CC: Sam and Ira Saying "Balance" Could Keep UM From Landing Harbaugh

Submitted by ama11 on

So Sam and Ira were discussing ad nauseam Schlissel's comments abount the "Evolution" and "balancing Academics and Athletics" and what that means for UM Football. Being as connected to UM as Sam is, is there reason to believe that the "balance" will keep UM from paying a football coach like Harbaugh "Saban-like" money to come here? Is Sam saying-without-actually-saying that Harbaugh won't happen?

Other things said by Sam and Ira (paraphrased):

  • Bringing a big-money coach doesn't show that you are balancing academics and athletics.
  • We can succeed with coaches that won't cost as much.
  • AD choice may take a year or two.
  • Nuss could be interim coach, or if Hoke wins-out he stays.
  • We could go after a Pat Fitzgerald-type coach for less pay and he will balance academics with football.
  • Maybe UM is no longer interested in being a top-notch football school that annually competes for the B1G.

I personally think that a school like UM can pay a coach a lot of money and still be regarded as a top-notch university. Why not show balance by being the best at both?

Thoughts?

MoJo Rising

November 3rd, 2014 at 12:49 PM ^

I am not sure if anyone commenting actually listend to what Sam has been saying because he hasn't said it's inside info. He's clearly giving his opinion and even stating it is his opinion. Some are having a hard time accepting Sam's opinions because of their incorrect assumptions based on not actually listening to what he's saying. And if they are actually listening to him, they should go see an ear doctor to get their hearing checked. 

True Blue Grit

November 3rd, 2014 at 1:52 PM ^

Many people here misinterpreted what he said.  All he was doing was interpreting Schlissel's comments to mean there was a good possibility (not that it was going to happen or he thought it should happen) that the President is likely to proceed with a more balanced approach to academics and athletics going forward.  Which in the context of looking for a new football coach, meant Michigan would not likely pursue a high profile, high salary candidate - among other potential changes.  Sam stated he had nothing to back this up other than what he thought Schlissel was implying from a few of his comments.  Sam also stated he personally would want someone like Harbaugh here and for Michigan to pay him what he was worth. 

Mr Miggle

November 3rd, 2014 at 12:43 PM ^

on interpreting Schlissel's comments.

Schlissel noticed the balance between academics and athletics is off here because Brandon was operating like the AD was a commercial business, not part of the school. That was seen in the way he treated the students and how they responded. I think it's meaningful that the only policy change Brandon made on the way out was lowering student ticket prices. I'd bet that was completely Schlissel's doing.

Reading into that how much we'll pay a new coaching staff is a big stretch. I think it's fair to say we won't be sacrificing our principles in order to win. Paying for top quality coaches or facilities doesn't contradict them. Schlissel specifically mentioned his learning the importance of our athletic traditions. One of them involves having the winningest footbal team.

I won't be surprised to see a change from having football players concentrated into the same major. That's something our president and Jim H can agree on.

charblue.

November 3rd, 2014 at 1:45 PM ^

in the weeks before Brandon's resignation, but I think his remarks also reflect a concern about a divide where football politics becomes a distraction beyond the mission goals of the university itself.

And I kind of thought in the aftermath of the press conference reading reaction from former players and Brandon supporters there was a disconnect beween those inside the Athletic Department and those viewing its operation from the outside. Now, whether this was the balance that the president was referring to or in scaling back the scope of Michigan's big time bread-winning program, it depends on what direction Hackett takes in finding his replacement and evaluating Hoke and staff's performance.

As far as the cost of a coaching transition, who knows how much it would cost. If the school opts to fire Hoke, then isn't it saying that winning matters more than just succeeding as a break-even program? And if that's the case, then you pay what the market requires for a coach with a track record that supports his hire. Clearly, you pay top dollar for top talent.

I mean this fan base wants one guy who will be in a position to name his own salary. And if he isn't available, then you don't have to worry about that.

As far as new AD hiring goes, the duration of choosing a new administrator will likely determine how the evaluation of the football program goes. I mean, what new coach would want to be hired by an interim guy and then managed by somebody later arriving on the scene.

So trhe process again will be a factor in who you get and what you get and at what cost.

SalvatoreQuattro

November 3rd, 2014 at 1:31 PM ^

This is Sam and Ira freaking out. Nothing what they say makes sense in light of what UM has  invested into the program.

This fear is an old fear going back to the Duderstadt days. He too sought to de-emphasize football. Did that work? Uh, no.  Michigan football is an integral part of the universities image. They are not going to let it slip to Northwestern's level. Not with 100,000 seats to fill and a $200 million bill to pay off.

Huma

November 3rd, 2014 at 12:42 PM ^

Why are people assuming "balance" means that athletics will get worse to be on par with academics?? I would argue Schlissel meant the opposite - academics at M have been and will continue to be top notch. It is the football program, in particular, that has failed to live up to the standard of excellence that we all expect out of everything the University of Michigan does. Thus, balance means improving those areas that have not been performing up to the level of excellence that is expected from Michigan.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Schembo

November 3rd, 2014 at 12:44 PM ^

The coaches salary comes out of the athletic budget, doesn't it? It's not like they have to tap into other funds. Besides, Harbaugh is big on athletes education...see his comments when LC was coach.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Muttley

November 3rd, 2014 at 6:37 PM ^

http://www.forbes.com/sites/aliciajessop/2013/08/31/the-economics-of-co…

A true fiduciary would look at the growing patches of empty seats and conclude--as they say in Economics-- Ruh Roh.

Increasing the coach's salary from $4mm to $8-10mm--a $4-6mm marginal investment--seems rather wise to protect an $85mm revenue stream that is facing a risk of a significant decline.

Erik_in_Dayton

November 3rd, 2014 at 12:46 PM ^

This was just Sam's opinion.  He is very plugged in with respect to recruiting.  He is not very plugged in with respect to the AD. 

Something that doesn't add up to me: Sam was focused on the cost buyouts for Hoke, Nuss, Mattison.  But wouldn't some like Ross (or a group of Rosses) just write a check? 

I would take the idea that Michigan won't pay for a major coach much more seriously if JUB said it. 

Erik_in_Dayton

November 3rd, 2014 at 1:03 PM ^

...he's guess that Harbaugh would be in AA (with Brad Bates) in year.  He's emphasized that this is just a guess.

But more importantly, IMO, JUB hasn't said anything about Schlissel indicating that he wants to de-emphasize football. 

MoJo Rising

November 3rd, 2014 at 1:22 PM ^

But it doesn't mean he will or does it mean Schlissel would allow a donor to do so. But the financial aspect of bringing in Harbaugh makes it even more unlikely that he will come to Michigan unless the stars and millions of dollars align for him. I don't see JH taking a pay cut. 

Perkis-Size Me

November 3rd, 2014 at 12:46 PM ^

Schlissel has to know how this will reflect on him if he doesn't go out and get the best candidate for the AD job. Academics will always be important, but I don't see why we can't get a grand slam hire to go along with it. Hiring a top notch football coach who leads your team to wins does more than just hoisting trophies.

-Donors pony up more money, whether for the academic or athletic side. People are in a more giving mood when your team wins.
-Application rates and interest in the school go up exponentially, as they have at Alabama.

Schlissel had to know when he signed on the dotted line that this school cares A LOT about its athletics, and it's not going to change. To turn into a Northwestern-like program that sees athletics merely as a leisurely activity would never mesh with our fans. If you asked me, I'd wonder why he wouldn't want to get a slam dunk hire in both the AD and football coach positions. If both of those guys take care of their own business and produce winning products, that allows him to devote his time to what he'd rather focus on: academics. If he hires lame ducks, he'll be dragged through this process again in a few years, and his name could be dragged through the mud along with it.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Ty Butterfield

November 3rd, 2014 at 12:46 PM ^

Going the way of Northwestern would be.....disappointing. You think attendance is bad now? Season ticket sales would fall off a cliff. I round rather see the football program shut down then end up like Northwestern.

ThadMattasagoblin

November 3rd, 2014 at 12:47 PM ^

Does it really matter if you pay Harbaugh 7 million a year if it comes from the athletic department? That seems like a no brainer to me since he values academics and athletics both as a coach and wins too.

AMazinBlue

November 3rd, 2014 at 12:51 PM ^

When you have the largest stadium in the country and play in the biggest rivalry game in college football, 'balance' means something completely different.....I posted something about this in the "win out" thread, If the thought is to go the Northwestern road and just be 'competitive' then Schissel will be shown the door before too long.  In this day and age with big time economics and big time sports driving much of those economics, de-emphasizing football and sports will be the kiss of death.   That stadium doesn't exist to be 'competitive'.  Leaders and Best doesn't mean 'competitive.   The ath dept give multi-millions of $$ to the general university every year.  If the football program is merely competitive and there is a 'balance' then the university can kiss those $$ goodbye because it doesn't happen if the Athletic Dept. isn't in the black and it won't be if the football program doesn't improve significantly.  FIRE Hoke & Co. and hire Harbaugh!  Stop screwing around.  Stanford has a great balance and their academics are at least if not better than Michigan's.

sadeto

November 3rd, 2014 at 1:12 PM ^

I'm sorry, but you and others are so wrong about the football team and the financial health of the athletic department and, by a rather desperate extension, the university (desperate because the AD revenue is a bit north of $140M, and the U is a $5B+ enterprise). I could talk at length about this, but all I really have to do is point out that the football program has been in moderate decline for going on 7 years now, with one exceptional season, yet the AD has seen growth and very positive returns all along. Meanwhile, the football team did pretty well under AD Goss, yet the department's finances fell into the red. 

With the B1G television contract up for renewal, and a consistent top-5 status in merchandise sales, plus a huge and relatively well-off alumni base, the AD isn't going to be a financial drain on the U in the near future irrespective of the football team's performance. 

charblue.

November 3rd, 2014 at 2:04 PM ^

However, I don't think that is the context of the debate. I think the balance issue as Sam Webb was discussing it based on his interpretation of the president's comments at the presser, dealt with whether Michigan ought to be the leader and best in pursuing football greatness. It wasn't a question of affordability but a question of mission balance for the university. 

And he seemed to base this POV on certain inside information regarding the duration of hiring a new AD, which would necessarily impact how you evaluate the football program and whether you make a change in its leadership. If you do, and you let the inrerim AD make both a firing decision, then you are opening the possibilty of requiring him to name an interim coach who would serve until either a new AD is hired or force him to conduct a search for a new coach before Brandon's replacement takes office. And that would sort of be awkward for both recruiting and appointing Hoke's successor regardless of the financial cost.

The process is the issue now. And how that's handled will determine the path to which the idea of balance and football success are ultimately pursued.

blueinbelfast

November 3rd, 2014 at 12:51 PM ^

Don't want to say too much without actually having heard them.  But this sounds like a whole lot of groundless speculation on their part based on very little, and then a little more spectulation on the part of the OC.  All smoke, no fire.

mgob-rad

November 3rd, 2014 at 12:53 PM ^

I think that if schlissel has learned one thing since taking the job as Michigan's president it is how serious the alumni, students and entire fan base are about winning. He acted quickly on getting rid of Brandon and I believe will do the same in finding the next athletic director who will hire this school's next great football coach. And what is Sam implying he won't see us hiring a Harbaugh or Saban type coach because of "balance"? I'm sorry because last time I checked I'm currently attending the best damn public university in this country (well top 3). If we had a true balance, we would have great football right with great academics. That's "balance"

Eye of the Tiger

November 3rd, 2014 at 12:53 PM ^

I think that's a plus for Jim, considering his gripes about Michigan a few years back were as follows:

“College football needs Stanford. We’re looking not for student athletes but scholar-athletes. No other school can carry this banner. The Ivy League schools don’t have enough weight [because of their low athletic level]. Other schools which have good academic reputations have ways to get borderline athletes in and keep them in.”

“Michigan is a good school and I got a good education there, but the athletic department has ways to get borderline guys in and, when they’re in, they steer them to courses in sports communications. They’re adulated when they’re playing, but when they get out, the people who adulated them won’t hire them.”

In order words, Jim wants exactly the thing that Sam and Ira are saying might keep him away.

charblue.

November 3rd, 2014 at 2:14 PM ^

they also addressed another issue that would assuage that Harbaugh concern about bringing in borderline athletes to improve the university's football image at the exense of a student's future after football. And this is a career impact program that Webb indicated has been cited by the parents of many football recruits including current commit Brian Cole's parents as a major asset that goes beyond what other schools offer athletes. That plus the value of a Michigan degree continue to make the school an attractive program.

gwkrlghl

November 3rd, 2014 at 12:56 PM ^

Just tell the AD that as long as he keeps contorl of his department and the budget is balanced that he is free to manage his resources as he sees fit. Schlissel clearly sees how important athletics are to the 'Michigan family'.

If he gives the AD that freedom, Schlissel is more than free to focus the university at large on academics instead of babying various disasters going on at south state st

ThadMattasagoblin

November 3rd, 2014 at 12:57 PM ^

Weren't we a top notch athletic and academic program in the 70s through 90s. Why can't we go back to that. Everyone's happy. We're not the University of Chicago where we can't have both.

JamieH

November 3rd, 2014 at 12:59 PM ^

Here's a coach who sits and lobs bombs at his own University for steering football players into easy majors (essentially having them major in football) instead of trying to get the kids into programs that will set them up for the right skills in life.  I would think a University President would LOVE to hear talk like that from a football caoch.  A coach who wants to make sure his kids get the right degrees to be successful?  Who doesn't just care that they show up at 4:30 PM practice eligible to play?

 

Now, some of what Harbaugh said can be written off as self-serving babble because he was the coach at Stanford and was thus saying things to try and make Stanford look good, and pretty much all they had to look good at the time was their academics.  But still, it's pretty clear that Harbaugh isn't going to be a rubber-stamp, "get 'em whatever degree keeps 'em on the field playing for me and who cares what happens to them when they are done" kind of coach.  Not that ANY of Michigan's coaches have ever been like that--obviously Lloyd Carr cared deeply for his player's futures, as did Bo.   I'm just saying, I don't think Schlissel will read what Harbaugh has said in the past and think this isn't a guy he would want representing Michigan.

Njia

November 3rd, 2014 at 12:59 PM ^

When did "balance" suddenly become "doesn't care about football"? I think this goes to the same reflexive (and bullshit) argument that "only Michigan Men can coach Michigan." Ipso facto, because our new University President came from Brown, he doesn't "care" about football.

Sam, et al, must think that Schlissel's actions against Brandon are more like a blind squirrel finding a nut than the product of thoughtful deliberation and astute observation.

ish

November 3rd, 2014 at 1:09 PM ^

this had better be nonsense talk.  my wife and i donate to the scholarship funds, not the athletic department, but we donate because of our connection to the university, which as alumni, is largely about the football and basketball team and visiting AA.  if the football team was mediocre, we probably wouldn't visit as much, our connection could diminish and we might not donate as frequently.  we aren't big donors, but i bet there are a lot of alumni who send a few $50 checks per year who feel the same way.

MGoMofo

November 3rd, 2014 at 1:11 PM ^

Wolverine nation goes into meltdown because Sam Webb tries to read between the lines of Schlissel's presser.  The drama and pageantry of college football doesn’t get much better than this. Sooooo.

GoBlueRandy

November 3rd, 2014 at 1:16 PM ^

If I'm not mistaken, at the DB presser. Schlissel something along the lines of "striving for excellence in every sport." Im paraphrasing but certainly didn't sound like he doesn't want a successful football program.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad