MSU is still blocking details of Mel Tucker’s $95 million guaranteed contract

Submitted by chuck bass on October 2nd, 2022 at 7:37 PM

Isn’t this odd? The next court date in this FOIA battle with Detroit Free Press is in a few weeks. What could MSU be hiding? My hunch, the two billionaire boosters aren’t paying much of the $95M, let alone “all” of it as many Sparties continue to claim? In other words, it looks like more reckless spending at taxpayer expense by a university with financial challenges?

Axios-Detroit: Lawsuit involving Mel Tucker's contract heats up

The closely guarded funding sources of Michigan State football coach Mel Tucker's $95 million contract will be discussed in court Oct. 25 as part of a public records lawsuit.

https://www.axios.com/local/detroit/2022/09/30/foia-friday-lawsuit-mel-tucker-contract

chuck bass

October 2nd, 2022 at 8:18 PM ^

I think you’re honing in on the motive to conceal it is the university, i.e. students and Michigan taxpayers, likely paying most of the $95 million — not boosters. Not only do they have that $500 million Dr Nassar lawsuit settlement bond to service, the athletic department was running a massive deficit last year, they also had to cut varsity sports and close their pool, and were in court regarding their alleged inability to afford the cancelled sports. The university is cash-strapped and it looks reckless and frankly asinine that the majority of trustees would agree to blow $95 million on a (mediocre) football coach for 10 years. Solution: Pretend a pair boosters are paying the $95 million and just never actually reveal the contract to the public?

jmblue

October 3rd, 2022 at 7:18 AM ^

I don't think he was much different from the MSU and OSU coaches involved in their scandals.  In all three cases, a team physician abused his power and the coaches allowed it to happen - presumably because they figured they didn't know any better, having no medical training.  That's a terrible situation but I see it as more of an institutional failure than something to be laid on the shoulders of the coach alone.   

But in Paterno's case, it was a member of his coaching staff doing the abusing.  There was absolutely no reason to allow Sandusky continued access to children in the football complex.

I'mTheStig

October 3rd, 2022 at 6:24 PM ^

Really?

The hill you're going to stand on is relationship by job title?

Wow!

I'll help you out here:

  • Bo and JoePa are both larger than life, cult of personality figures, at their respective institutions.
  • As such both Bo and JoePa wielded tremendous influence and power.
  • Whether or not one abuser is a member of the football program and the other abuser a member of university staff is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT.  Both Bo and JoePa were in a postion to prevent horrible, systemic, institutionalized abuse and fucking did jack shit about it.

oriental andrew

October 3rd, 2022 at 12:26 AM ^

Doesn't make the comments regarding msu untrue.

This isn't a "pointing out the splinter in your eye when we have a plank in ours."

There has plenty of discussion over Anderson and Bo and the general consensus is that Bo knew and our university has a lot to answer for, even after the settlement. 

But that doesn't mean we can't call a spade a spade. 

SF Wolverine

October 2nd, 2022 at 7:58 PM ^

If it's not really donor money they are in deep trouble.  If it is, perhaps they are scared of disclosing what the buyout terms are.  Those might be getting relevant sooner than they'd like.

bronxblue

October 2nd, 2022 at 8:01 PM ^

I wouldn't be shocked if there were more financial shenanigans with the contract; something like "rich guys will pay as long as he wins but anything guaranteed is coming out of MSU if he's fired".  

MSU is absolutely going to be fleeced on this deal for Tucker and while I'm all for a guy getting the bag it is crazy just how quickly the "Tuck comin'" talked died off.  I remember listening to an off-season podcast and one of the hosts went on and on about how MSU was recruiting and portaling "SEC athletes" and how they looked so fast and I can only assume it was watching MSU's DBs and they looked "fast" because they were chasing all out after another WR streaking past them for a TD.

MGoVictory

October 2nd, 2022 at 9:14 PM ^

Also, sure Ishbia is a billionaire with a net worth of $3.8 billion, but not outrageously wealthy like other billionaires worth tens of billions. $95 million is 2.5% of $3.8 billion, and it's not like that $3.8 billion is liquid. Spending 2.5% of your net worth on an unproven college football coach seems rather stupid.

 

Vote_Crisler_1937

October 2nd, 2022 at 10:27 PM ^

One thing I’ve learned in observing the billionaire and few hundred millionaires I’ve been fortunate to get to know: they are as human as anyone else and they all have their blind spots where any objectivity is subjugated to pure emotion.
 

Its possible Ishbia is very smart. It’s Also possible Ishbia is of normal intelligence but had a couple good enough ideas and enough luck to become a billionaire. In either case, MSU athletics could be such a blind spot for him. Or he could be emotionally hijacked about the prospect of being the financial savior of MSU athletics. Maybe we will learn in time but I wouldn’t assume that just because someone is generally smart that they are making rational, wise, self-interested decisions with big amounts of money. 

bronxblue

October 2nd, 2022 at 10:04 PM ^

Yeah, his net worth has tumbled this year (per Forbes his net worth in 2021 was $9.7B and now it's under $5B), and it seems like most of that is in stock related to UWM.  So yeah, he's not flush with cash on hand and $100M is still something he'd notice.  

And even if he does wind up paying most of Mel's salary, that likely means he won't be giving money to other projects at MSU, something I'm sure guys like Izzo would be unhappy about.

bronxblue

October 2nd, 2022 at 10:01 PM ^

Yeah, rich guys don't stay rich by accident and even if you could argue Ishbia came into his money via outside assistance (his father was the originator of the company and it was already doing reasonably well went he became CEO) he absolutely isn't going to just throw ~$100M around.  The fact the mortgage industry is struggling a bit and his personal net worth has taken a dive from $9.7B to $4.9B (the tinniest violin playing, I know) might also be a factor.