Prediction Roundup

Submitted by Dagger on

I thought it might be useful to put all of the "expert" predictions for tomorrow's game in one thread.

  • Detroit News Staff:
    • Angelique: MSU 24, Michigan 21
    • Matt Charboneau: MSU 31, Michigan 14
    • Wojo: MSU 27, Michigan 20
    • Niyo: MSU 34, Michigan 28
  • MGoBlog:
    • Brian: MSU 22, Michigan 19
    • Mathlete: MSU 28, Michigan 27
  • ESPN
    • Rittenberg: MSU 23, Michigan 21
    • Brian Bennett: MSU 24, Michigan 20
    • Mark May: Michigan
    • Holtz: Michigan
  • CBS Sports
    • Dodd: MSU
    • Feldman Michigan
    • McMurphy: MSU
    • Fornelli: Michigan
    • Hinnen: Michigan
    • Jacobi: MSU
    • Patterson: MSU

For those counting, that's only 29% (5) of the 17 predictions going M's way.  

*Edit: Corrected Angelique and Wojo predictions (I swear they changed them!).  Added Holtz and May

BayWolves

October 14th, 2011 at 8:33 PM ^

will deliver this victory to Michigan. The so-called experts are dead wrong.

 seniors will not go out without a victory.

the whole team is focused and hungry.

Hoke has the magic touch.

maize & blue defense is dramatically improved over previous years.

maize & blue offense will shock MSU with creativity they haven't yet witnessed.

 

Michigan: 28

MSU: 14

GO BLUE!

Logan88

October 14th, 2011 at 8:39 PM ^

While I think it is entirely possible that MSU will win, the prospect of them winning by 2+ TD's seems unlikely.

Prediction FAIL by the Detroit News staff.

Blue since birth

October 14th, 2011 at 8:53 PM ^

The vast majority of the media has framed this game as the MSU defense vs Denard. They seem to forget that MSU's offense also has to play our defense. Many (not unlike around here) are still hung up on what happened last year as well.

They're also fond of calling MSU's defense "the best in the nation"... Forgetting that judging a matchup on padded stats is like judging a woman's attractiveness by her telephone voice. Truthfully their defense is probably somewhere between decent and good. "Best in the conference" is still a stretch at this point and "best in the nation" is a joke. 

UM-28

MSU-13

dnak438

October 14th, 2011 at 9:13 PM ^

(link) I don't know, though, I'm feeling more confident about the game than I was at the beginning of the week. I'd prefer that we go into the game as underdogs (according to Vegas and the media).

BlockM

October 14th, 2011 at 9:14 PM ^

I love peoples' obsession with predictions. Makes me giggle.

But seriously, I can see the future better than all of you. Tornado takes out East Lansing and the game doesn't even get played. It's pretty obvious this will happen based on the butterfly activity in Peru the last couple hours.

BlueHills

October 14th, 2011 at 9:23 PM ^

It was 1969.

The Ohio State Team of the Century had won its previous 22 games by a wide margin and was defending national champion. They were heralded by the media as "the greatest college football team of all time."

That season's scores coming into the Michigan game were OSU 62, TCU 0; OSU 41, Washington 14; OSU 54, MSU 21; OSU 34, Minn 7; OSU 41, Illinois 0; OSU 35, NWU 6; OSU 64, Wisconsin 7; OSU 42, Purdue 14.

In the prior season, they had beaten an eight win Michigan squad 50-14. 

Ohio State did not trail in a football game for one second during the entire 1969 season, before coming to Ann Arbor. Not one pundit predicted a Michigan win. It was only going to be a question of how much we'd lose by.

But Bo Schembechler and the Michigan football team, the team, the team, decided to show up and play anyway.

Does anyone on this board believe for a nanosecond that the 2011 Michigan State Spartans are the Team of the Century? That they are the greatest college football team of all time?

Brady Hoke and the Michigan football team are going to show up at Spartan Stadium and play a football game tomorrow. It will be decided on the field. And it doesn't matter what the pundits say, or what the predictions are.

Because that's why they play the games.