Marell Evans' contribution this year

Submitted by go16blue on

I haven't heard much about him other than "wow, hes back at michigan." However, from what I saw at the spring game he looks like he could be an instant contributer on defense, especially given the lack of depth, and his experience. I would actually expect him to be a starter on day 1, unless a freshman contributes more than expected.

What do you think, mgoblog?

Naked Bootlegger

June 30th, 2011 at 11:20 PM ^

I checked out season stats since about 1990 at http://stats.ath.umich.edu/football/footstart.php, & the following list of LB's all showed PT - sometimes significant - in their 2nd (sometimes their 1st) years:

Erick Anderson, Steve Morrison, Jarrett Irons, Sam Sword, Rob Swett (a lot of PT his 2nd year, not as much later), Clint Copenhaver (a lot of PT his 2nd year, not as much later), Ian Gold, Dhani Jones, Victor Hobson, Larry Foote, Carl Diggs, Scott McClintock, David Harris, Pierre Woods, Chris Graham, Prescott Burgess, Shawn Crable, Obi Ezeh, John Thompson, Jonas Mouton

 

Some of the early ones on this list got significant 1st year PT.  Most received significant PT in their 2nd years.

 

PhillipFulmersPants

July 1st, 2011 at 7:20 AM ^

It's not typical, but it happens. Sometimes true freshman LBs play at  high high level.  Chris Borlandand and James Laurinaitis are a couple of good Big 10 examples, both major contributors as true freshmen.  Max Bullough played significant minutes for MSU last year. 

It's not ideal, obviously, to have kids that young playing LB in a major conference, but if they're talented enough, they'll get on the field.

Chester Copperpot

June 30th, 2011 at 8:45 PM ^

Based on nothing other than my personal opinion, I say the starters at LB on Sept. 3 are Demens, Cam Gordon, and Mike Jones.  I'd imagine Evans will contribute, but probably on special teams more than anything.

somewittyname

June 30th, 2011 at 9:06 PM ^

is passing trendy and heading towards mainstream. Not really helping one's mgoequivalent of indie-cred at this point.

turtleboy

June 30th, 2011 at 9:13 PM ^

is too much of a tossup. Demens will start as the Mike, other than that I think the coaches will simply put the best players on the field. Jake Ryan, and Cam Gordon will get a big chunk of the playtime, Herron, Fitzgerald, and Evans will get time as seniors and Jones could get playtime too, and Desmond Morgan and Antonio Poole will likely jump in early. The problem with projecting a LB depth chart is even with 3 seniors graduating this year we will still have roughly 14-15 LBs on scholarship (depending on where they're counted) competing for 3 spots in 2012. 

m1jjb00

June 30th, 2011 at 9:13 PM ^

I was wondering if Fitzgerald would get the nod at weak side.  He looked a little better in a similar role last year than early on, much in the same way Ezeh did better in that role.  Plus, Fitzgerald is bigger and we know how Hoke likes him the bigguns.  I think Evans gets time to spell Demens. 

Erik_in_Dayton

June 30th, 2011 at 9:33 PM ^

I remember seeing an interview with him this spring in which he talked about knowing how lucky he was to be at Michigan.  I don't think you can measure that kind of maturity in recruiting stars.  He looked good this spring, and I think he'll be a nice addition to the team on and off the field. 

Mich1993

June 30th, 2011 at 9:46 PM ^

With Demens in the middle and Gordon primarily at SLB (potentially sharing time with Ryan), WLB will be the best of Evans, Jones, Fitzgerald and Ryan. 

My guess is Evans starts game 1 with the others subbing in, but Ryan starts by the end of the year.

 

jbibiza

July 1st, 2011 at 3:09 AM ^

I think Cam is more likely than Ryan to switch from SAM to WILL as size is less important on the weak side.  That said, this thread shows how unsettled we are at both of those positions and to get back to the OP I think Evans will be mostly used as a much needed back-up for Demens.

leftrare

June 30th, 2011 at 10:10 PM ^

What happened to Evans in the first place? He started against Utah and then disappeared. (wouldn't it be ironic if he started for BHs first game too?) I have read the back story about Hampton, etc, but there's never been any explanation for his demise and rebirth. It reminds me of The Natural, the Roy Hobbs story. It's just weird.

blueblueblue

July 1st, 2011 at 7:16 AM ^

Right, nothing of this nature that had anything to do with RR. He was a passive recipient of all those who were out to get him. His actions had no consequences, only others' actions resulted in consequences. The other coaches, dump luck, nefarious nattering nabobs of negativity, climate change, unrest in the middle east, and so on, were the reasons for UM's losses in the past 3 years. RR being here, and you know, running the whole football program, was just weird coincidence. Just ask Section 1, he will tell you all about it.