[Patrick Barron]

Bear Eats You Comment Count

Brian March 25th, 2022 at 2:00 PM

3/24/2022 – Michigan 55, Villanova 63 – 19-15, 11-9 Big Ten, Season Over

This is not going to be a romantic post about the end of a season. Last year, yes, romance abounds. This year it's time to say good job making the best out of a bad situation and start speculating about the future. Because, well, sometimes the bear eats you:

The other stat floating around out there was Michigan going 12/29 on dunks and layups. This kind of thing has happened before, but for it to happen against a team with no real shotblocking (and to a team that was 28th in shooting at the rim nationally) is boggling. Much like the early going of the Colorado State game, it felt like every weighted coin flip came out the wrong way. Michigan would put up a shot that rolled around on the rim and faded out; Villanova would do the same and the ball would eventually decide to go in.

There are other things you can point to, of course—a silly foul by Dickinson at the end of the first half that blunted momentum, an inexplicable no call when Devante' Jones got obliterated, a banked-in three—but while those are all factors the lingering bad taste in everyone's mouth will always be about a bunch of bunnies that did not go down.

At least this feels like a spiritually appropriate way to end the season? I included a Shot Quality graph in the preview that indicated Michigan got a ton of open threes and gave up relatively few, and here's a bookend for that:

FOdbmy8XMAUmQh6

Some of that is trying to check Johnny Davis with Eli Brooks because you don't have any 6'5" guys but some of that is just shrug-worthy. Michigan finished the season as a 7th percentile team defending pull-ups, and this was an improvement from that point midseason when they were 1st percentile. The whole damn season was getting good shots and losing to bad shots.

Maybe "bad" should get scare quotes in the previous sentence, because this season forces you to reconsider previous fatwas against mid-range jumpers and the role of athleticism in contesting shots. Since you can get a pull-up on just about every possession having an opposition floor that high is devastating, particularly when you're still in the deep 300s when it comes to forcing turnovers. On the other hand, that hideous performance on pull-ups is 0.9 PPP, ie, still not great. Michigan is getting teams to shoot from the right places; they just needed to have a legion of 6'5"-6'9" NBA wing types to maximize their results. Like, you know, last year.

In the end this was a team with significant flaws we glossed over because of the expectation Caleb Houstan would play like a top 10 overall prospect. This was wrong not only because Houstan played like a typical freshman but because it ignored that we weren't just replacing Isaiah Livers but also Franz Wagner and Chaundee Brown. Those guys got replaced by nothing resembling an NBA wing, and since the schedule was stacked back to front with productive wing types the defense went off a cliff.

Even so they improved over the course of the year, battled through the third-toughest schedule in America, made the tourney, made the Sweet 16, and set the table for next season, give or take a lot of knife-edge NBA decisions. Michigan got great shots and forced bad ones, further confirming that Juwan Howard is "that dude," as the children say. Hit the portal and acquire the most Chaundee-like thing you can find and further success beckons.

[Hit THE JUMP for a glimpse at the future]

BULLETS

Bear ate us. I don't have a ton of other takes on this game, so let's focus on the future in this section.

Scholarship status. Brooks is done. Nunez has a COVID year but if he takes it, it won't be in Ann Arbor. Zeb Jackson is in the portal. Michigan has four guys in the recruiting class, so there needs to be one departure from potential returners to fit those, and a third to hit the portal. Realistically, Brandon Johns and Devante' Jones are not likely to return, so one additional departure opens up the portal.

51959404136_700da81fde_c

questions abound [Barron]

Stay or go. Michigan has five contributors who may or may not be back next year:

  • Devante' Jones has a COVID year if he wants it. He just tweeted out "Michigan… THANK YOU," which implies he's headed to the pros. Some possibility he could go through the process, find out he's ticketed for the G-League or overseas, and Michigan NIL means that's the most sense for him next year. Doubtful.
  • Hunter Dickinson explicitly stated he was back for one more year at the beginning of the season. When asked about his future plans after the game he said "the only thing I can think of is how I let my team down." Andrew Kahn talked to a "former high-level executive for an NBA team" that said he can't play in the NBA because of his lateral agility, but longtime skeptic Sam Vecenie did crack a little bit after the first weekend, saying "Dickinson is lethal enough on offense to where he’s raised his esteem in my eyes" but hammering his defense ("non-negotiable for him to clean this up … needs to be able to not get absolutely obliterated outside"). I continue to maintain that if Dickinson is not back next year it's time to start panicking about Michigan's weak NIL game. If there is a place in the world where Hunter Dickinson can make more money playing basketball next year than Ann Arbor, it's a failure.
  • Rumors around Moussa Diabate suggest he was planning to be a one-and-done. He obviously has more NBA potential than anyone on the roster but has been stuck in the mid-second round on the few mock drafts that have bothered to include him. John Hollinger's take after taking in the first weekend in Indianapolis is that he (and Houstan) "would get destroyed in an NBA game right now, and probably even in the G League, but I can’t rule out teams swinging on them in the second round if they enter the draft." NIL might be more complicated here because he is not a US citizen, but Kentucky apparently figured it out for Oscar Tshiebwe so maybe it's possible. (Tshiebwe is older and thus has been a resident longer, so it's also possible that Tshiebwe is eligible while Diabate is not.) This seems like a situation where it would be beneficial for a high-potential player who's clearly not a first rounder to go through Camp Sanderson and blow up in year two, but sometimes guys just want to go.
  • Caleb Houstan was also a potential one and done but while Diabate and Dickinson are at least on NBA radars consistently, the only recent mention of Houstan was in the Hollinger article above. It took draft analysts a long time to drop Houstan all the way off their boards but once he was gone he was gone. He is the most likely player to return, because he did not produce like an NBA three point specialist and does not have the obvious defensive upside that Diabate does.
  • Brandon Johns has a COVID year if he wants it. Johns may want to go do something boring in a place where no one is looking at him all the time, or possibly transfer to a lower level where he could just jump over everyone all the time. I'd be surprised if it wasn't time for a fresh start for him, but he is a Big Ten level athlete with a lot of experience who just played 17 minutes in a Sweet 16 game so it's worth mentioning.

No Michigan players made ESPN's mock draft after the first round, FWIW.

51958181577_89b41ef197_c

plz learn shoot [Barron]

The Frankie conundrum. There will be questions about whether Michigan really needs Jones back after Frankie had a bit of a breakout in the tournament. The answer to that is "yes." After a rough start Jones hit his stride in Big Ten play, where he had a 112 ORTG on 24 percent usage—barely a drop from his Coastal Carolina days. If you can get that back you get that back.

Unfortunately, I don't see how the two guys can play next to each other unless one or both gets a consistent outside shot. Since Jones is 24 already and Frankie is a million miles away, I don't see that happening.

I do think that if Jones returns you would see a much more even split between the two, as Collins should improve more quickly and brings some things Jones does not.

Portal targets. One dude currently in the portal jumps out as a high priority target: WVU's Jalen Bridges. Relatively low usage but a career 56/36/79 shooter. He's 6'7" and played in WVU's frenetic defense and is thus likely to be a plus defender. And his numbers are absolutely battle-tested in the B12; WVU had the nation's #2 SOS. He'd have two years to play.

Utah Valley C Fardaws Aimaq is planning to meet with Michigan. At Utah Valley he was a 30% usage C with giant rebound rates who shot 48/44/71 from the floor; not much rim protection to speak of. Also that 3 point number is on 45 attempts and may be optimistic. The WAC is about on par with the Sun Belt, where Jones transferred from, FWIW.

Michigan has been in contact with St. Joe's stretch four Taylor Funk, who Phil Martelli recruited and coached. Career 56/35/81 shooter with a low TO rate, 6'8", seems to replicate the same stuff that Caleb Houstan does. Seems very unlikely he'd be an athletic plus.

Michigan has also apparently been in contact with PSU transfer Sam Sessoms, to which I say "eh." Sessoms has been wildly variable in his shooting so I don't know if the spike in his three pointers this year is at all sustainable. He's been turnover prone and bad inside the arc when not roasting Kobe Bufkin. I'm dubious he'd add much.

And, uh, Patrick Baldwin Jr may hit the portal after his dad got fired from UWM. Baldwin is still being listed in many mock draft first rounds even after an injury-wracked season in which he went 42/27 against mostly low-major competition, so this is a believe-it-when-you-see-it situation. People are Talking, however.

Scenarios. An optimistic scenario:

  • PG: Collins/McDaniel
  • SG: Bufkin/Portal
  • SF: Houstan/Jett
  • PF: Diabate/Williams
  • C: Dickinson/Reed

A less optimistic one:

  • PG: Collins/McDaniel
  • SG: Bufkin/Portal
  • SF: Jett/Barnes
  • PF: Houstan/Williams
  • C: Portal/Reed

Either way it looks like Michigan really needs Bufkin to hit starting next year.

Comments

Seth

March 25th, 2022 at 2:10 PM ^

Guess who:

PLAYER 1: 22% mins, 93 ORtg, 17% usage, 7/17 Asst/TO, 51/22/77 on 90 shot eqv
PLAYER 2: 23% mins, 93 ORtg, 15% usage, 11/11 Ass/To, 32/30/50 on 96 shot eqv

trueblueintexas

March 25th, 2022 at 3:53 PM ^

Are we going to ignore the fact that Caris earned real minutes during the tourney run his freshman year prior to blowing up and Bufkin......uhhhhh....did not? Very different trajectories and situations.

That said, I hope Bufkin is awesome and lives up to the ranking because Michigan needs him.

Michigan also needs another true shooting guard or combo guard via the portal. There is simply not enough depth of bodies at the guard position who can get their shot or play defense without relying on help every time someone gets in the lane. 

I give Jones credit for improving, but he had a hard ceiling. So did Mike Smith. Brooks carried this team and should get all of the accolades, but he had a hard ceiling as well given his height and athleticism limits. If Michigan wants to get passed the Sweet 16, they have to have some taller athletes at the guard spots. 

trueblueintexas

March 26th, 2022 at 12:05 AM ^

He still earned time on the court playing in every tourney game and in the Final Four against Syracuse he played 21 minutes putting up 8 points, 4 boards, and 2 assists on 3/4 shooting. 
I’m not saying Caris was an all star but Beilein trusted the freshman to play at least a few minutes a game when it mattered. Howard did not show the same trust in Bufkin.

TrueBlue2003

March 30th, 2022 at 4:54 PM ^

But defense is the more important part to have initially because what's needed to be elite (athleticism, length) you can't teach.

But on offense, you can much easier hide so-so players by simply having them be low usage.

Easier to learn how to dribble and shoot.

So if you have the former, like Caris did, and Diabate does, your upside is much higher.  If you have the latter and not the former, like Dickinson (and to an extent Iggy) the ceiling is lower.

That said, Bufkin didn't play as much because he was behind Brooks who was a guy Michigan (rightfully) just did not want to take off the floor because of what he does on both sides.  Caris played more because Stauskas was a defensive liability (and a freshmen himself) so he wasn't yet a guy that Michigan needed on the court like Michigan needed Brooks.  He was just a corner gunner that didn't play defense very well.  You can take a guy like that out to get more defense on the court.

Megumin

March 25th, 2022 at 2:36 PM ^

Mm, yeah just checked. Didn't realize Frankie's ORTG was so low, and Simpson's was pretty decent. Definitely room to improve for Frankie in terms of scoring. Feels like he has the burst to get to the rim, but the finishing against college level opponents wasn't ready in year 1.

Also Simpson's freshman FT rate was at a decent 71% before falling into the "clench your teeth" zone, so at least I recalled something right.

Don

March 25th, 2022 at 2:18 PM ^

"I continue to maintain that if Dickinson is not back next year it's time to start panicking about Michigan's weak NIL game."

How much would Dickinson realistically make in the G league?

Of all the MGoBlog memes that have turned out to be sadly unsupported by reality, I'd put "U-M money cannon" near the top of the list, right next to "Eeeee Barwis."

MI Expat NY

March 25th, 2022 at 3:36 PM ^

Yeah, I think Brian is off on this unless he means the blatant rule violating NIL rumored to be propping up Texas A&M football recruiting.  We are probably intentionally weak on that point.

Unless you're a Zion Williamson level sensation there's only so much money you can legitimately make on NIL especially when the chief basketball player sponsorship, the shoe deal, is unavailable.

Maybe Dickinson can do better with NIL than a G league salary, but the G league benefit is being the most direct line to the NBA.  I expect Europe is where he could make the most money playing basketball next year, no matter how strong Michigan's NIL game is.

TrueBlue2003

March 30th, 2022 at 5:14 PM ^

Why is the shoe deal unavailable?  Jordan / Nike can sponsor individual players now can't they?

And is T A&M violating a rule?  I believe Matt Ishbia is paying every MSU football and bball player $500/month.  I'm not sure if there are promotional obligations that come with that but if they have to show up to some career fair or some BS appearance, that's well within the legal bounds of NIL.  And there's no limit to what a sponsor could pay to do that, which is essentially what T A&M is doing. 

There is no limit to what a billionaire could pay.  And if that same billionaire is willing to pay an obscene amount of money for a coach (which is what Ishbia did), then the equivalent value in wins of a top player easily reaches six or maybe even seven digits.

On the one hand, I agree with Brian that Dickinson should theoretically be able to demand a lot of money from NIL.  On the other, I don't think he's worth that many wins for Michigan.  His defense offsets most of the amazing things he does on offense.  If I were directing NIL money based solely on value to the team (and not on marketing value), I just wouldn't see how he's worth crazy money and that's why the NBA isn't interested.

bronxblue

March 25th, 2022 at 2:30 PM ^

"I continue to maintain that if Dickinson is not back next year it's time to start panicking about Michigan's weak NIL game."

He's 21 years old now and going to be 22 for most of next season.  If the end goal is the NBA and the things you have to work on are "lateral quickness" and "showing you can defend NBA players", playing in the G league is a likely next step.  Dickinson isn't likely to raise his profile much with another year in college and given his advanced age anyway I wouldn't read too much into him going to the NBA draft beyond "he wants to play in the NBA draft".  This logic feels not unlike when people kept arguing Michigan could offer Harbaugh the moon and stars but if his goal was to coach an NFL team UM didn't stand a chance of retaining him.  Same with Dickinson.

I think next year's team will look radically different than this year's squad but that's okay.  Howard will likely pull in a couple of guys through the portal and I think the focus will be on pushing some more athleticism on the court even if it hurts efficiency early on.  Howard undoubtedly saw that the defense struggled in no small part due to physical limitations early on, and so if they can grab a larger combo guard and a wing that would be key.

I'm not sure if Diabate comes back but if so he's an early candidate for a big jump as a sophomore.  The athleticism is there and I think a year of refinement offensively gets him to being one of the better big men in the conference.

goblu330

March 25th, 2022 at 3:11 PM ^

There is the one variable that you still see from time to time, albeit less common these days.  That might be that these guys think they can get to the promise land next year together and have no particularly concrete optimistic plans in lieu of returning.  If there is a coach I think could talk them into giving it one more go together it is Howard.

Kilgore Trout

March 25th, 2022 at 5:16 PM ^

I agree that next year is going to look way different. I feel like Sam has said that he thinks both Diabate and Houstan are 80%+ gone and Dickinson is 50/50. It's always dangerous projecting our own logic on to these players. They have their own set of criteria that are likely to be very different from ours. We will see what happens. 

goblu330

March 25th, 2022 at 6:40 PM ^

I do not understand the Houston projection to leave.  Seriously, to where?  He just scored a total of 7 points in two combined NCAA tournament games.  What exactly about Houston makes him any more of a prospect than 3 different guys on Villanova’s team last night.  Is it his poor 3 point shooting.  His invisible rebounding prowess?  His mediocre defense?  His complete lack of iso game?  His total absence on draft boards?  Where does Houston think he is going?

I like Houston.  I think he could become a very good college player in a year or two and have a cup of coffee in the NBA.  Maybe even a full meal.  But I don’t understand how people think he can go pro right now.

MGoBruski

March 25th, 2022 at 10:01 PM ^

From purely an outsider perspective, it seems apparent that the staff focus was improving Houstan's defense first and foremost. Early on he was a huge liability and, combined with his inconsistent shooting, was nearly unplayable.  By the end of the year, he was much improved on defense. Expectations were way too high for a freshman that also moved up a class. He has the potential to be a plus contributor if he can become the consistent 3 point threat we anticipated coming in and he will be a good defender. I trusted his defense at the end of the year more than BJJ.

 

rc90

March 25th, 2022 at 2:40 PM ^

I'm old enough to remember college basketball before the three-point line. I remember thinking back in 1989 how do you guard a shooter who's 6'7" (and led the conference in rebounding one year) along side another shooter who's 6'9"? Last night was kinda the other side to that, why aren't there four just-a-shooters surrounding the 7-footer who's got a nice touch and passing skills but no lateral agility?

It seems like American coaches are still figuring out what the three-point line means to college basketball. I mean, Diabate isn't a bad basketball player, of course, but he really didn't seem to fit the roster, and thus he was sitting on the bench during the last couple of desperate minutes, in what might be his last game before he's headed to the NBA in a few months. So looking ahead, my main thought is that Howard needs to find some guys who can shoot, even if they are otherwise limited.

Yeah, pretty simple-minded of me. But I'm starting to understand how Beilein succeeded all those years.

NotADuck

March 25th, 2022 at 3:13 PM ^

This has been on my mind lately too.  Coach Howard doesn't seem to value shooting ability.  The only player he recruiting in the last class with good shooting ability was Houstan and we all saw how that turned out.  The next class is filled with guys who are ok-to-poor outside shooters too.  From what I've read:  Dug is a poor outside shooter, Glenn is average-to-good, Jett is average from outside, and Tarris has some potential as an outside shooter but hasn't reached it yet.  That... doesn't bode well for next year at minimum.

Brian Griese

March 25th, 2022 at 3:21 PM ^

I agree.  Diabate looked lost trying to make rotations on 3 point shooters.  Maybe I am confusing him with someone else but I swear that twice he ran towards a potential shooter that a teammate, whom was already closer, was rotating over to thus leaving the person he should have peeled off to wide open.  

1145SoFo

March 25th, 2022 at 3:35 PM ^

These are a few great points. Regarding the "just find shooters" thought, that seems to be a common refrain from fanbases for quick ways to improve a team. Of course always easier said than done, i.e. Houstan being a middling shooter this year.

Makes the consistency of shooting from teams like Beilein's and Wright's all the more impressive. I do wonder how some of the historically better evaluators weight certain characteristics -- mechanics, production / game results, intangibles, height / measureables.  

snarling wolverine

March 25th, 2022 at 7:45 PM ^

the consistency of shooting from teams like Beilein's

3-point shooting percentage of Beilein teams:

2008 - 31.2%

2009 - 33.4%

2010 - 29.9%

2011 - 35.2%

2012 - 35.0%

2013 - 38.5%

2014 - 40.2 %

2015 - 35.9%

2016 - 38.0%

2017 - 38.5 %

2018 - 35.7%

2019 - 34.2%

Not that remarkable.  And these were from the shorter distance of 20'9".  In 2019 it was moved back to the international distance of 22'2".

Beilein's teams did take a huge number of threes, but they weren't especially accurate at doing so.

This year's team shot 33.9%, FWIW.

Honker Burger

March 26th, 2022 at 11:48 AM ^

You say they weren’t that accurate, but over 35% in college from 3 is very good, over 40% is elite. Every team after his early years of program building shot well from 3 point range.
 

Michigan team B1G rank 3P% during those same years.

07-08: 11

08-09: 10

09-10: 11

10-11: 7

11-12: 8

12-13: 2

13-14: 1

14-15: 7

15-16: 3

16-17: 2

17-18: 6

18-19: 7

Shooting a lot of 3s, even if only average, can make up for a lot of other deficiencies.

Not only did we not shoot well this year, we had the 3rd fewest 3 point attempts per game. Last season, even though we ranked 2nd in 3P%, we also shot the 3rd fewest in the B1G. Some of that is bc of having Dickinson and having a big focus on easy 2s. But having shooters makes your dominant big man that much more dangerous, as he can kick out for open looks when demanding a double team.
 

Juwan can coach bigs no doubt. But it does concern me the lack of emphasis on shooters, based on his most recent recruiting classes. Hopefully that changes going forward. 

DetroitDan

March 26th, 2022 at 12:36 PM ^

My take is that the coaches lost the Villanova game by not encouraging more 3s from Brooks, Jones, and Houstan,  The paint was clogged as Villanova didn't respect the outside shot.  If Brooks would have taken 10 more 3 pointers, he would have made 4 of them and loosened things up for Dickinson and Diabate inside.

Shop Smart Sho…

March 25th, 2022 at 2:48 PM ^

Wouldn't an optimistic scenario be that the freshman that this site thought was the most physically ready for a B1G season was ready to at least be Bufkin/Houstan's backup? Or did you hear something about Barnes leaving?