Could players sue for reckless endangerment?

Your logic is better than any other logic we’ve seen the past 3 weeks. 

i thought the same.. This is a pandora's box in the lack of response and responsibility that could result in player lawsuit now... If it was player safety, why not address all the injuries that Big Ten conference did not protect the players in-game with signal sharing that is happening legally or not. This is player safety as commish stated and they did nothing about it... This will go bad now.. 

Also, this should then force Big Ten to address the issue of the game signal exchanges between the 3 schools promptly and not slowly either case..

No. Please stop.  This is not even remotely a safety issue.  This is a fake controversy ginned up by our rivals and inexplicably run out by this dipshit of a commissioner.  

Penn State will sue for having him get everyone so fired up that they get run off the field.

I don’t think we have proof that it is more dangerous. 
 

In theory, if you knew where a play was going you would be in a better position to make a textbook tackle at a slower rate of speed/impact. Or even better, be there early and make a play on the ball as opposed to full contact. That is safer. No question. 

Often significant collisions occur when a defender is catching up to a play, because they were out of position in space at full speed. 

IMO this is further proof Tony doesn’t know what he is talking about. 
 

Can I sue my wife for her cooking?

Seems doubtful. But I'd like to believe that in our lawsuit it will be dismissed as an obviously preposterous argument on the part of the Big Ten and that it will hurt their case for holding such contradictory beliefs (it's a health and safety issue so it's only legal if you do it this way and not the other way even though the end result is the same).

I thought more about NIL reasons: would be labeled a cheater without investigation or trial humor damage the perception of the programs and players. Plus this could cost the players wins, hurting exposure and NIL value and marketability. I’m no lawyer (but I did stay at a holiday inn express), but I’d imagine some lawyer could present a case about the oppressive NCAA and Big Ten exploiting and damaging the NIL value and profitability of the players through bush league tactics to silence opposition. 

Uh, oh!  Jim would be the one to pose this concerning question to the media and as written to the entire NCAA and Bigten then reiterate, as before, the need for revenue sharing for fairness and this issue for safety (link Hallers much used ironical quote for consistency).

Reckless endangerment is a crime, not a tort, so you can't really sue someone for it.

The problem with that sign stealing has been going on every since there has been signs and there is no proof whatsoever that it is dangerous. In fact, no one has ever even suggested it was dangerous until Sparty came up with that. 

Obviously, no one ever believed that because the NCAA specifically says it is legal and no one has objected. In fact, if anyone had ever thought it was dangerous it could be completely eliminated by using helmet headphones. But that idea was not accepted because of the minor cost it would require. 

Great point. If sign "stealing/decoding" is so damn dangerous, how is it permitted at all? Sadly, I  doubt we see any CFB talking heads point this out, even "pro Michigan" ones b/c it would make too many heads explode. 

Yes, I made this same point after I saw Petitti's letter.  Would be nothing sweeter than to see former players bankrupt the B1G while we are heading out the door to join the ACC.