1145SoFo

October 28th, 2021 at 6:20 PM ^

It seems hard to draw conclusions based on this alone. What should a typical P5 QB downfield completion rate be? 20 yrd throws?

Much of Cade's chart doesn't even have enough volume to have %'s. I think we know his traditional stats aren't great, I wish BillC color coded it based on normalized results.

DairyQueen

October 29th, 2021 at 2:28 AM ^

The "content" model has always been about:

"clicks"

Not, rigorous, well-thought, well-reasoned, well-presented information---that makes no money.

Hence why the news (and everything else) plays on your basest instincts: fear, anger, vindication.

Combine that with gamified animal-potent intermittent-reinforcement, it spells game over.

It's "genetic" to the medium itself (fundamental to the medium of computers/phones--same thing really), go outside and nothing's on fire, talk to people and they are all friendly and happy, but go online and the world is ending tomorrow!

Casanova

October 28th, 2021 at 6:20 PM ^

Oof but at least right side screen game is on point. 
 

but it’s a little tough to understand without context. What are some other QBs charts? 

DoubleWolverin…

October 28th, 2021 at 6:34 PM ^

I would argue the comparison shouldn't be to Payton Thorne. We should expect at least a QB on the level of Brennan Armstrong (charted in the Twitter thread, probably 15-20th best QB in CFB), and Cade falls way short of that mark.

While others are pointing out a limited sample size for Cade, there seems to be a complete disregard for the fact that most teams stack the box and Cade is getting very favorable matchups with receivers relatively open. 

swn

October 28th, 2021 at 6:48 PM ^

Don't really agree with anything you just said. Brennan has one nice sweet spot but otherwise the charts look not too different and Cade has better deep ball success. That 20 yard sweet spot could be as much a function of the offense and a favorite target as it is of him.

And I definitely don't agree Cade is getting favorable match ups with open receivers. He's gets open receivers within 10 yards and converts at a very high clip. All is the only guy who consistently gets open past 10 yards and WR2 is a huge hole for us.

double blue

October 28th, 2021 at 7:05 PM ^

His chart is very similar to Thorne and everyone is talking up Thorne who also has a tremendous receiving corps. Bell would make a huge difference. 
 

I think klatt last week pointed out the biggest issue for Cade is he’s throwing a “ pretty “ pass that looks like it’s in a good place but it is giving the defender a chance at the ball. Cade needs to throw the ball to the open space where the receiver has the better if not only chance to cash it. 

JamieH

October 28th, 2021 at 7:16 PM ^

I don't see this as a yikes at all.  He's being asked to throw a lot of short passes, and he is completing a lot of short passes.  I would like to see a comparison of this chart with Brian Griese in 1997.

JamieH

October 29th, 2021 at 2:15 AM ^

Sure it did. And do you know how many passes of over 40 yards Griese had prior to the Rose Bowl?  

Three.  And one of those was to a running back.  Yes he hit 2 to Streets in that game, probably because Michigan was able to catch Washington State packing the box and hit them with play action.

Cade has 5 passes of over 40 yards this season, which already equals Griese's total for the entire 1997 campaign.  





 

JamieH

October 29th, 2021 at 2:19 AM ^

Jesus Christ dude--2019 LSU had Joe Burrow, who was the #1 overall pick in the 2020 NFL draft and in just his second NFL season is sitting at number 5 in QB Rating ahead of Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers and Josh Allen. 

No one can expect to get QB play like that.  

pescadero

October 29th, 2021 at 11:47 AM ^

" I would like to see a comparison of this chart with Brian Griese in 1997."

Why? The game is totally different.

 

Griese was #22 in the country with a 138 QB rating.

That will now qualify you for about #60.

 

Griese was #50 in the country with 2042 yards.

That will put you around #80 now.