Michigan AD Dave Brandon says Big House will remain alcohol free

Submitted by Mr. Yost on

Bucking national trends, Michigan AD Brandon is not an advocate of serving alcohol at Michigan Stadium, "Sometimes people lose track of the fact that we have to organize & manage 110,000 to 115,000 people all in one tight space, and get them in and out of there safely. I don't think serving alcohol is going to make that job any easier."

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10621904/alcohol-sales-p…

http://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/index.ssf/2014/03/michigan_stadium_beer.html

NiMRODPi

March 17th, 2014 at 12:51 PM ^

Yeah, because everyone attending the games now is stone sober...

There is already 115,000 drunk people being managed every gameday. Banning alcohol in the stadium is purely for apperance and patting ourselves on the back. Drunken assholery is not a legit concern. If it was, you'd have a better policy than this.

ilah17

March 17th, 2014 at 1:26 PM ^

Really, you think everyone is drunk? Are you forgetting about the elderly people who choose not to participate in the cheers? I would venture to guess no more than 50% of the stadium is actually *drunk* in the stadium. I have been to at least 50 games with my husband and neither one of us has ever been drunk. Except maybe Under the Lights I. haha 

gbdub

March 17th, 2014 at 1:58 PM ^

The people who are currently sober at the game are not the ones who would cause problems if the concession stands sold beer.

In other words, selling beer would certainly increase the number of drinkers at the game. I'm not sure how much it would increase the number of drunk assholes, which are the real problem, and already represent a sizable population.

Don

March 17th, 2014 at 9:29 PM ^

The potential problems lie in the fact that there's always going to be a number of people who enter the stadium moderately buzzed from tailgating. Since they can't get more booze inside the stadium grounds, they're not going to get appreciably drunker during the course of the game, and will probably sober up a bit if they're drinking something non-alcoholic. If beer is available, a percentage of these folks will continue to drink, and will quickly move from moderately buzzed to bona-fide shitfaced. That's when the problems start to surface in earnest. We don't need that regardless of whatever revenue is possible, and I'm glad that Brandon sees it that way as well.

Danwillhor

March 17th, 2014 at 2:10 PM ^

at UTL2, those around me snuck in bottles of......who knows what and I KNOW we were seen by ushers yet they said nothing. I went in with a buzz and left Fuuuuuu'd up. However, win or lose, I'm a happy drunk. No issues with me or anyone in that group and we had about 5 nd fans within the 20 person starting circle. Everyone was quite polite to them, even asking them to stay when they thought it was over with 9 mins left.

WolverineMac

March 17th, 2014 at 1:30 PM ^

Is that there more sober by the time they stop, go through the lines, sit for a whole and can't consume alcohol for a few hours. Certainly people bring in flasks and also drink so much before hand that it doesn't matter but those are the exceptions and this is a smart move.

Danwillhor

March 17th, 2014 at 6:27 PM ^

I'm not necessarily disagreeing and fully understand that. As I wrote above, I just want the experience to somehow remain safe and fun for everyone. For some (too many, imo) that means sitting, making little noise and essentially behaving as if at an opera. You could have a million of those fans and your home field advantage is basically nonexistent. For others (mainly students and younger fans/alums) it largely means getting tore up and crazy. Heck, just crazy or having some sort of tradition to carry on. It seems like the fans and especially students no longer have one for one reason or another (marshmallows due to field turf, etc). As far as having fun/being "crazy" due to alcohol, the issue IS definitely avoiding NFL levels of drunken fan in seat level asshattery. Again, it's been debated to death on how with no answers. I'm neither for or against beer sales. I just want a miracle "fix all, cure all" with regard to making our 110k+ home field truly reflect the advantage it SHOULD be. As I also said above, it doesn't bother me when a team says how easy it is to play UM at home (win or lose) as we already know. The renovations helped a bit with sound but we're still largely an opera house fanbase for home games. I hate that. Yet, I also hate drunk douchebags. So, "this is Michigan", I guess. I just recall crowds on the 90s being crazier than now. It's why I want grass back (done correctly this time) at least because as a kid I remember the student section and other areas being very into games. Once we got the field turf (could coincide with our play?) the mallows were gone and "Block M" flags on sticks went from everywhere to none and it just FEELS......generic and sterile. Feels like a doctor's office. I can't explain. It feels anything but College Football, let alone the home of the winningest, arguably most historic program within CFB. I dunno?

Section 1

March 17th, 2014 at 9:18 PM ^

...you've just been going to the wrong operas.

What will it take to finally debunk the myth of the all-powerful superior-enthusiasm student rooting section?  The exact timing of the photo below is determined by Michigan's Man Up Front at the tunnel entrance; the MMB is about to enter the field, and the student section is half empty.

 

 

HarBooYa

March 17th, 2014 at 1:12 PM ^

And respect the fact he took a principled position instead of making fistful or dollars here. Now if we can just call the head coach, the just the "head coach" rather than the "Ethel whatever napa auto parts memorial hc" that would be cool.

Who am I kidding...shots for everyone, let's win the cash war!

ilah17

March 17th, 2014 at 1:24 PM ^

I really hope he sticks to this. Yes, some people are drunk in Michigan Stadium from tailgating. But we went to a Lions game where we didn't sit in the family section and it was awful. I can't imagine Michigan Stadium turning into that.

mgoblue78

March 17th, 2014 at 1:33 PM ^

Michigan Stadium was never alcohol-free.

The student section passing all the empties up to the top row at the end of the 3rd Quarter was as much a tradition as the band playing The Victors.

mgoblue78

March 17th, 2014 at 4:36 PM ^

Some days, if it was a still day with no breeze, it was hard to see the student section from across the stadium, or to see the field from the student section through the haze of smoke.

That made for a pretty mellow student section, especially on a warm sunny day.

Danwillhor

March 17th, 2014 at 6:39 PM ^

I hear ya. I'm just speaking in generalities. I know the downside to drunken idiots and I know the effects of "other substances" (ha) but I just want Michigan to feel less sterile playing at home. I've said a few times above (on droid app) that it doesn't bother or shock me when a team wins or loses here but mentions how easy it was to play here, how they've never experienced a tame 70k stadium, let alone 110k+, etc. Why? It's true. Even the UTL games had plenty of very quiet/still moments. Some lasted for 5-10 real time minutes. Was having a blast but thinking then and as I left that "THAT cannot be Michigan". Of those games are considered "wild" from a fan standpoint, you'd think we were a mid level program on a historical/passion scale. JMHO. As I also said, there is no "cure all" but I want one. I think we all do.

I dumped the Dope

March 17th, 2014 at 2:01 PM ^

Ya sell beer, ya better double the rest room capacity and bring back the troughs.  Its already bad on the top of the Northeast corner.  Males would be peeing all over....when ya gotta go ya gotta go, and some decreased inhibitions doesn't help either.

stormhit

March 17th, 2014 at 6:09 PM ^

EDSBS has one of their "Michigan Man" posts joking about this subject, but judging by most of the comments here it's actually an entirely accurate analysis.