (Michigan State), DJ Durkin (Maryland -- yes, THAT DJ Durkin who's on "administrative leave" from being head coach at Maryland), P. J. Fleck (Minnesota), James Franklin (Penn State), Scott Frost (Nebraska) and Urban Meyer (Ohio State). LINK to List of Voters in Coaches Poll

blueday

September 16th, 2018 at 6:30 PM ^

Well.  Did not expect a bump.  Check the teams ahead of us. 

Plus, offense is high schoolish and D can't contain. Ranking making sense. 

This is on the ones that make the mulla ...  need to produce at the coaching level. 

We won. but SMU out coached D. Brown.

VictorsValiant91

September 16th, 2018 at 9:42 PM ^

So let me get this straight. Arizona State loses which makes MSU loss that much worse yet MSU on a bye week moves up. Michigan lost to a ranked team on the road and is 2-1 but Wisconsin loses at home to a non-ranked team but is ranked higher than us. TCU loses as well to a ranked team but somehow they just drop 2 spots

MDSup3rDup3

September 17th, 2018 at 1:24 PM ^

Rankings are a joke. They are based on eye test and inborne issues with subjectivity. If you check the FPI and S&P+, we are ranked 8th and 10th, respectively (ahead of ND). This accounts for SOS and actual efficiency. Also, a reminder that these rankings mean nothing in comparison to the CFP rankings that will come out later this year (which are also inefficient).

 

With that being said, I don't understand how a home loss to BYU still leaves you ahead of a team who lost by 1 score on the road at ranked ND. UGH!!!