Wolverine Devotee

December 9th, 2016 at 3:08 PM ^

Word is that staff decided to go in different direction. Could've had him if we really put the press on. In other words wanted us more than we wanted him.

Ace posted the Scout link on the front page.

Rabbit21

December 9th, 2016 at 3:11 PM ^

UCLA board is very sad about this as they thought they had a real shot at him.  UCLA has had a very bad season mostly due to having a terrible O-Line, UCLA therefore not putting the full press on Banks strikes me as.....foolish.

ThadMattasagoblin

December 9th, 2016 at 3:13 PM ^

We still have Filiaga, Wilson, Ruiz and the longer shots of Leatherwood and Slaton on our board. We still have about 11 total spots open to get to 32 and probably more that we are in on.

ak47

December 9th, 2016 at 3:14 PM ^

It may be true, but when you are posting things about a guy not being a take on the day of his decision a week after reporting that he would be a take it looks like sour grapes.  Good luck to this kid in his career, hopefully for him Brian Kelly isn't around for most of it.