ST3

February 23rd, 2024 at 4:41 PM ^

Judge from Tennessee issues ruling favoring University of Tennessee. Film at 11.

The house of cards is splattered all over the floor. The Wild West just got a little wilder.

meeashagin

February 23rd, 2024 at 10:27 PM ^

Its my understanding that Michigan wants someone else to make their NIL payments, fans, local business ect.

The top NIL schools are raising donor funds or taking recruits/portal right to donors houses (FSU did this) and sitting recruits down. These schools are probably still offering regular NIL or Michigan NIL to the non superstars.

I mean we just had 3, 5-star QB's come out of the state of Michigan during a 40-3 stretch that ended in a national title and we are having to chose from a couple of middling 3 stars, a walkon, & a true freshman. This is the biggest indictment on our NIL.

Avery Queen

February 24th, 2024 at 12:15 PM ^

Dante Moore & Bryce Underwood are the 2  in-state 5-star QBs  we missed out on that come to mind-- who is the 3rd one you're referring to? CJ Carr? If it's CJ you're referring to, it seemed like personal factors contributed to him choosing Notre Dame over Michigan (and in any case, I think we're better off with Jaydn Davis in this class) 

In any case, I think it's simplistic to blame NIL for Michigan's underwhelming recruiting classes the last 2 years.  I mean, it's obviously a factor, but I also have to believe Harbaugh's dalliance with the NFL & the uncertainty about Michigan's future coaching situation the last 2 years have played a big role too.  Also, when it comes to QB, the fact that Michigan employs such a run-heavy offense and is clearly reluctant to use QB runs also plays a role in limiting our QB recruiting.  

 

Hensons Mobile…

February 23rd, 2024 at 4:46 PM ^

I probably haven’t been following this as closely as I should.

I believe this means we no longer have to pretend collectives function as something other than pay for play (or pay for work, as Brian prefers), correct?

Nickel

February 23rd, 2024 at 4:50 PM ^

The ruling barred the NCAA from "enforcing its rules prohibiting name, image and likeness compensation from being used to recruit athletes..."

So correct, it can now be used as a "we'll pay you $X if you join our team..." type of enticement. Which of course was already going on just in a wink, wink, nudge, nudge way.

rice4114

February 23rd, 2024 at 4:48 PM ^

You all know the little shit at schools they dont like is all they have left now? So this is a win in a way that Bama lost a ton of blue chip recruits was a win.

DetroitBlue

February 23rd, 2024 at 6:45 PM ^

It’s actually even worse than that . . . It isn’t that we didn’t get a favorable ruling, it’s that we dropped the entire request (so there was nothing for a judge to rule on). On a podcast Craig said that the judge was favorably disposed to granting the TRO, but we’ll never know one way or the other now

Avery Queen

February 24th, 2024 at 9:55 AM ^

Yeah, unless Craig personally heard Judge Connors say that he was going to grant the preliminary injunction (or knows somebody who heard Judge Connors say that) there is no way he can claim to know how the judge was going to rule. Given that the TRO was already denied, I don't see anybody can guarantee that that the preliminary injunction would have been granted.

Perkis-Size Me

February 23rd, 2024 at 5:01 PM ^

While this is another blow for the NCAA, what it also means is that until another governing body comes in to take its place and establish some sort of baseline for rules / regulations (contracts, salary caps, etc.) it just means the Wild West is going to get even more wild. 

The ridiculousness of NIL is going to get worse before it gets better. Probably a lot worse.