January 4th, 2011 at 1:02 AM ^
Sketchy. Or jilted girlfriend.
January 4th, 2011 at 1:02 AM ^
How in the happy heck is this OT?
January 4th, 2011 at 1:04 AM ^
He also tweeted "Josh Groban hates the Stanford offense."
January 4th, 2011 at 1:20 AM ^
Eisen re-tweeted what I sent him. Still good fun.
A decent amount of people replied asking me why Josh Grobin cared. One person suggested Eisen get him on his podcast.
January 4th, 2011 at 1:05 AM ^
Not a chance he goes there, sorry Mr. Elway.
January 4th, 2011 at 7:17 AM ^
Which one is the horse.
January 4th, 2011 at 7:41 AM ^
One is a horse, the other's an ass.
January 4th, 2011 at 8:22 AM ^
Elway dates SJP?
January 4th, 2011 at 9:23 AM ^
As a Browns fan, I love it!!! Eff John Elway and his donkey teeth!
GO BLUE!!!
January 4th, 2011 at 1:08 AM ^
In all seriousness, after watching the game tonight, I hope we shell out whatever it takes to get him as our coach. That was one of the more impressive performances I've seen in a BCS game by a team not in the SEC.
There's no doubt in my mind if JH can bring those kids to Stanford, he can bring even better talent to Ann Arbor, and we will be terrifying.
January 4th, 2011 at 1:10 AM ^
if I could
January 4th, 2011 at 1:12 AM ^
Money no object.
January 4th, 2011 at 1:26 AM ^
I got a Jackson with Harbaugh's name all over it.
January 4th, 2011 at 1:14 AM ^
Gah I remember when we were using the "If _____ (coach) can win at ______ (school) with those players, imagine what he can do here!" for RR.
...With that said, and if there is a change, I'm drinking the kool-aid! Gimme Jimmy!
January 4th, 2011 at 1:18 AM ^
I'd seen a few of their games and honestly wasn't surprised. They play a relentless style but very sound. Tonight was really beautiful football in that second half. They were only continuing the steady improvement that has been Jim's hallmark in his last two jobs. He has a way of building great habits in his players and teaching them very specific techniques to rise above their talent levels
I get excited about the possibilities at Michigan too. If he passes on us now, the guy we hire might stick. So we actually have the rarer opportunity. That which is rarer is almost always more valuable.
January 4th, 2011 at 1:22 AM ^
Or, as JH put it during the post-game presser, "You are allowed to get better as the season goes on."
January 4th, 2011 at 1:31 AM ^
January 4th, 2011 at 7:44 AM ^
DID execute well tonight, we did tackle well, we did stay focused, and we did keep our assignments. - Comments earned to be said by Jim Harbaugh, after the game.....
January 4th, 2011 at 1:28 AM ^
I did as well. I watched them play UCLA and ND, and one more that I can't remember. They dominated the games I watched too. Not that either of those teams are world beaters, but they looked like Stanford was playing high school teams.
And although Stanford has a really good recruiting class going for 2011, the classes that comprise the guys on the field now weren't very good, but they all looked like All-Americans out there.
January 4th, 2011 at 1:22 AM ^
the few that was wanting Harbaugh after the PSU game. I don't think anyone is argueing if he can do it anymore, now everyone just hopes he will take the job.
January 4th, 2011 at 1:10 AM ^
I know it's hard to miss lately what with no threads about this stuff and such, but i see no way on earth that this is OT, and unless i'm just really off here, i'm guessing a JH: or a CC: would've been appropriate.
January 4th, 2011 at 1:11 AM ^
The horse has better teeth AND better hair. C'mon Elway! BoRics? Really? Don't you have millions?
January 4th, 2011 at 1:11 AM ^
This stinks like the Alabama at Dr. Phillips thing, I hated seeing Elway sitting there like a vulture.
January 4th, 2011 at 1:14 AM ^
This couldn't be more ON-topic.
January 4th, 2011 at 1:19 AM ^
Saying something to the effect of, "What's this college offense where the QB doesn't run the football, I'm confused"...
January 4th, 2011 at 1:23 AM ^
for Stanford's performance tonight goes to the experienced coordinators on Harbaugh's staff. The game was almost even until Stanford came out in the second half and made adjustments to pull away.
January 4th, 2011 at 1:27 AM ^
Wasn't it beautiful when Stanford brought pressure all night and the players were all in the right position and made tackles.
January 4th, 2011 at 7:31 AM ^
It sure is easy to have players in position to make tackles and then actually execute when you start two fifth-year seniors, two fourth-year seniors, two fouth-year juniors, three third-year juniors, one third-year sophomore, and one sophomore on defense.
Signed, your friend,
Chumley the Walrus.
January 4th, 2011 at 8:50 AM ^
Since tackling and proper angles are taught since pop warner, why wouldn't that be expected for men dedicating 40 hours a week to football, whether they are freshman or fifth year seniors?
January 4th, 2011 at 9:42 AM ^
Tater implied that experience leads to the players reacting faster and without having to think too much so that they are in position a step quicker. Once you are in position, tackling gets a lot easier. We hear all the time that "the game slowed down for him this year" when referring to a player who gets another year of experience under his belt. The experienced player gets the angle quicker, fills the hole quicker and isn't arm-tackling all the time.
At least that's what I assume he meant.
January 4th, 2011 at 1:27 AM ^
JH has a huge advantage over RR in getting kids and coaching them who also fit under the strict and superior academic requirements at Michigan. Stanford >>>WV in academics.
January 4th, 2011 at 1:35 AM ^
What a concept: defense sacking a top quarterback over and over. Just like old days. Sigh...
January 4th, 2011 at 8:12 AM ^
CB - this is *so* close to a haiku...make it happen!
January 4th, 2011 at 8:49 AM ^
so if Elway ruins my life AGAIN i may have to drive to Denver
January 4th, 2011 at 8:54 AM ^
January 4th, 2011 at 9:36 AM ^
That JH has been through 4 DCs (one transition of which was our fault). It's only this year, his fourth, that he has managed to put forth a sound defense.
January 4th, 2011 at 9:52 AM ^
You mean he actually values performance when letting people coach for him? Oh man he's so bad.
January 4th, 2011 at 9:50 AM ^
JH won only 1 more game in his 3rd year than RR did with Gerhart and Luck, 2 Heisman finalists. If we had Gerhart in our backfield, would we have won more games?
January 4th, 2011 at 9:54 AM ^