[Patrick Barron]

Unverified Voracity Was Eventually Right About Brad Underwood Comment Count

Brian January 22nd, 2020 at 5:13 PM

Sponsor note. Become an Alumni Association Member (or upgrade your membership) and you'll have a chance to win courtside(!) seats to the Indiana game on February 16th. See Tom Crean's pants up close and in person! I know he's no longer the coach but his pants are a grad assistant!

Sign up by the 9th to qualify; drawing is on the 10th. Enter the promo code LETSGOBLUE when you sign up.

The Wade family story. Andrew Khan gets the family background on Brandon Wade's departure from Duquesne and enrollment at Michigan:

In September 2018, before his freshman season at Duquense even started, his legs were hurting. It was more serious than shin splints and necessitated multiple MRIs. With treatment and pain tolerance, he gutted through the season, but his shooting numbers suffered. He finally shut it down for a couple of months in the spring.

But the Wades insist that even if Brandon had performed better on the court or gotten more playing time, he would have left Duquesne.

"We had some conversations last year that no parent wants to have," Keith says. "It had zero -- zero -- to do with basketball, which hurts a parent, especially me, more than anything else. Our family is such a basketball-based family."

Keith had coached his sons -- Ryan is a year younger and now a freshman at Holy Cross -- throughout their youth, both at Skyline and AAU.

Being part of the coaching fraternity, Keith says, "There was no way in hell I'm allowing him to transfer over some minutes."

It's been a rough few years for the Wades; hopefully that's in the past.

Is there a Don Brown problem? Michigan's defense has gotten blasted the last two years by OSU, leading noted Michigan twitter person Manuel Excel to wonder if Don Brown's defenses get worse as the opposition gets better. The effect, if there is any, is small, and the slope of Brown's line is up entirely because Michigan got nuked the last two years:

EOhgIBFXsAYdR7L

He describes this as an OSU problem, not a Don Brown problem. I'm a little more willing to put blame on Brown since OSU had Michigan downloaded the last two years—raise your hand if you're long-yardage conversion on a short throw—and Michigan had little to no response. That might be a program issue rather than a defense issue, but the offense was busy putting up as many yards as OSU gives up in a game in the first half. The defense couldn't fit OSU's most basic run play.

[After THE JUMP: Congratulations, Michigan fans: Illinois is good]

Underwood pulls a Beilein. Illinois is surging in Brad Underwood's third year, and a large reason why is a total overhaul of his system. Not everyone can step back and pull this kind of thing off:

"We knew from that we had to make changes defensively, even though we were turning people over at an extremely high rate," Underwood told me. "Second in the country, but on the back end it wasn't worth it. We were fouling too much, were starting almost every game down eight points at the foul line. We were not maximizing with free throw attempts for us or picking up offensive rebounds for extra possessions. We felt that combination was too difficult to achieve at the highest level, to balance it out. That forced changes."

Illinois is 10th in free-throw rate this season. It was 338th last season. It's No. 4 in offensive rebound percentage after checking in at 148 in 2018-19. This is, by far, the best interior defensive team of Underwood's career (45.1% 2-point defense). Other tweaks have helped. Freshman Kofi Cockburn has been tremendous on the glass. Underwood put the ball back in Trent Frazier's hands -- and he's had only four turnovers in 10 games. Ayo Dosunmu has since thrived off the ball.

"It's all kind of a mosh pit of change and growth and stuff that had to happen in the process of getting to this point," Underwood told me Tuesday. "You can't shortcut it."

This gladdens the heart of Brad Underwood's biggest fans: Michigan fans still cooling off after that ludicrous Oklahoma State-Michigan 7-10 game.

The above makes me wonder if some of Michigan's extreme stat outliers are worth it—particularly the opposing TO rate in the 300s. Michigan is in Illinois 2018-19 territory in FT rate but most of that is the team's personnel. Their main penetrator doesn't actually want to go to the free throw line because his shooting there is weak, and then you've got guys like Brooks and Teske who are more liable to pull up for a jumper than push to the rim.

The TO rate might have some personnel issues. Michigan doesn't have a lot of length in the backcourt. Michigan's drop coverage has a lot to do with that, but also there's a general lack of pressure on the perimeter. X dropped from a 2.9 and 2.6 steal rates to 1.6; Livers went from 1.9 to 0.6. Feels like Michigan hasn't found the right balance yet.

Alan Griffin pulls the Charles Barkley vs Angola. Am I remembering that right? Dream Team guy stepping on a dude? Anyway, Illini wing Alan Griffin got ejected from the Illini's resounding road win against Purdue for this:

Probably not suspension-worthy but something to keep an eye on. Illinois's next game is against Michigan.

Signs of the apocalypse. Rutgers is ranked. In basketball. Matt Norlander attempts perspective:

The Scarlet Knights went almost 41 years between appearances, having last made it in the final poll of the 1978-79 season. … That's a 738-week hiatus, making RU the team with the longest drought between appearances of any power-conference school ever. Butler going 53 years (1949-2002) is longer but BU was a mid-major through and through for that run. Now the longest power-conference drought is with Oregon State. The Beavers are at 538 weeks without being ranked, dating back to 1990.

They're doing this after losing Eugene Omoruyi to a transfer out of nowhere. Steve Pikiell gets coach of the year, and find the last ten awards and give 'em to him too. I'm putting his last name in my spellcheck. He's gonna be around. It's big time.

The compromise is we call it amateurism after changing it completely. The LA Times Daily alum Nathan Fenno obtained a copy of an internal NCAA document that features various highly-placed university employees bemoaning the current state of the discourse. Some of these people are slightly out of touch:

“The biggest threat is that the court system will force us to start paying athletes. And that will be the end of amateur sports as we know it,” one commented. “I think if we did a better job to show the academic benefits of playing college sports, it would take a lot of wind out of the balloon. All of the perks like letter jackets, cost of attendance, ring, etc.”

And some saw the South Park parody and thought it was a documentary:

"I know people fear the pendulum will swing too far to support student-athletes’ rights."

But even amongst this group of people whose salaries are bloated by the fact that their workers get paid in company scrip there seems to be a growing acknowledgement that amateurism can and probably must "evolve":

“It is a hard environment with these sports writers who think amateurism is ludicrous. I think there is room for the definition of amateurism to evolve. In some sports, it is okay for students to compete in non-collegiate competition, like the Olympics, where there is an opportunity to make money through endorsements. And this inconsistency is ridiculous to me. Treat student-athletes like other students. If a pianist got an endorsement from Steinway, we go, yay. If it is an athlete, totally different story.”

That's evolving into not amateurism, but if you need a fig leaf fine. Fig leaves for all.

Former NCAA guy says obvious thing. Former NCAA honcho Mark Lewis says something anyone who's attended a football game in the past ten years knows in their commercial-soaked bones:

"The priority is to monetize the sport," Lewis told ESPN this past week. "That's taken precedent over everything else. If that's the model -- and there's nothing wrong with that -- then you can't expect the players to live by the same set of rules [as they did in the past]. To me, it's just a question of fairness." …

"…in this drive for revenue now, the boxes line up the same. Colleges are doing everything that pro sports leagues are doing to make money. So how come you're treating the participants radically different? You can't justify it."

It is grating that all of the people with a plantation mindset the previous section happily suck up seven-figure salaries while trying to justify the current state of the organization.

In his defense it was a stool, not a chair? If you missed the end of the Kansas-Kansas State game you missed a wild brawl:

This angle provides more details:

The guy wearing 22 is Silvio De Sousa, who is the guy who got Kansas in hot water with the FBI. Also he picked up a chair at some point. Given the current trajectory of Kansas basketball, expect him to be named university president by Thursday. They'll release a video with Bill Self throwing chairs at puppies on Friday. Saturday, Snoop Dogg will have sexy chair dancers mock-beat him at halftime.

Also… uh:

"Stand back, I've got this under control. I'm a cheerleader."

Camp is ghosting everyone. The Dolphins announced their new staff. Absent:

Etc.: Joe Moorhead lands at Oregon to be OC. That's not in the Big Ten, so it's good. 2021 D commit Luke Hughes profiled. Josh Uche starting to get some pre-draft praise. OT Coy Cronk grad transfers from Indiana to Iowa. Dwumfour ends up at Rutgers.

Comments

Brian Griese

January 22nd, 2020 at 2:23 PM ^

Brian, I think you’ve got the Laettner stomping issue confused with the Barkley elbow (though they both happened in 1992). In the memorable Duke Kentucky tournament game that year, Laettner stomped on Aminu Timberlake if I recall correctly. 
 

Barkley elbowed the shit out of some poor soul from Angola that couldn’t have weighed more than 150 pounds because, well, it’s Charles Barkley. 

TrueBlue2003

January 22nd, 2020 at 3:01 PM ^

Re: those TO rates for Michigan.  Those are crazy drops for Simpson and Livers and are hurting the defense a lot.

I don't think it's a lack of perimeter "pressure" though.  Michigan is up on guys on the perimeter.  That's how you hold opponents to the lowest three point rate in the country.

On-ball steals are fairly rare, and they're extremely rare when a defender is one-v-one. That's not how you rack up steals and TOs. Most steals come on intercepted/deflected passes or on-ball doubles.  This is almost certainly where Michigan is losing TOs compared to last year.

Michigan is almost exclusively not doubling (even though the Iowa game was a positive sign) and they're much less willing to help on drives and the post to stick with shooters.  It's those doubles - either designed or as a result of help defense - that lead directly to steals or force tough passes into rotating defenders. 

They're not helping enough off bad shooters / bad offensive players in a creative way.  Yaklich had a lot of interesting tweaks that kept opponents guessing to some extent.   Michigan has so far been wayyyyyyyyy too three point averse.  I think they're adjusting properly, though.

CincyBlue

January 22nd, 2020 at 3:04 PM ^

I went to HS at Pioneer with Keith Wade, he was a hell of a player back then and played his College ball at Toledo.   Glad to see his kids are doing well. 

LKLIII

January 22nd, 2020 at 3:25 PM ^

On the OSU absolutely torching Michigan's D the past two years:

I'd be curious to what extent some of OSU's massive success against us the past two years were due to temporary/limited yet potentially massive intelligence leaks. 

  1. OSU hired both Al Washington & Greg Mattison immediately after the end of the 2018/19 season. Is there *any* chance that OSU was playing footsie with one or both of them prior to the 2018 Michigan/OSU game? 
     
  2. For the 2019 Michigan/OSU game, now both are definitively on OSU's staff. Both undoubtedly shared every ounce of insight they had about the personalities, tendancies, strengths/weaknesses of key players & coaches on Michigna's staff.  Even if Michigan changed their play calling terminology, schemes, sideline signals, etc., it'd still be an informational bonanza that OSU had on their hands. 

    For the 2019 game, I also heard a news report that when we played Rutgers earlier in the season, they had somehow cracked our defensive sideline calls/signals.  They couldn't do anything about it b/c they were so inferior athletically, but apparently they knew them.  A salty Rutgers HC Chris Ash (OSU coaching staff alum) then contacted Ohio State staffers & shared everything with them.  IIRC, this is part of the reason we saw Michigan using those large flags/banners during time outs during the bowl game so the TV cameras couldn't show what was going on in the coaching huddles.

I'm not saying that we would have necessarily won either the 2018 or 2019 games. However, it does make me curious how damaging those developments actually were.  Plus, in many cases, momentum is a hell of a thing.  Once a team falls behind a couple of scores, team motivation/confidence flags, the offensive playbook starts to restrict & allow the opposing defense an even bigger advantage, etc. 

WolverBean

January 22nd, 2020 at 4:40 PM ^

And I think "couldn't" is the right word here too. At some point you can only do so much schematically to paper around your deficiencies, and eventually a team that has both top talent and top coaching will figure out how to exploit you.

I agree that momentum also probably played a huge role against OSU. Michigan started playing desperate in the third quarter, and I think that led to some bad passes, bad drops, and bad defensive angles that added to the snowball.

mfan_in_ohio

January 22nd, 2020 at 10:22 PM ^

The biggest problem against OSU was that seemingly every key player had a mistake at the worst possible time.  Offside on a punt on 4th and 4.  Drop after drop after drop.  Shea fumbled. Even the missed XP. 

Shea threw for 305 yards on eight completions, and I'm guessing there were about 8 drops that could have added another 100 yards or so and prevented some punts. Michigan needed a perfect game and for OSU to make the sort of mistakes they made against Clemson.  Instead, the reverse happened.

ERdocLSA2004

January 22nd, 2020 at 6:46 PM ^

I think it’s naive to assume Mattison wouldn’t use his knowledge of our scheme and personnel to give his current team and the ones who are paying his salary an advantage.  Mattison left for our most hated rival, I’m sure he spilled his guts on day one.

We don’t win either of these games regardless, but coaches use anything they can to get an advantage.

do you think vrabel didn’t use his knowledge of patriots system?  You think Gattis didn’t have anything to add to the Bama game plan?  Think we could count on Yaklich to not share any intimate details of our team if we played Texas in the Tourney?

There is no moral compass in sports.  It’s win at all costs.  I thought we all knew that by now.

Tex_Ind_Blue

January 22nd, 2020 at 7:36 PM ^

Look at his first point. The insinuation is the coaches gave "secrets" on their current employer to their future employer who also happens to be the final game of the regular season. If they really stooped to that level, no one else would hire them in the future. I think there is some honor among thieves. I hope so. 

I realize that every new employee brings company secrets from their previous employer and uses it to gain an advantage over them. But there is a difference in telling the tendencies of Michigan coaches vis-a-vis what signals Don Brown sent to set up a blitz. I do not think it happened to that extent. 

In fact, I think OSU has quite a few grad assistants breaking down every Michigan game film and generating cut-ups for the coaches. If Seth can write the Neck Sharpies column after running a decent sized blog, imagine what 10 of them could do when they just watched film all day. 

ERdocLSA2004

January 22nd, 2020 at 6:34 PM ^

I think OSU’s plan was and is to “get our playmakers in space and give them the ball”.  I’m not saying they don’t gamelan for us but when you have the players and coaches they do, they don’t have to find the chink in our armor, they just keep hitting until we break.  

lhglrkwg

January 22nd, 2020 at 3:31 PM ^

I don't think Brown's defense are overall a problem against good offenses, but Brown 110% has an OSU problem. Ryan Day has owned Don in every way possible. At this point, I see no reason to expect OSU to score less than 60 in Columbus this year and that's a problem

KSmooth

January 22nd, 2020 at 4:19 PM ^

RE: Alan Griffin -- I went to Illinois for law school and still check in on hoops over there from time to time.  Among Illinois fans the overwhelming majority want Griffin to be suspended for a game or two.  Part of it is he has a history of chippy play before this, and they want to rein that in.

Vasav

January 22nd, 2020 at 4:23 PM ^

Yea I guess the cheerleader messed up there, but in general it looks like the KU cheer team was actively trying to break up the fight - holding back both KU and KSU players and genereally acting like the "good guys."

1VaBlue1

January 22nd, 2020 at 4:54 PM ^

I don't see a Don Brown problem, either.  OSU is generationally good right now - better than they've historically been.  That doesn't mean Michigan will never beat them.  I think Brown's problem has been a complete lack of balance between offense and defense.  Say what you want about Patterson carving up OSU in the first half.  He (the offense) scored 16 points - one TD and three FGs.  I don't care how many yards you're racking up, if you're only kicking FG's you're going to lose the game.  When you're not scoring, the opponent offense can relax and play a little more loose.  Which puts your defense in more trouble.  Which, in turn, causes your offense to become one-dimensional.  It all adds up - and when you're starting with a mental block from having lost 100 games in a row to this team, well...

The 2018 game was a disaster of a defensive approach.  If you couldn't contain on press coverage alone, you got whooped.  Well, they got whooped.  In 2019, Brown greatly changed his approach.  He ran far more zone all year (and they got good at it), and changed up the DL and blitz calls.  It was a very different defense than he ran in 2018.  It didn't work, but I'll put a good share of blame on an offense that failed inside the RZ three times (incl a TO) and played for a FG late, during the competitive portion of the game.

You can't score, you don't win.  That whole 'defense wins championships' thing is dead and gone in CFB.  Ask Clemson...

Bringing back …

January 22nd, 2020 at 5:12 PM ^

The grad transfer's have been good for Iowa, Rutgers, and Miami in particular this year. We don't play Iowa or Miami but it will make it harder on MSU. They could very well end up dead last in the East next season. 

Mpfnfu Ford

January 22nd, 2020 at 6:28 PM ^

The one thing about all the amateurism stuff that always gets me is that if teams with major college athletics funneled the money generated by athletics back into the school and used those profits to say, pay TAs a living wage or hire a few more professors or fund a new building to replace one that's literally sinking into the ground and is maybe hazardous, I don't think they'd be facing The End of Amateurism. Even though I still don't think that would be fair to the kids themselves, I don't think there'd be a lot of crying about it if the money went back to things that matter to the overall university experience.

But that's NOT what happens. The revenue gets walled off in the athletics departments and ends up being wasted on athletic department salaries and unnecessary facility upgrades which are largely done for two reasons 1) to make some kind of compensation for athletes by giving them cool buildings instead of what they actually want, which is cash and 2) so athletic directors can have a bullet point on their resume as they job hop to the next gig. No athletic director in America is worth high 6 figures. They're making that much because all the money has to go somewhere, and everyone's too stupid to realize they're just giving it to themselves. All that while the modern AD is demonstrably worse at the core of their job than ADs that made a fraction of their salary in previous generations, as evidenced by the fact they all have to hire search firms to do their job for them.

I would rather set 900 grand on fire than give it to Warde Manuel or any other AD. They're all basic functionaries adding little value to the college while sucking up the money. And just about everyone who doesn't look at this stuff like religion has figured out this is all bullshit, so it's all gonna end soon or at least morph into something less obviously bullshit.

Mongo

January 22nd, 2020 at 6:45 PM ^

There is no Don Brown problem.  Is there an OSU problem ?  Heck yes, they are faster and bigger than us.  Period.  OSU owns everyone in the conference with an occasional brain fart loss against a lesser foe.  But that ain't happening vs UM. 

JR3410

January 22nd, 2020 at 8:20 PM ^

The excuses for Don Brown keep coming.  It’s unbelievable.  How many more awful performances against good offenses will it take for people to realize this guy is a liability?

Number 7

January 23rd, 2020 at 3:51 PM ^

I was a contemporary of Keith Wade's.  I played high school ball in Ann Arbor, same graduation year, once played on a (semi-organized) team with him and occasionally pick-up as well -- but, I'll be clear, I was not in his league.  Indeed, he was the king of Ann Arbor basketball c. 1987; I was not anywhere near royalty.  I remember being completely distraught to read about his illness a few years ago.

So to read about his recovery (in the context of his son's return to Ann Arbor) was exactly the dose of perspective I needed this morning.  (Especially since usually those doses come with a negative impact -- "too much f___n' perspective" as they say in Spinal Tap.)  Cheers to uplifting news.  (And thanks for linking to it in UV)