stephenrjking

April 8th, 2016 at 1:51 PM ^

I'm not sure I agree with your second paragraph. I hadn't given it a lot of consideration. The NCAA does not have the scale of interests that FIFA and the IOC do, and unlike officials in those organizations most NCAA stakeholders have larger incomes and responsibilities outside of the structure than within it.

But, based on my own guidelines for suspecting doping and other corrupt behavior, I will have to consider this a possibility.

I may not think it's the case, but I can no longer rule it out.

 

707oxford

April 8th, 2016 at 1:02 PM ^

Schools must conduct camps at their own facilities?  Okay, all M-sanctioned events are held in Ann Arbor.

 

Coaches may be employed only at their school's camps?  So they volunteer then.  If the remote camp held by, say, a high school had our coaches participate as volunteers/guests, and were not compensated as employees, it seems like the loophole still exists, no?

 

BuckNekked

April 8th, 2016 at 2:04 PM ^

 Volunteering thier time to another schools camp doesnt seem to be covered in this. The word employed may be the loophole. Id guess this is in violation of some federal employment rules too. I cant see how you can limit peoples employment opportunities.

Glennsta

April 8th, 2016 at 2:15 PM ^

So Harbaugh can still go to the camp with the Baylor coach, provided it's on a Baylor facility?

What's to stop JH from showing up as a volunteer at different HS camps around the South?  IMG's website offers year round football camps. Head coaches can't volunteer for these?

mgobaran

April 8th, 2016 at 1:03 PM ^

Harbaugh always knew this one was coming. So he hit as many last year as he could. No doubt in my mind that he already has the next loophole lined up. Can't wait to see what comes next.

 

Bodogblog

April 8th, 2016 at 1:04 PM ^

Can't you just picture the middle aged generic white male, arriving home to a quiet house, dropping his keys on the glass table, pausing in the moment to stare the middle distance.  He has a lot on his mind.  The wife appears in the background, blurry, then clear and anxious.  She doesn't know yet what happened.  He steps toward her, not looking her in the eye, his pace quickening as he closes the distance.  Now he catches her gaze, but can't maintain it.  He needs to hold her. 

"We did it...", eyes moistened and gleaming over with the white light of mid-day, "we thought of the children."   She collapses in his arms as they allow themselves to surrender to the tears which only their struggle - their very personal struggle - can bring. 

I Heart Huckleby

April 8th, 2016 at 1:18 PM ^

I've seen the tweet, but is there a more complete wording on the facilities restrictions? Seems like the wording of "at their own facilities OR at facilities regularly used for practice or competition" (emphasis mine) leaves a lot of gray area. Does that mean we can rent out the Rose Bowl for a camp since we've competed there pretty regularly over the years. Does this mean we can't team up with another University and co-sponsor a camp so that all coaches are then able to be "employed." As is the tweeted language still seems full of loopholes.

Glennsta

April 8th, 2016 at 2:08 PM ^

"""...at facilities regularly used for practice or competition."

That doesn't state who it is owned by or used by, now does it? In contrast to the preceding clause, no less.

Would have been easy to say at "facilities regularly owned and/or used for practice by the school."  They didn't. 

IMG's facilities are regularly used for practice or competition.  

stephenrjking

April 8th, 2016 at 1:06 PM ^

Oh, one more thing:

One person gets worked in every major winner/loser decision of this sort. He is the gift that keeps on giving (away). 

Fire Jim Delany.

Gr1mlock

April 8th, 2016 at 1:07 PM ^

Well, glad they're taking a bold step in preventing kids from having exposure to coaching outside their local area. Obviously, the benefits to the kids is clear and doesn't require description. But it definitely exists and this definitely isn't a move to appease the SEC overlords.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Wolvie3758

April 8th, 2016 at 1:20 PM ^

the SEC feels threatened and just like THAT the NCAA caves...the deck continues to be stacked in favor of the SEC

grumbler

April 8th, 2016 at 10:40 PM ^

The Big 12 and Pac 12 didn't "cave," they actively supported the ban.  I don't know why you think that three out of the four other Power 5 conferences continue to stack the deck in favor of the SEC, but I suspect that they don't; it seems more likely that you simply have no clue who made this decision, and so feel free to make shit up.

Stringer Bell

April 8th, 2016 at 1:10 PM ^

Shouldn't the NCAA be worried that their unpaid, amateur student-athletes are actually STUDENT-athletes first before they worry about shit like satellite camps? The fact that UNC and Syracuse were in the Final Four this year shows they're not doing their jobs.

Chicken22

April 8th, 2016 at 1:12 PM ^

What's the bid deal, it is just recruiting. But of course, the SEC doesn't like it's Michigan and Harbaugh, and because we are stealing recruits from down south. And because the SEC doesn't like it, of course the NCAA gets rid of them.

Rabbit21

April 8th, 2016 at 1:13 PM ^

Yes, let's go ahead and ban something that is helping a lot of people and only slightly inconveniencing a few coaches in a geographically advantageous region.

What a dumb, craven decision that amounts to cutting off one's nose to spite the face.  Is Harbaugh irritating you?  Fine, but don't compromise something that would be a benefit to you, too just because you're irritated by his media exposure.

If nothing else this will help expose that the SEC can effectively just yank the NCAA's leash whenever it wants to.