Mason NEEDS this, Pistons, after all you've put him through
- Member for
- 4 years 18 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|3 weeks 1 day ago||While we're on abbreviations,||
You sport yours in NoVa and I'll sport mine around RiVA. I'm sure there are some AA hippies running around NOLA to pick up my slack...
|3 weeks 1 day ago||I am listening to...||
Ora by Ludovico Einaudi. Little dude was putting up some mean cross rhythms for a second there, and then a nice gallant strut through the refrain.
|3 weeks 6 days ago||True that||
Seriously, we don't normally make dinner dates at the grocery store, but... the hot plates are pretty dang good, especially the breakfast bar, and they'll sell me a growler at the end of the day. Can have a pint with dinner, safely drive home, and then have a couple more pints at home. Got a nice little Sunday planned, maybe hit the Bed Bath and Beyond on the way home... I don't know, don't know if there'll be enough time.
|3 weeks 6 days ago||Exactly||
Perhaps he's just suggesting that Northwestern is too directional and needs to be re-named Illinois State of Chicago...
|3 weeks 6 days ago||Richmond locales||
Definitely had a moment of home sick set in... then discovered 3 places set to tap Oberon right here in Richmond, VA. My wife and I have set a dinner date for Whole Foods in Short Pump next Saturday! (Trauma nights for the next 6 days means I will be instead taking care of anyone having a few too many Oberon's with keys in hand... also, please keep gasoline and diesel away from your bonfires. Actually, please just stay away from fires. End of Public Announcement.)
|5 weeks 2 days ago||Agreed||
Living in Richmond, stoked to have reasonable road trips for football and basketball.
|10 weeks 5 days ago||By the way,||
I appreciated your points here, including players' rights to not be smeared (pre-emptively) by story hungry mediaites, as well as the implications of medical costs associated with injuries suffered during NCAA athletics.
|10 weeks 5 days ago||Tablet Error||
|10 weeks 5 days ago||Return||
I appreciate your tenor, and respectfully offer the following thoughts:
Agreed that 40 hours a week is a big time commitment. 1. A lot of people who don't have their educations paid for with scholarships do so with employment. I had a lot of respect for my classmates paying their way through school, because their bosses were much less likely to schedule around college courses, whereas my training was built to suit class scheduling. There is no reason to feel sorry for D1 athletes... again, what they do is fun. 2. The alleged rape didn't occur at 6 AM warm-ups either - D1 athletes have plenty of time to party.
|10 weeks 5 days ago||Wow||
Sorry you missed it... I WAS a college athlete. The point is that college athletes are neither hindered by their sports participation, nor is their (my) experience as an athlete anything like that of a medical intern. I'm not sure what it is you hold against janitors.
|10 weeks 5 days ago||Terrible Comparison||
Having been both a scholarship NCAA athlete and a medical intern, the comparison between the two is mind blowingly assinine. One requires two (usually three) degrees, a multi-$100k personal investment, and initiation of licensing (first two steps completed before internship) after which a physician (interns are doctors - not 'students') has the 'honor' to subsidize Medicaid/Medicare as the cheapest labor in the hospital ($8 an hour.) The other... NCAA athletes... play a sport while giving up free time they would otherwise use partying - and I still partied my ass off. I also completed a double major (Chemistry and Biomedical Sciences) with a Spanish minor in five years, 157 credit hours - so don't give me the 'sports are diminishing the value of the education' bullshit either. That editorial line simply proves that editors don't know jack. There is NO TRADE. People make personal decisions. If athletes are pursuing crap educations while given a free ride, THAT IS THEIR DECISION. College Athletics are a good time that gives life lessons - if you're not having a great time and think you should be paid to do it, you're doing it wrong. Signed - Guy Who Knows
|12 weeks 6 days ago||dude||
I don't even play basketball, and even I want to play for Beilein.
|22 weeks 2 days ago||Almost sums it up||
But let's s'pose The Honorable Sparrow instead says "...but why is the run gone?" Now that would sum it up beautifully.
|27 weeks 2 days ago||Good points||
I was referring to the weekly prep for an opponent as a sign of respect through preparation. I don't believe M should have spent a day of every week prepping for Akron, rather the point was that they had 5 days to respect their opponent and prep for them... I'm guessing a few of those days were spent basking in the glory of a solid victory, as opposed to figuring out in which areas their opponent's players excelled.
As far as Alabama - there would be two full seasons of development for our freshmen LBs that last started against them, as well as heavy losses on their O line. It would be a much different match-up 16 months later. Not saying M would be favored...
|27 weeks 2 days ago||90's||
Remember when Michigan seemed to continually have a lockdown secondary, with a prospect headed to NFL fame and fortune every year? I feel like that train has been started all over again. Work and talent mean the sky's the limit (or limited, in the case of a No Fly Zone). Go Blue!
|27 weeks 2 days ago||Akron and UConn||
c) An athlete's performance in a game of 1-1 matchups is heavily influenced by said athlete's perceptions of the opponent. The Spartans spend at least one day of every week learning about the opponent they hate most - with effective results. I am pretty sure that Michigan presumed it could win every 1-1 matchup with Akron on pure athletic prowess, and found out that a team without respect for a single 1-1 matchup in the game is not actually a team. Bo would not have been proud of 22 guys not doing their jobs and watching extra hours of film and preparing for their 1-1 to help the team. A team is not only about respecting your teammates, it is about respecting your opponents. This lesson has been learned (for the year) and will help M to prepare for every game as a single, respect worthy opponent going forward. Michigan 13-0 going into bowl season. Book it.
|29 weeks 2 days ago||unbelievable||
You mean the same place that initiated the reference to a political movement as tea-baggers (with a girlish giggle from Anderson Cooper, of course) would smash the ethos of journalism upon the rocks of sophomorism? I, for one, am shocked. /s
|29 weeks 2 days ago||Two things||
1. Most college teams are publicly owned/financed. The tax payers took the financial risk and built the franchises, certainly that value is not going to be divvied among a bunch of teenagers.
|31 weeks 2 days ago||Overlooking Opponents||
1. not sportsmanlike, nor Michiganmanlike
2. last time we exuberantly expressed our superiority to an opponent, expressed in the fashion of suggesting we need not even talk about them while we instead talk about a team in green, was 2007. remember it. learn from it.
|33 weeks 1 day ago||True that||
Can you imagine? Pipkins, Taco, Mone, McDowell, Hand, Cornell... that is a scary two-deep!
|33 weeks 2 days ago||I'm curious as well||
TCU, a defensive team, returns 9 defensive starters and returns one of the better QBs in the game after a suspension... unless a mediocre QB from last year beats him out (presumably he would no longer be mediocre at that point.) Add to that, Devonte Fields is no longer suspended for the LSU game. If defense still wins games, I like TCU's chances.
|34 weeks 4 days ago||in resp to dnak and bronx||
Choosing to ignore a large swath of a population does not increase perceptible differences in the 0.03% one chooses to focus on. It is also why we get the delight of players like Kovacs, Ryan, and Hart blowing up 5-stars on the field after being glossed over by a few scouts.
Each of your responses remind me of the pleasure we all witnessed in 2006 when a kid named Dan Bazuin rocked our offense on numerous plays for CMU. He was a kid from McBain MI who travelled to the metropolis of Lake City (kind of a suburb of Cadillac) to play football. He may have come from an unscouted high-school, but he more than proved he belonged on the field lined up against Jake Long, Chad Benne and Mike Hart. Thankfully, Michigan handled their business against CMU that day, proving that a team full of highly scouted players is always better than a team of under-scouted players (oh... until the next season opener?)
Essentially you have both pointed to scouting services' selection bias. You have not made an argument against the difficulty of defining differences among the top 0.03% of a 1,000,000 plus population.
|34 weeks 5 days ago||Sorry Ace||
But, "major outlier" needs a bit more definition. There are over 1,000,000 high school football players nationwide. Approximately 2500 will be selected by coaches/staff to play D1-FBS football, meaning these are somewhere between the top 0.25% to 1% of highschool football players. A Top 100 means the services are trying to differentiate a top 0.01% from the rest of the top 0.25%. Arguing that a player is #100 vs #300 (a whopping 200 spot difference!) Is simply suggesting that player resides in the top 0.01% vs the top 0.03%. A statistician would probably point out that the most major noise at the top (or bottom) 0.03% of a population is going to be due to biases and experimental mis-design. Obviously recruiting services are biased. But we are the chumps who buy into there being a palpable difference among the the kids rated in the top 300 in the nation.
|36 weeks 10 hours ago||Chartreus||
du 9e centenaire
|38 weeks 1 day ago||BBQ||
One of the coaches need to hop on a plane this weekend and take the Fournette's a plate of hot BBQ. Food sends a big message in Louisiana.
|43 weeks 5 days ago||Multiple Qbanks||
You're not studying to master UWorld.
Had a buddy in med-school who worked through UWorld 3 times. He was stoked (read 'braggadocious') about hitting 90s consistently the third time through... He then barely passed the real thing... and changed his specialty choice.
Mastering a single Q bank will give you false confidence. Make it hard for yourself, and watch your scores rise slowly as you work through multiple Q banks. 5000 unique questions is far better than repeating the same 2000 a couple of times.
|43 weeks 5 days ago||Forgot to mention...||
Best advice I ever received: Questions, Questions, Questions!!!
|43 weeks 5 days ago||Yup.||
Subscribe to USMLE World. Lock self in closet. Emerge in 4 months as the smartest version of 'you' ever to take a test.
3 q-banks -
2. First Aid Q&A book - easier Qs, but increased efficiency of working through UWorld. Also, 1000 questions for low cost.
3. Used Kaplan QBook for Step 2 CK; another source of cheap questions of moderate difficulty. I'm sure there's a Step 1 version.
Best of luck!
|43 weeks 5 days ago||The sum of all tests prior...||
and then you take Step 1. Now THAT is a test! Good luck, and keep on knocking 'em down!!!
|43 weeks 5 days ago||Practice Tests||
Took MCAT twice, 5 years apart. Started Coffee Shop and ran Wine Bar in between... not really the equivalent of academia. Studied all summer long the first time - big fat prep-book. 34... this while deep in a Science double-major. Studied one week the second time - almost exclusively practice tests. 35... this while steeped in the fine aromas of the soul. You will read the MCAT examines how a person thinks, and is not an evaluation of what they know. My experience, with a sample size of 1, validates such a theory.
Three nuggets of advice: