Michigan's graduate sociology program considers it a minor tragedy that Jamal Milan is not furthering his studies in Ann Arbor right now. [Illinois Athletics Communications]

Fee Fi Foe Film: Illinois Defense 2019 Comment Count

Seth October 11th, 2019 at 9:53 AM

Previously: The Offense

Resources: My charting, UI game notes, UI roster, CFBstats, Tampa 2 primer

In the late '90s Lovie Smith, along with Monte Kiffin and Tony Dungy, helped develop the Tampa 2 defense, a Cover 2 variant that uses the middle linebacker as a quasi-safety, and finally forced the West Coast offense to get dinky. This (and Warren Sapp, Derrick Brooks, Hardy Nickerson, John Lynch, Simeon Rice, Ronde Barber, Donnie Abraham…) earned Lovie a head coaching job with the Bears for the meatiest part of Brian Urlacher's career. On the strength of that defense the Bears went 13-3 in 2006, losing to Dungy in the Super Bowl. The NFL quickly adapted, attacking the seams with power forwards they called "flex tight ends" for lack of a better name, putting those MLBs in run-pass conflicts, and option-routing the poor OLBs to death.

By March 2016 Lovie was coming off two losing seasons in Tampa Bay and hadn't taken a team to the playoffs since the 2010 Bears, but to Illinois and their new AD, that was infinitely preferable to rolling with the post-Beckman interim Bill Cubit. The hope was Smith could fix the defense enough that their explosive offenses could do more than lose 67-65. Lovie brought in his longtime associates, including Hardy Nickerson as DC, and Donnie Abraham to coach the DBs.

Abraham suddenly quit in August 2018, followed in mid-season by Nickerson, who cited health reasons. Lovie raised his son from OLBs grad assistant to DBs coach, named himself acting DC, and spent the winter of 2018 searching high and low for a defensive coordinator. Instead, he found a bag coordinator type who'd followed Lane Kiffin to various places and knew how to recruit USC, moved his son to linebackers, named himself the DC, and grew a beard.

The beard is amazing. The rest is a comprehensive disaster. Longtime starters who weren't that good in the first place have regressed. The transfers who replaced them have no idea what the defense is trying to accomplish. Even the guy PFF thinks is the #2 linebacker in the conference right now graded out with double-digit negatives when faced with something more terrifying than Akron or UConn. I know you're all gonna BPONE this with "Just like our offense [clapx5]." That's because you've forgotten what the end of 2010 was like.

The film: Illinois was super-lucky to be in this game due to some Minnesota drops and weather stuff.

Personnel: My diagram: 

image

PDF Version, full-size version (or click on the image)

[After THE JUMP: Beard game is strong]

--------------------------------------

If you came looking for the scouting to match the stats on the big USC transfer, former five-star (15th in the composite) SDE Oluwole Betiku (+4/-9 run), I'm sorry but I was disappointed too. I'll cover him below. He's also not nearly as bad as converted linebacker WDE Ayo Shogbonyo (+1/-10.5). I see now why Illinois fans are so hype on his backup, the Uche-like Isaiah Gay, who was injured for this game and is questionable for ours. Shogbonyo's thing is he's still linebacker-sized, so he dives inside early, which leads to no edge, which leads to touchdowns. Backup DE Owen Carney (+0/-4) was crumpled or ejected on five plays and quickly removed from the field, and budding star Bobby Roundtree was lost to a freak swimming accident in the offseason, so depth there seems to be nonexistent.

It's too bad they lost Roundtree, because the DTs are good enough to pay things off. 3T Jamal Milan (+11.5/-2) is the one thing about Illinois living up to expectations, and the defense's lone bright spot in this game. A big ball of hate who regularly mucked things up in the backfield, Milan was probably responsible for most of the gaudy stats Betiku's getting credit for. Nose Tymir Oliver (+4/-5.5 run) was tracking that way but started getting hyper-aggressive late and picked up a chunk of negatives for running by the play. Rotational DT Jamal Woods (+6/-7) was more aggressive and thus more exploitable. Backup DT Kenyon Jackson (+0/-1) was the opposite: plenty of snaps where he wasn't the problem.

Oddly for LB guys like Lovie and Hardy, LB recruiting has been an issue since they arrived. Onetime Michigan commit MLB Dele Harding (+10/-6 run, +0/-6 coverage) is a good example of what Don Brown was living with at BC/UConn/Maryland: a good blitzer who reacts correctly to guards but won't hold up if he actually meets one. The coverage minuses are a coaching issue discussed later. Also discussed later, the guy PFF currently has in the top 15 among NCAA LBs, WLB Jake Hansen (+9/-12.5 run, –4 cov), because I have some thoughts. It's best we not dwell on Washington transfer SAM Milo Eifler (+6/-11 run, –2 cov), a major athlete (24/7 composite #142) who sat out last year, was behind a safety coming out of spring, and seems very confused out there. Both OLBs are more in the hybrid range, and all had some flashes. Coaching's doing them dirty.

Part of the reason Eifler looks so lost is the offseason plan was to move SS Delano Ware (+1/-8 run, –4 cov) down. As of this game, Ware was back starting at safety, for reasons made apparent when the other candidates came in for a spell. Ware's day was alright until you count three EXTREME busts, but when you're personally giving up three huge plays you get the cyan. And it's not like FS Tony Adams (+1/-9 run, –4 cov), the guy they like, was much better. Adams spread out his negatives over more plays, churning out bad angles and flat-footed misses as the single-high safety when Illinois went 4-3 Under/Cover 1 to load the box. Backup Kerby Joseph (0+/-1 run, –5 cov) started some last year, and is unplayable, giving up two TDs in only a handful of snaps. Stanley Green, a more responsible, less athletic option they brought in a lot last year whenever Adams needed some time on the sidelines with a protractor, was out for this game and is questionable for Saturday.

I gave field CB Nate Hobbs (+0.5/-4 run, –1 cov) a break since he was usually there in coverage, but any run that came near him was good for an extra 5 or 10 yards. At the boundary, this was the first start for CB Devon Witherspoon (+1/-2 run, –2 cov), a true freshman who committed late last July, and doesn't look a pound more than the 160 listed in his otherwise informationless recruiting profile. Witherspoon's in there because they've apparently had enough of CB Quan Martin (+2/- run, –4 cov in like 10 snaps), because nickel Sydney Brown (+0/-2, –1 cov in plenty of snaps) has enough on his plate with that and learning safety, and because top-100 recruit Marquez Beason is out for the season.

The Beard (+15/-2 in upkeep, +8 in conception) is stupendous.

-----------------------------------------

Beard Game [Scale: 1: Bad Case of Laurinaitis to 10: Civil War General]: 10. Stupendous. The head coach sets the tone for the whole team, and when he's also the defensive coordinator that goes double. Look at the fullness. The natural shading. The perfect edge that nonetheless doesn't look remotely shaven. The few whiskers left to react to the wind, not enough to appear shabby but enough to bring your attention to the magnificence of the thing.

Lovie3

Is Lovie Smith the worst coach in the Big Ten? I can't argue otherwise. But consider how much of football is running plays, and how much is looking at the head coach reacting and leading and stuff. So let's take a moment and appreciate the guy who makes this part of your afternoon an absolute pleasure, especially when you consider some of the Keebler salesmen on TV these days.

image

Base Set: Illinois came into the game a 4-3 over with two high.

image

They then switched to a 4-3 under and man coverage for awhile, then single-high later in the game, bringing down a safety because Minnesota was having no problems running. Alignment didn't change within a drive unless a tight end swapped the strength; in this case only the linebackers moved and the DL became the opposite of whatever they were before. The solitary exotic was a 3-3-5 with two DL to one side, the WDE off the edge of the other, and a couple of LBs threatening to blitz then backing out as another LB came.

Illini v Minn D Shift   Safeties   Rushers
Down Type 4-3 Over 4-3 Under 3-3-5 4-3 Wide 1-high 2-high 3 4 5 6+
Standard (37) 56% 42% - 2% 38% 62% - 43% 50% 7%
Passing (19) 77% 15% 8% - 31% 69% - 69% 23% 8%
Total (56) 34 20 1 1 20 35 - 27 24 4

This was 85% 4-3 over for the first 20 minutes, and 90% two-high until mid-way through the 3rd quarter, FWIW. They only switched to a base under (with the SAM down like a fifth lineman) to get more guys at the line of scrimmage, IE they went from sending four guys 75% of the time to more than four guys 70% of the time. It's really reactionary; they want to be a rush-four 4-3 Cover 2, went to an under because the run game was getting shredded, then got blitzy because that was destroying their passing game.

The beard however.

The Smiths

What Shall We Call the Hybrid Today?: Sam/Will. The old Tampa 2 made the middle linebacker a sort of hybrid and gave him middle deep coverage responsibilities. Lovie's latest defense has that and uses a pair 225-pound OLBs (think Stevie Brown).They'll remove one for a dedicated nickel in extreme passing situations.

Man or zone coverage: Hybrid. They want to be Cover 2, went to a lot of Cover 1 in this game.

Pressure: GERG or GREG: Average bring was 4.7 on standard downs and 4.4 on passing downs. That's about in Michigan State (fairly GREG) range, but not mixed like Michigan State. As I said, they brought four until that wasn't getting it done, then kept adding rushers as the desperation level rose. It's predictable.

Dangerman: So this is going to take some explaining. WLB Jake Hansen, the guy who'll appear on all your programs as "one to watch," the LB currently sporting a 2nd round grade and an 81.6 rating (#13 LB in the country, #2 Big Ten), was, at least in this game, not good. There were times he did things that were good. Visibly good. Notably awesome even. Take this blitz, where he shot past a tackle and forced a fumble that led to a defensive TD:

I gave him a +4 for that. Here's a more conventional thing he did on a pinch blitz where Hansen followed the tight end across the formation on a split zone and stuck the ballcarrier at the line of scrimmage.

That was a +2. His five plays of good work however were more than offset by a lot more of this kind of thing:

Hansen did that weird thing with his hands, like he's trying to get off a block from a ghost, a lot. He also got edged a lot, got owned by (corporeal) blockers a lot, and got stiff-armed a lot. He was also a total zero against the pass, biting hard on play-action, then doing nothing but hang out near the line. His constantly sucking up on play-action is discussed in the overview because it was a team thing. There were also two very bad coverage plays where Hansen was almost certainly the guy with the curl/flat zone but was hanging out in someone else's. But he does lead the nation in fumbles forced (four) and recovered (three), so.

The other guy you'll hear about is SDE Oluwole Betiku. The USC grad transfer is already up to 10.5 TFLs and 7 sacks on the season. Glance at the game long and you'll see all but one of those were courtesy of Akron (3 TFLs, 1.5 sacks) and UConn (3.5 TFLs, all sacks). Glance at the highlights from those games and you'll see more of Betiku getting caved by a tight end or giving up the edge for a big gain than swimming past what had to be some super-cyan tackles. His positives in this game were mostly helping after getting washed down the line. I suspect Betiku's raw athleticism is too much for UConn, but if you're looking for the closest Michigan comp it's probably what we'd have if Luigi Vilain was starting right now (Betiku's USC career was beset by injuries).

I also suspect that Betiku's stats were really the work of Illinois's true unsung hero, the bowling ball in #55 named Jamal Milan. At first blush he looks like a standard space-eater. Then he splits his third double-team of the day:

And then he comes around a stunt and accelerates into the backfield so fast the quarterback thinks it must be a linebacker, and throws the ball to the linebacker.

The lack of many negatives is noticeable in this defense where everybody's trying to guess how the guy next to him is going to screw up next. Milan was consistently disruptive, mostly immovable, and has a quite good 75.1 rating from PFF this year. If the guys around Milan ever execute their assignments, his disruptiveness will reward them with highlights.

OVERVIEW:

Once again Illinois Football Breakdown is out there chartin' in the kind of conditions that would have even the hardiest Michigan fan reaching for Henri the Otter of Ennui:

It's rough out there, and so much of it is self-inflicted that it's hard to tell if any of them will be any good one day. Lovie has a system defense designed to stop Brett Favre that he's running with freshmen and transfers, some of whom've been on campus less than 10 weeks. This isn't 100% his fault—the defense was in shambles when he arrived, and Champaign is hardly a jewel of the Midwest. But if you're hoping the new arrivals are going to be your best players in Year Four, that's a problem. If you're using one of the most coaching-intensive positions (linebackers) to give your young son his first coaching gig, and another coaching-intensive position (cornerbacks) for a guy mainly there to help you recruit players off USC's roster, that's a problem. And when you make yourself the defensive coordinator of all these problems, you're out of other people to blame for them.

We have to talk about play-action, because oh my frikkin god these linebackers won't believe it's a pass until an offensive lineman is whispering it in their ears:

See if you can spot Dele Harding (MLB #9) on this one:

Remember in this defense the middle linebacker is supposed to be deeper than normal. By the time Harding figured this out all he can do is leap from two yards beyond the line of scrimmage at pass going 14 yards downfield. Even the safeties' minds were like RUN! RUN! OMIGOD RUN THEY'RE GONNA RUUUUU—oh, hamburgers.

Okay, yeah, you're right, that's a backup in that example. Let me show you why the starter had just been pulled (watch #15, Delano Ware, the safety starting on the top on the first down line):

But really most of this was on the linebackers, who look like they've never been coached on zone coverage. Rule #1: you and the other linebackers' butts should never touch:

I've never seen linebackers this blitzballs against the run, and I've charted WMU. In 46 run, RPO, or play-action snaps in this game, 44 I noted "Hard" linebacker reactions to the run. The first time Hansen sat back, ate a blocker, and got deposited 7 yards from the gap he was supposed to be in. The second time was when Delano Ware (#15) returned from getting chewed out over the Rashod Bateman bust so tentative that he gave up the easiest give read since OC Rod Smith was running them for Glenville State.

I mean...

EGh66EbWoAAC9Hd

And it's not like all this hard-chargin' is helping them against the run anyway. All they're doing by moving more guys to the line of scrimmage is removing whoever could be there to help when the DEs forget to set an edge:

So, yeah, this ran long, but I don't believe I'm ever going to get another opportunity to write about a Lovie Smith defense. There's a stance bad teams take when they know it's over, even in competitive games, where trying hard just makes you look like the fool. This touchdown is the kind of thing that happened to 2010 Michigan all the time. They're rolling the safety on the top down expecting a run to the tight end's side. From there:

The beard though.

image

Comments

Brhino

October 11th, 2019 at 10:01 AM ^

Shea Patterson from Heisman finalist hopeful to cyan circle is going to be the story of the 2019 season unless something real good changes real soon.

Champeen

October 11th, 2019 at 10:20 AM ^

On top of that, in the future, after McCaffrey graduates, i think we may be in some trouble.  Although the rankings have McCarthy rated high right now, i think the services will adjust and he will slip to 150 ish.  He has some amazing potential, but there is some work to do there, and i am no longer sold on the QB whisperer getting him there.

ERdocLSA2004

October 11th, 2019 at 10:39 AM ^

We are already in trouble but it’s not due to lack of talent.  But can you explain why you think we are in “trouble” after McCaffrey graduates?  McCarthy is a 5 star and you’re saying we are in trouble because according to you his ranking will drop and this is based on what exactly?

recruits who commit super early always see a drop but I’m not sure how you can say we are in trouble when we already have a 5 Star qb commit.  Seems like you are going out of your way to be negative about a future prospect who looks nothing but promising.

RockinLoud

October 11th, 2019 at 1:25 PM ^

Seems like you are going out of your way to be negative about a future prospect who looks nothing but promising.

If only recent performance didn't support such a perspective... I don't agree with him, but on the other hand, can you blame him for having such a view? Given what we've seen out of QB's at UM in the last 4 years, I don't think you can.

ERdocLSA2004

October 11th, 2019 at 1:36 PM ^

The premise of his argument hinges on the graduation of McCaffrey and the drop in rankings of McCarthy.  If he is of the belief that another highly ranked recruit will enter Harbaughs system and underperform, I can’t argue with that.  But   his argument also cites lack of talent level as an issue, which at this point is certainly not the case.

JonnyHintz

October 11th, 2019 at 10:53 AM ^

Why would he slip? I mean outside of being already committed and the failure of the scouting services to continue evaluating all players. By all accounts he killed it on the camp circuit. His high school team is 5-1 and averaging 38 points per game. 
 

Any fall in the rankings seems like it would have little to do with his actual ability. In which case I don’t care if he’s ranked #1 overall or #1200 overall. If he’s good, he’s good. And the kid appears to be REALLY good. 

dragonchild

October 11th, 2019 at 10:50 AM ^

I'm getting tired of watching Michigan constantly try to coach the players to the scheme.  It's the same crap that Hoke/Borges/Nuss got grief for, and it's not SunTzuball.

MGoBlog has this thing going now where the problem is that Michigan's offense has no identity.  I don't think that's a problem.  The 2015 & 2016 offenses did more with less, and for much of it without an offensive identity while it worked through Rudock getting up to speed (and then suffered crippling injuries to QB and O-line).  The offense changed from week to week, but it wasn't mitigative -- it was adaptive.  The tone was set early on when a shell-shocked BYU said, "That was not the team we prepared for."  At various points during those years I remember the offense being built around bubble screens, FB dive, "hippopotamus-shaped Air Raid", and so on.  Because the offense was built around the capabilities of the players.  Initially it featured a lot of screens because the Hoke O-line was a tire fire and Jake "Mr. Checkdown" Rudock couldn't complete a pass longer than five yards.  They noticed the FBs were good so they heavily featured them in the run game.  Jake Butt was a focal point, and then a critical decoy.  As Rudock got comfortable with his receivers they incorporated more quick passes.  Speight picked up where Rudock left off and then the O-line/injury problems cropped up again.  But for a stretch the team scored 41, 63, 51, 45, 49, 14 (the 1950s game against Wisconsin), 78, 41, 32, and 59 points.  There are a few flippant holdouts who keep indignantly asking why we keep pining for Fisch.  Well, because of that.  THE RESULTS.  We were getting OSU-like output from a cobbled O-line whenever the QB wasn't getting killed, and it's not like these were genius plays; they were just very obviously what the offense could execute against what defenses were throwing at them.

I'm 100% on board with the Patterson-Collins Express but that's not an identity; it's the SunTzuball that's missing from Gattis trying to impose his will on a QB that can't execute what his offense demands.  If Shea can't or won't pull then stop calling plays as if he is.  Gattis is a rookie OC and it shows, but what really grinds my gears is his arrogance.  Our seniors don't have the time or luxury to trash their swan songs because Gattis is making Borgesesque errors of judgement.

BlueInGreenville

October 11th, 2019 at 11:41 AM ^

I agree that the early returns on Gattis as a strategist are poor, but how should he tailor an offense to a QB who can't throw against a zone defense and won't pull on a read play to open up the run game?  I understand that the WR and OL play hasn't been as good as we hoped, and Gattis isn't great, but Patterson is  by far the biggest problem right now.

SC Wolverine

October 11th, 2019 at 12:08 PM ^

All true.  But I bet we're going to find out that his first-game injury greatly hampered the play calling in subsequent games.  Moreover, we really won't find out about Gattis and the offense until PSU/ND.  There is still a chance that they are gelling b/c of transition costs -- yes, I am relying on the PSU example when Gattis was there -- and will put it together mid season.  If they don't we are toast.

P.S. -- Enjoy Fall for Greenville!

dragonchild

October 11th, 2019 at 12:22 PM ^

I'm nobody's idea of a football coach but I have some ideas I'd like to see.

Looking at our roster, since we're not getting any numbers advantage anyway, drop the read and threaten the edge a different way -- the Bob Stitt fly sweep.  It's not new, but you can run it with what we have.  Shotgun formation, O-line blocks IZ, send DPJ from boundary to field and Patterson either hands off to Charbonnet or "sets" (like in volleyball) the snap forward to DPJ -- if he drops it it's an incomplete pass, not a fumble.

Send Black and Collins down the sidelines, and reduce Shea's read to not even a read -- the throw is called in from the sideline.  It's self-limiting but safe; Shea -- who's already accurate -- doesn't think, he just chucks it to an NFL receiver flying downfield.  If he underthrows it they might get a PI.  If he overthrows the likely outcome is an incomplete pass.  Worst-case it's an unscheduled 40-yard punt.  We'll see Shea sometimes throw to a bracketed receiver but the ball will be out on time, drastically reducing sacks and forcing the defense to keep up with our best athletes.  It also presents problems with a short field, but I can live with that.  I'd rather the drives stall at the opponent's 15 than on our side of the field.  Every now and then you can throw to the flat or do other things with similar looks to keep the defense guessing where the ball's going to go.

Double gos/posts/fades, fly sweep action, threat of an inside run -- we won't have a numbers advantage up front, and this by itself doesn't constitute a complete playbook, but the defense is presented with a conundrum.  They may figure out that Shea's not reading the coverage anymore but they still don't know who's getting the ball before it's out.  So now it's a game of Russian roulette -- theoretically the non-designated receivers on any given play can be left completely uncovered but if they guess wrong, they've just given us a free TD.  So they'll have to respect everyone pre-snap, but the ball's out much faster so it doesn't give the back 7 time to help each other unless they play dangerously aggressively, which is what I want to see.  Force them to take risks, dammit.  Every other pass will be a Bad Idea when there's a good one, but it won't be for Shea's bad habits.  It'll be a feast-or-famine offense but I'll take that over what we're getting now, and it might frighten defenders into making mistakes because sitting back won't be enough against DPJ or Collins going full steam.  Meanwhile all the horizontal and vertical action pulls defenders out of the box for Charbonnet, unless the defense wants to man up our NFL receivers.

. . . or play Milton, unless he's really worse than half a Patterson in which case WTF is wrong with our QB coaching.

EastCoast_Wolv…

October 11th, 2019 at 12:09 PM ^

Completely agree with this take. Adapting to the skills of your players is an under-rated ability in coaches. For example, if Patterson won't pull on reads and you actually want him to pull, why not just call a designed QB run? Worst case scenario is you eat a 5 yard loss, but that's unlikely if the other team doesn't think Patterson will pull it.

ak47

October 11th, 2019 at 11:48 AM ^

The idea that Michigan had best QB room in the conference was a mixture of hope and lying to ourselves. The issues Patterson has he had all last year and got exposed any time we played a real defense. He's regressed but at the end of the day the offense hasn't put it to a good defense with him as QB

SC Wolverine

October 11th, 2019 at 12:04 PM ^

I'm as frustrated with Shea as anybody -- i.e. really frustrated -- but is he really a cyan?  Think of cyan-worthy QB's we've had in recent years.  Shea is nowhere down to their level.  Yes, I know he can't read a defense to save his life.  But he throws a sweet ball quite often.  No cyan throws that deep fade to DPJ.

dragonchild

October 11th, 2019 at 12:41 PM ^

As I understand it, it's results-based in order to give insight on matchup.  For instance, say you have a brick-handed mauler of a TE but instead of keeping him in line you split him out wide and send him out on routes.  Guy could be an NFL-caliber road grader but instead you're asking him to do things he's bad at.  I figure that guy would get a cyan if the defense is given no reason to prepare for anything other than a receiving TD who can't catch passes.

Which is why it takes time to earn a star or a cyan, because MGoBlog doesn't want to overreact to outliers.  But Shea's issues have persisted all season.

Shea can't execute the QB run game and can't read coverages in the passing game.  Whatever Shea is actually good at, and whatever blame falls on Gattis or the injury, the Illinois defense is essentially preparing for a cyan-caliber QB.

JonnyHintz

October 11th, 2019 at 10:57 AM ^

They’re certainly in the running. Rutgers gives up 8 more points per game so far. But Illinois gives up more passing yards per game, 12 yards separates their rushing yards allowed per game, and Rutgers gives up 1 more yard per game. Rutgers also allows .1 more yard per play than Illinois. 
 

Now how competition levels compare, I couldn’t say. And I really don’t want to sift through that catastrophe to put in my opinions. But from the looks of it, they’re as bad as Rutgers defensively.

EastCoast_Wolv…

October 11th, 2019 at 12:18 PM ^

Certainly seems like Illinois has faced a weaker schedule than Rutgers. Rutgers has faced BC (#46 offense according to FPI), Iowa (#50 offense), Maryland (#60 offense), and us (#93 offense-- woof). Illinois has faced Minnesota (#22 offense), Nebraska (#70 offense), EMU (#87 offense), UConn (#129), and Akron (#130). Minnesota is better than any offense Rutgers has faced, but I'd have to imagine Illinois's stats are boosted by playing 40% of their games against the two worst offenses in the country.

LloydCarnac

October 11th, 2019 at 10:27 AM ^

Cyan circle status is definitely disappointing. However, it possibly has causes that may not be fully understood or appreciated by the general public.

For example, consider that normal healing protocol for an oblique tear is progressive PT and rehab for about ten weeks, after pain from initial injury subsides.

Assuming media reports that this injury occurred on the first play of the first game of the season to be correct and true, it is unlikely that any improvement/healing in the torn oblique has occurred. Not only is continued motion and use likely preventing improvement, additional football hits potentially make the condition worse.

If this scenario is true, it definitely puts cyan circle status in a different light. I have utmost respect for athletes that play through painful injury. UM QBs have had their brunt of playing hurt: Denard playing through ulnar injury, Devin with broken foot and more, Shane with concussion, Wilton attempting return following fractured vertebrae, and now Shea with torn oblique.

You Only Live Twice

October 11th, 2019 at 12:48 PM ^

Thank you for this.  The injury factor is often missing from analyses, from most any content source, because it's difficult to assess objectively - people always point to regression without considering the effect of injuries.   

Shea, the most accurate long passer we have, is not 100%, Dylan is going to be rusty even if he plays - has he even been cleared for contact yet? 

Part of Shea's job is to stay alive.  Best to hope for tomorrow is that we have enough of a lead for him to leave the game and let Joe get some practice.

dragonchild

October 11th, 2019 at 10:14 AM ^

I expect Onwenu to get an unfairly bad PFF grade for Milan all game, a play-action pass to Nico Collins for a long TD in the first half that isn't tried again, and non-read shotgun runs into stacked boxes all day.  Also, John O'Neill will impose his incompetence.

It all won't matter because Illinois seems to be that bad, but unless they go full Rutger this could be an unwatchably miserable affiar.

S.G. Rice

October 11th, 2019 at 10:51 AM ^

I don't know how you'd work it into the graphic but Lovie's beard is 5 star, dangerman, All-American, first rounder, pretty much everything else you can think of.

It's really a shame that he's not coaching at Indiana where he could wear red and go for the full Father Christmas look when the weather turns chilly.

LKLIII

October 11th, 2019 at 4:31 PM ^

I will say this for Shea--it's pretty much do or die this week.  Consider:

 

  1. Illinois pass rush is terrible, they bite HARD on play-action, and based on Seth's review, Illinois SS Andre Ware is prone to "EXTREME busts." 

    Shea should have plenty of time to sit in a very clean pocket. If he can't survey the field and accurately deliver a pass to one of our WRs when this stuff happens, it pretty much means his ability to survey the field and make good decisions is really at rock bottom.
     
  2. Again per Seth's review, they also bite HARD towards the run when faced with RPO type plays as well.  I'm assuming that would also be the case for zone-read stuff as well.

    Maybe we just don't run RPO or zone read stuff at all ala Rutgers in order to save Shea's oblique injury.  Or, maybe we will but Gattis will just tell Shea to give on nearly 100% of them no matter what for the same reason. 

    But holy crap man...  If we end up calling plenty of option stuff against Illinois, Shea does NOT have marching orders from Gattis to give no matter what, Illinois is shading THIS hard towards the run, and Shea STILL doesn't keep it? 

    We'll know we are 100% screwed and totally beyond hope for a mid-season offensive renaissance this year.