Sparty's Inexperienced O-Line

Submitted by Mike Damone on

Sparty’s starting offensive line is as follows:

RT – Luke Campbell, RS FR

RG – David Beedle, JR OR Kevin Jarvis, FR

C – Brian Allen, SR

LG – Tyler Higby, SO

LT – Cole Chewins, SO

David Beedle didn’t play last week, and true freshman Kevin Jarvis had to step in.  Regardless, the right side of their line is very young and inexperienced, and only Brian Allen is the returning full time starter from last year.  It is going to be really fun to see what they do to try and slow our strong front 4 and our blitzers, including the Rabid Squirrel.  Campbell v Gary should be enjoyable – and you can only double team in so many places. 

Really looking forward to this one – Screw Sparty, and GO BLUE!!!

 

reshp1

October 3rd, 2017 at 1:36 PM ^

Furbush/McCray might not hold up real well to a pulling lineman or FB as a standup DE. Brown isn't really married to 3-3-5, in fact he admitted it he wasn't really expecting it to be the base defense as much as it has and only is rolling with it because it's worked well. I think Mone gets a lot more snaps as a space eating nose in this game.  

1VaBlue1

October 3rd, 2017 at 12:41 PM ^

I don't think so...  I think the 3-3-5 is here to stay, except if Furbush needs a break or there's an obvious run up the middle (4th & 1).  Furbush is big enough to handle Scott, and is invaluable in getting the Dread Pirate into the backfield cleanly.  I don't think Don Brown will change his scheme for anyone.

I'm probably wrong, but that's what I think!

Zenogias

October 3rd, 2017 at 12:33 PM ^

Fortunately, our offensive line doesn't have to go up against their offensive line (or our defensive line, for that matter). I'll take our offensive like versus their defensive line over their offensive line versus our defensive line any day of the week. They're gonna die. We will probably struggle, but what's going to happen to Sparty's offensive line is going to be borderline criminal.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

October 3rd, 2017 at 2:36 PM ^

Much less than that, I'm afraid.  Pickett's Charge covered about 1,290 yards (http://www.gdg.org/Gettysburg%20Magazine/measure.html) but Confederate casualties (including wounded) were 6,555.  Thus, Pickett did not even manage 0.2 YPC.  If "casualties" is defined as deaths only, it was a slightly more respectable 1.15 YPC.

DrMantisToboggan

October 3rd, 2017 at 1:46 PM ^

The average S&P rank of the defenses they have faced is 55.25, average rank of defenses we have faced is 67. So yes. Air Force is dragging down that average, or Florida is holding it up, depending on your POV. State has faced 2 top 20 defenses in Notre Dame (18) and Iowa (19), scoring 18 and 17 in those games, respectively. We will be the best defense they face by 16 spots in S&P rankings, and our D is giving up a TD less per game than their O is averaging against top 20 D's. If we get to 20 points we win.

TrueBlue2003

October 3rd, 2017 at 4:20 PM ^

per S+P+ defensive ranks in parenthesis with yards gained by the offenses:

           UM                                    MSU

Florida (14th) - 433 yards       ND (18th) - 496 yards

Cinci (66th) - 414 yards          Iowa (19th) - 300 yds

Purdue (74th) - 423 yards      WMU (63rd) - 457 yds

AFA (114th) - 359 yards         BGSU (121st) - 469 yds

 

This actually looks pretty close at first glance, especially if you account for all the yardage Sparty accumulated in mop up time against ND and that the AFA game had a low number of drives.  MSU has played tougher defenses, overall, basically to the extent that Iowa is better than Purdue, but they struggled against Iowa, especially in the second half and we dominated Purdue in the second half (as we should have).

Overall S+P+ ranks our offense 39th and Sparty 76th (!!).  Interestingly, I don't think the 2016 ranks are pulling those down and up respectively, since we were 41st last year in Offense and they were 66th, meaning the formula likes our offense slightly better this year and it likes their offense even worse than last year.

Couple things we can say:

1) Our offense with Speight wasn't great but was still comparable to or better than MSUs. JOK could be a lot better than that or worse.  Very wide range of possibilities.

2) Our defense will be a lot better than theirs at the Big House.

TrueBlue2003

October 3rd, 2017 at 7:12 PM ^

  UM                                    MSU

 

Florida (14th) - 5.8 ypp       ND (18th) - 5.8 ypp

Cinci (66th) - 6.3 ypp          Iowa (19th) - 4.4 ypp

Purdue (74th) - 5.6 ypp      WMU (63rd) - 6.5 ypp

AFA (114th) - 5.5 ypp         BGSU (121st) - 5.7 ypp

 

Story remains the same.  Nearly identical per play production against the comparable teams on the schedule with them doing worse against Iowa than we did against Purdue by probably about as much as one would expect if the offenses were of similar quality.

And I'm not sure how much that ND number was inflated by garbage time plays, but obviously, our Florida number wasn't at all inflated by garbage time (which didn't exist in that game).

The Maizer

October 4th, 2017 at 10:06 AM ^

Thanks!

I think Iowa holding them to 4.4 ypp is a good sign for us. That number is not inflated by big plays however (longest rush 15 yards, longest pass 31 yards). Interesting that MSU did not score a TD through the last 3 quarters of the game.

lhglrkwg

October 3rd, 2017 at 12:34 PM ^

I remember I think 2011 when MSUs O-line sucked and we thought RVB and Mike Martin would obliterate them and they didn't. I feel like even though LJ Scott and the O-line have sucked, they'll inexplicable be ok on Saturday, LJ will somehow get 100 yards, and the game will be annoyingly close

funkywolve

October 3rd, 2017 at 3:18 PM ^

If the offense plays anywhere close to what it did in the second half against Purdue, UM should win comfortably.  However, until I see the offense execute like that on a more consistent basis I have a lot of hesitation thinking UM is going to easily beat too many teams left on their schedule.