Dodd: B1G And SEC Expected To Flex For More Power In CFP Meeting Tomorrow

Submitted by Vandelay's Son on February 20th, 2024 at 8:50 PM

Per Dennis Dodd at CBS Sports:

https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/heres-what-big-ten-sec-could-demand-as-college-football-playoff-holds-critical-meeting-in-texas/

Key Points:

Multiple Guaranteed Playoff Bids & Structure

"Up for discussion will be the overall number of playoff teams with Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti favoring 16 instead of 12, according to multiple reports. No matter the bracket size, Wednesday looms as the start of a showdown with the Big Ten and SEC perhaps ready to flex their might.

Three sources told CBS Sports this week that they "wouldn't be surprised" if the two conferences demand/propose to receive multiple guaranteed playoff bids annually."

 

Governance And Weighted Voting

"Beginning in 2026, it's almost certain there will be a weighted voting structure. And it's almost certain that the Big Ten and SEC will seek weighted voting that exceeds even that wielded by Power Four conference peers, the ACC and Big 12."

 

Tiered Revenue Distribution

The Power Five conferences currently receive approximately $80 million each from the CFP simply for being the Power Five. That distribution has been adjusted going forward with each Power Five school receiving approximately $5 million each. That weighs the distributions based on conference size, ensuring universities receive appropriately even pieces of the pie.

The Big Ten and SEC are unlikely to be amenable to that structure remaining in place. Don't be surprised if those conferences are at the forefront of seeking a multi-tiered revenue distribution within the playoff system. That could be structured as such:

  • Top tier: Big Ten, SEC
  • Second tier: ACC, Big 12
  • Third tier: Mountain West, American
  • Fourth tier: Conference USA, MAC, Sun Belt

 

RobM_24

February 20th, 2024 at 8:53 PM ^

Saw people tweeting about how Notre Dame has to win 4 games no matter what to win a Championship (no bye). That made me happy. But people mentioned they also have no conference championship to win, so their path is easier, and it cancels out. Regardless, their path is harder than any time in the past, so that's fun. 

rob f

February 20th, 2024 at 9:33 PM ^

Depositing the clickable link here:

https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/heres-what-big-ten-sec-could-demand-as-college-football-playoff-holds-critical-meeting-in-texas/

 

After reading Dennis Dodd's story, it seems pretty apparent he's throwing a lot of stuff at the wall in the hopes that some of it sticks.  "Multiple sources" without naming any of them, SEC and B1G "could demand", "what the B1G and SEC may be seeking ", etc., etc--- a lot of speculation and relatively little else.

wolve1972

February 21st, 2024 at 2:11 PM ^

I second this - ND can eat shit. I probably hate those bastards more than any other school or fanbase just because they have their noses up in the air and feel they're above everyone else. Don't even let them in the Playoffs if they don't want to join a conference.

Ray

February 21st, 2024 at 6:47 PM ^

Yes, thanks Tunneler.  Great reminder of a lot of things that time had pried from my memory, including Katerina Witt’s Cold War-defrosting smile.  

We were newlyweds as well and we were about to buy a house in Ann Arbor for $115k.  The price seemed crazy but now I wish I‘d found a way to buy 10 more.  

oriental andrew

February 21st, 2024 at 1:43 PM ^

Reality is that the P4 conference championship games are still post-season games, it's just that the champions have their first (CCG) and second (2nd round of CFP) games spaced out a bit more. 

The toughest slate goes to the CCG losers who qualify for the CFP, as they basically have 5 postseason games and could potentially play up to 17 games. All other teams, including notre dame, would cap out at 16 games. 

Random question - does the Hawaii rule still apply? If so, a team could theoretically play in 18 games. 

Blau

February 20th, 2024 at 9:38 PM ^

Honestly, just start your own damn B1G/SEC league already.

Not that I agree with that sentiment but this posturing is the equivalent of the bigger neighborhood kids making up rules to a made-up game that makes it seem like it’s fair to everyone but truly only favors the bigger kids on the block.

A bit of forewarning: Those big kids usually get tired of beating up on everyone else and eventually decide to play by themselves…

Sleepy

February 20th, 2024 at 8:54 PM ^

UM winning the National Championship during the final season college football even remotely resembled the sport I grew up watching is something I’ll never forget.

Cam

February 20th, 2024 at 8:57 PM ^

This is exactly how I feel. Non-Michigan fans will never admit it, but Michigan won the last true college football national title. Starting next year, it will be essentially impossible to replicate what Michigan just did. The sport is a minor league now.

JacquesStrappe

February 20th, 2024 at 10:40 PM ^

I’ve said as much as well. We have the forever satisfaction of having won the last true college football national championship when things still look like college football with an emphasis of only the best teams being in the playoffs and at least a vague connection to the illusion of the amateur student-athlete ideal. Going forward what we will get will be a NFL-style tournament that dilutes the value of the regular season and includes teams that may get hit at the right time and win the tournament but not necessarily truly deserve to call itself national champ based on the total body of the season’s work. Could easily see a 2007 style ending where the college equivalent of the 10-6 Giants gets hot and lucky and beats an undefeated Pats type team. Sixteen teams is too many. Heck, twelve is too many to maintain the integrity of what a national championship should require. Eight, or better still, six should be the number of participants. But it’s all about the Benjamins. Worse still, P-Titti is leading the charge for sixteen teams. 

LVaught89

February 21st, 2024 at 8:33 AM ^

Revenue sharing is coming and the players are going to get TV money, which they obviously should. In order for that to work where everyone is getting a piece, more games are necessary. And the more regulation at the college level will help teams like Michigan. Players will automatically get paid through a union or a university contract with TV revenue built in. More sunshine on the process is best rather than the current SEC model where they just out bid us for players like Keon Sabb. If a team is able to win 4 games in a playoff, that is essentially going through multiple top 10 teams to close a season, they should be considered a legit champ. This is basically what Michigan just did.

Carpetbagger

February 21st, 2024 at 9:10 AM ^

I like the idea of using the playoff money to compensate players from the conferences participating. One of the biggest issues I have with the pay-the-players crew is "which players". Football makes the money, how do we pay the people making the money, football players, and not softball or crew athletes who are already overcompensated, relatively. 

This is the answer. Basketball can use their tournament too.

Amazinblu

February 21st, 2024 at 11:30 AM ^

First - I agree that media revenue sharing is important and the solution may not be easy - since revenue / non-revenue generating sports as well as Title IX need to be incorporated into any approach / solution / recommendation.

I assume your reference to the Basketball Tournament is - "The Dance".   Be careful here - there's a HUGE difference between football and men's / women's basketball.   The difference is - the CFP runs the football "tournament" - the NCAA runs The Dance.   So, any basketball solution / approach takes money away from the NCAA.

Hopefully, some type of a solution can be reached before the schools with the largest "variable / NIL" spend - stockpile the highest level prospects.   But, heck - we've seen Bama / Georgia / OSU lead the 247 Team Talent Composite for a decade or so already.

Carpetbagger

February 21st, 2024 at 12:22 PM ^

The NCAA tournament would have to be run by someone else. That should be understood if you are going to distribute that money to players. The NIT used to run this, they can again.

That also means the NCAA is going to find a different revenue source. Which will also likely change their focus and who calls the shots.

Title IX will be overcome. There is enough money to pay off the appropriate people, just as they do now. 

JacquesStrappe

February 21st, 2024 at 12:17 PM ^

Michigan went undefeated and beat other teams that had zero or one loss. That is not how this will turn out when teams sneak in with three losses because x conference was “tough” this year. When you add more games you add more variables that come down to luck over skill, like untimely injuries. This will impact outcomes and almost certainly result in an underwhelming and undeserving champion at some point.

Hail-Storm

February 21st, 2024 at 2:18 PM ^

As much crap as the BCS got, it feels like it was right.  There were years where a team got screwed out of a chance for a national championship, but FSU proves that 4 teams didn't change that.  We got some memorable National Championship games, and still got to keep the BCS games, that also felt special, and college bowl / tradition.  

Maybe this means we have fewer kids skipping the post season. But I agree with the 10-6 Giants vs Patroits Analogy.  The Patriots were clearly the better team that year, yet the Giants made one more play then the Patriots that day and got to be champions, despite losing 5 more games than the Patriots.