Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • 2014 Recruiting Board, Offense
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part IV - A NEW HOKE)
    Ron Utah - 5 hours ago
  • APR And Big Ten Football: A High-Level Summary
    LSAClassOf2000 - 8 hours ago
  • On Endowment, Financial Aid, and Perceived Prestige
    maizeonblueaction - 1 day ago
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 5 days ago
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part I)
    Ron Utah - 5 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
more
  • Yet Another Da'Shawn Hand post
    canzior - 2,921 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part II - THE MISTAKE)
    Ron Utah - 1,399 views
  • Devin and the White Rainbow
    MCalibur - 1,044 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part I)
    Ron Utah - 996 views
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 974 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part II - THE MISTAKE)
    Ron Utah - 52 comments
  • On Endowment, Financial Aid, and Perceived Prestige
    maizeonblueaction - 31 comments
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part III - HOKE IS A STRATEGY)
    Ron Utah - 11 comments
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 6-18-13
    Ace - 6 comments
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 5 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • One of the top DE in 2015 commits to GameCocks and trashes their academics!
    36 replies
  • ESPN Names Webber Top Draft Pick from B10 Since '89
    30 replies
  • MSU doesn't know who they're recruiting
    93 replies
  • (Mostly) OT: Michelle Chamuel of UM can win The Voice tonight (with votes)
    35 replies
  • Urban Meyer and Charlie Strong's "Core Values"
    132 replies
  • Burke & Hardway Jr Feature on BTN
    9 replies
  • Pretty OT: Golf Wedge Customization
    21 replies
  • ESPN Predicts Hand to M
    54 replies
  • OT: MCAT prep advice
    57 replies
  • OT: NCAA 14 Demo out tomorrow
    29 replies
  • High Noon with Rich Rodriguez and the Arizona Football Staff
    123 replies
  • ESPN Path to the Draft: No. 8 Michigan (Edit: Hoops)
    7 replies
  • B1G: Lunt to Illinois
    15 replies
  • Des Photobomb
    43 replies
  • Great Sam Webb Article on Hand
    43 replies
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 8
  • ››
  • OT: Griffins win Calder Cup
    3 replies
  • OT: Soccer - USMNT vs Honduras World Cup Qualifying Open Thread
    15 replies
  • 4* NJ TE/DE Garrett Dickerson's top 3: Stanford, M, Northwestern
    19 replies
  • OT- Alabama Installing Waterfalls In Football Locker Rooms
    59 replies
  • USF Camp (Cole/Scott)
    4 replies
  • OT - Pavel Datsyuk signs 3-yr extension with Red Wings
    43 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo thoughts; MGoBlogger PSN/Gamertag list
    82 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    84 replies
  • ESPN projects next three seasons, ranks M #5 ($)
    56 replies
  • More Camp Offers, 2014 WR and 2014 CB
    22 replies
  • Story on MBB Pete Kahler's Family
    4 replies
  • The Full NBA Job Interview: Trey Burke
    10 replies
  • MGoProfile to Return This Week
    72 replies
  • MSU doesn't know who they're recruiting
    93 replies
  • One of the top DE in 2015 commits to GameCocks and trashes their academics!
    36 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
  • Da'shawn Hand's New Top Three
    209 replies
  • OT'ish: Michigan or Harvard?
    176 replies
  • Coolest/favorite Michigan thing you own?
    139 replies
  • Urban Meyer and Charlie Strong's "Core Values"
    132 replies
  • OT: Man Of Steel. Wow
    129 replies
  • OT: City of Detroit Epic Comeback? (Business Insider)
    125 replies
  • High Noon with Rich Rodriguez and the Arizona Football Staff
    123 replies
  • ND to play ASU in football series
    112 replies
  • OT: Big storm coming
    103 replies
  • OT-4* recruit (non Michigan) posting really dumb things
    101 replies
  • OT: Tigers/afternoon baseball Open Thread
    97 replies
  • John U. Bacon on the GA Student Section
    97 replies
  • OT: Cool Story Bro!
    96 replies
  • MSU doesn't know who they're recruiting
    93 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    84 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • SF Kameron Chatman Talks UConn

    ...talks about how UConn hasn't been in contact and how they're out. (HT: UMHoops)

    0 comments
  • AIRBHG Invades Steelemas!

    wow

    0 comments
  • NBA Job Interview: Trey Burke (With Scouting Report!)

    Jalen, Burke, and Simmons.

    0 comments
  • 2013 World Dwarf Games to be held at MSU

    Mike Hart the heavy favorite in the trolling competition

    0 comments
  • NBA draft rumors: Pistons like Cody Zeller, but not Trey Burke - Detroit Bad Boys

    just what the Pistons need: a third string center. Joe Dumars was replaced by a mean ol' alien a few years back you guys.

    4 comments
  • New college grads: Don’t sell your time for a living

    this would be a close approximation of hypothetical graduation speech

    9 comments
  • College World Series Misspells "College" On Dugout

    no you guys they're just super pumped about COLLLLLLLLLLLLEGE

    0 comments
  • Michigan no longer looking for a transfer quarterback, Brady Hoke says

    not a surprise

    0 comments
  • Babcock: 'Glendening will play at the next level, for sure''

    premature congrats. One thing we can be sure of: he'll take fewer asinine penalties than Abdelkader

    1 comments
  • Spurrier may have to come up with a new UT spelling joke.

    Thanks to ugly transitions between Fulmer/Kiffin/Dooley/Davis, Tennessee is on the edge of APR penalties for football.

    1 comments
  • Report: NCAA ditching domes prior to Final Four

    i approve of this message

    0 comments
  • San Antonio Spurs may be doing something right by drafting international athletes

    strong indictment of AAU right heah

    0 comments
  • NBA draft 2013 Toss Up: Better PG prospect, Trey Burke or Michael Carter-Williams

    Glockner sides with justice

    0 comments
  • Brady Hoke-coached fantasy camp raises $140K for prostate cancer research

    a good cause, and a good time

    0 comments
  • Michigan men's basketball receives high academic honor with APR Public Recognition Award

    good job gents

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

Important Things About South Carolina

  • View
  • Revisions
By Brian — December 3rd, 2012 at 1:03 PM — 100 comments
Filed under:
  • 2012 outback bowl
  • south carolina

So, after shenanigans—there are always shenanigans—Michigan lands in the Gruesome Running Back Leg Injury Bowl against South Carolina. Appropriately, the game will be played in a pirate ship.

A new opponent requires knowledge. Here is the knowledge about South Carolina.

Haunting various dreams for the next month

hi-res-6703490_crop_650x440[1]

like Will Gholston, except good at football, so not like Will Gholston

Hey look it's Jadeveon Clowney, a 6'6", 260-pound defensive end with the kind of size/speed combo that has made him so patently unfair in college from day one that the only comparison you can make is with Adrian Peterson, who doesn't even play on the same side of the ball. Clowney's coming off a 4.5 sack performance against Clemson, leads the nation with 13 of those, and has hit 21.5 TFLs. Nobody approaches him and says "lol you name clowney."

Clowney's parents should have kept changing his name to something more outlandishly mockable with every inch he grew, just to see if anyone would bite on "I have a butt on my face Clowney." No one would have.

Unsurprisingly, over a sack per game by that guy is a good head start on lots of sacks in general—South Carolina is fifth nationally with 3.3 a game. Nobody else leaps off the page but that's actually a testament to South Carolina's pass-rush depth. The next three guys on the sack list have 5, 4.5, and 3 sacks. This isn't that impressive… until you look them up and find out they're all defensive ends. Which means that from two-ish positions on the field—I bet at least one of those guys plays DT on passing downs—South Carolina has 13 and 12.5 sacks. Put another way, Michigan's entire team has 6.5 fewer sacks than South Carolina's DEs*.

So at least NFL scouts are happy with the matchup of Lewan and Schofield versus those guys.

*[Not entirely fair since Michigan faced 294 passes to South Carolina's 342, but… yeah still pretty much fair.]

Haunting various dreams last month

That would be the aforementioned gruesome leg injury to Marcus Lattimore, whose knee ligaments had a suicide pact gruesomely consummated in the Tennessee game.

The downgrade in the run game was severe and immediately apparent. Backup Kenny Miles came in to grind out 34 yards on 10 carries—2.5 YPC worse than Lattimore's efforts—against the Vols. The next week against Arkansas Miles and Mike Davis combined to average 3.3 YPC. After a breather against Wofford, the pair split carries against Clemson for 3.1 YPC.

Lattimore had not been astounding before the injury, FWIW. He had a couple of Toussaint-like lines against LSU (13 carries for 35 yards) and Florida (3(!) for 13), and only cracked 100 yards against Vandy, Kentucky, and Georgia. Issues with South Carolina's run game seem systemic.

COACHES WANT TO BE SPIES

A8f23hXCYAAT0l0_medium[1]@ Right: Thompson is apparently evangelical.

This will sound familiar: South Carolina announced that backup quarterback Dylan Thompson would start against Clemson one hour before the game last weekend, rendering headlines like…

Connor Shaw Is the Key to the South Carolina-Clemson Game

…teeth-gnashingly frustrating for blog folk. Shaw had been fighting foot/ankle injuries that sapped his mobility for much of the year and should reclaim the starting job with a month to heal up.

Thompson did put up 310 yards passing, 3 TDs, and an interception while also picking up 73 yards on the ground (of which he gave back 35 on sacks), so if Connor Shaw struggles early you know the OBC is just itching to swap quarterbacks.

Shaw has not given much indication that he will as long as he's healthy. Michigan's defense is good but it's not at the level of LSU and Florida, and those are about the only defenses to give South Carolina much trouble this year. Oh, and Vandy. Right.

I learned it from YOU, dad

If you have not watched Carolina play this year it may surprise you to know that the Gamecocks have moved to what is pretty much a full-on spread offense with QB running and whatnot. Shaw and Thompson have 118 non-sack rushing attempts between them, many of them on old-timey zone read pulls when defenses sell out on Lattimore or Guy Who Isn't Lattimore.

No, this has not prevented them from finishing 12th in total defense, 15th in rushing D, and 13th in scoring defense. Yes, it is a crazy old world when Steve Spurrier is piloting a spread offense and winning with defense.

Further upping the sense Michigan is playing a weird alternate universe version of itself: Ace Sanders is a Gamecock Jeremy Gallon, except way better on punt returns. He's a slot dude, like all South Carolina receivers, and is a frequent target on screens. About which more later.

South Carolina practices are races to the quarterback

So I'm pretty sure the Gamecock offensive line is a shambles. There's the Lattimore numbers, which are depressing against superior defenses and grindingly okay against the Vandys of the world, where he'd pick up like 4.8 YPC because he gets one or three after contact every time. Without him the Gamecocks are a team that rushes for 4.1 YPC against Wofford.

Now add in the OL yielding 2.9 sacks a game on a relatively modest 329 attempts and this is not a good offensive line. It is a very bad offensive line, which helps explain why…

The Gamecock passing game is a betrayal of everything Steve Spurrier has ever believed in

Ace Sanders Georgia v South Carolina N1is2qWQmo3l[1]

Gamecock WRs: shorter than cornerbacks. Which cornerbacks? All cornerbacks.

Here's every attempt from the USCe-Missouri game:

Purdue. Before Lattimore's injury he was Carolina's leading receiver with 26 catches for 173 yards; Miles has 16 more catches. The top three receivers are all 5'9". That clip reel has about three passes past ten yards and given the YAC machines these guys are that is a season-long trend. The leading receiver, Bruce Ellington, is averaging about 15 yards a catch.

The two tight ends are frequently featured. Justice Cunningham is the large guy you see catching a half-dozen dumpoffs in the clip reel above; South Carolina will also go to Rory Anderson in the redzone—five of his 13 catches are touchdowns.

It works well enough, though: Spurrier's dink and dunk is 21st in passer efficiency. They spread the ball around, get lots of yards after the catch, and have kept the interceptions that plagued Stephen Garcia down.

Men who might tackle Denard Robinson

If Michigan can get to the second level, the guy most likely to be making the stop is fifth-year senior Shaq Wilson, who's a 5'11, 226-pound WLB sort who leads South Carolina in tackles. #2 is safety DJ Swearinger, which may or may not betray a tendency to get blocked on a second level that the defensive line covers up frequently.

This is probably not thecase. South Carolina is 15th nationally despite facing an absolute ton of rushing attempts. On a YPC basis they are better than OSU by 0.4 yards and better than MSU by 0.2 yards. They are essentially equivalent to Notre Dame, who Michigan did actually run on some—with Denard Robinson playing QB.

The over-under on Thomas Rawls YPC is set at one.

Well what about the air?

More plausible. Michigan's pass efficiency D slots in just behind South Carolina and I think we know Michigan can be had. The Bray went nuts against them with 368 yards on 43 attempts, 4 TDs, and one INT. On the other hand, Aaron Murray had 109 yards on 31 attempts and an INT, Tajh Boyd 183 on 24 attempts and a 1-2 TD-INT ratio. 

As someone who saw the Bray live in a game where Jarvis Jones was made to not exist, I think that game does indicate that if you can protect your quarterback the secondary will yield open guys and chunks of yards. Every time you drop back, though, you're playing with fire, as that clip above demonstrates. Sooner or later I have a butt on my face is going to get you.

If Michigan can move the ball against this defense it's going to be great news for Mike Schofield as Michigan's left tackle next year, because Lewan will take the money and run after sending his stock skyward. Also everyone will all be like WHERE WAS THAT AGAINST OHIO STATE because I tell you what running up the middle on third and short is going to have the same result.

Off the cuff first impression

10-6 South Carolina.

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
December 3rd, 2012 at 3:14 PM | I think you need to re-watch (Score:3 Normal)
Mfan2000
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 7988

I think you need to re-watch the ND game. ND never stopped M in the second half. Denard fumbled the ball away once around the 10. On M's other two drives Denard drove them down the field but they had to settle for FG's.

After ND went up 13-3 with under 7 minutes to go in game, Borges threw the ball more, but it was effective, and time was of the essence

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 3:16 PM | You make very good and (Score:4 Funny)
imafreak1
imafreak1's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1375

You make very good and reasonable points.

Give it to Wheatley!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 3:49 PM | You may be right, and my (Score:2)
GoBlueInNYC
GoBlueInNYC's picture
Joined: 03/23/2010
MGoPoints: 5920

You may be right, and my memories of that ND game may be distorted by an inaccurate MGoNarrative. And I'm in no rush to revisit that game, to be honest.

But my general sentiment toward Borges remains the same. I don't hate the guy the way a lot of people around here seem to, but I'm far from impressed by him and I think his bad game planning and play calling has cost Michigan some wins over the past couple of years.

I am this close to going all Dark Blue in here.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 4:54 PM | You don't have to suffer through watching the game again. (Score:2 Normal)
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 39216

Just look at the box score-

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/playbyplay?gameId=322660087&period=0

 

Edited- because copying the drive results is going to distort the whole thread, so deleting.
 
Our two second half drives before the last running out of time one consisted of 8 rushes and 2 passes, and 11 rushes and 2 passes.  Ended by a fumble and a FG, respectively.

"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 5:56 PM | I can't even bear to suffer (Score:1)
profitgoblue
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 19416

I can't even bear to suffer through the box score.  I'll just take your all's words for it (how do you like that English!).

 

Disgruntled former moderator.  I got a lot of problems with you people!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 6:17 PM | Is there anything more (Score:4 Normal)
GoBlueInNYC
GoBlueInNYC's picture
Joined: 03/23/2010
MGoPoints: 5920

Is there anything more emasculating than being proven wrong on the internet?

I can honestly say, no. No there isn't.

I am this close to going all Dark Blue in here.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:41 PM | Let's make a deal (Score:2)
InterM
InterM's picture
Joined: 01/16/2009
MGoPoints: 1116

I'll settle for play calling that has one of Michigan's all-time most dynamic offensive talents on the field (a) at least 90 percent of the time Michigan has the ball, and (b) on every play if the game is within a touchdown in the 4th quarter.  Or is that too much to ask?

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:47 PM | If Denard cannot throw, what (Score:5 Normal)
chitownblue2
chitownblue2's picture
Joined: 06/03/2009
MGoPoints: 7077

If Denard cannot throw, what do you want him to do on the field for 90% of the snaps?

It can't be at RB, because he can't block.

It can't be at WR, because he can't block.

Do we just give him the ball every single time? Or only run plays in which we either give him the ball, or decoy with him?

wolverineliberationarmy.com/blog

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:47 PM | It is too much to ask that he (Score:3 Funny)
imafreak1
imafreak1's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1375

It is too much to ask that he just be dynamic?

Give it to Wheatley!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:56 PM | Uh, is that a trick question? (Score:0 Overrated)
InterM
InterM's picture
Joined: 01/16/2009
MGoPoints: 1116

Since you asked, I'd like him to be in a position where (i) the ball ends up in his hands a good percentage of the time, and (ii) the defense is concerned that the ball might end up in his hands the rest of the time.  Here's the amazingly creative thing Michigan can do to compensate for Denard's lack of blocking:  put another back in the backfield with him who can block.  It actually is possible to have Hopkins or Smith in the backfield with Denard at RB -- see Iowa (and even OSU) game film for examples.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:59 PM | OK And giving him the ball (Score:4 Normal)
chitownblue2
chitownblue2's picture
Joined: 06/03/2009
MGoPoints: 7077

OK

And giving him the ball that often solves the predictability problem?

Look - I think we should have called more of the "using him as a decoy" stuff we did against Iowa, and I don't think Borges is blameless. But you can't put him on the field, routinely, at a position that is not QB, and not face the "but he can't block" problem. Again, unless you just always give him the ball.

wolverineliberationarmy.com/blog

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 3:11 PM | I must've missed the part of Michigan's season . . . (Score:0 Overrated)
InterM
InterM's picture
Joined: 01/16/2009
MGoPoints: 1116

where Denard running the ball was unpredictable and unexpected.  That must've been the same games where our OL and running backs were so effective, but I can't seem to remember those either.

Simply stated, Borges is way overthinking this.  It's college football -- put the ball in the hands of your playmaker and watch him make plays.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 9:18 PM | I can't speak for anyone (Score:1)
Harperbole
Harperbole's picture
Joined: 06/22/2012
MGoPoints: 159

I can't speak for anyone else, but my beef with Borges has been apparent inability to anticipate and/or identify weaknesses in opposing defenses efficiently with regularity against upper tier defenses. There will undoubtably be instances where a blitz will put Denard's inability to block to the forefront, but if Borges is able to diagnose these instances at a respectable rate there will be successful results, likely for big gains because of the space said blitz would open in addition to the occasional sack. Denard's skillset would in some ways limit the offenses playbook, but I find it difficult to believe that there isn't a way to manage the risks involved and get both players on the field in a way that would lead to a positive net result.

"The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about."
-Wayne Dyer

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 3:52 PM | But compensating for Denard's (Score:3 Normal)
GoBlueInNYC
GoBlueInNYC's picture
Joined: 03/23/2010
MGoPoints: 5920

But compensating for Denard's inability to block by putting in another RB who can is putting the offense at a disadvantage. Basically, if you're running a play with Denard on the field in which he doesn't get the ball and is not used as a decoy, you're basically running a play with 10 players.

I am this close to going all Dark Blue in here.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 6:13 PM | It's also a problem with the inverted veer ... (Score:2 Normal)
ca_prophet
Joined: 09/07/2010
MGoPoints: 212

... Denard and Toussaint is very different from Gardner and Denard.  (If I'm SC, I make Gardner keep it and hammer him; he's a good scrambler but if he carries 20 times on designed runs, we'll lose.)

Denard also isn't much of a decoy for the passing game - we can't go max protect with him in the game, and I've seen nothing to indicate that he can run anything but a flare or screen.

The real problem is that there's virtually nothing Borges can call that we can reliably run-block without the threat of Denard's arm *and* legs.  If he can't throw by the bowl game, we will have to pass to set up the run, and Denard's just not much use then.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 4th, 2012 at 8:01 AM | plenty of time to plan (Score:1)
borninAnnArbor
borninAnnArbor's picture
Joined: 10/10/2012
MGoPoints: 172

I am wondering what kind of job Borges will do given the amount of time he has to prepare. I fully expect that he will have a great plan in place, but I also expect that he will nave no usable plan B if plan A doesn't go to plan. I think I am going to start calling him "No plan B Borges". Or maybe work on it a bit to make it more creative.

Ann Arbor by birth.  Wolverine by choice.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:14 PM | Hard to tell with these SEC (Score:3 Normal)
BornInAA
BornInAA's picture
Joined: 11/21/2009
MGoPoints: 3675

Hard to tell with these SEC teams.

I thought we would get crushed by a #9 3-loss Gators in 2008.

I thought we would beat/be competitive with a #22 4-loss MSU in 2011.

life is like a box of chocolates... and you got the Whizzo Quality Assortment

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:17 PM | 2 Reactions from the SC v (Score:2)
unWavering
unWavering's picture
Joined: 01/13/2011
MGoPoints: 1767

2 Reactions from the SC v Mizzou video:

Holy hell is Missouri bad at tackling, also

holy hell are SCs uni's ugly.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:19 PM | I wish (Score:1)
Ron Utah
Joined: 02/28/2012
MGoPoints: 607

This is going to be a very, very tough game for us.  While only Ohio and 'Bama were able to move the ball against us consistently this year, the Gamecock offense has been able to slice-up some pretty good defenses.  I don't think we hold them to 10 points.

I think we'll need to score 28 points to win this game, and I don't think our O-line is good enough to get us there.  If we can't create two turnovers on defense, we are in big trouble.

Thank you, Coach Hoke, for bringing Michigan back.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:26 PM | Really you think only OSU and (Score:1)
Mfan2000
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 7988

Really you think only OSU and 'Bama could move the ball consistently? Air Force ran 90 plays against us and NW was giving us fits as well, from my remembrance of the games.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:20 PM | Hey (Score:2)
jamiemac
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7902

Hey a 10-6 final has Michigan covering the spread at least

#progress

Help My Friend Allison Fight ALS 

MSU/IU at the JCB

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:24 PM | I like that the board is (Score:5 Normal)
chitownblue2
chitownblue2's picture
Joined: 06/03/2009
MGoPoints: 7077

I like that the board is setting up Borges for failure here. Clearly, if he can't score on a top 10 defense while lacking an OL and a RB, he's an idiot!

wolverineliberationarmy.com/blog

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:30 PM | I think the bigger part of (Score:2 Normal)
Mfan2000
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 7988

I think the bigger part of the equation is M never gets beat by a better team. Always some excuse in play. Borges is this years fashionable excuse for M losing.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:59 PM | Ditto that! (Score:0 Redundant)
shogun
shogun's picture
Joined: 04/13/2010
MGoPoints: 43

Ditto that!

shogun

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 3:57 PM | As I poorly articulated (Score:3 Normal)
GoBlueInNYC
GoBlueInNYC's picture
Joined: 03/23/2010
MGoPoints: 5920

As I poorly articulated earlier in the thread, I don't hate Borges as much as most people around here, but I'm not a big fan, either.

Just curious, aside from thinking he's the favorite scapegoat around here, what are you opinions of him? Do you think he's a good OC after the past two seasons? Jury is still out with the remnants of Rodriguez's offense on the roster?

I am this close to going all Dark Blue in here.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 4:10 PM | I think he's a good OC. The (Score:5 Normal)
chitownblue2
chitownblue2's picture
Joined: 06/03/2009
MGoPoints: 7077

I think he's a good OC. The only time I've truly gotten aggravated was with his 2nd, 3rd down & short playcalls in the 2nd half against OSU. If I recall, he called 7 runs on 7 plays. Probably needed to get a little more creative.

wolverineliberationarmy.com/blog

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 5:06 PM | Not trying to argue, I'm (Score:2)
GoBlueInNYC
GoBlueInNYC's picture
Joined: 03/23/2010
MGoPoints: 5920

Not trying to argue, I'm legitimately curious (MGoBlog gets very echo chamber-y, so counter points are always interesting), what have you seen from Borges that he's a good OC?

One thing I've learned from the Rodriguez years is to not put too much stock into how a team looks against weak opponents. And I'm not sure I've seen anything from Michigan's offense against good opponents the past couple of seasons that's terribly inspiring. (Even in wins: ND in 2011 was a lot of luck and late breakdowns by ND's D, 2011 was a particularly weak year for OSU, VT was a defensive/special teams victory, I'm not sure Michigan really beat any good teams this season other than NW, etc.)

I didn't follow Borges before he moved to UM, and I don't really remember any of the teams that he coached for before SDSU (who were good, from what I remember). I just find it a little disconcerting how much he's bounced around in his career, and I'm not sure how much stock to put into what he's done at UM so far given the personnel he has had.

I am this close to going all Dark Blue in here.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 9:35 PM | Hard to blame you.  Borges (Score:-1 Flamebait)
Marshmallow
Marshmallow's picture
Joined: 11/08/2009
MGoPoints: -114

Hard to blame you.  Borges changes (or gets changed) out of coaching positions every couple of years, it seems.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 4:11 PM | I'm not chitownblue2, (Score:4 Normal)
unWavering
unWavering's picture
Joined: 01/13/2011
MGoPoints: 1767

I'm not chitownblue2, obviously, but my stance is similar to yours.  I do think the jury is still out on whether or not he can get the job done.  I want to see what he can do with a line of maulers, Shane Morris, and Derrick Green in the backfield.  My guess is that there won't be nearly as much griping if/when that happens.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:24 PM | Jadeveon "needs" a little weight (Score:2 Normal)
YoOoBoMoLloRoHo
YoOoBoMoLloRoHo's picture
Joined: 11/01/2012
MGoPoints: 1010

If or when he adds 10+ lbs and combines with a bull rush, he will be absolutely unstoppable as a junior.

Now the guy just hurdles, spins and splits tandems on a regular basis. Taylor has a huge challenge.

No one ever called him Tom Clowney on a recruiting trip.

"Everybody wants to be a hero, so to speak.  But it takes everybody."  - Charles Woodson

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 3:05 PM | If USCe has a guy partially (Score:2)
Lionsfan
Lionsfan's picture
Joined: 06/03/2011
MGoPoints: 3945

If USCe has a guy partially engaging the LT, this would be Defensive Play of the Year. Instead it's just "Holy shit we have to play that guy!?!?"

If you're doing nothing, how do you know when you're finished?

StraightDave owes me a steak dinner

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 3:49 PM | Seeing this clip... (Score:2)
ggoodness56
ggoodness56's picture
Joined: 04/06/2009
MGoPoints: 1108

I instantly shot a stream of pee into my boxers.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:36 PM | Everyone's so negative! (Score:2 Normal)
dahblue
dahblue's picture
Joined: 11/09/2009
MGoPoints: 1516

Everyone's so negative!  C'mon now...Michigan has a pretty good record, historically, against the SEC (23-7-1).   We didn't have too much trouble the last time (dark era omitted) we faced a vaunted SEC team, beating up Tebow and Co.  We'll be just fine (unless we run Denard and Rawls into the scrum all afternoon).

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 9:43 PM | Tebow and Co. was one of (Score:-1 Overrated)
Marshmallow
Marshmallow's picture
Joined: 11/08/2009
MGoPoints: -114

Tebow and Co. was one of Meyer's worst Florida teams.  [EDIT:  Also, I don't think the Bama game lasted long enough to be called an era, though I guess it felt that way at the time.]

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:44 PM | I am convinced... (Score:2)
ldoublee
Joined: 06/22/2009
MGoPoints: 2888

that if Borges runs Vincent Smith on an Iso on 3rd and short that he is a lurker on the MGoBoard and gets his jollies by trolling us.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 8:09 PM | Didn't we also do that a lot (Score:2)
snarling wolverine
Joined: 12/14/2011
MGoPoints: 4829

Didn't we also do that a lot with Rich Rod?  Two different staffs have used him that way.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:45 PM | I'm terrified of Jadeveon Clowney (Score:2 Normal)
Michigan4Life
Joined: 07/29/2010
MGoPoints: 5709

Everything that I've been hearing is he would have been a #1 overall pick if he was eligible for '13 draft, but he's pretty much a lock to get drafted at top 5 in '14 draft.  His combination of size/speed/athleticism is second to none and there isn't a DE in the country that have that kind of combination. He lines up all over the field at LDE, RDE, DT and even at LB which tells you how gifted he is.  Lewan and OL have a tall task of protecting whoever's at QB whether if it's Denard or Devin.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:47 PM | Brian, Is that six points off (Score:2 Normal)
NFG
NFG's picture
Joined: 04/24/2012
MGoPoints: 2247

Brian,

Is that six points off a halfback pass on a 1st and Goal from the ten yard line, with Gibby missing the PAT or is that from a 99 yard Vincent Smith run on a draw up the middle out of a power I formation?

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:59 PM | Pertinent quote (Score:1)
DealerCamel
DealerCamel's picture
Joined: 07/25/2012
MGoPoints: 374

"Also everyone will all be like WHERE WAS THAT AGAINST OHIO STATE because I tell you what running up the middle on third and short is going to have the same result."

That being said, if we do run up the middle, I will break something and somebody, in that order.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 2:59 PM | Talking to Auburn fans down (Score:2 Informative)
Lac55
Lac55's picture
Joined: 01/18/2011
MGoPoints: 1237

Talking to Auburn fans down here has only worsened my confidence in Borges to get it done. They all echo the same thoughts as most in the mgocommunity as way to predictable, stubborn, conservative at times, and just kind of sitting on the egg so to speak. I hope he brings his A game and stays aggressive throughout.

If I say a duck can pull a truck, shut up and hook the sucka up!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 4:10 PM | Cornelius Jones (Score:2)
Stuck_in_SEC
Joined: 11/19/2012
MGoPoints: 10

Somewhere, Cornelius Jones weeps.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 9:38 PM | I think it's "Conelius."  No (Score:1 Normal)
Marshmallow
Marshmallow's picture
Joined: 11/08/2009
MGoPoints: -114

I think it's "Conelius."  No "r."

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 4:36 PM | On Denard's blocking skills: (Score:2)
UMgradMSUdad
UMgradMSUdad's picture
Joined: 07/02/2011
MGoPoints: 2059

On Denard's blocking skills: I wonder how much of his ineffectiveness is injury related.  Obviously he doesn't have experience of practice and training in blocking, but there is no way to effectively block while trying to protect an arm either. 

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2012 at 8:22 PM | 10-6 seems like far too (Score:1)
I Bleed Maize N Blue
I Bleed Maize N Blue's picture
Joined: 09/27/2008
MGoPoints: 5047

10-6 seems like far too plausible a score.  Shouldn't it be more like 8-4?

Michigan Resurgent?  Michigan Resurgent!

The beatings will continue until the uniforms improve!

  • Login or register to post comments
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.