[Patrick Barron]

Punt-Counterpunt: Washington 2021 Comment Count

Seth September 11th, 2021 at 8:28 AM

Washington links: Preview, Podcast, FFFF Offense, FFFF Defense, Weather (t-shirts should be fine as long as they’re maize)

Something's been missing from Michigan gamedays since the free programs ceased being economically viable: scientific gameday predictions that are not at all preordained by the strictures of a column in which one writer takes a positive tack and the other a negative one… something like Punt-Counterpunt.

image

PUNT

By Bryan MacKenzie
@Bry_Mac

This piece was going to be a lot easier to write at about 4:00 p.m. last Saturday. Michigan, fresh off a solid but not spectacular victory over a mediocre opponent, would get a real test against a ranked, good-but-not-great Washington team. How would Michigan’s defensive front hold up against Washington’s veteran offensive line? How would Cade McNamara fare in his first true test as Michigan’s starter? Had Jim Harbaugh stopped the bleeding?

Normal football questions for a normal football game. The kind of standard crap you’d hear leading off any Gameday segment or local network preview. It would be framed in terms of a random anecdote or a tortured analogy, as this space is prone to do.

And then Washington went out and crapped its pants on regional TV.

clip_image002[4]

We’re not Fredo… at the moment

It was only the fifth FCS win over a ranked team in the 43-year history of the FBS/FCS (Division I-A/I-AA) split, and one of the most embarrassing. Appalachian State was the two-time defending national champion entering 2007, and won it again that season. North Dakota was the 4-time defending national champion when they knocked off #13 Iowa in 2016. Montana is 18-14 in Big Sky conference play over the past four seasons, and was a 24-point underdog, on the road, against the defending Pac 12 West champions.

[After THE JUMP: Dead dog bounce?]

Part of me wants to be peeved. Michigan has, to an extent, been placed in a ‘can’t win’ situation. Washington isn’t terrible. They probably aren’t even bad. They laid a galactic egg last Saturday, but that catastrophe, coupled with Michigan beating Western Michigan more handily than was expected, wasn’t even enough to move the line a full touchdown. Michigan was a 1-point favorite. Then they won their opener. Then Washington faceplanted. Now Michigan is a 6.5 point favorite. It’s still anyone’s game. But if you win, you accomplished as much at home as Montana accomplished on the road. And if you LOSE… hoooo buddy.

clip_image001

But you know what? These are September concerns. These are concerns of people who care, even a little bit, about the opinions of the Rainer Sabins of the world. Facing a Great And Worthy Opponent is good. You know what’s better? Wins. Victories. Left column >>> right column.

Some people still care that Michigan’s Final Four run in 2018 featured five opponents no higher than a 6-seed. You know who those people are? Spartans. Spartans who do not have a Final Four banner that says “2018” on it. Michigan fans could argue about the relative merits of various opponents. Or they can point to the rafters and say, “banner.” The latter is much easier. And much more satisfying.

clip_image003

Michigan is not in Clemson’s position. They are not going to be a 12-1 team with a middling schedule worried about a playoff berth. They are a team with a coach who needs wins. They’re playing in front of a bunch of recruits they need to impress. They’re dealing with a lot of shit. And wins are wins.

For the first time in a while, Michigan isn’t the fail-son. We’re not the Chet Hanks. I’m not sure we’re Colin… but we’re not Chet. Someone else gets the snickers on Gameday. Michigan gets to play the role of 2007 Oregon to Montana’s Appalachian State. Don’t look the gift grizzly in the mouth. Michigan 31, Washington 13

----------------------------

image

COUNTERPUNT

By Internet Raj
@internetraj

In finance, the term “dead cat bounce” refers to a meager and short-lived rise in an asset, like a stock, that ultimately suffers a steep decline over the long run. The temporary price appreciation of the “dead cat bounce” continues just long enough to seduce unsuspecting and guileless investors into buying into what will ultimately be a doomed trade. Specifically, the phrase draws its origins from the morbid, but viscerally instructive, notion that “even a dead cat will bounce from a great height.”

clip_image002[6]

Also a graphical representation of how much actual football is discussed in Counterpunt

Last week’s Michigan vs. Western Michigan game sucked me right in to a vortex of irrational exuberance like the naïve nitwit I am. I spent this entire past week gorging on the carcass of the Broncos blowout, lathering myself in the comforting bubble bath of optimistic podcasts and glowing game breakdowns.

Convinced that Mike Macdonald is a defensive wizard who has fixed Michigan’s longstanding systemic woes in a single offseason. Convinced that our starting quarterback is the surgical, calculating field general we’ve needed so badly in Ann Arbor the last 6 years. Convinced that our backup quarterback is an 18-year-old version of Patrick Mahomes. Convinced that a September win against a MAC team is not a blip on the radar doomed to becoming a footnote to another chapter of misery. Convinced that the win is the first data point in an upward sloping trend line that only hits new all-time high after new all-time high, all the way to Indianapolis.

The problem, though, is that the graveyards of Michigan football history are littered with September hopes and dreams that are not so much dashed as they are ground into a fine dust, drenched with kerosene, and lit on fire.

  • September Heisman campaigns.
  • September wins against ranked Notre Dame teams.
  • September fist pumping and September machismo.
  • September swagger.

All of it which invariably gives way to November disappointments.

  • November disasters.
  • November blowouts.
  • November excuses.
  • November self-immolation.

clip_image004

When you lose to yet another rival and/or when you’re full of free chips and salsa at the Mexican restaurant by the time the waiter comes around to take your entrée order.

Sure, Michigan may parlay a Week 1 win against Western Michigan into a foundation for a successful 2021 season, but that would definitively be the exception and not the rule of the Harbaugh Era. And it all starts with today’s game against the Washington Huskies. Washington is coming off an embarrassing faceplant against FCS Montana and, as a result, pundits all over the nation are stumbling over one another to predict a Michigan victory. And, once again, the speculative Wolverine September bubble is beginning to form, enticing even the most jaded and cynical of fans to wet their beak in maize-tinged Kool-Aid.

I can feel an overwhelming impulse overcoming me, compelling me to smash the big green “BUY” button that is Michigan football stock. As much as I try to plug my ears and ignore rationality, the pragmatist in me is cautioning against making that investment and instead only asks one question:

How high can a dead Wolverine bounce?

My score prediction says “not very” but heart says to the damn moon.

Michigan 24 Washington 27

Comments

BornInAA

September 11th, 2021 at 8:35 AM ^

If this is the team of the last 6 years, then we read our own press, play like we are owed the victory just because we are Michigan, Harbaugh goes into conservative run the A gap shell, we lose by 14.

If pappa's actually got a brand new bag, then we win by 10.

michengin87

September 12th, 2021 at 9:57 PM ^

And yet amazingly we bashed our heads into Tuli and Taki for 60 minutes and came out the less bloody.  Other than the lack of being able to punch it in from the 1 in the 2nd quarter, I have to say that the game plan worked very effectively overall.

So, to summarize, I'm not that they have progressed based upon the play calling and yet I somehow felt that they did due to the excellent Washington defensive backfield while Thunder and Lightning would not and could not be stopped.

jbrandimore

September 11th, 2021 at 8:36 AM ^

Raj, you should know that dead cat bounces last more than a day.

Reality for Michigan probably reveals itself in Madison.

After all, it is still sweet September!

M 27 W 17.

DietrichDaniels

September 11th, 2021 at 8:38 AM ^

When you lose to yet another rival and/or when you’re full of free chips and salsa at the Mexican restaurant by the time the waiter comes around to take your entrée order.

One of the greatest photo captions of all time. 

Firstbase

September 11th, 2021 at 8:49 AM ^

This is one of those coin toss games for me. I think Washington's O-line vs our defensive front is the key. If we get push, we win. If they manhandle our D-line, they win. We will get Washington's best effort, that's for sure.

As Mike Tyson famously stated, "Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face." Let's hope we land most of those punches and if we get hit first, counterpunch harder.

I think we win in the end. If for no other reason, their receivers are fairly banged up.

M-24  W-14

East Quad

September 11th, 2021 at 8:50 AM ^

Time for the "dead-cat bounce" company to turnaround due to new middle management.

Love the reinvigorated CEO and his new lieutenants. Inspiring the "employees" to lead and training them to perform.

GO BLUE!!!

 

Blue Vet

September 11th, 2021 at 9:42 AM ^

Seth, you are obviously a brilliant seer. (My son knows Chet Hanks and I suspect would agree with your assessment. P.S. when I was an actor, someone compared me to John Cazale but I was never as snappy a dresser as Fredo.)

Raj, I see a slight flaw in your although-exuberance-nevertheless-painful structure. Clearly it should be modified to although-exuberance-nevertheless-painful-but-actually-exuberance. Sincerely yours, Beakwet

BlueHills

September 11th, 2021 at 10:26 AM ^

Another brilliant punt-counterpunt!

All thoughts of good luck, and even mild predictability, hit the transfer portal a long time ago. On the one hand, that's a shame, and on the other hand, it no longer destroys my weekend if Michigan doesn't win.

Either team could make enough mistakes to blow their chances in this one.

LabattsBleu

September 11th, 2021 at 10:47 AM ^

Montana's DLine WRECKED Washington's OLine. That was Dawgman's assessment of the Montana game and their 260lb DL.

Washington will be missing half of their WR - their had 4 guys left last week. Total... while I am sure one or two guys will play dinging and some other players are going to shift to Offense if they have to this year, this isn't an offensive powerhouse Michigan is facing here.

This is the quintessential Michigan game that generates angst however...because, well, shit happens to Michigan.

But this is the kind of game Michigan should win 95 out of 100 times...

Harbaugh4TheWin

September 11th, 2021 at 11:19 AM ^

Predicting the future performance of stocks or college football is a fool's errand.  Yesterday's steadily rising "can't miss" stock could easily suffer huge losses when the crippling lawsuit is publicly announced tomorrow.  Or any other number of unforeseen hurdles suddenly appear out of nowhere.  In both football and stock picking, you can only use what is known up until now and apply your best logic to your picks. IMO this week's Washington team has several hurdles that causes their stock to fall.  #1.  Their recent performance vs. an FCS team.  #2.  Road team disadvantage with all it's usual issues (Jet lag, hotel noise, crowd noise, night game, etc.)  #3.  Key injuries ravaging its key WR corp resulting in experience and depth issues.  #4.  Relatively new head coach and staff that underwhelms compared to Michigan's.  #5  Middling QB with underperforming O-line. 

If they have issues scoring at home vs. Montana, I don't see how they outscore Michigan on the road.

True, Michigan lost its top WR also, but that skill position group is so deep it can sustain the impact of a single injury to its talented corp.  Michigan's defense may have some weaknesses, but I believe it is still more talented and probably better coached than anything Montana put on the field.

For my money, barring any unforeseen crippling "lawsuit", I'm picking the Michigan stock, giving the points, and GOing BLUE!

 

TIMMMAAY

September 11th, 2021 at 11:28 AM ^

I've never liked the vibe that this piece puts in the ether, it just seems like really bad juju to me. What have we won since this piece started? Eh? Sports curses are real, they have to be, but we don't take them seriously enough around here. 

I'm at least half serious. 

MadMatt

September 11th, 2021 at 11:49 AM ^

I must not have expectations.
They are the mind-killer.
They are the little-death that brings total obliteration.
I will face my expectations.
I will permit them to pass over me and through me.
And when they have gone past, I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
Where the expectations have gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.

bronxblue

September 11th, 2021 at 1:03 PM ^

The analogy to Oregon in 2007 is positive here because like App St., Montana highlighted issues with UW that are foundational.  They don't have much of a down field passing game.  Their running backs are just guys.  They don't have much of a pass rush.  UM in 2007 didn't have corners, they didn't have a ton of confidence in their ability to stop mobile QBs, etc.  There were fundamental flaws with that team that others were able to exploit.  Washington is a fine team but playing at home, UM should be better.

27-10.

FlexUM

September 11th, 2021 at 3:13 PM ^

The crazy thing (well not crazy) is I firmly believe we will see if this “culture changed” is real or not pretty quick into this game. 

Do we see the mentality of old where they think they win the NC last week and as soon as they face adversity they fold? Or not…

AlbanyBlue

September 11th, 2021 at 4:29 PM ^

RE: full from free chips and salsa.....or, every weekend in high school once I got a car. We thought Chi-Chi's was excellent Mexican food.....well, at least there was free chips and salsa.