Petition against another liveblog!

Submitted by thevictor22 on
The evidence against liveblogs for basketball games continues to pile up and so I have decided to start a petition against a liveblog against Minnesota next week. This game is too important to our NCAA hopes to tempt the Angry MGoLiveblog Hating God and despite the better perforance in today's game, we still need a win or two. Post here to voice your opinion against this madness! (And no, a blog disguised as a discussion about an obscure Asian country should not be accepted either). Let your voice be heard and Go Blue!

pobopo

March 1st, 2009 at 5:32 PM ^

It may be ridiculous, but when I ask myself whether I feel our chances to win at Minnesota are significantly increased by Brian not hosting a liveblog, I most definitely do. signed.

jmblue

March 1st, 2009 at 6:03 PM ^

The bottom line is that we're 2-6 when Brian hosts a liveblog this season, and 16-6 when he doesn't. He did NOT host one for any of our four biggest wins of the season: UCLA, Duke, Illinois or Purdue. The evidence is overwhelming. No liveblog for next Saturday or the BTT. (And maybe none for Selection Sunday, just to be safe.)

mfan_in_ohio

March 1st, 2009 at 6:04 PM ^

I can't believe we'd even think about doing a liveblog. Don't mess with mojo you don't understand. Think of it as doing your part to help the team.

yvgeni

March 1st, 2009 at 7:48 PM ^

If Brian decides to ignore our populist demands, I will hack into this site on that day and turn it into a lolcats mirror. Don't you dare think I'm bluffing Cook....

MechE

March 1st, 2009 at 11:22 PM ^

The bottom line is a lot of people still participate in the liveblog and assuming that a live internet discussion between an arbitrary group of people has anything to do with the performace of some basketball players is absurd. Also, correllation != causation. Thank you

dmccoy

March 1st, 2009 at 11:26 PM ^

No more live-blogs until we lose a game. If we lose to Minnesota, on with the live-blogs. If we win, continue the ban on live-blogs.

dankbrogoblue

March 2nd, 2009 at 12:29 AM ^

Whether correlation=causation or not (scientists today still struggle with this question) an MGoLiveBlog will create bad energy amongst the blogosphere which will affect the game poorly (IMHO). SIGNED.

Amazin-Blue

March 2nd, 2009 at 8:08 PM ^

So I guess the fact that 69% of over 2,800 votes cast say NO to a live blog is not enough? You want a petition? So, like almost 2,000 people can duplicate their vote by signing the petition? Are petitions better than voting?? I'm corn-fused!!

WolvinLA

March 2nd, 2009 at 8:25 PM ^

First, you guys are all dumb. Second, what if we told all the players that Brian wasn't doing a LiveBlog but then we did one anyway without them knowing? Is that enough? I live in LA and the game will not be on TV here. I get too frustrated usually with those live feeds. Without the LiveBlog I'm relegated to ESPN GameCast which isn't that cool.