LIST OF WWE PERSONNEL?!?
- Member for
- 6 years 14 weeks
|5 years 49 weeks ago||yes||
|5 years 51 weeks ago||Where did you play?||
Where did you play?
|5 years 51 weeks ago||Oh, so are you saying .500 is||
Oh, so are you saying .500 is some sort of threshold that would get us in because we have some big wins to go along with it?
|5 years 52 weeks ago||haha pun intended?||
haha pun intended?
|6 years 2 hours ago||It may be ridiculous, but||
It may be ridiculous, but when I ask myself whether I feel our chances to win at Minnesota are significantly increased by Brian not hosting a liveblog, I most definitely do.
|6 years 1 day ago||karpo, Try bringing this up||
Try bringing this up again in a few months. If no one here is planning on skipping out on tickets next year, I know at least a few people who would definitely do it for 20 bucks.
|6 years 1 day ago||Student ticket sales are||
Student ticket sales are mostly online now, I think.
|6 years 2 weeks ago||!= as in "is not equal to".||
!= as in "is not equal to".
|6 years 2 weeks ago||lol you sounded pretty||
lol you sounded pretty serious
|6 years 3 weeks ago||The USNews ranking system is||
The USNews ranking system is biased against public schools; that's not a new idea.
Look at their ranking methodology:
As college football fans, we all know about the problems with rankings. That being said, the quality of education at Michigan is definitely what you make of it.
|6 years 3 weeks ago||You never go full retard.||
You never go full retard.
|6 years 4 weeks ago||Didn't we used to have||
Didn't we used to have stickers?
|6 years 4 weeks ago||http://www.youtube.com/watch?|
|6 years 4 weeks ago||I care about hockey, and I||
I care about hockey, and I think Michigan fans in general care too.
|6 years 4 weeks ago||This was definitely a joke||
This was definitely a joke hahaha
|6 years 4 weeks ago||lol wow, I got a pretty good||
lol wow, I got a pretty good laugh out of that.
|6 years 5 weeks ago||OH oops I see Losers from the||
OH oops I see
Losers from the top 4, losers from the bottom 4.
|6 years 5 weeks ago||I don't think the visual aid||
I don't think the visual aid matches the description. The image seems to make more sense than the way you described it though; an 8-team bracket would have only 4 losers after the first round, so for the bottom 4 losers to be eliminated and the top 4 losers to play the next round, well.. I don't understand.
Did you mean that the bottom 2 losers get eliminated?
|6 years 5 weeks ago||I'm confused. Why do you post||
I'm confused. Why do you post on this board? This isn't me telling you to leave or anything like that; I'm just curious.
|6 years 6 weeks ago||Is Texas' fight song 'I've||
Is Texas' fight song 'I've been working on a railroad'?
|6 years 6 weeks ago||Trgovac a possiblity for||
Trgovac a possiblity for what? For a truly informative post, it seems like "Trgovac a possibility for new DC" would be necessary. But no matter how much complaining there is, I don't think every poster is ever going to be that clear in their titles.
|6 years 6 weeks ago||I'm definitely with all of||
I'm definitely with all of you that informative titles make the board a lot better. I just don't think it's as big of a deal as people make it out to be.
"Trgovac" ended up being a post about Trgovac. True, it's ambiguous, but in no way is this the least informative one out there.
|6 years 6 weeks ago||Promote RichRod, look at||
Promote RichRod, look at anyaskman's post titled "not so much" like 3 posts above yours and tell me your last post doesn't sound like an argument for his point. The headline for this thread isn't misleading or purposefully fake. I looked at the title and instantly knew it was about Trgovac. It told me what his post was going to be about; that seems informative enough to me.
I don't post too often on this board; I really just like to read and browse, and the non-informative thread titles are annoying, but certainly are not the big deal people are making it.
|6 years 6 weeks ago||EnjoyLife, your posts seem||
EnjoyLife, your posts seem so.. contrived that you almost sound like Rita Skeeter from the Harry Potter books.
Anyway, Pete Carroll is generally known as a really good guy; why not give him the benefit of the doubt?
|6 years 6 weeks ago||That is the general consensus||
That is the general consensus on this board, yeah, but how do we actually know this? I'd love to believe that Rich Rodriguez didn't run him away, but as far as I've seen, there isn't much proof.
What proof is out there?
|6 years 6 weeks ago||Some ushers are really lax||
Some ushers are really lax about these things. There's one usher who works football games who I know almost never checks tickets for his section.
|6 years 6 weeks ago||disagree||
On what grounds do you say that?
|6 years 7 weeks ago||lol lol||
|6 years 7 weeks ago||Ann Arbor under fresh snow is||
Ann Arbor under fresh snow is SO nice. If it doesn't get too cold, they might really like it.
|6 years 7 weeks ago||What? A lot of interceptions||
What? A lot of interceptions are receivers messing up.
But maybe if you get angry and swear more I'll change my mind.