Whats the chances we're ranked?

Submitted by natesezgoblue on

i know we were around 40ish and the media for the most part was impressed with the win..Thoughts?

switch26

September 5th, 2010 at 10:03 PM ^

Ya i would say we won't get ranked, since we didn't beat a ranked team..

 

If we beat ND by 2 td's ill bet we are ranked.

BlueTommy

September 5th, 2010 at 10:13 PM ^

If we take care of Notre Dame, I think you'll see us in the bottom 1/5 of the polls.  Of course, the voters could get all kinds of Denarded this weekend and throw us enough votes to sneak in at 25.

biakabutuka ex…

September 5th, 2010 at 10:22 PM ^

There will be 1-3 spots open. My guess is the first opening goes to Stanford.

I'll just be happy to see Michigan in the list of "other teams receiving votes". I've considered that our Super Bowl these last two years.

Enjoy Life

September 5th, 2010 at 10:30 PM ^

Note to OP --- there is this thing called "The Google" you type in AP Top25 and it tells you the current record of all the Top25 teams. So far, only 3 have lost. Pittsburgh (15), UNC (18), Oregon State (24).

Boise State (3) and VT (10) play tomorrow but even the loser will probably not fall out of the Top25.

I'm guessing UNC and OSU (heh, heh) drop out. Doubtful M would move in.

NOLA Blue

September 5th, 2010 at 10:55 PM ^

You mean to tell me that Florida is still going to be ranked in the top 25?

Michigan outplayed #4 Florida and was more impressive than #5 Texas, against a far better team than either of those powers faced.  Even #21 LSU could barely pull it off against a team missing 7 defensive starters, and #14 USC allowed Hawaii to out-gain them with 588 yards.  Yep, U of M deserves to be ranked.  Florida's spot would be the most fair, but I suppose I would settle for LSU's spot... until next week.

Beavis

September 6th, 2010 at 12:33 AM ^

Have you seen some of the articles on CBSSports?  I'd have to say the media is giving us even more love than ND.

Love the season thus far.  Hope that RR and Denard keep control of the guys and don't let all this media love take the chip off their shoulders!

Dhani Bowtie

September 5th, 2010 at 10:35 PM ^

We were ranked briefly following the ND game last year if my memory serves me correctly. I'm as excited as anybody but we were all this excited last year after the first four games.

wolverhorn

September 5th, 2010 at 10:40 PM ^

Yeah I keep bringing myself back to reality by thinking about this time last year.  I do think we're better but if last year taught us anything, it's to take the season a game at a time.  Just enjoy the ride.  Haha for some reason as I typed that I thought of that Harold and Kumar scene where they ride the cheetah...except Denard is the cheetah.

(firing up GIMP...)

Brodie

September 6th, 2010 at 2:24 AM ^

First 4 games last year: Dominated a MAC team Needed a miracle comeback to beat overrated Notre Dame Dominated a MAC team Needed a miracle comeback to beat not at all underrated Indiana I'm not seeing how this start is comparable. If we beat Notre Dame, we're looking at a probable 5-0 start going into a very favorable matchup with MSU. I'm all about keeping my expectations realistic, but the win yesterday really was that big of a deal. Michigan beat the shit out of a good BCS team and our defense proved totally capable of bending without breaking. That bodes incredibly well for this season.

befuggled

September 6th, 2010 at 9:33 AM ^

We beat what *may* be a good team. At the time we beat Notre Dame, I'm sure you remember they were in the top 25 and were generally thought to be a better team than they actually were.

Connecticut may ultimately prove to be a good team, but at the same time they may have regressed a little from last year. We just don't know yet.

goldmanblue

September 5th, 2010 at 10:41 PM ^

I'm loving the glow but let's see how te men do the next five games before we start looking at rankings. We need to keep supporting our team to keep the heads level.

Njia

September 5th, 2010 at 11:16 PM ^

We not care about rankings for the time being? As coaches like to say, "Take it a game at a time. Rankings and props from the pollsters will take care of themselves."

Until we prove that we can slug it out with the Big 10's biggest mo' fos, I'd just as soon we sneak up on people, anyway.

Tater

September 5th, 2010 at 11:22 PM ^

A convincing victory over ND would probably get Michigan in the top 25: barely.  One good thing about being Michigan is that if they play well, they will be ranked fairly by the end of the year.  That is what really counts, anyway.

Getting "too far ahead," I could see a very nice ranking if they manage to go 6-0 with a signature victory over Sparty.

jlcoleman71

September 5th, 2010 at 11:32 PM ^

The team played well, but even going 2-0 by beating ND won't get Michigan in the top 25...........we saw this story last year and the team imploded once they got into Big Ten play.....the voters won't be so quick to give UofM the benefit of the doubt, not after the last few years.

Beating UConn and ND would be great, but then you've got UMass and Bowling Green........no one will care about Michigan beating those teams.

Start out Big Ten play convincingly, and then we'll talk about being ranked..........I want this team to succeed, I like RichRod and his style of play, but it won't mean anything unless we win a few against our conference opponents.

Griff88

September 5th, 2010 at 11:49 PM ^

If you watched sportsworks like I did. Woody said the Spartans were much more impressive. Baligian and Sharp were of the opinion it was more about UCONN sucking, then Michigan doing well. Also according to Sharp, when B10 play starts, other teams like the great Spartans will just run it down Michigan's throat. The 3-3-5 has no chance of stopping the run. Our finesse defense will be smooshed by all the ogres in the B10. Also DR will be out with injury soon enough. You see, he runs far to much.

Now that I have been enlightened by experts such as these... at least the suspense for this season is over.  Michigan will be lucky to finish the season ranked ahead of Yale, let alone the top 50.

Njia

September 6th, 2010 at 6:57 AM ^

I watched those ass hats talk about Notre Dame. I don't know if you've heard, but we might as well mail it in against Notre Dame on Saturday. Our defense won't be able to stop that Brian Kelly offense who will just "run it down the defense's throats."

Someone should ask Bob Stoops what he thinks of a 3-3-5 "finesse defense" against the run. His Oklahoma Sooners played against WVU's in the 2008 Fiesta Bowl. I'm fairly certain he came away impressed.

ThornXBL

September 5th, 2010 at 11:52 PM ^

I know it's completely irrelevant, but I found it amusing.

When playing a NCAA 2011 Dynasty, Michigan was still out of the Top 25 after starting 7-0. One of the fake "headlines" it showed on the ESPN News thing was "ANN ARBOR IS FURIOUS: Fans angry about snub in polls"

lhglrkwg

September 6th, 2010 at 1:02 AM ^

and rightfully so. everyone hopped right back on the bandwagon last year when we started 4-0 and some people were putting us in their top 10/15 in those 'based on performance only' rankings. they all got totally burned (as did we) so they will wisely stay off the michigan pos-bang for another week or so.

Blue Ninja

September 6th, 2010 at 12:39 PM ^

Its concievable that we get ranked after ND if we win, but I think some will be at least sceptical until the MSU and Iowa games. Win those and we're on our way back.

 

All that said beat ND in South Bend and do it walking away.....its certainly possible.

jmblue

September 6th, 2010 at 12:54 PM ^

Not this week, but it's possible if we win next week.  We turned some heads Saturday.  Beating a Brian Kelly-coached ND in South Bend would turn some more.