THE KNOWLEDGE CHALLENGE 2016, 2016.1 and 2016.2

Submitted by THE_KNOWLEDGE on
.
at the half way point of the season, as all revelations shown have come true, THE KNOWLEDGE has soared and basked in glory
.
many was the number of fools who contacted THE KNOWLEDGE when Michigan had fallen behind 7-21 to Colorado in order to challenge the infallibility of THE KNOWLEDGE's revelations
.
where are these people now? down in the cellar with the spartans
.
yes
.
now that Michigan is in the middle of a 4 week stretch of alternately playing low to no competition, THE KNOWLEDGE shall introduce THE KNOWLEDGE CHALLENGE for the 2016 season
.
in previous years, THE CHALLENGE was introduced at the beginning of the season. THE KNOWLEDGE, of course, knew fully well that nobody was capable of winning it and becoming THE TOP FRIEND of THE KNOWLEDGE
.
however, THE CHALLENGE was still introduced at the beginning of the season to reveal to the masses how ineffective they are in predicting the future
.
yes
.
THE KNOWLEDGE CHALLENGE 2016 is to correctly predict the 4 participants in the CF playoffs
.
those that predict correctly will be provided the greatest honor of being titled THE TOP FRIEND of THE KNOWLEDGE. wise people know that this title is infinitely more prestigious than the phony titles such as "Sir" provided by a useless setup
.
yes
.
THE KNOWLEDGE CHALLENGE 2016.1 is to correctly predict the score of the Michigan-MSU game. Most people already know the score of the Illinois game - hence, it is worthless as a CHALLENGE
.
the correct or closest to correct predictor will win the Protege of The Week award
.
yes
.
THE KNOWLEDGE CHALLENGE 2016.2 is to correctly predict the score of the Michigan-Indiana game
.
reply with correct responses to the overall CHALLENGE 2016 and the weekly challenges 2016.1 and 2016.2
.
and soar with THE KNOWLEDGE
.
yes
.

Comments

SwitchbladeSam

October 20th, 2016 at 4:36 PM ^

I  had a hard time deciding between playing or just changing my username to "THE TOP FRIEND of THE KNOWLEDGE".

I figured THE KNOWLEDGE anticipated my move, and already secured that username... so I'll bite

 

UM, Bama, Washington, L'Ville

Good Guys 56- Sparty Nooo 3

Michigan 46 Indiana 17

 

Bo Glue

October 20th, 2016 at 4:47 PM ^

They are that bad. Truly awful stuff.

Bama, Michigan, Washington, OSU.

I hate to say it, but I think people will still be all over giving OSU another chance once we beat them.

Trebor

October 20th, 2016 at 5:14 PM ^

2016: Alabama, OSU, Clemson, Washington

2016.1: Michigan 31 - MSU 17 (I refuse to believe we blow them out in their own stadium, regardless of the trajectory of each other's seasons, until it actually happens.)

2016.2: Michigan 38 - Indiana 10

superstringer

October 20th, 2016 at 6:40 PM ^

1 - BAMA (13-0) (def. Tennessee in SEC CG)

2 - UM (13-0) (def. Nebraska in B1G CG)

3 - Washington (13-0) (def. USC in {Pac12 CG)

4 - Ohio State (11-1) (*)

(*) OSU game vs M will be classic and close, so its body of work will be stellar.  Clemson is going to lose a game somewhere along the line, and its body of work (along with 11-1 Louisville's) won't merit selection over OSU.  Winner of the Big 12 will have 2+ losses, or, will be a one-loss Baylor who has zero point zero chance of being selected over OSU or Clemson.  TAMU might end up in the 11-1 mix as well, although I think they will lose to someone other than Bama too.  It'll be Bama and UM for the championship game; Bama in a close one over OSU, and we'll blow out UW.

Michigan 28, Michigan State 10.

Michigan 34, Indiana 13.

MgoHacker

October 20th, 2016 at 8:19 PM ^

1)Michigan, Ohio State, Bama, and Clemson

2)M 42 sparty 0

3)M 38 IU 13

I look forward to bestowing the honor of being titled THE TOP FRIEND of THE KNOWLEDGE