Mens Basketball vs Bowling Green Open Thread

Submitted by mrlmichael on

Just thought I would get this started for those who are watching the game. Michigan up 3-2 early. 

tdcarl

November 18th, 2010 at 8:28 PM ^

I hadn't realized exactly how young this team was until I looked up and saw 3 freshmen, a sophomore, and a junior on the floor. This team has potential to be pretty solid in the future. I could see them surprising some people this year too.

umchicago

November 18th, 2010 at 8:33 PM ^

are the only two upperclassmen.  and they're both back next year.  i like what i see thus far out of the kids, but i'm not too optimistic this year.  i don't see them sniffing the ncaa for two more years.

SysMark

November 18th, 2010 at 8:40 PM ^

nope...you're right...been busy correcting myself

I just remember standing near the court last year watching him in warmups and thinking this guy is way too thin to be playing now...did not realize he hadn't

SysMark

November 18th, 2010 at 8:34 PM ^

As good as Sims and Harris were, and I loved them both, watching this you can see what a difference it makes when everyone seems to be playing the right position

harmon98

November 18th, 2010 at 8:52 PM ^

hardaway junior looks the part of baller.  thus far his play is backing it up (albeit his second game).  guy has a nose for the game and seems to be mentally tough.  I'm excited for this squad.

Blue boy johnson

November 18th, 2010 at 9:06 PM ^

Yes 8-17 is phenomenal. Real nice ball movement tonight, Hardaway PT in the 2nd half, paid big dividends for Morgan.

Smot and Hardaway both have their heads up when they catch the ball, step one in being a smart player. This team will be fun to watch all season if they play this intelligent and this unselfish.

el segundo

November 18th, 2010 at 9:19 PM ^

Did Bowling Green play much 2-3 zone, as advertised?

How did UM shoot against the zone?  How did they move the ball to move the zone?

What defense or defenses did UM play? Any 1-3-1? If so, who ran the baseline?

Mannix

November 18th, 2010 at 10:45 PM ^

Did Bowling Green play much 2-3 zone, as advertised?

BG mixed up zone and man

How did UM shoot against the zone?  How did they move the ball to move the zone?

Good looks and got pretty much whatever shot on the floor they wanted. Looked pretty good against man. Lots of good looks of screens

What defense or defenses did UM play? Any 1-3-1? If so, who ran the baseline?

Mostly man, and mixed in the 1-3-1 a bit.

Solid effort

M2GoBlue

November 18th, 2010 at 9:46 PM ^

IMO this team will not frustruate me as last years did because of the way they are playing within the system. Last year with Manny and Peedi they were very talented, but took so many bad shots game after game. They are going to struggle in the stacked Big Ten, but they could become a team that you do not want to face down the stretch. Just my opinion

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

November 18th, 2010 at 10:19 PM ^

Don't want to get too crazy based on Bowling Green, but I liked a lot of the little things I saw out of the team, especially the extra passes to open guys.  Novak's first runaway block was the turning point of the game but I liked his second one better: up by buckets inside of three minutes, most guys would have just said, "fuck it, let 'em have those two."  That's a guy who's gonna teach the younguns how the game is played.

South Bend Wolverine

November 18th, 2010 at 10:23 PM ^

"That's a guy who's gonna teach the younguns how the game is played."

Exactly.  A point that a couple folks around here made is that the only major difference between the tournament team and last year's debacle was the absence of CJ Lee & David Merrit - not exactly big points contributors.  However, both were smart players (esp Lee) who were great locker-room leaders.  Harris & Sims, for all their top-shelf talent, are just quiet dudes by nature.  With Novak as the top upperclassman on this team, I look to him to take over that role behind the scenes, during timeouts, etc.  He certainly leads with his play on the floor, I hope he takes it to the next level.

03 Blue 07

November 19th, 2010 at 1:27 AM ^

I somewhat agree: I don't think Jovohn was much on offense except for the athleticism to penetrate that you rightfully point out, but I really thought he was an asset on defense, and that alone should have garnered him a few more minutes a game. He always harassed the guy he was defending with high effort and exhibited both quickness and strength, and he also always seemed to hustle and be quick on the chase for loose balls, which I guess is like saying he was an athletic, gritty guy. Who deserved more burn.

jmblue

November 18th, 2010 at 10:42 PM ^

We're starting to look like a "classic" John Beilein team - good size, guys who can play multiple positions, good ball movement and solid shooting.  We're super-young and going to take our lumps this season, but you can see the potential in this group. 

Bb011

November 19th, 2010 at 12:43 AM ^

My impressions from the first three games:

 

-We look like a "bigger" team. Now that novak is playing his correct position, we don't have the extreme small feeling. 

-Morris is a true point guard, and the first one we've had in a while. He's good, real good.

-Novak is pure grit. He gets the Hard Edge award for sure.

-Vogrich....well i had high hopes for him last year, but i just truly can't see him being great. He has made a lot of costly errors and seems to just be purely outmanned in just about every aspect. With that said, he does have a nice shot, but unless he irons out the rest of his game, the costs out weigh the benefits. 

-Colton Christian and Horford seem to be a good role players for this year. They probably won't do amazing things their first year, but don't seem to really "mess up" much when they're in. Christian is actually much larger of a person than i expected. Sadly, i have to almost include Stu in this section. He doesn't seem to have made the strides i was expecting, but still can benefit the team.

-Evan Smotrycz looks to be a great player that will contribute a lot this year.

-Morgan and Mclimans both look good. I would give the edge to Morgan but they both seem to do well at C.

-Last but not least, Hardaway Jr. He seems like he could be a star this year. I'm very surprised by how well he looks his first year here.

 

I know this analysis is only based on playing shitty teams, so I didn't want to extrapolate too much. We'll obviously know more about this team in a few weeks. We look to be playing like a team and I like it. We aren't going to be amazing this season, but I think we will definitely be better than what I was expecting from before the season.

UM Indy

November 19th, 2010 at 8:31 AM ^

This team is more balanced sans Sims and Harris.  The scoring will be distributed a lot more and it seems there's quite a bit of depth, albeit young depth.  Morris is the key.  If he plays like that consistently, this will be a good team.  Morgan looks to be a rebounding machine and has the beef to compete in the Big Ten.  Hardaway looks like a natural.  Novak and Douglass will provide good leadership.  In short, I can already tell I like this team a lot and it's too early to buy into the doomsday predictions for the year.