that makes one of us
- Member for
- 3 years 8 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|17 weeks 4 days ago||This is a more tranquil tone||
than I expected from Brian.
|22 weeks 2 days ago||2nd?||
Which one are we not counting....
|31 weeks 3 days ago||ONIONS!||
Way to go fellas.
|33 weeks 4 days ago||Good job,||
|1 year 44 weeks ago||Hey so,||
you probably get this a lot...but, are you, uh...the Proclus?
|1 year 44 weeks ago||...although he won't actually be at the game?*||
|1 year 44 weeks ago||He does have a game, league championship this weekend...||
which is why, I believe, Shallman won't be attending either.
|1 year 49 weeks ago||Math is the most common-sense field there is...||
or did you mean "the eye-ball test" instead of "common sense"?
|1 year 51 weeks ago||Coming this fall, Michael Scarn in...||
Fret Level: Midnight.
|1 year 51 weeks ago||Mmm, Spartan tears taste like sugar...||
so yummy and sweet.
Also, RVB just swallows up Persa (?) in one of the Evanston highlights.
|2 years 4 weeks ago||So, no one's in doubt to start Fall camp...||
from an injury perspective? Not Poole? Or is that something that gets cleared up on Monday?
|2 years 19 weeks ago||Our 3rd and short defense in that game was...||
|2 years 26 weeks ago||Fuck it! Yes!||
That's your answer. That's your answer for everything! Tatoo it on your forehead!
|2 years 26 weeks ago||No person was defenestrated...||
but their hopes were.
Incidentally, I'll be interested to see what Wilbon says today ;)
|2 years 29 weeks ago||Flamebaited? Come on, these never get old||
|2 years 33 weeks ago||Forgot 2 important ones:||
|2 years 37 weeks ago||*NBA Jam voice says* "He's heating up..."||
|2 years 37 weeks ago||So, so winner...||
|2 years 37 weeks ago||How is that a "jet" play at all? No one is in motion before||
the snap...I thought a jet sweep utilized a man-in-motion who received the ball right after the snap while running full speed. Hence, "jet."
|2 years 37 weeks ago||I get the spirit of it, I'm just saying it's stupid...||
Moving from 20% to 30% confidence is a relative increase of 50% in confidence; one could argue it IS worth quite a bit. Indeed, I think ANY improvement would be beneficial in this case.
Further, instituting a playoff would not be that hard, and you are more (though not perfectly) insulated from these kinds of criticisms: the differences between teams ranked 1-3 are much smaller than the differences between teams ranked 1-6 or 1-8. The last team out has less of an argument that they are legitimate contenders as you increase the number of teams. So why not increase the number of teams?
|2 years 37 weeks ago||You wouldn't want a playoff if it potentially DOUBLES the||
fictional accuracy of choosing NC contenders? Obviously 100% is ideal...but if there is a concrete way to get closer to 100%, you wouldn't do it because it doesn't get you all the way there?
|2 years 38 weeks ago||Estan en la biblioteca?||
Me gustan los commits. MUCHAS ESTRELLAS, POR FAVOR!!
|2 years 38 weeks ago||When is Wright deciding?||
Haven't seen that here....
|2 years 39 weeks ago||Hail to the seniors...||
They were starvin', not anymore!!
|2 years 39 weeks ago||Take it easy on the delivery guy, Brian...||
It's not his fault he can't read!
|2 years 39 weeks ago||"But||
if MGoBlog didn't come around to combine that loss with the narrative of the Declining Carr (which then melded into the narrative of Thwarted Rodriguez Promise) and give it that catchy name, it wouldn't seem like that big of a deal. "
No, it is and was a big deal. It was literally a historical first, you cannot dispute that. That's why sportswriters will never stop talking about it.
|2 years 39 weeks ago||Yep, sure came out quickly in the 2nd though, 51 points||
in the half for us.
Duke was amazing from 3pt range though. Even more amazingly, if we make our FT's and shoot a little better from distance (we were 31%), we might have been able to withstand that great shooting performance.
|2 years 39 weeks ago||Yeah, but at what cost?||
At what point does individual talent trump chemistry? What are others who wanted to visit going to think if you bend the rules for PB?
|2 years 39 weeks ago||Fisher's going to be good, and we have a small hole at OT||
for the immediate future. That one still stings :(
|2 years 39 weeks ago||Yeah, I had the same reaction....||
You won't hear Hoke et al. talk about "balance." Probably won't hear them talk about anything besides winning. And if Meyer doesn't win, Ohio fans will immediately question "balance."