UM vs. MSU: To Kick, or To Receive...THAT is the Question
Say we win the coin toss this Saturday against MSU...do you want to KICK, or would you prefer to RECEIVE?
This is the question I found myself asking myself (think about THAT for a minute) as I watched Chesson's gallup to glory over and over.
With our dominating defense, I would normally defer to the second half to: (1) stifle the crap out of Connor Cook and the MSU offense and amp up the crowd, as well as (2) learn all I can about our opponent and have more time (including the half) to adjust.
However, I have seen the glory that is John Baxter's special teams - and I'd love to have a big return set an electric tone for the game!
Not to mention scoring first will keep the crowd in it, and take the wind out of Dantonio's sails!
What is YOUR take? Do you want to KICK, or RECEIVE against MSU this weekend?
Oh, and that 7 point spread? Don't think that hasn't been noticed and will be harped upon all week!
October 12th, 2015 at 12:11 PM ^
October 12th, 2015 at 12:11 PM ^
October 12th, 2015 at 12:38 PM ^
I meant Always Defer too. /s (after seeing the results of my informal poll, that is!)
October 12th, 2015 at 12:15 PM ^
Who cares whether we kick or receive. We will either take it to the house or force a 3 and out.
October 12th, 2015 at 12:17 PM ^
October 12th, 2015 at 2:10 PM ^
thanks UMDawg, figured it was implied that comment was toungue in cheek. Should have added the /s
October 12th, 2015 at 12:23 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 12th, 2015 at 12:12 PM ^
The answer is always Kick. THAT is the answer.
October 12th, 2015 at 12:13 PM ^
Defer. It's always defer.
October 12th, 2015 at 1:57 PM ^
primarily so you can control what happens at the end of the half. if little time is left and the game is close or we are ahead, we can sit on the ball and just receive the kick to start the 2H. if we are down a score or more, you have the option of running your 2 min drill to try and score before the end of the half AND then get the opening kick of the 2H.
October 12th, 2015 at 5:01 PM ^
Protecting the ball, but in either event (down or up a little), why wouldn't you run an offense and try to score instead of just sitting on the ball? If Michigan is moving the ball, and there's at least a minunte left, why shouldnt' we try to at least get in field goal range?
October 12th, 2015 at 12:22 PM ^
I thought about this earlier too. I'd rather have the offense let the butterflies get out watching the defense take the field first. State fans keep saying Michigan's D is overrated and hasn't seen a truly dynamic offense or "elite" QB - OK, then. Let's put up or shut up, right now. Moment of Truth. I know who my money's on. Then the offense can start the second half by delivering a dagger.
October 12th, 2015 at 12:15 PM ^
defer to the second half and then choose to kick. We are THAT good.
October 12th, 2015 at 12:15 PM ^
October 12th, 2015 at 12:15 PM ^
but mentally I would be 'it doesn't matter'. If we get the ball first, it's on; if they get the ball first, it's on.
October 12th, 2015 at 12:16 PM ^
Have the No. 2 Total Defense/No. 1 Scoring Defense in the land take the field set the tone for the afternoon.
Just like at Penn State in 1997.
Then, come what may, receive the kickoff to start the second half.
October 12th, 2015 at 12:21 PM ^
October 12th, 2015 at 12:19 PM ^
You ALWAYS kick if you win the toss, especially when your strong suit is the defense. I am always more comfortable starting the second half with the ball. It's especially huge if you're the team that scores first before halftime and then starting the third quarter, you have the chance to score first.
October 12th, 2015 at 1:22 PM ^
kicks when your defense is so strong. There really is no debate on this one.
October 12th, 2015 at 12:19 PM ^
October 12th, 2015 at 12:44 PM ^
...they STILL have the option to kick or receive to start the second half.
October 12th, 2015 at 1:03 PM ^
Got a good laugh out of me - kudos to you sir!
October 12th, 2015 at 1:59 PM ^
that was the strategy in the old "snow bowl"
October 12th, 2015 at 5:31 PM ^
the Notre Dame game where we did just that (I think it was 1992)? Instead of saying "defer", our guys said "kick". So we kicked off at the beginning of each half.
October 12th, 2015 at 12:22 PM ^
October 12th, 2015 at 12:22 PM ^
I know that tradition says "defer," and let the defense start. But whether we kick or receive to begin the game doesn't matter that much. If anything mattered, I guess I would want the wind at our back in the 4th quarter.
October 12th, 2015 at 12:24 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 12th, 2015 at 12:26 PM ^
Peppers runs it back to start the second half, making the score 28-0.
October 12th, 2015 at 12:26 PM ^
Defer the option to the second half if we win the toss.
If MSU wins the toss and defers, then receive.
October 12th, 2015 at 12:27 PM ^
October 12th, 2015 at 12:28 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 12th, 2015 at 12:28 PM ^
Oh, and keep the crowd into it... Seriously???
October 12th, 2015 at 12:28 PM ^
On the topic though, this might be another game where special teams plays a huge part. MSU has one of the worst net punting averages in the country, a bad kicker, and one of the worst kick return defense units in the country too. And their punter was injured at the end of Rutgers so their back up QB had to punt. This looks like another game where one or two special teams plays may go our way.
October 12th, 2015 at 12:40 PM ^
Always defer. I want the ball in the second half, and I'm not sad sending our D out there to bludgen them to death and set the tone early. Plus, controlling wind is valuable.
October 12th, 2015 at 12:43 PM ^
This will likely be a field possession game, so kick to them, stop them and get set up with good field position. And I like the two-fer possibility to close the first half with the ball (and score) and open the second half with the ball (and score). I've seen the Saints, when they were rolling, kill the opponent's will with that.
October 12th, 2015 at 12:43 PM ^
I'm usually a defer guy, but in a game like this I would receive and take the ball down and score. Give a 7-0 lead to our defense and you have yourself an offense that will shit their pants.
October 12th, 2015 at 12:45 PM ^
defensive dominance from first snap.. if we have the choice, defer to the 2nd.
October 12th, 2015 at 12:46 PM ^
October 12th, 2015 at 12:50 PM ^
October 12th, 2015 at 12:50 PM ^
October 12th, 2015 at 12:53 PM ^
I remember watching a Michigan game when I was a kid in which the opposing team chose to kick off at the beginning of the game. Then at the start of the second half, everyone assumed the other team would receive, but because they did not defer and chose to kick, Michigan had the option and ended up receiving to start the game and to begin the second half as well. I've never seen that happen again since. Lesson learned the hard way by the other team... always defer or receive, never choose to kick.
October 12th, 2015 at 12:54 PM ^
Kick. Then out comes Jabrill and the boys. Crowd immediately starts DE-FENSE chant.
October 12th, 2015 at 1:13 PM ^
That is all.
October 12th, 2015 at 1:22 PM ^
Were gonna kick the ball to you, take it from you, ram it down your throat and repeat until youve had enough
October 12th, 2015 at 1:29 PM ^
You never want to receive first...unless you are playing Northwestern.