Niko Porikos grew up in an NTDP billet home. Cool story.
- Member for
- 2 years 38 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|1 day 22 hours ago||17-7 michigan||
|3 days 1 hour ago||My moment: an employee of||
My moment: an employee of this site constantly twittering kids with "Follow back!".
|5 days 14 hours ago||Pretty sure the NCAA video||
Pretty sure the NCAA video game franchise has made everyone an expert on red shirting. Do it to all your players and they are magically better the next year!
|6 days 11 hours ago||Maybe you got down voted for||
Maybe you got down voted for sounding like an ass?
|1 week 1 day ago||My mom ranks me #1!||
My mom ranks me #1!
|1 week 2 days ago||I think Hoke has changed the||
I think Hoke has changed the tide on the rivalry. Hell people in Ohio are starting to believe him. Never in a million years I would have thought that. Selling Michigan jerseys is a good start.
|2 weeks 14 hours ago||Should we throw a Terrelle||
Should we throw a Terrelle Pryor party?
|3 weeks 14 hours ago||I pretty much just post here||
I pretty much just post here so I can stay above 100 points while I neg you.
But seirously, don't wear a jersey.
|3 weeks 1 day ago||Yeah small sample data not||
Yay? small sample data not controlled for opponent or possesions!
|8 weeks 5 days ago||ADD PUNTERS!!! Nothing like||
Nothing like rooting for an offense to fail miserably (without turning the ball over). Set the scoring so they don't mean much (like 1 pt for 100 yards punted), and then make fun of your buddies when they lose because of their punter (it will happen).
|10 weeks 2 days ago||The day I tweeted a recruit!||
The day I tweeted a recruit!
|10 weeks 2 days ago||These threads always turn out||
These threads always turn out exactly the same.
1) post says "shouldn't need to say this, but don't tweet at recruits"
2) everyone responds going "man I never tweet at recruits! Don't do it guys!"
It is just like the sole purpose of these threads is to make 40 year olds that follow teenagers on twitter feel good about themselves because they don't tweet directly at them.
As a side note, anyone on the internet has to be exactly who they say they are. Recruits should definitely base their college choice based on what they say.
|17 weeks 2 days ago||I know it is a kickstarter,||
I know it is a kickstarter, but 85 bucks gets you 1600 (or less) calories?
|18 weeks 3 days ago||Googled it, and still can't||
Googled it, and still can't figure out whaat The Swarm is.
|21 weeks 1 day ago||"The Wolverines came into Big||
"The Wolverines came into Big Ten play slightly chastened by a home loss to Kent State and their brilliant pitcher, but nevertheless riding a brilliant non-conference performance. "
While I enjoyed this review. Do yuo think you might be using "brilliant" too liberally?
|22 weeks 4 days ago||chicks||
|25 weeks 11 hours ago||can we label the axes of the||
can we label the axes of the first gaph so they make sense?
|27 weeks 12 hours ago||Duke over wisconsin?||
Duke over wisconsin?
|27 weeks 12 hours ago||khakis?||
|27 weeks 2 days ago||Do threads about reading||
Do threads about reading Sparty message boards always end well?
|28 weeks 6 days ago||not coreect thread||
not correct thread capitalization according to ME
|28 weeks 6 days ago||naw||
|28 weeks 6 days ago||I strive to stay around 100||
I strive to stay around 100 points. However recently I havent been negging WD/negged enough, so this should be good.
|29 weeks 3 days ago||negged for using the word||
negged for using the word "proves" so utterly wrong.
|29 weeks 5 days ago||$||
|29 weeks 5 days ago||Really cool thread about some||
Really cool thread about some guy's website and its hypothetical schedule for a tournament that no one cares about.
|30 weeks 3 days ago||What a terrible click bait||
What a terrible click bait article. Doesn't even cite their source or mention their actual data once, so gonna assume it is just total BS.
|32 weeks 1 day ago||this is not about rod/cone||
this is not about rod/cone differences between individuals (which does exist), but about whether or not you percieve the dress as in a shadow.
|32 weeks 1 day ago||Sorry for replying yo the||
Sorry for replying yo the first post, but as someone who studies vision I thought I could explain what is going on here. The dress is an example of color constancy and how our mind deals with shadows. Basically:
1) if you see the dress as black and blue, your mind is perceiving the entire picture as overexposed with the dress NOT in a shdow.
2) if you percieve the dress as gold and white, your mind is perceiving the dress as in a shdow, with the rest of the picture NOT overexposed. Because the dress is in a shadow, your mind corrects for the darker images and lightens the dress.
It is in a sense the classic checkboard shadow illusion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checker_shadow_illusion
Now what makes someone percieve the dress as in a shadow and others as not, I have no clue. For me, it switches back and forth occasionaly, but I tend to see it as gold and white with a few times seeing it as blue and black.
|34 weeks 18 hours ago||Joe Morgan Appreciation||
Joe Morgan Appreciation Thread