denard would have endorsed some things [Eric Upchurch]

Unverified Voracity Has More Bills Than A Platypus Convention Comment Count

Brian December 17th, 2020 at 1:56 PM

Yet another NIL bill. This one is from a couple of Democratic senators and is less a name and image bill than a complete overhaul of the NCAA. It includes name and image rights, naturally, but keeps going. The biggest component:

• Athletes in sports that generate more revenue than the total amount of money that is spent on scholarships in that sport would be entitled to share 50% of the money left after scholarships are paid. In FBS-level football, for example, the commission would add together the revenue generated by all 130 football programs and subtract the total costs of scholarships at all those programs. Half of the money that is left would be distributed evenly among all players at the FBS level. The sports that currently generate enough money to qualify for this revenue sharing, according to Booker's office, are football (both FBS and FCS levels), men's and women's basketball, and baseball.

This is a terrible idea. It is a slightly different version of paying the money to people who don't earn it since San Jose State's punter is going to get as much as Devonta Smith under this regime. It is a massive transfer from P5 schools to everyone else; it does nothing to help break the current playoff hegemony. It does not allow schools to get anything in return, like an agreement to actually play in bowl games, in exchange for paying them. Once you pay them, you get to ask things of them. That's what the money is for.

It's also uselessly complicated and nonsensical when we have this whole "market" thing that could be applied and is applied in all other sports. Just ban restrictions on compensation and be done with it.

[After THE JUMP: various other options]

At least it's not a capitulation. Dan Murphy rounds up the other bills in Congress. There are six, although two seem DOA now that their authors are no longer going to be in the House. The still extant in addition to the above:

  • Marco Rubio's NCAA lobbyist bill that allows the NCAA to rewrite their own rules and gives them an antitrust exemption. It seems like nobody except Marco Rubio is interested.
  • A bill from former OSU WR Anthony Gonzalez and some guy from Missouri that gives athletes NIL rights, prohibits them from endorsing naughty things, and allows schools to prevent athletes from directly conflicting with their existing sponsors at games—but does not prevent them from signing deals with competitors generally. It attempts to prohibit boosters from using NIL as a recruiting tool, which isn't going to work, but whatever.
  • A more restrictive version of the above bill where anyone defined as a booster would not be able to pay athletes for their endorsement.

If I had to bet I'd say that the Gonzalez bill is the closest to whatever eventually passes congress.

Meanwhile in lawsuits. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the Alston case. If you don't remember what that was: NCAA was sued by former WVU player Shawne Alston. The judge in the case made a weird nonsense ruling that the NCAA was violating antitrust law by capping compensation, and then limited that ruling to educational expenses:

Wilken limited her ruling to include only benefits related to education, such as covering the costs of "computers, science equipment, musical instruments" and other similar items. She wrote that the NCAA's unique business model justified some limits.

Congratulations, everyone gets half a baby.

Anyway, a parade of appeals ensued. The NCAA was unsuccessful at overturning the Wilken ruling. Interestingly, it seems like even though the Alston lawyers nominally won the lower court lawsuit there was some prospect that higher courts would expand that W:

Alston's attorneys asked the appellate court to expand Wilken's initial ruling and allow schools the option to compensate athletes however they wanted, rather than limiting those options to education-related expenses. The trio of appellate judges declined to broaden the scope of Wilken's ruling.

"We believe we had a good legal argument for it, but sometimes progress on difficult things requires you to take one step at a time," said Jeffrey Kessler, one of Alston's attorneys. "You don't get to the end of the road all at once."

So that might be on the table for the Supreme Court, as well. Sports law talking guy Michael McCann thinks this is probably good for the NCAA but points out that traditional notions of conservative and liberal don't map onto the NCAA very well, probably because everyone hates the NCAA.

Tom Allen: not going anywhere, probably. Tom Allen's buyout is the full amount:

Auburn fans are on Flight Aware, as one must be, and noted that an Auburn plane is in Bloomington, prompting reminders that Tom Allen is super expensive and Auburn just axed Gus Malzahn for 21 million dollars. Rumors down there are focused on Kevin Steele, which would be incredible since he is currently Auburn's DC. Eating twenty million dollars of buyout so you can promote a 62-year-old coordinator: worse than hiring Brady Hoke?

Blanket. Go. The NCAA has issued a blanket waiver for all transfers this year. Go get, uh…

South Alabama's Keith Gallmon? Ah hell he's a safety. Go get someone! To corner at people!

Gemon Green did okay. Michigan's secondary checks in 75th to PFF. Woof. Green came out all right though:

Gemon Green is starting at one of the outside spots for the first time in his career and has allowed an impressively low catch rate (39%) with good ball production (eight pass breakups). But when he has allowed a catch, it’s more often than not a huge play. Green has given up 19 catches that on average have resulted in a 15.4-yard gain.

Sort of okay.

Etc.: Bonus Auburn conspiracy wackadoodle business. The aftermath of Grant Newsome's injury. Chris Hunter, directing basketball ops. Iowa's offense has terrifying shot volume.

Comments

Catchafire

December 17th, 2020 at 2:13 PM ^

Check this y'all.  Auburn fired Gus and had to pay him $21 million to leave.  The guy that will replace Gus: the current Auburn DC Kevin Steele... Talk about making a splash hire y'all.

Go Blue!

JFW

December 17th, 2020 at 3:51 PM ^

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recency_bias#:~:text=Recency%20bias%20is%20a%20cognitive,before%20being%20dismissed%20to%20deliberate.

Carr,

2000 till 2007 was 73-27 for a .73 winning percentage and two bowl wins. 

Hoke/RR, 2008-2014, were 46-41 for a .52 winning percentage and one bowl win. 

Harbaugh, 2015-2019, was 47-18 for a .723 winning percentage. His last two years were 10-3 and 9-4; so two years ago matched his best year and last year was one game off of that pace. 

3-3 vs. MSU, but 2-1 in the past 3 years. 

During that whole time, we have had three victories over OSU; two under Carr (the last being in '03) and one under Hoke when he faced off against Fickell. OSU isn't a Harbaugh problem. It's a Michigan Problem in this century. 

Further, by my calculations, from '00 to '07 we were 22-16 vs. Ranked opponents for a winning percentage of .57 (better than Harbaughs .49, admittedly, but not OMG stellar) and at the same time during that period lost 18 times to lower or unranked teams (including the App State game). 

So, yeah, prior to this year: 

A) He turned us around and got us back, or at least very close to, a pre RR/Hoke winning percentage.

B) His records are remarkably consistent, 10 wins, 10 wins, 8 wins, 10 wins, 9 wins. 

C) Every coach we've had in this century sucks at bowls; including Harbaugh. 

D) His winning percentage vs. ranked teams is worse, but more of a matter of degree. 

E) We lost alot of games to teams ranked lower than us prior to him coming. This isn't a new Michigan thing  

Sure, the blowout losses to OSU suck; and I honestly think they've lead, for the most part, to horrible losses in the bowls because the team has had its hopes crushed and doesn't care much. That happens in college. 

I'll also admit, there are worrisome trends. Clock management, and more recently preparation seem to be a real problem. The biggest noticeable difference from Pre RR/Hoke are the blowout losses to Wisci and PSU. This season with something like 20 guys gone from the 2 deep and the whole COVID thing, has been a disaster past minnie. 

But let's not deny what he has done for us; and what looking for 'The Next Great Coach! Don't Let FEAR Guide You! Lightning in a bottle boys! We're One Coach Away! We Need A Modern Offense!, We Need A True Michigan Man! WE JUST NEED CHANGE!' thinking got us under RR/Hoke. 

And when people here LOSE THEIR SHIT over an 8-5 season I don't want to hear a damned thing about 'Say what you want about RR' and his last season 7 wins. 

Our fanbase is toxic. 

stopthewnba

December 17th, 2020 at 4:55 PM ^

^ THIS.

 

Stolen from a post just prior to the Minnesota game:

Harbaugh has elevated Michigan to a level that Michigan has always been in, outside of a very select few years.
 

For example, since 1975 (when Michigan began routinely playing 12+ games in a season) Michigan has won more than 10 games just 4 times. Bo did it once, Moeller didn’t do it, Carr did it twice (including a natty) and Hoke did it once. The fact is, Michigan is routinely a 9-10 win team. Period. It’s who we have always been. Harbaugh has returned us to that level.

Now a couple things have changed now compared to back then. Ohio State has improved leaps and bounds. They’re now a consistent top 5 team. You won’t see them limping into the Big House with a 7-4 record any time soon. The other major difference, is that it’s no longer the Big 2, little 8. Wisconsin and Penn State are now consistently top 20 teams. Minnesota and NW have shown the ability to knock out 10-11 wins here and there. MSU even went through a stretch of success. Point being, you can’t win the Big Ten with 3 losses anymore (something Carr did in every conference title season with the one very obvious exception)

TrueBlue2003

December 17th, 2020 at 5:26 PM ^

When you crater a program from a typical 9-10 wins to 3 in your first year, it's not that difficult to go up a little from there (even if still not even close to normal).

Our current coach had a rough year with QB issues, but this isn't a "direction".  It's a down / rebuild year.  No reason to expect he can't get back to 9-10 wins probably even next year like he bounced back after his last rebuild / injury plagued year in 2017.

When deciding if Harbaugh is the guy for the job, the question is whether 9-10 wins with a chance to win the division heading into The Game every three years also with a "down" year every three years is where you want to be.  It's a lot like the Lloyd Carr conundrum.  Sure, maybe you try to swing for the fences with someone that could be better but you're more likely to get someone worse like RR or Hoke.

I'd be in favor of kicking the tires on the occasional high probability guy (like Urban and mayyybe Campbell but no one else this year) but if someone like that isn't available, I don't think they should fire Harbaugh without a very good replacement in hand.

JFW

December 17th, 2020 at 5:52 PM ^

When deciding if Harbaugh is the guy for the job, the question is whether 9-10 wins with a chance to win the division heading into The Game every three years also with a "down" year every three years is where you want to be.  It's a lot like the Lloyd Carr conundrum.  Sure, maybe you try to swing for the fences with someone that could be better but you're more likely to get someone worse like RR or Hoke.

I'd be in favor of kicking the tires on the occasional high probability guy (like Urban and mayyybe Campbell but no one else this year) but if someone like that isn't available, I don't think they should fire Harbaugh without a very good replacement in hand.

Well said. We are what we are. We might be able to improve, but I think if we want to do that we have to re-look at how we want to have players approach academics like OSU did. Have an NFL degree for kids who otherwise wouldn't get in. Use NIL when it comes out. Or just use bagmen and say 'Why not, the NCAA won't do anything'. 

If we don't do that, I honestly don't see us breaking into that top 5. 

Blue in MD

December 20th, 2020 at 7:02 PM ^

Very well said. Definitely the most cogent post I've seen regarding Coach Harbaugh in context. 

I actually have a positive outlook about the future of UM football, because Coach has still managed to recruit well. Fans also shouldn't discount the culture of our school, which will always enable it to attract the talent and leadership to improve the program. (You don't have to look too far in the past to see the down years and elite years for other blueblood program universities... USC, Bama, etc. have all had these low points). I believe that Coach Harbaugh will hire some better assistant coaches and strength program coaches to develop the recruited talent and compete with Ohio for Division and Conference championships.

RockinLoud

December 17th, 2020 at 5:35 PM ^

Huh, I don't see where I said anything about win totals being comparable on an overall basis. I said "implode back to RR levels of performance". What exactly do you call....

  • Going 2-4
  • Losing to the least talented MSU team in years that has a new last second desperation hire of a coach that didn't even get any spring practice
  • losing to an 0-5 PSU team, at home
  • Getting lambasted by Wisconsin, again, the same Wisconsin that didn't even score a TD against Indiana
  • Setting the record for worst half-time deficit in program history
  • Setting the record for largest margin of defeat at home in program history
  • Getting lambasted by Indiana after 24 straight wins
  • Needing 3 OT's to beat Rutgers
  • Failing to win a single game at home for the first time in program history
  • Having depth and talent issues at key positions in year 6 of your tenure despite the fact that even amateur observers could see them coming a mile away
  • Running off quite possibly your best QB right before the season started

...if not an implosion to RR levels of performance on the field?

JFW

December 17th, 2020 at 5:50 PM ^

Playing in a pandemic year with injuries, sickness, and losing key players to the B1G shuffle, and having a truncated season. COVID affects teams differently. 

Harbaugh nearly matched RR's first season with the world on fire around him. RR took Carr's team and just had a 3 win season. 

JFW

December 17th, 2020 at 8:54 PM ^

Yup. Constant testing. Disrupted practices compared to the year before. Covid, injuries, opt outs, it all adds up. Because you are spending time going back to square one repeatedly when a kid gets hurt. Or you’re trying to get more practice time for more kids to guard against losses that may occur at any time, and take a chunk of kids with them. It all has an effect. Saying it doesn’t is screaming at clouds because you don’t like the guy, or because it’s popular to do so. And it’s especially foolish when we don’t have a lot out there to choose from. 

East German Judge

December 18th, 2020 at 12:02 AM ^

Yeah, no other B1G coach and team faced covid in 2020, right???  No other B1G coach had to not play their last 3 games due to covid, right???

While the latter one could be "bad luck", the first excuse is fucking bullshit and all you Harbaugh apologists please cling to it for dear life!

While Joe Milton may be a great person, have immense physical skills, and a great representitive for this University and team, how the hell does the "qb whisperer" pick him stubbornly to be the starter AND why did DM leave the team at the last minute, and please stop the BS because he wasn't the starter.

JFW

December 18th, 2020 at 6:58 AM ^

It affects each team differently. That’s been a constant in this pandemic. In the organization where I work one hospital is slammed and had staffing shortages and the next one 2 counties over is fine. 
 

add to that our injuries and relative youth over all and it’s a perfect storm.

but whatever. “UNACCEPTABLE!”

 

East German Judge

December 18th, 2020 at 10:01 PM ^

Apparently using your excuses, we must have been THE ONLY B1G team to play in a pandemic year with all the excuses your are mentioning.  Think about how the heck did we lose to MSU who has no talent and a first year coach who had less time than Jim to get his crew ready???  We lost 4 games at home and took 3 OTs to beat Rutgers, but right only we had covid issues and no one else in the B1G did.

East German Judge

December 18th, 2020 at 12:10 AM ^

Which part of the first 5 years was worth something:

  • 0-5 vs OSU, including 2 WORST losses ever!!!
  • 0 B1G titles, not even playing in the B1G title game let alone CFP
  • best road win is against #20 Northwestern
  • 1-4 in bowl games
  • 0-15 when Michigan is an underdog
  • 2-12 vs. top 10 teams
  • talented players transferring / leaving the program early
  • roster management is non-existent, OSU and Bama kids leave early ALL THE TIME, and their roster is not a shitstorm with the excuses of we are young
  • 4th highest paid coach in the country

 

JFW

December 18th, 2020 at 10:44 AM ^

  • 0-5 vs OSU, including 2 WORST losses ever!!!
    • Yup. And three (3) wins by all other coaches since '00. 
  • 0 B1G titles, not even playing in the B1G title game let alone CFP
    • Last one was '04. NOT a Harbaugh problem. 
  • best road win is against #20 Northwestern
    • No road wins against ranked opponents with RR. 
    • No road win agasint ranked opponent under Hoke; 
  • 1-4 in bowl games
    • Lloyd had 3 wins from '00 to '07. Since then we've had TWO. Harbaugh has one of them. And this is in an era where the with the playoffs bowls don't matter so teams don't care as much if they aren't one of the four. 
  • 0-15 when Michigan is an underdog
    • Not going to go through each season, but given the state of the other numbers I'm guessing that he's not far off what we were. 
  • 2-12 vs. top 10 teams
    • 18 losses to unranked teams or teams ranked lower under Carr and other coaches. 
  • talented players transferring / leaving the program early
    • Happens to everyone. Have to evaluate each player and each reason. 
  • roster management is non-existent, OSU and Bama kids leave early ALL THE TIME, and their roster is not a shitstorm with the excuses of we are young
    • Because they recruit higher to begin with for reasons we all know. The distance between the top five recruiting classes and the next five is large. Go ahead, keep comparing us to OSU and Bama. You wont' be happy with almost any other team in college football. 
  • 4th highest paid coach in the country
    • You paying? Silly point. 

Dude. Just go root for 'Bama. Everyone will be happier. Because if we get another coach in here and he is at Harbaugh's level or worse you'll still be chewing your TV remote and coming up with bullet points. 

GrahamTastic

December 18th, 2020 at 12:09 PM ^

The new PR intern has apparently entered the chat.

Demonstrating that RR and BH were just as bad as Harbaugh has been isn't the compelling argument that you think it is. Even showing Carr's shortcomings isn't, either. Harbaugh was hired to surpass them, to deliver Big Ten titles, to get Michigan into the playoffs. You've proven that he hasn't done the first objective, and we all know that we're lightyears from the second and third.

If you're content with the big money hire whose mission was to exceed the accomplishments of his immediate predecessors but just replicates what they have done, then fine. It's not a good way to run a business, or really anything.

For the record, though, I don't see a way that the university can move on from him this year and justify it financially--everybody across the university has taken pay cuts, most programs are restricted from spending, and the athletic department is projected to run at like a 20-30 million deficit (maybe this will change depending on rollout of the vaccine(s)), so just buying him out and splashing another huge contract on a coach at this point would just be vulgar.

JFW

December 18th, 2020 at 1:58 PM ^

Been here 10 years. 

"If you're content with the big money hire whose mission was to exceed the accomplishments of his immediate predecessors but just replicates what they have done, then fine. It's not a good way to run a business, or really anything."

This 'GET IT DONE OR ELSE NO EXCUSES' attitude is an absolutely pathetic way to run anything outside of a prison camp. 

Harbaugh was hired to win. He's done that except for this year. But the objective reality is that we have *never* been like OSU is now; and unless we make changes, we won't be. College Football is different now. 

Do I want to win a National Title again? Yup. Absolutely. I'm willing to let the program work and build, and weather the storms that happen along the way. It's like a football index fund. 

I'm sick and tired of the people that cherry pick statistics to make out like Harbaugh is a bad coach with a bad record here; while ignoring what our from the hip fires and hires have done before. He ABSOLUTELY out performed RR and Hoke. And oh how RR was defended and lauded here because of his magic offense. He isn't a bad coach. He's a good coach. Will it work out eventually? Don't know. But incurring transition costs based on cherry picked data is a stupid way to run anything. It's the management of outrage and hubris. 

JFW

December 18th, 2020 at 2:03 PM ^

Then stop paying. Your percentage of his salary is miniscule. Are you willing to bring that up for every hire? Write a letter to Warde 'I want more value for my tickets. Next coach don't pay so much. Or pay him but cut back on the assistants, and pass the savings on to me.'

And the 'Slightly better if no worse than Hoke and RR' is the equivocating I hate. He's way, way better than either. Remember losing to Toledo in a normal season? I do. Remember beating Illinois in a shoot out? I do. Remember damn near losing to Akron? I do.

Harbaugh's not quite up to 2000's Carr, but close. Michigan has never been this national elite that people think we have been. After the 40's we have one national title that we shared. But people take our lack of CFL births in an era when the elite are higher than ever as a personal insult then yell and scream and chew the carpet. 

My Name is LEGIONS

December 18th, 2020 at 11:05 AM ^

You can finger Harbaugh for the Brown hire, and the risk that went with it if it didn't work out... getting all these tweeners... now we have a defense stacked with smallish players in the front seven.  And guess what, it didn't pan out..and it sucks...

RR did the same but on offense.. threw out the beef on the OL and went with smallish players...

Now it'll take time to get the defense back with bigger players in the front seven... 

But Harbaugh got the program back to a very good spot..... we have a few stud QBs here, a solid OL (though my gosh we need four more OTs), some great WRs,   and he took back the state... this cannot be understated.... RR gave it away.    Now we just need to hope the DC hire is the right one.

Wolverine In Exile

December 17th, 2020 at 2:39 PM ^

OMG. I just read the Auburn twitter thing... Bobby Lowder is back. For those of you who don't know the history, go back in the internet archives and read the "As the Plains Burns" thread from Tiger Droppings around the Cam Newton at Auburn era. Sometimes I wish our Michigan conspiracies were even 1/10th as crazy as your average SEC powerhouse. 

mrguy

December 18th, 2020 at 12:43 PM ^

I tried going to tigerdroppings and got nowhere. It seems to have been scrubbed from the internet. What I did get was falling down a very weird political hole that was beyond bizarre and frankly unnerving. After reading that board, I think today is the day I am going to go out to pick up a firearm.

Also re: "Sometimes I wish our Michigan conspiracies were even 1/10th as crazy as your average SEC powerhouse." WHY would you want that kind of drama/insanity??? I think it's entertaining but only when it is another program.

mrguy

December 18th, 2020 at 12:43 PM ^

the dreaded double post. It must do this when you take too long to finish your post. I wrote and rewrote that post several times to avoid veering into any unsafe areas.

 

Also rereading my original post again, I hope no one takes offense by what I said. Visiting tigerdroppings was eye-opening. It makes me appreciate having robF around.

rob f

December 17th, 2020 at 4:05 PM ^

It also was a good summary of what Grant went through in the aftermath of his awful knee injury and shines a great light on the person he is.  Very inspirational, it's clear he's going to be successful in whatever career he pursues. Whether or not he decides to continue climbing the coaching ladder, I'm rooting for him. 

RAH

December 17th, 2020 at 9:02 PM ^

There are few people that can more impactfully remind players that no matter how much talent they have they are one play away from relying on their degree (and alumni network) to make a good financial life for themselves and their families. That really is an important value for UofM players.

PeteM

December 17th, 2020 at 2:49 PM ^

Maybe he has laid this out in other posts and I missed it, but I'd be curious to hear Brian outline in more detail how compensation would work in his preferred scenario. This sentence from the post above suggests that compensation would be completely up to the market:

It's also uselessly complicated and nonsensical when we have this whole "market" thing that could be applied and is applied in all other sports. Just ban restrictions on compensation and be done with it.

But some pro sports are not purely market based as they share media revenue and have salary caps.  To me, two questions have to be at least considered:

  1. To what extent does the popularity of college sports rely on the premise (in many cases obviously a fiction) that players chose a school based on its traditions, academics, etc., and live lives on campus that at least bear a passing rresemblance to other students. In other words, if college sports coverage was full of stories about Ohio State and Alabama bidding for a DB from Texas and/or players transferring for more money would fans view college football as just the NFL without the same level of performance and be less interested.
  2. What is the impact of a greater division between haves and have nots.  Yes, I know that recruiting now isn't anything close to a level-playing field but there are still many competitive games every weekend.  How many games will be worth watching if schools like Indiana, Purdue go from getting a few players a year that Michigan or Ohio State might want to almost none?

Again, maybe I misunderstand what Brian means, but since the revenue ultimately comes from (or because of) fans watching TV and -- hopefully again in the future if safe -- attending games I think what will, and won't appeal, that constitutency is a relevant concern.

PrincetonBlue

December 17th, 2020 at 3:31 PM ^

1. Not at all

2. Michigan and OSU cannot outbid every other school for all 85 players on their rosters.  

If anything, the playing field will be more level: a borderline kid that would have originally sat on the bench at OSU could potentially have the monetary incentive to play at Indiana.  As it stands right now, no recruit has any reason to choose Indiana over OSU, given both offers.

Gulogulo37

December 17th, 2020 at 6:02 PM ^

Sure they do. Playing time, proximity to home, better relationship with the coaches. But yes I agree overall. The NFL will still be watching. It'll probably be better to get paid something to be a star at Indiana instead of a backup at OSU.

One thing I could see is some law going too far while the ncaa fights everything instead of reforming itself sensibly and getting out ahead of things. Then everyone will blame the law instead of the ncaa for refusing to change and being forced to.

grumbler

December 17th, 2020 at 4:28 PM ^

Universities would have to spin off their professional football teams unless they get state legislatures to re-write their mission statements, or they are private universities.  Schools couldn't justify football as a student-athlete activity because; once they teams professionalize, the employees could no longer legally be required to attend the university (that's unrelated to their job and so cannot be required).  

Who are these spun-off professional teams going to play?  Is Purdue going to spin off a pro team, or just reorganize/restructure their football program so that it is no longer profitable and they don't have to pay players?  What happens when Brian's preferred pro teams go bust and now high school graduates can't get any pre-professional training at all?

The idea that college sports are really just like professional sports is one of the Brian hobby-horses that just never made a lick of sense to me.  He's still riding it, though, so I'm still amazed at his lack of foresight.

grumbler

December 17th, 2020 at 8:44 PM ^

The statement is based on laws regarding restraint of trade and, potentially, employment discrimination.

If the players become professional football players (which they would become under this proposal), then the university can only require them to get admitted and take classes if the job of, say, a professional linebacker required ongoing attendance of classes.  Since many professional linebackers (say, in the NFL) do not attend classes, then limiting the university's professional linebackers to those who can get accepted and pass classes (a skill unnecessary for the job) and refusing to hire the others is restraint of trade.  If the rejected players can show that the student requirement imposes a greater burden on players from protected classes, that's likely employment discrimination as well.

Now, if the extra benefits were coming from outside the university (for example, passing rules that allow bag men to call themselves "NIL purchasers"), then the student requirement might be sustainable.  Of course, then your football program is owned by outsiders, but that's a different issue for a different day.

In the case of this  direct payment system, I can't imagine the UofM (or most major programs) being able to avoid spinning off the professional football teams as outside their remit.