The Worst Part Of It Comment Count

Brian

9/14/2013 – Michigan 28, Akron 24 – 3-0

9754804624_8ff95e854c_c[1]

Bryan Fuller

What was the worst thing about the events that took place in Michigan Stadium on Saturday? There are dozens of candidates vying for the crown. A selection:

That moment when Taylor Lewan was down. Almost picked up the very cute small child in front of me and threw it onto the field. Hey, don't judge me. It could have popped on an Akron helmet and stopped Fitzgerald Toussaint for a one-yard loss. It would have been in no danger of anything except padding its stats.

Small children stopping Fitzgerald Toussaint for one-yard losses. Akron's line consists of a six-year-old, ten-year-old, a guy named Bob who they found walking into the game, and an actual scholarship athlete who chose Akron and is therefore so crazy he insists everyone calls him "Pope Licentiousness III." Fitzgerald Toussaint averaged under four yards a carry against them, and about 80% of his first down runs resulted in second and eleven.

That pick-six. Not digging that M starts every game in an 0-7 hole.

All of it. An obvious contender.

The ruination of an entire Saturday of college football. Don't know about you, but that sapped me so much that I could barely remain awake after it and looked at the other games dully before falling asleep just into the second half of Purdue-Notre Dame. I missed the Wisconsin-Arizona State madness as a result. Never has a win felt so much like a loss.

The severe correction in season expectations. Michigan plays Akron straight up; Notre Dame executes a stirring fourth-quarter comeback to top a team that beat Indiana State thanks to a trick kickoff return on the first play of the day. I liked it better when Michigan had solidly defeated a team obviously headed for ten wins because of its overwhelming talent, and was not the equal of one of the worst teams in college football.

The repudiation of the idea that events follow from other events and can be projected with any certainty. Just because something happened before does not mean it is likely to happen again. Devin Gardner can beat Notre Dame nearly singlehandedly and lose to Akron nearly singlehandedly. Michigan can look like the best team in the Big Ten for two weeks and play a dead-even game with a team that has gone 1-11 the past three seasons and hasn't beaten a I-A opponent since November of 2010. At any moment the laws of physics that bind our component molecules together could catastrophically alter themselves, turning us all into rapidly disintegrating collections of atoms that suddenly hate each other. (IE, how you felt in the fourth quarter.)

My adorable nine-year old niece experiencing her first Michigan game one seat away from me. Sometimes it is nice to take the pressure building inside your head and throw some of it into the atmosphere via colorful expectoration of words. In this manner, you vent dangerous levels of pressure to the atmosphere. When the best you can muster is an under-your-breath "Jesus Christ," your inner control panels look like Chernobyl instead of Fukushima, and you can hear the BEEP BLORP BEEP BLORP as you try not to fall over.

MGoNiece reports that the game was "fun" and "exciting," and not "three hours during which I learned many new words that make my mom cry and that Uncle Brian is possessed by Satan." MGoNiece remains as pure as the driven snow, at all costs.

How familiar it all felt. The first time I thought "this can't be happening" in Michigan Stadium, Michigan was losing to Northwestern. That Northwestern outfit would win en route to their first Rose Bowl in forever, but they walked in overrated pretenders to my 15-year-old self. They were not. Over the course of the game my attitude shifted from  annoyance to disappointment to concern to chest-clenching-panic. Back then I kept thinking "how can this happen?"

Here we are again, following up a Notre Dame win with a severe expectations check that bodes unwell for the season. In 2010, a 42-37 win over UMass was an early indicator that Michigan had the worst defense in the history of the program. This one promises a year of quarterbacks given time to complete PhDs in the pocket and far too many "my bad" blocks.

Now our best hope is that contender a little farther up the page: that causation has failed and we're just coasting along on the universe's sufferance. Michigan will come out against UConn and turn them into gray paste, because that's what the random number generator says next Saturday. That's the ticket.

I don't think "how can this happen" anymore. Not after 10-7 over Utah or 24-21 over SDSU or that Ball State game or The Horror or Toledo. I think "not again." I thought I was done thinking "not again" for a while. Apparently not. I'll be over here, trying to keep all my molecules from fleeing into space.

Highlights

BEWARE

This is Akron's perspective:

At 1:40 you can see that the pick intended for Gallon is just a horrible read; with the corner sinking the crossing route to Funchess is the obvious throw. The deciding play from the first row of the student section.

Parkinggod:

He's going to have to start putting some good things that happen to the other team if he can only get up to seven minutes by including Akron not executing the snap correctly.

[After THE JUMP: a first-ever for Epic Double Point, and a lot of complaining.]

Awards

brady-hoke-epic-double-point_thumb_3_thumb_thumb[2]Brady Hoke Epic Double Point Of The Week. Is not awarded.

Mournful Hoke Double Point points at you and wishes for you to think about what you've done. Did you turn the ball over a lot? Write "Go Blue" over Spartan Stadium? Play to the east side of Michigan Stadium? Refuse to sacrifice a small child to the Michigan Stadium field? Wear the wrong hat? Predict 62-0 pregame in a dismissive game preview? You should feel bad. Don't do that again.

Epic Double Point Standings.

1.0: Devin Gardner (ND), Jeremy Gallon (ND)
0.5: Cam Gordon (CMU), Brennen Beyer (CMU)

Brady Hoke Epic Double Fist-Pump Of The Week. I guess we have to go with the last play of the game, as Thomas Gordon did jump inside the WR's route, forcing Akron's QB to try to throw a looper to the back of the endzone.

Live it looked dangerous and possibly interference, but when you see it on the video it's Gordon jumping the route and the Akron WR desperately trying to get open, tripping over either himself or Gordon's feet.

This looked like an option route for Akron with the receiver automatically releasing to the back of the endzone if the route gets jumped; Gordon took away the easy throw and made them execute the much more difficult one as the QB got leveled.

Honorable mention: Jehu Chesson is gently escorted to the endzone by Akron defenders; Devin Gardner doesn't turn the ball over that one time.

Epic Double Fist-Pumps Past.

8/31/2013: Dymonte Thomas introduces himself by blocking a punt.
9/7/2013: Jeremy Gallon spins through four Notre Dame defenders for a 61-yard touchdown.
9/14/2013: Michigan does not lose to Akron. Thanks, Thomas Gordon.

Offense

large[1]

A MOMENT TO REMEMBER (that the people running Michigan's social media are not permitted to deviate from the plan no matter how dumb the plan becomes)

Well WTF. How are you supposed to figure out anything if Devin Gardner is going to do that against Notre Dame and that against Akron? I guess the performances aren't that different statistically. Gardner approached 10 YPA, as per usual, and ran for over 100 yards on just ten carries. He still picks up yards at an incredible rate. But four turnovers almost entirely his fault speak for themselves. Gardner's bad decision rate has been relatively low for a new starter; in this one he looked freshly hatched.

The turnovers:

  1. Michigan runs speed option to the boundary, Gardner should pitch, Gardner tries to fake a Zip linebacker, ends up fumbling. Pitch is a large gain, possibly a touchdown.
  2. Gardner throws to a Gallon in-out-in goal line slant, ball is undercut, intercepted; had Funchess on easy high-low read on the corner.
  3. 20-yard pass momentarily complete to Jake Butt before Butt is blown up by a safety; ball pops up and is picked off.
  4. Toussaint is undercut on a screen pass and it's returned for a touchdown.

1 and 2 are very bad and on Gardner; 3 was not included on the BTN highlight reel but I remember it as a good play by that safety more than anything else, and it was less damaging as Michigan only had a few seconds left in the first half. 4… I actually don't know how much I blame Gardner for that. It's a screen, and he's not really looking at Toussaint until the last second so that he doesn't give it away. Akron blitzes a linebacker, he reads it and makes a great play. I think that's more on Miller, who went to momentarily double a DT and never touched the blitzer. Even a brush there knocks him off enough so that he can't intercept.

Well WTF II. Gardner was put in bad positions he often rescued Michigan from by the offensive line and Fitz Toussaint, who collectively saw Michigan's tailback running game acquire 74 yards on 20 carries. That's under four yards a pop. That is terrrrrrrible against Akron. Michigan did pop Toussaint free for a number of ten to twenty yard runs; when they weren't doing that they were getting Toussaint buried in the backfield by multiple dudes.

I have no idea why this happened yet. I try not to get down on particular OL before a thorough review. A Space Coyote tweet from the game emphasized that for me: live I thought a particular stretch play was a WTF moment from Miller; SC pointed out that Akron lined up two DTs in the A gaps, so he couldn't help on both.

I can say it's bad. Michigan doesn't appear to do anything well. They can't block the stretch or inside zone or power with any consistency, and don't seem to check into the right run when a defense overplays. Their best play right now is iso.

Try it again. Toussaint was not covered leaking out of the backfield all day. Very frustrating that they went to him once early in the second quarter and not again.

Hey: Chesson. Chesson is apparently such a nice guy that opposing defenses prefer to shove him towards the touchdown he deserves than tackle him. We should use this in our favor, throwing him more balls.

9741779685_010c6783a4_z[1]

Upchurch

Throw it to Dileo—play Dileo. Problematic moments late when Funchess went out and Michigan went with a one-handed Jordan Paskorz in his first meaningful snaps instead of Drew Dileo. If Paksorz isn't playing at all when AJ Williams is out, he's probably not as good as Dileo. You can cover for the fact that Dileo isn't a tight end by forcing someone to check him on run plays by threatening—yes—bubble screens. This site's enduring obsession with that play has never been about the few (or several) yards you grab with it but the fact that it turns a slot receiver into a guaranteed block if they actually cover it.

Instead, Michigan tries to execute blocks with tight ends. This is not going as well as you'd hope. Run plays get blown up by single points of failure, and Michigan is not consistent at all on the OL right now. Fewer points of failure == more successful runs, as long as you've got a guy like Gardner who can balance out the numbers with his legs. This is clearly not Borges's philosophy, and it gets frustrating when Michigan can't run for four yards a carry against Akron.

Defense

9741741875_9f2f3e8f08_z[1]

Grady Brooks'd [Upchurch]

Nope. Three games into the season and Frank Clark has zero sacks, one TFL that Greg Mattison generated for him, and four QB hurries on which two were free runs, one was Clark jumping over a running back cut, and the last was actually a block beaten. This is not due to a lack of opportunity. Opponents have attempted 130 passes already; he's been out there for probably two-thirds of them. And he seems to vacate running lanes with frequency.

While he had a decent* game against Notre Dame, I mean "decent" exactly. +4 for a DE, which is what he got in the UFR, is not very far above Mendoza-line performance, especially when the pass rush gets –2 overall and would have been much worse if Mattison didn't load up at the end of the game. He was adequate, maybe. That's a far cry from the massive preseason hype.

When Jake Ryan gets back, it's Clark's playing time that's under the most threat. Brennen Beyer has been Michigan's most dynamic pass rusher so far and he can play WDE.

Meanwhile, the rest of the defensive line. Black occasionally does something good, and Heitzman is an okay plugger. They've gotten little production from the nose tackles, because they don't play their nose tackles. Any organic pass rush was from Beyer, and that huge completion near the end of the game came about because three of the four DL ended up on the ground as Akron's QB rolled out into infinite space.

image

Guy not on his face: Beyer

Cumong, man.

(While we're talking about the DL: Tom Strobel was not on the dress list. FWIW.)

Play a nose tackle please. Part of the problem on the defensive line is that Michigan's not playing their best player, Quinton Washington. He's probably still hurt somewhat and Michigan's trying to get him healthy; fine. But what is the deal with Ondre Pipkins getting sparing time as Glasgow and Wormley eat up the bulk of the defensive tackle snaps not given to Jibreel Black?

If the idea is to get more pass rush out of that spot, it's not happening, and those two backup three-techs (actually, Wormley is a backup SDE) are getting consistently gashed by doubles. Pipkins has played much better than either in his limited time so far this year and is the only interior lineman to actually get some pass rush up the middle, as he bulled a guy back into Tommy Rees against ND. Pipkins has exactly as much experience as either guy getting PT over him and has played better, so what the hell is going on there?

9741205833_65c6d84f72_b[1]

Wilson has been solid. [Fuller]

Countess at nickel… uh. Akron hit two long fly routes and was close to another couple as they worked on Raymon Taylor and Jourdan Lewis. I get the idea behind having a multipurpose weapon at the nickel spot, but Countess isn't really that—he mistimes his blitzes consistently—and by tucking him inside you're taking your best cover corner away from the most vulnerable area of the field.

Meanwhile, the nickel corner was a different guy for the third straight game. First Stribling, then Hollowell, then Lewis. That doesn't seem good, especially when Lewis is getting beat over the top and barely recovering. I wonder if we'll see Courtney Avery return to his ancestral home as a boring no-blitz nickel when he's ready to come back; it seems like they need a corner more than they need a safety at the moment.

Bend but don't break has a different feel. It was one thing to play soft against Notre Dame, which has a senior quarterback and some excellent receivers and has bombed both of their opponents not named Michigan with big plays. It's entirely another to do so against Akron. Michigan stayed in a basic two deep shell the vast majority of the day; when they did not they frequently tipped their blitzes, saw Akron check, and did not check in response.

That last bit is frustrating. I bet that Michigan doesn't have much of a check game because in practice they're going up against an offense that gets out of the huddle with 15 seconds left and does not have time to totally reset after the defense reveals intentions. They seem ill-prepared to go up against no-huddle offenses that will check to the sideline.

I wasn't expecting to feel that this defense had a massive athleticism deficit three games into the season. It's hard not to see Taylor get beat by yards by an Akron WR and not come to that conclusion.

Miscellaneous

Special teams: ugh. Brendan Gibbons misses for the first time in 17 attempts from 45. Okay. He gets a pass. Matt Wile shanking two punts of 21 and 22 yards after shanking one against Notre Dame: not so much. May be time to try out Kenny Allen. Don't get me started on the punt formation. Setting up in the modern spread punt only to go back to dinosaur punt is setting practice time on fire just to piss people off.

Meanwhile, Akron had a half-roll rugby kicker who averaged 42.6 yards net and made it near impossible to return his punts. Akron.

I could use some restoration of Hokefaith. Here you go:

General admission can't fix the fact we're playing Akron at noon. It actually makes it look worse. FWIW, I'm in an old-blues section of the stadium and it was decidedly roomy.

9752944532_b546546b40_h[1]

I was annoyed more by the game than the student attendance. Plenty of non-students were in the same boat—they're just more spread out. MVictors points out that the announced attendance was under capacity. I heard that Michigan was dumping free tickets on anyone vaguely connected with the athletic department this week, which is no surprise after everyone got that mailing in their inbox trying to sell tickets to groups in blocks of 10+.

I heard the band! Please never do it again. The band played to the East for the first time, which meant I could hear them loud and clear. This was enjoyable. Unfortunately, they can clearly never do this again.

I appreciate the effort, though.

Here

We have the pressers from Hoke and the players, photosets from Eric Upchurch and Bryan Fuller, and Ace's recap*. Regular Diarists bronxblue and ST3 persevere as well. Best And Worst:

Worst:  It’s a Win? (as said in the voice of Ron Burgundy)

Yeah, I’m not going to be one of those people who says it would have been a better “learning experience” if they had lost; I’m a results-based grader so a win is always better than a loss.  That said, this is up there with narrowly beating Indiana and Illinois under RR and a turrible 10-7 win against 5-6 Utah in 2002 (a game I attended and apparently blocked from my memory until now).  And unlike those games where you could at least point to one element of the performance being a positive, it isn’t really hyperbole or “ESPN talking head”-ole to say UM was beat in all three phases of the game.

Inside The Boxscore:

* I get it that the D-Line doesn't normally get involved in a lot of tackles, and Akron was throwing the ball quite a bit, but they still ran the ball 30 times. Our D-Line was led by a reserve, Ojemudia, with 4 tackles. The starters ended up like this: Clark 2 assists, QWash 0, Heitzman 0, Black 0. Did they even play? [ED: Qwash barely did, FWIW.]

Also LSAClassof2000 has a look at the league three weeks in if you want to feel better. Actually, not feel better.

*[I was advocating for this guy to be the face of the PANIC and RUN AROUND SCREAMING shirt:

panic

Instead it's me. Merph.]

Elsewhere

Blog types. Concentrate on something brighter: last night's Breaking Bad. Walter White finally figured out he can roll a barrel!

Oh hurray we made Shamepaint.

2013Week 3-1[1]2013Week 3-2[1]

Don't click through unless cartoon genitalia are your bag, man.

Hail.

11. Michigan.

DOMINATED AKRON IN A

terrifying, ramshackle, and completely unanticipated

28-24 VICTORY.

At least we're not Wisconsin.

Maize and Go Blue wins Best Headline:

Glazed and confused: Michigan 28 – Akron 24

Magnus gets the important thing:

A hundred years from now, nobody will remember this day.

Since they won, nobody will remember it as soon as Michigan shows itself to be a contender in the division.

Maize and Blue Nation photos; also MVictors. HSR suggests we never speak of the shortcut again. Maize and Blue Nation says things. Hurrah they threw it to Chesson. Holding the Rope:

The rationalizing calculus was "yes no yes no no yes NO *flatlining resignation.*

Newspaper types. Images from Melanie Maxwell:

-d408ae17c8dce026[1]

I envy you without context.

I thought this was supposed to be over now that Denard was gone?

Devin Gardner giveth, and Devin Gardner taketh away

The redshirt junior quarterback had 83 percent of Michigan’s total yards on Saturday, continuing his role as the backbone of the offense. He’s immensely talented and athletic — the Wolverines’ offense would look a lot different (read: worse) without him.

If most outlets won't tell you how mad Taylor Lewan actually was, the Daily will:

2. The offensive line isn’t quite there

Fifth-year senior offensive tackle Taylor Lewan was furious after the game, to the point where he told reporters, “You all don’t even know. You all just write shit down.”

Some of us almost keel over in terror, as well. I bet the skywriter who wrote Go Blue over Spartan Stadium was the same guy who was doing it over the stadium… probably freelancing. Don't do that again, dude.

Baumgardner on stuff and things. Zach Helfand notes that the brain meld was even off:

Gardner even seemed out of sync with his favorite target, fifth-year senior wide receiver Jeremy Gallon. The two usually seem to share a brain. But at the start of the half, after another incompletion on third down, the pair gestured to each other while running off the field. Somewhere in the play, there was a miscommunication.

Gallon thrust his hand and turned, signaling his route. Gardner did the same, miming his read. The pair discussed as they ran off the field. In all, Gardner threw four incompletions intended for Gallon.

Comments

imafreak1

September 16th, 2013 at 12:52 PM ^

Not after 10-7 over Utah or 24-21 over SDSU or that Ball State game or The Horror or Toledo. I think "not again." I thought I was done thinking "not again" for a while. Apparently not. I'll be over here, trying to keep all my molecules from fleeing into space.

This list perfectly illustrates a point. Maybe not the point that Brian was trying to make but...

These games happen. They happen over and over. Expecting them to cease happening is to defy history. BUT here is where it gets better. SOMETIMES these games mean something--like Toledo and UMass. SOMETIMES they mean nothing, except the first point that these games happen, like Ball State and SDSU. (I am not going to try to characterize The Horror or the 2007 season.)

Personally, I still think that Michigan and ND are headed towards double digit wins--one or both will probably make a BCS Bowl.

However, I have been reading this blog long enough to know that Brain over reacts--especially to the negative--so I don't blame him for his skepticism.

befuggled

September 16th, 2013 at 1:29 PM ^

These were from Bo's early years, when Michigan was in the top ten and in Big Ten title contention nearly every year.

1970: Michigan 14, 2-9 Texas A&M 10

1971: Michigan 20, 3-7 Purdue 17

1972: Michigan 7, 2-9 Northwestern 0

1973: Michigan 14, 4-7 Navy 0

1975: Michigan 14, 3-6-2 Baylor 14

1975: Michigan 21, 5-6 Illinois 15

1976: 5-6 Purdue 16, Michigan 14

1977: Michigan 14, 5-6 Navy 7

1980: Michigan 17, 0-11 Northwestern 10

M-Wolverine

September 16th, 2013 at 4:44 PM ^

That maybe the most replayed Michigan highlight of all time is needing a last second pass to beat INDIANA.  Pretty good as Indiana goes (8-4 that year) but maybe the worst program in the Big Ten historically. 

I get the feeling if it happened in today's sports environment we'd be killing everyone involved for letting it get exciting.

PeterKlima

September 16th, 2013 at 2:18 PM ^

I wasjust logging in to make this point (in some similar way).

 

Sometimes theseethings happen.  It can mean something or not.  We don't know yet.

 

What record would Akron have to post this year to make us feel better?  What if they went .500 in the MAC?

 

Just look at last year, Ohio State would have gone to the NC game (possibly) and might have won the B10 (if allowed), and they barely beat a very bad Purdue team in OT.

The year before that, 11-1 Okie State lost to a very bad Iowa State team in overtime.

In 2009, Big Ten champ OSU actually lost to a worse Purdue team.

 

Is a 5-7 Iowa State team worse than a TBD Akron team?

 

I expected better, we all did, butI am nothitting panick just yet.  A young team can be cocky and not concentrate on a lesser opponent.  That, combined with Gardner's seeminginability to care about the game from a mental standpoint....well...Let's not gettoo worried.

 

CompleteLunacy

September 16th, 2013 at 3:09 PM ^

OSU barely beats Purdue (because they seem to have some sort of...thing...versus Purdue I guess), yet goes undefeated and would have played ND in the championship if not for being the cheaters that they were.

ND beats Purdue yesterday in a similar struggle. Except it was a night game on teh road, and it didn't take overtime to do it (though it did take a 21-point 4th quarter). And we like to lol at it, but ND-Purdue is an instate rivalry, and rivalry games are funny sometimes, or most of the time. Why else does the UM-MSU game seem to always be close no matter how good/bad either team is?

Let's not overreact to it. It was just one game. Either it means something, or it doesn't. I will believe it doesn't until there's evidence otherwise, because the ceiling is still 14 wins until it isn't. I'm not saying Michigan goes undefeated of course, because they won't, but I don't think that yesterday suddenly means this team has no chance at winning the Big Ten. Especially knowing that the Big Ten is...well, the Big Ten.

Football is strange sometimes. Yesterday had an all-around bad vibe to it. One of those "intangibles" things that always seem to loom over letdown games, when your team probably thinks they could win with no effort and yet oh crap I guess not. Sounds like even the coaches approached the game as a scrimmage...they're human too. It's hard not to look at MAC Akron's 4 wins the past 3 years and think that this game would be a blowout in the 1st quarter. Shoot, everyone here did. Did anyone predict a letdown? I mean, I'm sure some people did, and I though it as a possibility, but not a letdown in the sense that they would need a goalline stop in the end to win...a letdown as in "maybe it's a close game for awhile but Michigan pulls away enroute to a multiscor victory"

WE DIDN'T LISTEN.

 

MGlobules

September 16th, 2013 at 12:56 PM ^

and this continued to make sense as a game and season strategy well into the second half. Had we run Devin more and played out of the I less this would not likely have been a terribly close game. The strategy conspired with game events and. . . tire fire. 

We are a little bit Back to Denard Future here, going to be depending on a still-green, sometimes erratic QB to make things happen with a green O and D line, too. (If Brian's reasoning holds and just 2 of the TOs are purely his bad, then that may be something like par for the corpse.) I see us handling CT next week, but wonder just how stubborn Hoke remains with the manball approach. I also wonder where Mattison might not be inspiring but a little predictable, the Hoke ceiling starting to round into view.

Cannot forget that the O stats were good, that without the shite penalties and a decent margin of victory we are look at Fitz this a.m. as well on his way, 110-plus yards. 

M-Wolverine

September 16th, 2013 at 4:32 PM ^

We'll have to see what we do against an opponent we think has a pulse, or now knowing our running game doesn't have one. Many, many Michigan games of the past I'd have been yelling "throw the ball already" to use it to open up the run. But Saturday I wasn't even getting excited by first down passes, because I thought we should be running the damn ball against Akron. Because we should be able to. The worry is we couldn't; not that we tried too much. Because if I thought that I'm sure the coaches thought that too. Now we see if all our expectations and reactions are altered.

maizenbluenc

September 16th, 2013 at 4:40 PM ^

all three press conferences: "had you set a game strategy up on something your were trying to develop, improve, or hide in advance of the Conference schedule?"

e.g., Garder seemed leashed - not as much roll out / improv or run in the 1st half - were they working on reads and spreading the passing around?

The vanilla nickle D was pretty much like ND week ... etc.

GoBlueInNYC

September 16th, 2013 at 12:56 PM ^

Did Fitz actually have that bad of a game? It seemed more like all his runs for losses were him getting swallowed by multiple defenders in the backfield. Personally, as someone who doesn't dissect plays well or often or anything, it's sometimes hard to separate RB performance from what the OL gives him. But it seemed like Toussaint did what he could with what he had in front of him.

Also, I thought Countess did pretty well. When the DBs got burned, it was Taylor getting picked on, or Lewis running a step behind. Countess made some plays, and as far as I remember, didn't really give any up. But I'm not sure what he was doing away from the ball, aside from his mistimed blitz picking up an offsides flag.

gbdub

September 16th, 2013 at 1:22 PM ^

I don't think Brian is saying Countess played poorly. He's saying Countess would have been more useful staying at corner rather than being played as a nickel back. Akron's big passing plays came when they targeted the cornerback spot normally occupied by Countess that was filled by a less skilled player so that Countess could play nickel.

gbdub

September 16th, 2013 at 1:49 PM ^

Maybe they see the nickel back getting more targets against a dink and dunk team? So we want our best cover guy to be the one getting thrown at the most? I dunno. With the safeties playing decent so far, I'd feel better about Wilson and Gordon's ability to clean up a missed play by Thomas or Stribling or whoever at nickel back than I feel about Jourdan Lewis' ability to defend a home run ball.

alum96

September 16th, 2013 at 2:28 PM ^

I agree.  I dont get the Fitz hate.  The kid is showing vision and is making nice cuts and running with determination.  If he is hit in the backfield he is like almost every other RB.   p.s. was Stribling hurt or a bad week of practice and hence so much Lewis and Hollowell?

Blarvey

September 16th, 2013 at 12:58 PM ^

"But what is the deal with Ondre Pipkins getting sparing time as Glasgow and Wormley eat up the bulk of the defensive tackle snaps not given to Jibreel Black?"

Can somebody explain why they do this on a nickel front? Pohl didn't exactly seem mobile to me, so I don't think it was to get more speed on the line to contain a mobile QB but I saw Wormley getting knocked inside a lot, sometimes into Black.

gbdub

September 16th, 2013 at 1:42 PM ^

Yeah I don't get the basic logic either. I mean, in general I see why you'd want more nimble linebackers and an extra DB when playing a passing spread (or even running spread / option) team - the need to cover the whole field outweighs the need for overwhelming strength at any particular point of attack.

But why does that apply to the interior of the defensive line? Aren't your ends and outside LBs your "contain" guys that need east-west speed? A "speedier" pass rush from the tackles is useless if your smaller guys get manhandled. Better to throw in a guy like Pipkins or QWash who can either collapse the pocket with brute strength or at least eat a double team. At the very least it lets your LBs be more effective in the run game.

MichiganTeacher

September 16th, 2013 at 1:02 PM ^

Brian, you're ignoring the mental and emotional side of the game. Players aren't robots. You're talking like the players have constant qualities that can be discovered perfectly by charts and scientific investigation. Charts and investigation are helpful, but a player's qualities are not constant.

The mental and emotional aspects of the game cause a player's performance and observables to change immensely. That might not be convenient, and it might not be easily chartable, but it's true.

This game was the perfect demonstration of the role that emotion and mentality play in a team sport. A review of this game that doesn't mention the psychology of it is missing a large part of the picture. 

GoBlueInNYC

September 16th, 2013 at 1:16 PM ^

I don't know if he's ignoring that stuff. It's just that the cause (whether coaching, emotional let down, both, etc) doesn't actually change the execution on the field, which is what he's talking about. The OLine still couldn't block. The DLine couldn't do anything. If Gardner can't execute because of mental or emotional fatigue, that's still not good.

bronxblue

September 16th, 2013 at 1:56 PM ^

I don't disagree that the players were obviously not as invested emotionally and mentally in this game at the start, but they actually seemed to get worse blocking in the second half, and the pass rush never materialized.  And Devin still threw that horrible INT.

Also, the lack of a running game, the miscues on both lines, etc. are not new; the team still couldn't run the ball effectively against CMU or ND, and both of those games probably had them more engaged.

Soulfire21

September 16th, 2013 at 1:18 PM ^

I'm not sure if it is consolation, but weren't there two long Fitz runs that ended up coming back due to penalties?  Regardless, I was excited to see both Fitz and Green go over 100 on Saturday.  Dammit.

I remember when Gardner opted not to pitch the ball over to Toussaint.  That could've been us pulling away (would've been up 14-0 or 14-3 I believe).

The game, for me, felt like it could (or should) break open at any point.  When we built an 11 (hahlol) point lead by the 4th I started to feel comfortable, only for Gardner to throw a pick six.  The game was a myriad of momentum swings.

So what's this UConn team we're playing or something?

jamiemac

September 16th, 2013 at 1:03 PM ^

It could be worse. We could just have 4 3rd down conversions all season (PSU) or have a D bucking for worst in program history honors while stars of the program's past take the airwaves to throw the program under the bus (Nebraska) or, well, that's all I got.......

Space Coyote

September 16th, 2013 at 1:05 PM ^

That DTs lining up in the A gap was a thing the Michigan D showed, blew up the run, then never ran again. Not sure if Akron ran it as well, but yeah, didn't see it if they did.

WolverineHistorian

September 16th, 2013 at 1:11 PM ^

10-7 over Utah and 24-21 over San Diego State both happened the week after losses to Notre Dame. Playing bad does seem to be a trend after playing the Irish, win or lose. That's the only small straw I'm going to grasp at right now.

mgobaran

September 16th, 2013 at 2:50 PM ^

Was my first ever Michigan game at the Big House. My dad made me leave after the 3rd quarter...

That sucked!

Beating Syracuse in 1999 at Syracuse felt like a huge redemtion game to me at the time. Granted I was 9 years old and had no real perspective. But still. 

enlightenedbum

September 16th, 2013 at 1:12 PM ^

The substitutions on the defensive line in this game were totally baffling.  Particularly inside.  We seem to be playing the DTs inversely proportional to their production.  And they're getting blown off the ball, which makes Morgan look bad because he's eating guards.  Ross cleaned up a lot of huge holes and kept 10 yard runs down to 3 or 4, it seemed like to me.

Not Countess corner play is concerning.  And blitzing him is just stupid.  He's the only guy who can cover consistently one on one and he's a bad blitzer.  This game was pretty much the first time I was really frustrated with Mattison.

As for the offense... three things:

1) Nothing more to say about the offensive line.  It's not good, even Schofield was bad in that game.

2) Gardner desperately needs to improve his decision making.

3) We consistently had little 8 yard curls to the TEs early on.  And the rare times Borges went back to it, they were open later in the game.  It felt like either we went away from it or Gardner did.  Hopefully UFR will tell us the story there.  But my suspicion was Borges went in Unleas the Dragon mode.

maizenbluenc

September 16th, 2013 at 4:55 PM ^

what the Chips and the Zips defenses showed. Question: did they both show something new (because of their evil MSU and OSU connections)? - OR - Did Gardner spend more time both weeks watching ND film (1st week to prep for ND, last week to learn from his ND game)?

I hope the O-line gets the double A gap blitz figured out before East Lansing.

Callahan

September 16th, 2013 at 1:16 PM ^

The skywriting over Spartan Stadium stunt just goes to show you that all fanbases have their uber-douchebag types. Whoever coordinated it is undoubtedly one of those guys who likes to bark about Michigan State not or is barely a rival and is obsessed with us. 

saveferris

September 16th, 2013 at 1:37 PM ^

If we're going to claim the high ground when it comes to impotent stunts like putting up billboards after your first  win in 7 tries talking about "Pride comes before the fall", or whining about being left out of the BCS bowl picture when your tied 3 ways for the conference championship, then yeah, we need to knock off sky-writing "Go Blue" over Spartan Stadium.

bronxblue

September 16th, 2013 at 9:49 PM ^

Definitely.  Fully disclosure - I went to MSU for grad school, during the JLS years that were horrible.

I think all schools should discourage alums to waste money with petty displays like this.  First, it's silly and dumb, and secondly, it reflrects way worse on the actor than the target.  

matty blue

September 16th, 2013 at 1:59 PM ^

i think mattison has played fairly conservatively thus far because he doesn't have a lot of lightning-bolt playmaker types out there.  not yet, anyway.  the kids that will be are still just that - kids - prone to mistakes and hesitation.  he doesn't have anyone he can just cut loose.  once he does, we'll see a different defensive approach.

readyourguard

September 16th, 2013 at 1:30 PM ^

Our DL twists (which seem to occur regularly) take too long and are completely ineffective.

On Devin's stretch read TD, there was some sick blocking going on.  Glasgow damn near killed a guy who had his back turned.

On the Pick 6, it was Man to Man coverage, so the LB has the RB which is why he was knifing in there so quickly.  I have to believe there's a line call for that.

The WR simply runs right by Taylor on the long ball.  He even backed off from the line to defend the deep ball.  Yikes.

On the subsequent TD pass, WE were in man to man coverage.  Whoever is over Akron's #1 totally blew their assignment by jumping the out route (which was Taylor's guy).

Blown assignments man.  They'll kill you every time.